Yuengling Center · at South Florida
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | USF | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects USF 86–68 · win probability USF 94%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 153.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: USF has more of the edges
JAX 0, USF 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: JAX 17.2%, USF 15.1%. Forced: JAX 15.0%, USF 19.1%
Context
Schedule so far
JAX has played the 247th-hardest schedule, USF the 89th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: JAX plays 65.7 a game (322nd fastest), USF 74.4 (9th). Faster games mean more points
USF offense vs JAX defense
Offense 59th of 366 against a defense 210th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: JAX 50.0 and allows 54.8; USF 50.6 and allows 48.8
Free throws
Free throw rate: JAX 32.8, USF 40.4. Allowed: JAX 42.7, USF 39.0
JAX offense vs USF defense
Offense 232nd of 366 against a defense 121st, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
JAX hits 31.8% and allows 36.3%; USF hits 32.5% and allows 34.5%. Threes are 37.4% and 43.8% of their shots
Home court
USF at home. This season: USF 0-0 at home, JAX 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: JAX 27%, USF 14%. Transfers in: JAX 6, USF 10. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: JAX 31.7%, USF 38.1%. Defensive: JAX 70.9%, USF 68.1%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | USF -17.9 | — |
| Total | — | 153.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | JAX 67.9 · USF 85.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | USF -10.5 | — |
| 1H total | 71.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | JAX 30.7 · USF 41.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 9-1 90% | 7-3 70% | 2-8 20% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
| Date | Game | Last meeting |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 12 | @ DAY | No recent meeting |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Jacksonville
30 games played
Straight up
10-20
33% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-18
40% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 69-86 | +18.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 64-85 | +17.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 69-67 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 57-79 | +16.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 69-64 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 53-68 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 135.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 85-82 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 65-88 | +5.5 | L −17.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 75-112 | +26.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 187 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 65-72 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 63-87 | +23.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 57-76 | +12.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 68-71 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 51-77 | +4.5 | L −21.5 | 154.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 75-43 | -1.5 | W +30.5 | 141.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 60-62 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 90-68 | +1.5 | W +23.5 | 133.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 70-77 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 138.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 81-76 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 70-65 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 49-68 | -1.5 | L −20.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 84-93 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 73-87 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 62-67 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 63-56 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 84-86 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 61-65 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 89-85 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 85-61 | -1.5 | W +22.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 79-82 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MIA
L 69-86
+1.5
11
@
HPU
L 64-85
−3.5
15
@
VMI
W 69-67
+0.5
18
@
GMU
L 57-79
−5.5
24
vs
BCU
W 69-64
+8.5
25
vs
PAC
L 53-68
−12.5
2
vs
FAMU
W 85-82
−7.5
6
@
FIU
L 65-88
−17.5
14
@
TA&M
L 75-112
−10.5
17
@
FAMU
L 65-72
−10.5
22
@
FSU
L 63-87
−0.5
1
@
LIP
L 57-76
−6.5
3
@
APSU
L 68-71
+7.5
8
vs
QUC
L 51-77
−21.5
10
vs
WGA
W 75-43
+30.5
15
@
CARK
L 60-62
+5.5
17
@
UNA
W 90-68
+23.5
22
vs
BELL
L 70-77
−11.5
24
vs
EKU
W 81-76
+3.5
29
