Addition Financial Arena · at UCF
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UCF | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UCF 88–68 · win probability UCF 96%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 155.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UCF has more of the edges
AMER 2, UCF 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
AMER has played the 263rd-hardest schedule, UCF the 41st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
AMER hits 33.0% and allows 35.5%; UCF hits 36.2% and allows 33.9%. Threes are 46.5% and 34.8% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: AMER 26.9%, UCF 35.0%. Defensive: AMER 70.6%, UCF 71.2%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: AMER 96%, UCF 20%. Transfers in: AMER 0, UCF 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Turnovers
Turnover rate: AMER 15.6%, UCF 16.0%. Forced: AMER 19.2%, UCF 15.7%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: AMER plays 66.7 a game (289th fastest), UCF 71.2 (63rd). Faster games mean more points
AMER offense vs UCF defense
Offense 201st of 366 against a defense 93rd, on the model’s ratings
UCF offense vs AMER defense
Offense 18th of 366 against a defense 122nd, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: AMER 28.7, UCF 30.5. Allowed: AMER 42.1, UCF 34.9
Shooting
Effective FG%: AMER 51.5 and allows 54.4; UCF 52.6 and allows 52.1
Home court
UCF at home. This season: UCF 0-0 at home, AMER 0-0 away
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UCF -20.1 | — |
| Total | — | 155.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | AMER 67.8 · UCF 87.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UCF -11.8 | — |
| 1H total | 72.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | AMER 30.5 · UCF 42.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
American
30 games played
Straight up
14-16
47% wins
Against the spread
16-14
53% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 74-88 | +19.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 84-78 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 67-107 | +17.5 | L −22.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 71-80 | +16.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 74-61 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 133.5 | O 135 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 55-59 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | U 114 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 92-66 | -5.5 | W +20.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 75-73 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 78-60 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 130.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 83-105 | +19.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 51-95 | +27.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 84-69 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 64-62 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 62-64 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 73-84 | -8.5 | L −19.5 | 137.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 65-51 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 78-67 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 70-66 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 76-67 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 68-77 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 65-67 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 59-60 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 73-82 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 134.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 82-90 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 75-63 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 75-57 | -3.5 | W +14.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 22 | @ | W 75-61 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 73-78 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 65-68 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 73-75 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
WAKE
L 74-88
+5.5
9
vs
PENN
W 84-78
+7.5
12
@
GW
L 67-107
−22.5
18
@
RUTG
L 71-80
+7.5
28
vs
ME
W 74-61
+5.5
29
vs
SIE
L 55-59
−1.5
30
vs
LONG
W 92-66
+20.5
3
vs
DREX
W 75-73
−2.5
6
vs
UMES
W 78-60
+7.5
18
@
VCU
L 83-105
−2.5
22
@
UVA
L 51-95
−16.5
31
vs
L-MD
W 84-69
+6.5
3
@
BU
W 64-62
+3.5
7
@
