PPG Paints Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | PITT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WVU 73–69 · win probability WVU 66%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 142.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: WVU has more of the edges
WVU 4, PITT 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: WVU 51.6 and allows 48.5; PITT 51.0 and allows 53.4
Free throws
Free throw rate: WVU 35.1, PITT 30.4. Allowed: WVU 29.3, PITT 30.9
PITT offense vs WVU defense
Offense 87th of 366 against a defense 19th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WVU 16.8%, PITT 17.2%. Forced: WVU 17.8%, PITT 16.3%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WVU 30.5%, PITT 33.9%. Defensive: WVU 71.4%, PITT 71.9%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WVU 23%, PITT 3%. Transfers in: WVU 6, PITT 10. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Three-pointers
WVU hits 33.0% and allows 34.3%; PITT hits 33.4% and allows 35.2%. Threes are 43.0% and 42.6% of their shots
Even
WVU offense vs PITT defense
Offense 77th of 366 against a defense 59th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Context
Tempo
About 65 possessions: WVU plays 65.3 a game (336th fastest), PITT 65.0 (345th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
WVU has played the 62nd-hardest schedule, PITT the 65th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WVU -4.8 | — |
| Total | — | 142.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | WVU 73.4 · PITT 68.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WVU -3.0 | — |
| 1H total | 66.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | WVU 34.7 · PITT 31.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
WVU 3–2 PITTWVU leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · WVU 2-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2025-26 | PITT 49 @ WVU 71 | WVU -5.5 | WVU W |
| Nov 15, 2024-25 | WVU 62 @ PITT 86 | PITT -7.5 | PITT W |
| Dec 6, 2023-24 | PITT 80 @ WVU 63 | WVU +3.5 | PITT W |
| Nov 11, 2022-23 | WVU 81 @ PITT 56 | PITT +2.5 | WVU W |
| Nov 12, 2021-22 | PITT 59 @ WVU 74 | WVU -17 | PITT W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
West Virginia
35 games played
Straight up
21-14
60% wins
Against the spread
18-17
51% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-22
37% overs · avg −1.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 70-54 | -19.5 | L −3.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 73-65 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 69-47 | -17.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 71-49 | -5.5 | W +16.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 81-59 | -24.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 140 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 67-70 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | O 137 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 68-78 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 70-38 | -21.5 | W +10.5 | 127.5 | U 108 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 91-49 | -31.5 | W +10.5 | 134.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 66-75 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 90-58 | -27.5 | W +4.5 | 132.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 88-89 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 86-51 | -42.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 59-80 | +16.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 62-60 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 132.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 86-75 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 48-77 | +13.5 | L −15.5 | 127.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 72-61 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 75-63 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 53-88 | +17.5 | L −17.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 59-54 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 53-63 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 59-54 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 127.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 63-70 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 74-67 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 56-61 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 133.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 54-60 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 84-91 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 79-71 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 63-65 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 77-62 | -4.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 48-68 | +3.5 | L −16.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Apr 2 | vs | W 82-77 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | O 159 |