vs
LIP
W 70-65
+8.5
31
vs
FGCU
L 49-68
−20.5
5
@
QUC
L 84-93
−0.5
7
@
WGA
L 73-87
−15.5
11
@
STET
L 62-67
−7.5
14
vs
UNF
W 63-56
−0.5
18
@
FGCU
L 84-86
+4.5
21
vs
APSU
L 61-65
+2.5
26
vs
STET
W 89-85
−3.5
28
@
UNF
W 85-61
+22.5
4
vs
BELL
L 79-82
−1.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MIA
L 69-86
+12.5
11
@
HPU
L 64-85
−7.5
15
@
VMI
W 69-67
−15.5
18
@
GMU
L 57-79
−0.5
24
vs
BCU
W 69-64
−10.5
25
vs
PAC
L 53-68
−14.5
2
vs
FAMU
W 85-82
+28.5
6
@
FIU
L 65-88
+7.5
14
@
TA&M
L 75-112
+39.5
17
@
FAMU
L 65-72
−2.5
22
@
FSU
L 63-87
−9.5
1
@
LIP
L 57-76
−14.5
3
@
APSU
L 68-71
−1.5
8
vs
QUC
L 51-77
−26.5
10
vs
WGA
W 75-43
−23.5
15
@
CARK
L 60-62
−14.5
17
@
UNA
W 90-68
+24.5
22
vs
BELL
L 70-77
+8.5
24
vs
EKU
W 81-76
+14.5
29
vs
LIP
W 70-65
−7.5
31
vs
FGCU
L 49-68
−19.5
5
@
QUC
L 84-93
+30.5
7
@
WGA
L 73-87
+21.5
11
@
STET
L 62-67
−9.5
14
vs
UNF
W 63-56
−34.5
18
@
FGCU
L 84-86
+33.5
21
vs
APSU
L 61-65
−16.5
26
vs
STET
W 89-85
+35.5
28
@
UNF
W 85-61
−5.5
4
vs
BELL
L 79-82
+16.5
over 12under 18avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
South Florida
33 games played
Straight up
24-9
73% wins
Against the spread
18-15
55% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-18
45% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 102-67 | -25.5 | W +9.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 95-99 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 100-50 | -34.5 | W +15.5 | 167.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 108-89 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 177.5 | O 197 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 95-103 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 177.5 | O 198 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 66-78 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 172.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 97-91 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 167.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-83 | -2.5 | L −17.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 74-61 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 81-75 | -13.5 | L −7.5 | 160.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 93-104 | +14.5 | W +3.5 | 178.5 | O 197 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 94-69 | -22.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 106-109 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 163.5 | O 215 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 74-70 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 93-78 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 163.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 82-71 | -18.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 85-86 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 158.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 82-69 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 168.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 25 | vs | W 89-75 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 166.5 | U 164 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 97-83 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 78-79 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 109-88 | -23.5 | L −2.5 | 164.5 | O 197 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 80-74 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 170.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 66-58 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 160.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 83-81 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | U 164 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 87-66 | -9.5 | W +11.5 | 163.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 75-56 | -11.5 | W +7.5 | 157.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 90-62 | -15.5 | W +12.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 96-89 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | O 185 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 83-60 | -17.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 86-64 | -15.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 15 | vs | W 70-55 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 79-83 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
FAMU
W 102-67
+9.5
8
vs
GW
L 95-99
−5.5
12
vs
COPP
W 100-50
+15.5
16
@
KENN
W 108-89
+11.5
19
@
OKST
L 95-103
−4.5
26
vs
VCU
L 66-78
−10.5
27
vs
WKU
W 97-91
−1.5
28
vs
CSU
L 68-83
−17.5
4
vs
USU
W 74-61
+10.5
10
vs
COFC
W 81-75
−7.5
17
@
ALA
L 93-104
+3.5
21
vs
UMBC
W 94-69
+2.5
4
vs
UAB
L 106-109
−11.5
7
@
UNT
W 74-70
−0.5
10
@
TLSA
W 93-78
+16.5
14
vs
ECU
W 82-71
−7.5
18
vs
WICH
L 85-86
−8.5
22
@
UAB
W 82-69
+10.5
25
vs
FAU
W 89-75
+8.5
28
@
TULN
W 97-83
+5.5