COLG
L 62-64
+3.5
10
vs
HC
L 73-84
−19.5
12
vs
NAVY
W 65-51
+16.5
18
@
ARMY
W 78-67
+6.5
21
vs
COLG
W 70-66
+2.5
24
@
HC
W 76-67
+4.5
28
@
L-MD
L 68-77
−13.5
31
vs
LAF
L 65-67
−7.5
4
vs
BUCK
L 59-60
−8.5
7
@
NAVY
L 73-82
−4.5
11
@
LEH
L 82-90
−9.5
14
vs
ARMY
W 75-63
+2.5
18
@
BUCK
W 75-57
+14.5
22
@
LAF
W 75-61
+10.5
25
vs
LEH
L 73-78
−12.5
28
vs
BU
L 65-68
−6.5
5
@
BU
L 73-75
−0.5
covered 16didn’t cover 14avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
WAKE
L 74-88
+22.5
9
vs
PENN
W 84-78
+7.5
12
@
GW
L 67-107
+22.5
18
@
RUTG
L 71-80
+7.5
28
vs
ME
W 74-61
+1.5
29
vs
SIE
L 55-59
−23.5
30
vs
LONG
W 92-66
+9.5
3
vs
DREX
W 75-73
+10.5
6
vs
UMES
W 78-60
+7.5
18
@
VCU
L 83-105
+33.5
22
@
UVA
L 51-95
−7.5
31
vs
L-MD
W 84-69
−1.5
3
@
BU
W 64-62
−16.5
7
@
COLG
L 62-64
−22.5
10
vs
HC
L 73-84
+19.5
12
vs
NAVY
W 65-51
−23.5
18
@
ARMY
W 78-67
−2.5
21
vs
COLG
W 70-66
−10.5
24
@
HC
W 76-67
+3.5
28
@
L-MD
L 68-77
−2.5
31
vs
LAF
L 65-67
−10.5
4
vs
BUCK
L 59-60
−22.5
7
@
NAVY
L 73-82
+20.5
11
@
LEH
L 82-90
+31.5
14
vs
ARMY
W 75-63
−6.5
18
@
BUCK
W 75-57
−8.5
22
@
LAF
W 75-61
−5.5
25
vs
LEH
L 73-78
+10.5
28
vs
BU
L 65-68
−7.5
5
@
BU
L 73-75
+6.5
over 15under 15avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
UCF
33 games played
Straight up
21-12
64% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-20
39% overs · avg +1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 82-78 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 93-105 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 166.5 | O 198 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 97-60 | -23.5 | W +13.5 | 169.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 86-74 | +10.5 | W +22.5 | 172.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 87-83 | -13.5 | L −9.5 | 163.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 77-67 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 102-91 | -13.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | O 193 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 82-57 | -25.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 86-61 | -9.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 81-63 | -16.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 102-80 | -17.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 85-80 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 81-75 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 76-87 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 175.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 73-72 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 82-73 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 170.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 77-84 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 57-87 | +14.5 | L −15.5 | 156.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 95-86 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 79-76 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 88-80 | +5.5 | W +13.5 | 159.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 55-79 | +15.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 72-92 | +4.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 67-74 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 82-71 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 73-71 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 97-84 | +14.5 | W +27.5 | 162.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 86-87 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 104-111 | -8.5 | L −15.5 | 167.5 | O 215 |
| Mar 6 | @ | L 62-77 | +4.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 66-65 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 59-81 | +15.5 | L −6.5 | 159.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 71-75 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
HOF
W 82-78
−4.5
8
vs
VAN
L 93-105
−1.5
11
vs
FAMU
W 97-60
+13.5
14
@
TA&M
W 86-74
+22.5
17
vs
OAK
W 87-83
−9.5
20
vs
PITT
W 77-67
+11.5
25
vs
QUIN
W 102-91
−2.5
29
vs
VMI
W 82-57
−0.5
7
vs
TOW
W 86-61
+15.5
17
vs
MER
W 81-63
+1.5
20
vs
FGCU
W 102-80
+4.5
23
vs
FAU
W 85-80
−3.5
3
vs
KU
W 81-75
+10.5
6
@
OKST
L 76-87
−9.5
11
vs
CIN
W 73-72
−1.5
14
@
KSU
W 82-73
+11.5
17
vs
ARIZ
L 77-84
+2.5
20
@
ISU
L 57-87
−15.5
24
@
COLO
W 95-86
+12.5
27
vs
ASU
W 79-76
−3.5
31
vs
TTU
W 88-80
+13.5
4
@
HOU
L 55-79
−8.5
8
@
CIN
L 72-92
−15.5
14
vs
WVU
L 67-74
−10.5
17
vs
TCU
W 82-71
+12.5
21
@
UTAH
W 73-71
+0.5
24
@
