Case Gym · at Boston U
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BU 74–70 · win probability BU 63%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 143.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BU has more of the edges
UNH 2, BU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNH 46.7 and allows 53.5; BU 57.5 and allows 53.6
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNH 16.5%, BU 17.7%. Forced: UNH 15.8%, BU 13.0%
Three-pointers
UNH hits 30.5% and allows 34.3%; BU hits 38.9% and allows 36.6%. Threes are 43.1% and 43.8% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNH 28.5, BU 31.4. Allowed: UNH 35.8, BU 30.5
UNH offense vs BU defense
Offense 300th of 366 against a defense 201st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: UNH plays 68.9 a game (186th fastest), BU 65.2 (340th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
UNH has played the 237th-hardest schedule, BU the 296th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
BU at home. This season: BU 0-0 at home, UNH 0-0 away
BU offense vs UNH defense
Offense 305th of 366 against a defense 255th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNH 25.7%, BU 28.0%. Defensive: UNH 73.1%, BU 72.0%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNH 47%, BU 52%. Transfers in: UNH 3, BU 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | BU -3.9 | — |
| Total | — | 143.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | UNH 69.8 · BU 73.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BU -2.2 | — |
| 1H total | 67.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNH 32.5 · BU 34.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 1-9 10% | 6-4 60% | |
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UNH 1–1 BUSeries tied · 2 games since 2021-22 · UNH 1-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2025-26 | BU 82 @ UNH 88 | UNH +5.5 | UNH W |
| Nov 20, 2022-23 | BU 64 @ UNH 57 | UNH +5.5 | BU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
New Hampshire
28 games played
Straight up
7-21
25% wins
Against the spread
12-16
43% covers · avg −2.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-13
54% overs · avg +0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 38-88 | +29.5 | L −20.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 75-86 | +15.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 44-61 | +24.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 105 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 66-98 | +29.5 | L −2.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 47-59 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 106 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 68-72 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 68-69 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 88-82 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 134.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 59-58 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 79-93 | +34.5 | W +20.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 55-86 | +31.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 61-80 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 76-80 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 74-75 | +6.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 65-48 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 129.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 88-82 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 80-72 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 66-61 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 84-92 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 131.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 57-80 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 70-76 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 63-85 | +2.5 | L −19.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 56-78 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 151.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 58-61 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 63-65 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 61-84 | +3.5 | L −19.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 88-83 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 69-84 | +12.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | O 153 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
CLEM
L 38-88
−20.5
9
@
HARV
L 75-86
+4.5
15
@
GMU
L 44-61
+7.5
18
@
PROV
L 66-98
