UD Arena · at Dayton
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DAY | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DAY 77–76 · win probability DAY 55%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
USF 2, DAY 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: USF plays 74.4 a game (9th fastest), DAY 68.3 (213th). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: USF 40.4, DAY 46.1. Allowed: USF 39.0, DAY 35.5
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: USF 38.1%, DAY 26.9%. Defensive: USF 68.1%, DAY 71.2%
Home court
DAY at home. This season: DAY 0-0 at home, USF 0-0 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: USF 15.1%, DAY 16.9%. Forced: USF 19.1%, DAY 21.0%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: USF 50.6 and allows 48.8; DAY 51.6 and allows 51.0
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: USF 14%, DAY 31%. Transfers in: USF 10, DAY 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
DAY offense vs USF defense
Offense 109th of 366 against a defense 121st, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
USF hits 32.5% and allows 34.5%; DAY hits 33.9% and allows 35.4%. Threes are 43.8% and 41.4% of their shots
Even
USF offense vs DAY defense
Offense 59th of 366 against a defense 57th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
USF has played the 89th-hardest schedule, DAY the 90th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DAY -1.4 | — |
| Total | — | 152.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | USF 75.5 · DAY 77 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DAY -0.7 | — |
| 1H total | 71.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | USF 35.3 · DAY 36 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-1 90% | 7-3 70% | 2-8 20% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 2-8 20% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
| Date | Game | Last meeting |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 15 | vs RGV | No recent meeting |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
South Florida
33 games played
Straight up
24-9
73% wins
Against the spread
18-15
55% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-18
45% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 102-67 | -25.5 | W +9.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 95-99 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 100-50 | -34.5 | W +15.5 | 167.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 108-89 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 177.5 | O 197 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 95-103 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 177.5 | O 198 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 66-78 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 172.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 97-91 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 167.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-83 | -2.5 | L −17.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 74-61 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 81-75 | -13.5 | L −7.5 | 160.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 93-104 | +14.5 | W +3.5 | 178.5 | O 197 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 94-69 | -22.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 106-109 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 163.5 | O 215 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 74-70 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 93-78 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 163.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 82-71 | -18.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 85-86 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 158.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 82-69 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 168.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 25 | vs | W 89-75 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 166.5 | U 164 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 97-83 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 78-79 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 109-88 | -23.5 | L −2.5 | 164.5 | O 197 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 80-74 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 170.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 66-58 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 160.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 83-81 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | U 164 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 87-66 | -9.5 | W +11.5 | 163.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 75-56 | -11.5 | W +7.5 | 157.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 90-62 | -15.5 | W +12.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 96-89 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | O 185 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 83-60 | -17.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 86-64 | -15.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 15 | vs | W 70-55 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 79-83 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
