Hope Coliseum · at West Virginia
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | WVU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WVU 76–70 · win probability WVU 70%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
VT 3, WVU 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
VT hits 35.5% and allows 30.6%; WVU hits 33.0% and allows 34.3%. Threes are 39.7% and 43.0% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: VT plays 69.8 a game (127th fastest), WVU 65.3 (336th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: VT 31.9%, WVU 30.5%. Defensive: VT 67.4%, WVU 71.4%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: VT 14.9%, WVU 16.8%. Forced: VT 17.3%, WVU 17.8%
Home court
WVU at home. This season: WVU 0-0 at home, VT 0-0 away
VT offense vs WVU defense
Offense 68th of 366 against a defense 19th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: VT 47%, WVU 23%. Transfers in: VT 8, WVU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: VT 52.2 and allows 50.9; WVU 51.6 and allows 48.5
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: VT 34.0, WVU 35.1. Allowed: VT 28.8, WVU 29.3
Context
Schedule so far
VT has played the 74th-hardest schedule, WVU the 62nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
WVU offense vs VT defense
Offense 77th of 366 against a defense 72nd, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WVU -6.0 | — |
| Total | — | 145.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | VT 69.8 · WVU 75.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WVU -3.4 | — |
| 1H total | 68.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | VT 32.3 · WVU 35.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Virginia Tech
32 games played
Straight up
19-13
59% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +3.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 98-67 | -18.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 107-101 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | O 208 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 94-59 | -12.5 | W +22.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 84-76 | -18.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 78-61 | -24.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 66-64 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 66-77 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 68-86 | +2.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 86-83 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 73-62 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 11 | vs | W 96-74 | -20.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 82-53 | -27.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 82-81 | -12.5 | L −11.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 95-85 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 78-81 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 68-69 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 78-75 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 76-77 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 89-76 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 76-74 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 71-85 | +14.5 | W +0.5 | 160.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 71-65 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 58-72 | +13.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 73-82 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 76-66 | +8.5 | W +18.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 69-92 | -4.5 | L −27.5 | 156.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 66-67 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 82-63 | -3.5 | W +15.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 82-89 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 72-63 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 72-76 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 89-95 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | O 184 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CHSO
W 98-67
+12.5
8
vs
PROV
W 107-101
+8.5
12
vs
JOES
W 94-59
+22.5
16
vs
CLT
W 84-76
−10.5
19
vs
BRY
W 78-61
−7.5
26
vs
CSU
W 66-64
−2.5
27
vs
SMC
L 66-77
−5.5
28
vs
VCU
L 68-86
−15.5
2
@
SC
W 86-83
+5.5
6
vs
GMU
W 73-62
+6.5
11
vs
WCU
W 96-74
+1.5
14
vs
UMES
W 82-53
+1.5
20
vs
ELON
W 82-81
−11.5
31
vs
UVA
W 95-85
+15.5
3
@
WAKE
L 78-81
+2.5
7
vs
STAN
L 68-69
−4.5
10
vs
CAL
W 78-75
−2.5
14
@
SMU
L 76-77
+7.5
17
vs
ND
W 89-76
+6.5
21
@
SYR
W 76-74
+5.5
24
@
LOU
L 71-85
+0.5
27
vs
GT
W 71-65
−3.5
31
vs
DUKE
L 58-72
−0.5
7
@
NCSU