−2.5
26
vs
BRWN
L 47-59
−6.5
30
@
FAIR
L 68-72
+5.5
3
@
DART
L 68-69
+7.5
6
vs
BU
W 88-82
+11.5
17
vs
STO
W 59-58
−2.5
21
@
SLU
L 79-93
+20.5
30
@
NEB
L 55-86
+0.5
3
vs
UVM
L 61-80
−11.5
8
@
NJIT
L 76-80
−6.5
10
@
UMBC
L 74-75
+5.5
19
@
ME
W 65-48
+18.5
22
vs
BING
W 88-82
−3.5
24
vs
UALB
W 80-72
+5.5
29
vs
UML
W 66-61
+1.5
31
@
BRY
L 84-92
−6.5
7
@
UVM
L 57-80
−13.5
12
vs
NJIT
L 70-76
−8.5
14
vs
UMBC
L 63-85
−19.5
19
@
UML
L 56-78
−18.5
21
vs
ME
L 58-61
−6.5
26
@
BING
L 63-65
−4.5
28
@
UALB
L 61-84
−19.5
3
vs
BRY
W 88-83
+2.5
7
@
UMBC
L 69-84
−2.5
covered 12didn’t cover 16avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
CLEM
L 38-88
−20.5
9
@
HARV
L 75-86
+13.5
15
@
GMU
L 44-61
−39.5
18
@
PROV
L 66-98
+2.5
26
vs
BRWN
L 47-59
−30.5
30
@
FAIR
L 68-72
−7.5
3
@
DART
L 68-69
−10.5
6
vs
BU
W 88-82
+35.5
17
vs
STO
W 59-58
−21.5
21
@
SLU
L 79-93
+14.5
30
@
NEB
L 55-86
−5.5
3
vs
UVM
L 61-80
+1.5
8
@
NJIT
L 76-80
+18.5
10
@
UMBC
L 74-75
+5.5
19
@
ME
W 65-48
−16.5
22
vs
BING
W 88-82
+34.5
24
vs
UALB
W 80-72
+14.5
29
vs
UML
W 66-61
−19.5
31
@
BRY
L 84-92
+44.5
7
@
UVM
L 57-80
−1.5
12
vs
NJIT
L 70-76
+0.5
14
vs
UMBC
L 63-85
+1.5
19
@
UML
L 56-78
−17.5
21
vs
ME
L 58-61
−16.5
26
@
BING
L 63-65
−13.5
28
@
UALB
L 61-84
+6.5
3
vs
BRY
W 88-83
+35.5
7
@
UMBC
L 69-84
+10.5
over 15under 13avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Boston U
33 games played
Straight up
16-17
48% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +8.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 76-75 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 52-76 | +17.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 90-77 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 129.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 79-91 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 135.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 49-54 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 103 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 75-74 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 87-96 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 65-74 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 82-88 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 134.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 59-69 | -8.5 | L −18.5 | 128.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 64-77 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 88-76 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 77-82 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 62-64 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 83-67 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 100-91 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 91-93 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 57-74 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 77-73 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 79-80 | +7.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 50-58 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 138.5 | U 108 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 97-103 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | O 200 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 72-64 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 78-69 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 85-68 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-69 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 85-58 | +2.5 | W +29.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 67-70 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 78-63 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 68-65 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 75-73 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 8 | @ | W 73-72 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 136.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 11 | @ | L 60-74 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 138.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
NE
W 76-75
+3.5
7
@
NU
L 52-76
−6.5
12
vs
BRWN
W 90-77
+9.5
15
vs
MRMK
L 79-91
−14.5
18
@
COLU
L 49-54
−0.5
22
vs
HARV
W 75-74
+5.5
25
@
PSU
L 87-96
+5.5
29
@
NKU
L 65-74
−1.5
6
@
UNH
L 82-88
−11.5
10
vs
ME
L 59-69
−18.5
13
@
DART
L 64-77
−10.5
21
vs
UML
W 88-76
+6.5
31
@
NAVY
L 77-82
−0.5
3
vs
AMER
L 62-64
−3.5
7
@
LAF
W 83-67
+14.5
10
vs
ARMY
W 100-91
+1.5
14
vs
LEH
L 91-93
−6.5
17
@
L-MD
L 57-74
−18.5
21
vs
LAF
W 77-73
−0.5
24
@
COLG
L 79-80
+6.5
28
vs
NAVY
L 50-58
−6.5
31
@
BUCK
L 97-103