FAMU
W 102-67
+9.5
8
vs
GW
L 95-99
−5.5
12
vs
COPP
W 100-50
+15.5
16
@
KENN
W 108-89
+11.5
19
@
OKST
L 95-103
−4.5
26
vs
VCU
L 66-78
−10.5
27
vs
WKU
W 97-91
−1.5
28
vs
CSU
L 68-83
−17.5
4
vs
USU
W 74-61
+10.5
10
vs
COFC
W 81-75
−7.5
17
@
ALA
L 93-104
+3.5
21
vs
UMBC
W 94-69
+2.5
4
vs
UAB
L 106-109
−11.5
7
@
UNT
W 74-70
−0.5
10
@
TLSA
W 93-78
+16.5
14
vs
ECU
W 82-71
−7.5
18
vs
WICH
L 85-86
−8.5
22
@
UAB
W 82-69
+10.5
25
vs
FAU
W 89-75
+8.5
28
@
TULN
W 97-83
+5.5
31
@
TEM
L 78-79
−10.5
4
vs
UTSA
W 109-88
−2.5
8
vs
TLSA
W 80-74
+1.5
11
@
WICH
W 66-58
+5.5
15
@
FAU
W 83-81
−2.5
19
vs
MEM
W 87-66
+11.5
25
@
RICE
W 75-56
+7.5
1
vs
TULN
W 90-62
+12.5
5
@
MEM
W 96-89
−0.5
8
vs
CLT
W 83-60
+5.5
14
vs
CLT
W 86-64
+6.5
15
vs
WICH
W 70-55
+8.5
19
vs
LOU
L 79-83
−0.5
covered 18didn’t cover 15avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
FAMU
W 102-67
+15.5
8
vs
GW
L 95-99
+34.5
12
vs
COPP
W 100-50
−17.5
16
@
KENN
W 108-89
+19.5
19
@
OKST
L 95-103
+20.5
26
vs
VCU
L 66-78
−28.5
27
vs
WKU
W 97-91
+20.5
28
vs
CSU
L 68-83
−4.5
4
vs
USU
W 74-61
−27.5
10
vs
COFC
W 81-75
−4.5
17
@
ALA
L 93-104
+18.5
21
vs
UMBC
W 94-69
+2.5
4
vs
UAB
L 106-109
+51.5
7
@
UNT
W 74-70
−3.5
10
@
TLSA
W 93-78
+7.5
14
vs
ECU
W 82-71
−5.5
18
vs
WICH
L 85-86
+12.5
22
@
UAB
W 82-69
−17.5
25
vs
FAU
W 89-75
−2.5
28
@
TULN
W 97-83
+21.5
31
@
TEM
L 78-79
+2.5
4
vs
UTSA
W 109-88
+32.5
8
vs
TLSA
W 80-74
−16.5
11
@
WICH
W 66-58
−36.5
15
@
FAU
W 83-81
−1.5
19
vs
MEM
W 87-66
−10.5
25
@
RICE
W 75-56
−26.5
1
vs
TULN
W 90-62
−3.5
5
@
MEM
W 96-89
+21.5
8
vs
CLT
W 83-60
−13.5
14
vs
CLT
W 86-64
−3.5
15
vs
WICH
W 70-55
−26.5
19
vs
LOU
L 79-83
+1.5
over 15under 18avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Dayton
37 games played
Straight up
25-12
68% wins
Against the spread
17-20
46% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-24
35% overs · avg −2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 88-48 | -25.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 77-71 | -25.5 | L −19.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 62-74 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 91-82 | -21.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 77-71 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 74-55 | -29.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 84-79 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 79-83 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 88-71 | -11.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 73-86 | +5.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 84-61 | -30.5 | L −7.5 | 159.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 97-69 | -6.5 | W +21.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 61-64 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 63-56 | -16.5 | L −9.5 | 139.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 70-68 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 79-72 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 71-65 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 78-51 | -16.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 64-67 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 74-81 | -6.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 76-81 | -9.5 | L −14.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 71-102 | +9.5 | L −21.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 72-70 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 73-99 | +8.5 | L −17.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 70-59 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 82-67 | +2.5 | W +17.5 | 137.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 78-66 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 77-62 | +3.5 | W +18.5 | 157.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 68-66 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 65-60 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 62-68 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 68-63 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 70-69 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 15 | vs | L 62-70 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 18 | @ | W 80-66 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 21 | @ | W 80-61 | -3.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 25 | vs | L 55-61 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | U 116 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CAN
W 88-48
+14.5
8
vs
UMBC
W 77-71
−19.5
11
@
CIN
L 62-74
−6.5
15
vs
BCU
W 91-82
−12.5
19
@
MARQ
W 77-71
+12.5
22
vs
NCCU
W 74-55
−10.5
27
vs
GTWN
W 84-79
+3.5
28
vs
BYU
L 79-83
+5.5
2
vs
ETSU
W 88-71
+5.5
6
vs
UVA
L 73-86
−7.5
13
vs
UNF
W 84-61
−7.5
16
vs
FSU
W 97-69
+21.5
20