L 73-82
+1.5
11
@
CLEM
W 76-66
+18.5
14
vs
FSU
L 69-92
−27.5
17
@
MIA
L 66-67
+7.5
21
vs
WAKE
W 82-63
+15.5
28
@
UNC
L 82-89
+0.5
3
vs
BC
W 72-63
−2.5
7
@
UVA
L 72-76
+7.5
10
vs
WAKE
L 89-95
−4.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CHSO
W 98-67
+18.5
8
vs
PROV
W 107-101
+50.5
12
vs
JOES
W 94-59
−5.5
16
vs
CLT
W 84-76
+14.5
19
vs
BRY
W 78-61
−12.5
26
vs
CSU
W 66-64
−23.5
27
vs
SMC
L 66-77
−1.5
28
vs
VCU
L 68-86
+0.5
2
@
SC
W 86-83
+19.5
6
vs
GMU
W 73-62
−9.5
11
vs
WCU
W 96-74
+17.5
14
vs
UMES
W 82-53
−4.5
20
vs
ELON
W 82-81
+4.5
31
vs
UVA
W 95-85
+26.5
3
@
WAKE
L 78-81
+5.5
7
vs
STAN
L 68-69
−11.5
10
vs
CAL
W 78-75
+4.5
14
@
SMU
L 76-77
−2.5
17
vs
ND
W 89-76
+21.5
21
@
SYR
W 76-74
−2.5
24
@
LOU
L 71-85
−4.5
27
vs
GT
W 71-65
−19.5
31
vs
DUKE
L 58-72
−18.5
7
@
NCSU
L 73-82
+0.5
11
@
CLEM
W 76-66
+3.5
14
vs
FSU
L 69-92
+4.5
17
@
MIA
L 66-67
−15.5
21
vs
WAKE
W 82-63
−5.5
28
@
UNC
L 82-89
+21.5
3
vs
BC
W 72-63
−7.5
7
@
UVA
L 72-76
+2.5
10
vs
WAKE
L 89-95
+33.5
over 17under 15avg +3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
West Virginia
35 games played
Straight up
21-14
60% wins
Against the spread
18-17
51% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-22
37% overs · avg −1.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 70-54 | -19.5 | L −3.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 73-65 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 69-47 | -17.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 71-49 | -5.5 | W +16.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 81-59 | -24.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 140 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 67-70 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | O 137 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 68-78 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 70-38 | -21.5 | W +10.5 | 127.5 | U 108 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 91-49 | -31.5 | W +10.5 | 134.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 66-75 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 90-58 | -27.5 | W +4.5 | 132.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 88-89 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 86-51 | -42.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 59-80 | +16.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 62-60 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 132.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 86-75 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 48-77 | +13.5 | L −15.5 | 127.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 72-61 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 75-63 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 53-88 | +17.5 | L −17.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 59-54 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 53-63 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 59-54 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 127.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 63-70 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 74-67 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 56-61 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 133.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 54-60 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 84-91 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 79-71 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 63-65 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 77-62 | -4.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 48-68 | +3.5 | L −16.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Apr 2 | vs | W 82-77 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | O 159 |
| Apr 4 | vs | W 87-70 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 137.5 | O 157 |
| Apr 5 | vs | W 89-82 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 171 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
MSM
W 70-54
−3.5
6
vs
CAM
W 73-65
−7.5
9
vs
LEH
W 69-47
+4.5
13
vs
PITT
W 71-49
+16.5
17
vs
LAF
W 81-59
−2.5
21
vs
CLEM
L 67-70
+1.5
23
vs
XAV
L 68-78
−15.5
30
vs
MERC
W 70-38
+10.5
3
vs
COPP
W 91-49
+10.5
6
vs
WAKE
L 66-75
−11.5
9
vs
LR
W 90-58
+4.5
13
vs
OSU
L 88-89
+2.5
22
vs
MVSU
W 86-51
−7.5
2
@
ISU
L 59-80
−4.5
6
vs
CIN
W 62-60
+3.5
10
vs
KU
W 86-75
+13.5
13
@
HOU
L 48-77
−15.5
17
vs
COLO
W 72-61
+4.5
21
@
ASU
W 75-63
+13.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 53-88
−17.5
27
vs
KSU
W 59-54
−2.5
31
vs
BAY
L 53-63
−12.5
5
@
CIN
W 59-54
+10.5
8
vs
TTU
L 63-70
−2.5
14
@
UCF
W 74-67
+10.5
18