| Apr 4 | vs | W 87-70 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 137.5 | O 157 |
| Apr 5 | vs | W 89-82 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 171 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
MSM
W 70-54
−3.5
6
vs
CAM
W 73-65
−7.5
9
vs
LEH
W 69-47
+4.5
13
vs
PITT
W 71-49
+16.5
17
vs
LAF
W 81-59
−2.5
21
vs
CLEM
L 67-70
+1.5
23
vs
XAV
L 68-78
−15.5
30
vs
MERC
W 70-38
+10.5
3
vs
COPP
W 91-49
+10.5
6
vs
WAKE
L 66-75
−11.5
9
vs
LR
W 90-58
+4.5
13
vs
OSU
L 88-89
+2.5
22
vs
MVSU
W 86-51
−7.5
2
@
ISU
L 59-80
−4.5
6
vs
CIN
W 62-60
+3.5
10
vs
KU
W 86-75
+13.5
13
@
HOU
L 48-77
−15.5
17
vs
COLO
W 72-61
+4.5
21
@
ASU
W 75-63
+13.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 53-88
−17.5
27
vs
KSU
W 59-54
−2.5
31
vs
BAY
L 53-63
−12.5
5
@
CIN
W 59-54
+10.5
8
vs
TTU
L 63-70
−2.5
14
@
UCF
W 74-67
+10.5
18
vs
UTAH
L 56-61
−15.5
21
@
TCU
L 54-60
−1.5
24
@
OKST
L 84-91
−5.5
28
vs
BYU
W 79-71
+10.5
3
@
KSU
L 63-65
−5.5
6
vs
UCF
W 77-62
+10.5
11
vs
BYU
L 48-68
−16.5
2
vs
STAN
W 82-77
+2.5
4
vs
CREI
W 87-70
+15.5
5
vs
OU
W 89-82
+10.5
covered 18didn’t cover 17avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
MSM
W 70-54
−12.5
6
vs
CAM
W 73-65
−0.5
9
vs
LEH
W 69-47
−23.5
13
vs
PITT
W 71-49
−14.5
17
vs
LAF
W 81-59
+4.5
21
vs
CLEM
L 67-70
+4.5
23
vs
XAV
L 68-78
+5.5
30
vs
MERC
W 70-38
−19.5
3
vs
COPP
W 91-49
+5.5
6
vs
WAKE
L 66-75
−2.5
9
vs
LR
W 90-58
+15.5
13
vs
OSU
L 88-89
+31.5
22
vs
MVSU
W 86-51
−0.5
2
@
ISU
L 59-80
−3.5
6
vs
CIN
W 62-60
−10.5
10
vs
KU
W 86-75
+21.5
13
@
HOU
L 48-77
−2.5
17
vs
COLO
W 72-61
−8.5
21
@
ASU
W 75-63
−7.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 53-88
−2.5
27
vs
KSU
W 59-54
−33.5
31
vs
BAY
L 53-63
−23.5
5
@
CIN
W 59-54
−14.5
8
vs
TTU
L 63-70
−6.5
14
@
UCF
W 74-67
+0.5
18
vs
UTAH
L 56-61
−16.5
21
@
TCU
L 54-60
−19.5
24
@
OKST
L 84-91
+30.5
28
vs
BYU
W 79-71
+8.5
3
@
KSU
L 63-65
−15.5
6
vs
UCF
W 77-62
−3.5
11
vs
BYU
L 48-68
−25.5
2
vs
STAN
W 82-77
+23.5
4
vs
CREI
W 87-70
+19.5
5
vs
OU
W 89-82
+29.5
over 13under 22avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Pitt
33 games played
Straight up
13-20
39% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg −0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 74-59 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 78-60 | -14.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 78-66 | -15.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 49-71 | +5.5 | L −16.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 84-50 | -16.5 | W +17.5 | 141.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 67-77 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 75-83 | -12.5 | L −20.5 | 140.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 67-66 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 73-81 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 73-80 | -8.5 | L −15.5 | 134.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 61-79 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 103-63 | -24.5 | W +15.5 | 134.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 80-46 | +1.5 | W +35.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 69-76 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 68-73 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 72-83 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 89-66 | -1.5 | W +21.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 59-100 | +7.5 | L −33.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 62-65 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 72-81 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 80-76 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 52-63 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 47-67 | +12.5 | L −7.5 | 142.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 67-86 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 54-70 | +17.5 | W +1.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 65-79 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 73-68 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 67-75 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 72-56 | +6.5 | W +22.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 74-75 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 71-69 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 64-63 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | U 127 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 88-98 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 186 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