−7.5
2
@
HC
W 72-64
+5.5
7
vs
L-MD
W 78-69
+3.5
11
@
ARMY
W 85-68
+14.5
14
vs
BUCK
W 82-69
+7.5
16
vs
COLG
W 85-58
+29.5
22
@
LEH
L 67-70
−5.5
25
vs
HC
W 78-63
+6.5
28
@
AMER
W 68-65
+6.5
5
vs
AMER
W 75-73
+0.5
8
@
NAVY
W 73-72
+7.5
11
@
LEH
L 60-74
−16.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
NE
W 76-75
+8.5
7
@
NU
L 52-76
−8.5
12
vs
BRWN
W 90-77
+37.5
15
vs
MRMK
L 79-91
+34.5
18
@
COLU
L 49-54
−41.5
22
vs
HARV
W 75-74
+12.5
25
@
PSU
L 87-96
+40.5
29
@
NKU
L 65-74
−4.5
6
@
UNH
L 82-88
+35.5
10
vs
ME
L 59-69
−0.5
13
@
DART
L 64-77
−3.5
21
vs
UML
W 88-76
+18.5
31
@
NAVY
L 77-82
+21.5
3
vs
AMER
L 62-64
−16.5
7
@
LAF
W 83-67
+7.5
10
vs
ARMY
W 100-91
+50.5
14
vs
LEH
L 91-93
+39.5
17
@
L-MD
L 57-74
−17.5
21
vs
LAF
W 77-73
+4.5
24
@
COLG
L 79-80
+11.5
28
vs
NAVY
L 50-58
−30.5
31
@
BUCK
L 97-103
+61.5
2
@
HC
W 72-64
−3.5
7
vs
L-MD
W 78-69
+1.5
11
@
ARMY
W 85-68
+12.5
14
vs
BUCK
W 82-69
+13.5
16
vs
COLG
W 85-58
−2.5
22
@
LEH
L 67-70
−4.5
25
vs
HC
W 78-63
−0.5
28
@
AMER
W 68-65
−7.5
5
vs
AMER
W 75-73
+6.5
8
@
NAVY
W 73-72
+8.5
11
@
LEH
L 60-74
−4.5
over 19under 14avg +8.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
New Hampshire has the better starters
Position by position: New Hampshire 3, Boston U 1, even 1
New HampshireBetterBoston U
G T. Bike7.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 34
←UNHSmall
G A. Abdullah8.2 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 13
G E. Oliver-Bush TR3.2 pts · 2 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 7
→BUSmall
G D. Tisinger6.1 pts · 2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 37
F D. Poser6.9 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 11
=No call
G K. Alexander1 pts · 2 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
F J. Squire5.8 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 34
←UNHSmall
F S. Hughes9.2 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 10
F D. McKenna TR3.9 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 47
←UNHBig
F Q. Nielsen1 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 5
New HampshireBetterBoston U
UNH offense300th of 366 · -9.3
→BUSmall
BU defense201st of 366 · -5.0
UNH defense255th of 366 · -6.7
=Even
BU offense305th of 366 · -9.5
Backcourt-3.5 · 2 players
←UNHSmall
Backcourt-5.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-4.5 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt-4.3 · 2 players
Bench-2.3 · 4 players
→BUSmall
Bench-0.1 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestUNH betterBU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Bike24 minE. Oliver-Bush16 min · TRM. Blackley2 minA. SquireNewJ. ColemanNewJ. FaumuinaNew
Forwards
D. Poser29 minJ. Squire27 minD. McKenna11 min · TRR. Zan8 min · TRJ. O'Neill6 minK. MyersNew
Centers
G. Xanthopoulos6 min
Guards
A. Abdullah30 minD. Tisinger20 minK. Alexander11 minP. Carr2 minA. ZakheimNewJ. TerryNew
Forwards
S. Hughes30 minQ. Nielsen8 minM. Oberti4 min · TRA. Bhesania3 minM. BaptisteNewD. LloydNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.6 #339 | Points per game | 74.5 #176 |
| 0.96 #347 | Points per possession | 1.14 #72 |
| 68.9 #186 | Pace (possessions) | 65.2 #340 |
| Shooting | ||
| 46.7 #344 | Effective FG% | 57.5 #11 |
| 30.5 #333 | 3-point % | 38.9 #5 |
| 43.1 #110 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.8 #92 |
| 28.5 #338 | Free throw rate | 31.4 #270 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.5 #166 | Turnover rate | 17.7 #252 |
| 25.7 #329 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.0 #269 |
| 10.6 #348 | Assists per game | 14.2 #131 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.4 #227 | Points allowed | 74.5 #174 |
| 1.11 #247 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #310 |
| 53.5 #282 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.6 #288 |
| 34.3 #204 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.6 #330 |
| 15.8 #227 | Turnovers forced | 13.0 #353 |
| 73.1 #32 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.0 #65 |
| 6.1 #222 | Steals per game | 4.7 #346 |
| 2.0 #345 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #181 |
New Hampshire
7-21 in 2025-26 overall · 5-12 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ UMBC69–84
- Wvs Bryant88–83
- L@ UAlbany61–84
- L@ Binghamton63–65
- Lvs Maine58–61
A week or more of rest.
Boston U
16-17 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Lehigh60–74
- W@ Navy73–72
- Wvs American75–73
- W@ American68–65
- Wvs Holy Cross78–63
A week or more of rest.