vs
UTAH
L 56-61
−15.5
21
@
TCU
L 54-60
−1.5
24
@
OKST
L 84-91
−5.5
28
vs
BYU
W 79-71
+10.5
3
@
KSU
L 63-65
−5.5
6
vs
UCF
W 77-62
+10.5
11
vs
BYU
L 48-68
−16.5
2
vs
STAN
W 82-77
+2.5
4
vs
CREI
W 87-70
+15.5
5
vs
OU
W 89-82
+10.5
covered 18didn’t cover 17avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
MSM
W 70-54
−12.5
6
vs
CAM
W 73-65
−0.5
9
vs
LEH
W 69-47
−23.5
13
vs
PITT
W 71-49
−14.5
17
vs
LAF
W 81-59
+4.5
21
vs
CLEM
L 67-70
+4.5
23
vs
XAV
L 68-78
+5.5
30
vs
MERC
W 70-38
−19.5
3
vs
COPP
W 91-49
+5.5
6
vs
WAKE
L 66-75
−2.5
9
vs
LR
W 90-58
+15.5
13
vs
OSU
L 88-89
+31.5
22
vs
MVSU
W 86-51
−0.5
2
@
ISU
L 59-80
−3.5
6
vs
CIN
W 62-60
−10.5
10
vs
KU
W 86-75
+21.5
13
@
HOU
L 48-77
−2.5
17
vs
COLO
W 72-61
−8.5
21
@
ASU
W 75-63
−7.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 53-88
−2.5
27
vs
KSU
W 59-54
−33.5
31
vs
BAY
L 53-63
−23.5
5
@
CIN
W 59-54
−14.5
8
vs
TTU
L 63-70
−6.5
14
@
UCF
W 74-67
+0.5
18
vs
UTAH
L 56-61
−16.5
21
@
TCU
L 54-60
−19.5
24
@
OKST
L 84-91
+30.5
28
vs
BYU
W 79-71
+8.5
3
@
KSU
L 63-65
−15.5
6
vs
UCF
W 77-62
−3.5
11
vs
BYU
L 48-68
−25.5
2
vs
STAN
W 82-77
+23.5
4
vs
CREI
W 87-70
+19.5
5
vs
OU
W 89-82
+29.5
over 13under 22avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Virginia Tech has the better starters
Position by position: Virginia Tech 2, West Virginia 1, even 2
Virginia TechBetterWest Virginia
G E. Copeland TR14.5 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 67
→WVUSmall
G F. Bizjack TR17.1 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 88
G B. Hammond13.2 pts · 2.3 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 89
←VTBig
G S. Traore TR9 pts · 3.4 reb · 2 ast
Score 46
G I. Elohim TR12.2 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 71
←VTSmall
G M. Somerville TR8 pts · 3 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 54
G T. Johnson8 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 77
=Even
F B. Lorient11.9 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 91
F A. Hansberry14.3 pts · 7.4 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 92
=Even
F J. Buchanan TR12.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 89
Virginia TechBetterWest Virginia
VT offense68th of 366 · +1.8
=Even
WVU defense19th of 366 · +5.5
VT defense72nd of 366 · +0.8
=Even
WVU offense77th of 366 · +0.9
Backcourt+4.7 · 4 players
←VTBig
Backcourt+1.3 · 3 players
Frontcourt+3.8 · 1 player
→WVUSmall
Frontcourt+6.2 · 2 players
Bench+1.5 · 5 players
=Even
Bench+1.6 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestVT betterWVU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
E. Copeland32 min · TRB. Hammond32 minI. Elohim29 min · TRT. Johnson26 minJ. Curry24 min · TRB. Johnson21 min · TR
Forwards
A. Hansberry31 minM. Heide19 min · TRK. Atak14 min · TRS. Jones7 min
Centers
M. Sagnia12 min · TRS. DavisNew
Guards
F. Bizjack34 min · TRS. Traore29 min · TRM. Somerville26 min · TRJ. Sanon21 min · TRA. Jenkins16 minM. FeenaneNew
Forwards
B. Lorient29 minJ. Buchanan28 min · TRM. OlejaszNew
Centers
M. Sylla21 min · TRA. DioumNewA. SeiniNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.8 #85 | Points per game | 70.6 #271 |
| 1.13 #89 | Points per possession | 1.08 #183 |
| 69.8 #127 | Pace (possessions) | 65.3 #336 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.2 #134 | Effective FG% | 51.6 #166 |
| 35.5 #88 | 3-point % | 33.0 #227 |
| 39.7 #179 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.0 #118 |
| 34.0 #209 | Free throw rate | 35.1 #173 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.9 #60 | Turnover rate | 16.8 #188 |
| 31.9 #129 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.5 #178 |
| 14.4 #122 | Assists per game | 12.8 #228 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.9 #184 | Points allowed | 65.7 #11 |
| 1.07 #141 | Points allowed per possession | 1.01 #34 |
| 50.9 #147 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.5 #50 |
| 30.6 #26 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.3 #201 |
| 17.3 #131 | Turnovers forced | 17.8 #108 |
| 67.4 #284 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.4 #86 |
| 6.4 #187 | Steals per game | 6.3 #195 |
| 3.2 #190 | Blocks per game | 3.1 #204 |
Virginia Tech
19-13 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Wake Forest89–95
- L@ Virginia72–76
- Wvs Boston College72–63
- L@ North Carolina82–89
- Wvs Wake Forest82–63
A week or more of rest.
West Virginia
21-14 in 2025-26 overall · 9-10 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Oklahoma89–82
- Wvs Creighton87–70
- Wvs Stanford82–77
- Lvs BYU48–68
- Wvs UCF77–62
A week or more of rest.