BYU
W 97-84
+27.5
28
vs
BAY
L 86-87
−2.5
3
vs
OKST
L 104-111
−15.5
6
@
WVU
L 62-77
−10.5
11
vs
CIN
W 66-65
+4.5
12
vs
ARIZ
L 59-81
−6.5
20
vs
UCLA
L 71-75
+1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
HOF
W 82-78
+19.5
8
vs
VAN
L 93-105
+31.5
11
vs
FAMU
W 97-60
−12.5
14
@
TA&M
W 86-74
−12.5
17
vs
OAK
W 87-83
+6.5
20
vs
PITT
W 77-67
−5.5
25
vs
QUIN
W 102-91
+30.5
29
vs
VMI
W 82-57
−20.5
7
vs
TOW
W 86-61
−1.5
17
vs
MER
W 81-63
−16.5
20
vs
FGCU
W 102-80
+20.5
23
vs
FAU
W 85-80
+2.5
3
vs
KU
W 81-75
−1.5
6
@
OKST
L 76-87
−12.5
11
vs
CIN
W 73-72
−5.5
14
@
KSU
W 82-73
−15.5
17
vs
ARIZ
L 77-84
−4.5
20
@
ISU
L 57-87
−12.5
24
@
COLO
W 95-86
+21.5
27
vs
ASU
W 79-76
−6.5
31
vs
TTU
W 88-80
+8.5
4
@
HOU
L 55-79
−12.5
8
@
CIN
L 72-92
+17.5
14
vs
WVU
L 67-74
+0.5
17
vs
TCU
W 82-71
−1.5
21
@
UTAH
W 73-71
−10.5
24
@
BYU
W 97-84
+18.5
28
vs
BAY
L 86-87
+13.5
3
vs
OKST
L 104-111
+47.5
6
@
WVU
L 62-77
−3.5
11
vs
CIN
W 66-65
−18.5
12
vs
ARIZ
L 59-81
−19.5
20
vs
UCLA
L 71-75
−5.5
over 13under 20avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UCF has the better starters
Position by position: American 0, UCF 4, even 1
AmericanBetterUCF
G W. Nausadis7.5 pts · 1.4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 25
→UCFSmall
G C. Vasko TR11 pts · 4.7 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 52
G M. Collins13.2 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 97
=Even
G D. Johnson TR23.5 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 100
F G. Jones12.4 pts · 4.9 reb · 2 ast
Score 55
→UCFSmall
F L. Walker TR18.7 pts · 4.9 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 87
F M. Mayock8.4 pts · 3.7 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 36
→UCFBig
F I. Malone TR10.4 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 82
F J. Iturbe10.4 pts · 4.6 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 55
→UCFSmall
F C. Abass TR8.4 pts · 5.7 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 70
AmericanBetterUCF
AMER offense201st of 366 · -6.3
→UCFSmall
UCF defense93rd of 366 · -0.4
AMER defense122nd of 366 · -2.1
→UCFSmall
UCF offense18th of 366 · +8.0
Backcourt+1.4 · 2 players
→UCFBig
Backcourt+7.4 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.4 · 3 players
→UCFBig
Frontcourt+5.3 · 3 players
Bench-2.4 · 5 players
→UCFBig
Bench+2.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestAMER betterUCF betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
W. Nausadis23 minM. Collins22 minK. Sebastian22 minD. Hogans6 minJ. Anderson2 minM. Casey1 min
Forwards
G. Jones31 minM. Mayock29 minJ. Iturbe26 minC. McDonald18 minC. Eagan11 minN. JonesNew
Guards
C. Vasko33 min · TRD. Johnson26 min · TRM. Dean17 min · TRC. Pacheco16 minA. DeanNewT. JonesNew
Forwards
L. Walker34 min · TRI. Malone23 min · TRC. Abass20 min · TRJ. Asemota8 min · TRL. GivanNewD. MannNew
Centers
J. Bol19 minE. Hulsewe5 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.0 #242 | Points per game | 80.7 #53 |
| 1.08 #190 | Points per possession | 1.13 #77 |
| 66.7 #289 | Pace (possessions) | 71.2 #63 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.5 #169 | Effective FG% | 52.6 #123 |
| 33.0 #235 | 3-point % | 36.2 #49 |
| 46.5 #39 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.8 #281 |
| 28.7 #335 | Free throw rate | 30.5 #295 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.6 #110 | Turnover rate | 16.0 #137 |
| 26.9 #299 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.0 #47 |
| 12.5 #248 | Assists per game | 15.7 #56 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.7 #124 | Points allowed | 78.3 #274 |
| 1.09 #200 | Points allowed per possession | 1.10 #219 |
| 54.4 #313 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.1 #221 |
| 35.5 #283 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.9 #176 |
| 19.2 #40 | Turnovers forced | 15.7 #241 |
| 70.6 #127 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.2 #96 |
| 7.3 #100 | Steals per game | 5.6 #285 |
| 1.4 #363 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #225 |
American
14-16 in 2025-26 overall · 9-10 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Boston U73–75
- Lvs Boston U65–68
- Lvs Lehigh73–78
- W@ Lafayette75–61
- W@ Bucknell75–57
A week or more of rest.
UCF
21-12 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UCLA71–75
- Lvs Arizona59–81
- Wvs Cincinnati66–65
- L@ West Virginia62–77
- Lvs Oklahoma St104–111
A week or more of rest.