31
@
TEM
L 78-79
−10.5
4
vs
UTSA
W 109-88
−2.5
8
vs
TLSA
W 80-74
+1.5
11
@
WICH
W 66-58
+5.5
15
@
FAU
W 83-81
−2.5
19
vs
MEM
W 87-66
+11.5
25
@
RICE
W 75-56
+7.5
1
vs
TULN
W 90-62
+12.5
5
@
MEM
W 96-89
−0.5
8
vs
CLT
W 83-60
+5.5
14
vs
CLT
W 86-64
+6.5
15
vs
WICH
W 70-55
+8.5
19
vs
LOU
L 79-83
−0.5
covered 18didn’t cover 15avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
FAMU
W 102-67
+15.5
8
vs
GW
L 95-99
+34.5
12
vs
COPP
W 100-50
−17.5
16
@
KENN
W 108-89
+19.5
19
@
OKST
L 95-103
+20.5
26
vs
VCU
L 66-78
−28.5
27
vs
WKU
W 97-91
+20.5
28
vs
CSU
L 68-83
−4.5
4
vs
USU
W 74-61
−27.5
10
vs
COFC
W 81-75
−4.5
17
@
ALA
L 93-104
+18.5
21
vs
UMBC
W 94-69
+2.5
4
vs
UAB
L 106-109
+51.5
7
@
UNT
W 74-70
−3.5
10
@
TLSA
W 93-78
+7.5
14
vs
ECU
W 82-71
−5.5
18
vs
WICH
L 85-86
+12.5
22
@
UAB
W 82-69
−17.5
25
vs
FAU
W 89-75
−2.5
28
@
TULN
W 97-83
+21.5
31
@
TEM
L 78-79
+2.5
4
vs
UTSA
W 109-88
+32.5
8
vs
TLSA
W 80-74
−16.5
11
@
WICH
W 66-58
−36.5
15
@
FAU
W 83-81
−1.5
19
vs
MEM
W 87-66
−10.5
25
@
RICE
W 75-56
−26.5
1
vs
TULN
W 90-62
−3.5
5
@
MEM
W 96-89
+21.5
8
vs
CLT
W 83-60
−13.5
14
vs
CLT
W 86-64
−3.5
15
vs
WICH
W 70-55
−26.5
19
vs
LOU
L 79-83
+1.5
over 15under 18avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
South Florida has the better starters
Position by position: Jacksonville 1, South Florida 2, even 2
JacksonvilleBetterSouth Florida
G C. Williams TR16.1 pts · 3.6 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 65
=Even
G S. Wilson TR17.2 pts · 3.8 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 79
G J. Phillips TR15.5 pts · 5 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 59
=Even
G A. Dancler TR15.6 pts · 5.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 72
G H. Wood11.6 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 64
→USFSmall
G J. Omojafo11 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 80
G E. Sterck6.5 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 23
→USFBig
G A. Shoshkikj TR10.4 pts · 2.6 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 73
F J. Morrow TR7.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 58
←JAXSmall
F R. Goods TR7.8 pts · 5.9 reb · 2 ast
Score 41
JacksonvilleBetterSouth Florida
JAX offense232nd of 366 · -7.1
→USFSmall
USF defense121st of 366 · -2.1
JAX defense210th of 366 · -5.4
→USFBig
USF offense59th of 366 · +2.7
Backcourt-1.9 · 4 players
→USFBig
Backcourt+4.4 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.2 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-0.8 · 1 player
Bench-1.1 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-0.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestJAX betterUSF betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Williams33 min · TRJ. Phillips31 min · TRH. Wood28 minE. Sterck25 minR. Loux1 minL. BuckinghamNew
Forwards
J. Morrow21 min · TRR. Stirling15 min · TRN. Turner6 min · TRJ. Newell2 min · TR
Centers
S. MbingazoNew
Guards
S. Wilson37 min · TRA. Dancler34 min · TRJ. Omojafo28 minA. Shoshkikj26 min · TRC. Davis18 min · TRM. James11 min · TR
Forwards
R. Goods25 min · TRG. Johnson23 min · TRJ. Lewis23 min · TRZ. High9 min · TRR. StevensonNewJ. FeldhausNew
Centers
T. Diawara3 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.5 #293 | Points per game | 86.8 #6 |
| 1.06 #237 | Points per possession | 1.17 #42 |
| 65.7 #322 | Pace (possessions) | 74.4 #9 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.0 #232 | Effective FG% | 50.6 #209 |
| 31.8 #289 | 3-point % | 32.5 #255 |
| 37.4 #223 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.8 #93 |
| 32.8 #242 | Free throw rate | 40.4 #55 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.2 #222 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #73 |
| 31.7 #137 | Offensive rebound rate | 38.1 #7 |
| 11.1 #335 | Assists per game | 16.8 #28 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.2 #194 | Points allowed | 76.5 #230 |
| 1.14 #313 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #54 |
| 54.8 #325 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.8 #58 |
| 36.3 #318 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.5 #218 |
| 15.0 #290 | Turnovers forced | 19.1 #42 |
| 70.9 #115 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.1 #252 |
| 6.3 #206 | Steals per game | 9.0 #8 |
| 2.8 #261 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #72 |
Jacksonville
10-20 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Bellarmine79–82
- W@ North Florida85–61
- Wvs Stetson89–85
- Lvs Austin Peay61–65
- L@ FGCU84–86
A week or more of rest.
South Florida
24-9 in 2025-26 overall · 17-3 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisville79–83
- Wvs Wichita St70–55
- Wvs Charlotte86–64
- Wvs Charlotte83–60
- W@ Memphis96–89
A week or more of rest.