vs
LIB
L 61-64
−12.5
31
vs
FOR
W 63-56
−9.5
3
@
LUC
W 70-68
−5.5
6
vs
GW
W 79-72
+4.5
13
@
DUQ
W 71-65
+3.5
16
vs
LUC
W 78-51
+10.5
21
@
LAS
L 64-67
−12.5
24
@
JOES
L 74-81
−13.5
27
vs
URI
L 76-81
−14.5
30
@
SLU
L 71-102
−21.5
3
vs
SBU
W 72-70
−5.5
6
@
VCU
L 73-99
−17.5
15
vs
DAV
W 70-59
+5.5
18
@
GMU
W 82-67
+17.5
21
vs
DUQ
W 78-66
+5.5
24
vs
SLU
W 77-62
+18.5
27
@
GW
W 68-66
+4.5
3
@
RICH
W 65-60
−0.5
6
vs
VCU
L 62-68
−7.5
13
vs
SBU
W 68-63
−0.5
14
vs
SLU
W 70-69
+5.5
15
vs
VCU
L 62-70
−4.5
18
@
BRAD
W 80-66
+11.5
21
@
UNCW
W 80-61
+15.5
25
vs
ILST
L 55-61
−13.5
covered 17didn’t cover 20avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CAN
W 88-48
−6.5
8
vs
UMBC
W 77-71
−6.5
11
@
CIN
L 62-74
−11.5
15
vs
BCU
W 91-82
+24.5
19
@
MARQ
W 77-71
−3.5
22
vs
NCCU
W 74-55
−17.5
27
vs
GTWN
W 84-79
+17.5
28
vs
BYU
L 79-83
+11.5
2
vs
ETSU
W 88-71
+18.5
6
vs
UVA
L 73-86
+11.5
13
vs
UNF
W 84-61
−14.5
16
vs
FSU
W 97-69
+3.5
20
vs
LIB
L 61-64
−17.5
31
vs
FOR
W 63-56
−20.5
3
@
LUC
W 70-68
−2.5
6
vs
GW
W 79-72
−3.5
13
@
DUQ
W 71-65
−16.5
16
vs
LUC
W 78-51
−12.5
21
@
LAS
L 64-67
−6.5
24
@
JOES
L 74-81
+15.5
27
vs
URI
L 76-81
+18.5
30
@
SLU
L 71-102
+21.5
3
vs
SBU
W 72-70
−2.5
6
@
VCU
L 73-99
+24.5
15
vs
DAV
W 70-59
−11.5
18
@
GMU
W 82-67
+11.5
21
vs
DUQ
W 78-66
−4.5
24
vs
SLU
W 77-62
−18.5
27
@
GW
W 68-66
−18.5
3
@
RICH
W 65-60
−19.5
6
vs
VCU
L 62-68
−16.5
13
vs
SBU
W 68-63
−10.5
14
vs
SLU
W 70-69
−6.5
15
vs
VCU
L 62-70
−7.5
18
@
BRAD
W 80-66
+4.5
21
@
UNCW
W 80-61
+2.5
25
vs
ILST
L 55-61
−24.5
over 13under 24avg −2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: South Florida 2, Dayton 2, even 1
South FloridaBetterDayton
G S. Wilson TR17.2 pts · 3.8 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 79
←USFSmall
G Z. Lowery TR8.1 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 63
G A. Dancler TR15.6 pts · 5.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 72
=Even
G L. Joseph TR7.9 pts · 2.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 78
G J. Omojafo11 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 80
←USFSmall
F G. Randall TR11.5 pts · 6.7 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 65
G A. Shoshkikj TR10.4 pts · 2.6 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 73
→DAYSmall
F A. L'Etang11.9 pts · 5.9 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 89
F R. Goods TR7.8 pts · 5.9 reb · 2 ast
Score 41
→DAYSmall
F J. Simon5.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 63
South FloridaBetterDayton
USF offense59th of 366 · +2.7
=Even
DAY defense57th of 366 · +1.4
USF defense121st of 366 · -2.1
=Even
DAY offense109th of 366 · -1.7
Backcourt+4.4 · 4 players
←USFBig
Backcourt+0.8 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.8 · 1 player
→DAYBig
Frontcourt+3.5 · 3 players
Bench-0.3 · 5 players
=Even
Bench+0.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUSF betterDAY betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
S. Wilson37 min · TRA. Dancler34 min · TRJ. Omojafo28 minA. Shoshkikj26 min · TRC. Davis18 min · TRM. James11 min · TR
Forwards
R. Goods25 min · TRG. Johnson23 min · TRJ. Lewis23 min · TRZ. High9 min · TRR. StevensonNewJ. FeldhausNew
Centers
T. Diawara3 min · TR
Guards
Z. Lowery23 min · TRL. Joseph18 min · TRT. Perry17 min · TRE. Dickey2 minM. Grant1 minW. Maxwell1 min
Forwards
G. Randall32 min · TRA. L'Etang26 minJ. Simon18 minM. Thomas9 minD. Friery6 minJ. HaynesNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 86.8 #6 | Points per game | 74.1 #193 |
| 1.17 #42 | Points per possession | 1.09 #167 |
| 74.4 #9 | Pace (possessions) | 68.3 #213 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.6 #209 | Effective FG% | 51.6 #168 |
| 32.5 #255 | 3-point % | 33.9 #182 |
| 43.8 #93 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.4 #142 |
| 40.4 #55 | Free throw rate | 46.1 #2 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.1 #73 | Turnover rate | 16.9 #198 |
| 38.1 #7 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.9 #298 |
| 16.8 #28 | Assists per game | 14.2 #134 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.5 #230 | Points allowed | 69.3 #50 |
| 1.03 #54 | Points allowed per possession | 1.01 #37 |
| 48.8 #58 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.0 #164 |
| 34.5 #218 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.4 #270 |
| 19.1 #42 | Turnovers forced | 21.0 #11 |
| 68.1 #252 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.2 #94 |
| 9.0 #8 | Steals per game | 8.2 #31 |
| 4.0 #72 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #90 |
South Florida
24-9 in 2025-26 overall · 17-3 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisville79–83
- Wvs Wichita St70–55
- Wvs Charlotte86–64
- Wvs Charlotte83–60
- W@ Memphis96–89
A week or more of rest.
Dayton
25-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-7 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois St55–61
- W@ UNC Wilmington80–61
- W@ Bradley80–66
- Lvs VCU62–70
- Wvs Saint Louis70–69
A week or more of rest.