YSU
W 74-59
+0.5
7
vs
LONG
W 78-60
+3.5
10
vs
EMU
W 78-66
−3.5
13
@
WVU
L 49-71
−16.5
17
vs
BUCK
W 84-50
+17.5
20
vs
UCF
L 67-77
−11.5
23
vs
QUIN
L 75-83
−20.5
28
vs
OSU
W 67-66
+6.5
2
vs
TA&M
L 73-81
−4.5
7
vs
HOF
L 73-80
−15.5
13
@
VILL
L 61-79
−7.5
17
vs
BING
W 103-63
+15.5
21
vs
PSU
W 80-46
+35.5
30
@
MIA
L 69-76
+2.5
3
vs
CLEM
L 68-73
−1.5
10
vs
SYR
L 72-83
−12.5
14
@
GT
W 89-66
+21.5
17
vs
LOU
L 59-100
−33.5
21
@
BC
L 62-65
−5.5
24
vs
NCSU
L 72-81
−2.5
27
vs
WAKE
W 80-76
+2.5
31
@
CLEM
L 52-63
−0.5
3
@
UVA
L 47-67
−7.5
7
vs
SMU
L 67-86
−14.5
10
vs
DUKE
L 54-70
+1.5
14
@
UNC
L 65-79
−2.5
21
vs
ND
W 73-68
+1.5
25
@
STAN
L 67-75
+0.5
28
@
CAL
W 72-56
+22.5
4
vs
FSU
L 74-75
+0.5
7
@
SYR
W 71-69
+7.5
10
vs
STAN
W 64-63
+5.5
11
vs
NCSU
L 88-98
−1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
YSU
W 74-59
−12.5
7
vs
LONG
W 78-60
−7.5
10
vs
EMU
W 78-66
+2.5
13
@
WVU
L 49-71
−14.5
17
vs
BUCK
W 84-50
−7.5
20
vs
UCF
L 67-77
−5.5
23
vs
QUIN
L 75-83
+17.5
28
vs
OSU
W 67-66
−15.5
2
vs
TA&M
L 73-81
+1.5
7
vs
HOF
L 73-80
+18.5
13
@
VILL
L 61-79
+1.5
17
vs
BING
W 103-63
+31.5
21
vs
PSU
W 80-46
−20.5
30
@
MIA
L 69-76
+0.5
3
vs
CLEM
L 68-73
+5.5
10
vs
SYR
L 72-83
+12.5
14
@
GT
W 89-66
+9.5
17
vs
LOU
L 59-100
+6.5
21
@
BC
L 62-65
−10.5
24
vs
NCSU
L 72-81
+8.5
27
vs
WAKE
W 80-76
+5.5
31
@
CLEM
L 52-63
−20.5
3
@
UVA
L 47-67
−28.5
7
vs
SMU
L 67-86
+5.5
10
vs
DUKE
L 54-70
−12.5
14
@
UNC
L 65-79
+1.5
21
vs
ND
W 73-68
+0.5
25
@
STAN
L 67-75
+3.5
28
@
CAL
W 72-56
−15.5
4
vs
FSU
L 74-75
+4.5
7
@
SYR
W 71-69
−1.5
10
vs
STAN
W 64-63
−9.5
11
vs
NCSU
L 88-98
+41.5
over 19under 14avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: West Virginia 1, Pitt 1, even 3
West VirginiaBetterPitt
G F. Bizjack TR17.1 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 88
=Even
G N. George TR10.9 pts · 3 reb · 5.4 ast
Score 75
G S. Traore TR9 pts · 3.4 reb · 2 ast
Score 46
→PITTBig
G A. Sumler TR19.3 pts · 4.6 reb · 3.9 ast
Score 93
G M. Somerville TR8 pts · 3 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 54
=Even
F T. Rudovskii TR13.1 pts · 4.8 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 59
F B. Lorient11.9 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 91
=Even
F B. Ndongo TR11.8 pts · 8.1 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 90
F J. Buchanan TR12.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 89
←WVUSmall
C A. Mighty TR13.3 pts · 10.9 reb · 1 ast
Score 71
West VirginiaBetterPitt
WVU offense77th of 366 · +0.9
=Even
PITT defense59th of 366 · +1.3
WVU defense19th of 366 · +5.5
←WVUSmall
PITT offense87th of 366 · +0.2
Backcourt+1.3 · 3 players
→PITTSmall
Backcourt+4.1 · 2 players
Frontcourt+6.2 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt+5.4 · 3 players
Bench+1.6 · 3 players
←WVUBig
Bench-4.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestWVU betterPITT betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
F. Bizjack34 min · TRS. Traore29 min · TRM. Somerville26 min · TRJ. Sanon21 min · TRA. Jenkins16 minM. FeenaneNew
Forwards
B. Lorient29 minJ. Buchanan28 min · TRM. OlejaszNew
Centers
M. Sylla21 min · TRA. DioumNewA. SeiniNew
Guards
N. George32 min · TRA. Sumler31 min · TRC. Hawkins27 min · TRJ. Powell16 min · TRJ. Bethea8 min · TRM. Moore6 min
Forwards
T. Rudovskii32 min · TRB. Ndongo27 min · TRA. Souare8 min · TRD. Diomande8 min · TRB. MayhewNewJ. NelsonNew
Centers
A. Mighty32 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.6 #271 | Points per game | 70.5 #274 |
| 1.08 #183 | Points per possession | 1.08 #181 |
| 65.3 #336 | Pace (possessions) | 65.0 #345 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.6 #166 | Effective FG% | 51.0 #193 |
| 33.0 #227 | 3-point % | 33.4 #206 |
| 43.0 #118 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.6 #124 |
| 35.1 #173 | Free throw rate | 30.4 #300 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.8 #188 | Turnover rate | 17.2 #223 |
| 30.5 #178 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.9 #72 |
| 12.8 #228 | Assists per game | 13.2 #197 |
| Defense | ||
| 65.7 #11 | Points allowed | 71.8 #101 |
| 1.01 #34 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #237 |
| 48.5 #50 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.4 #279 |
| 34.3 #201 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.2 #263 |
| 17.8 #108 | Turnovers forced | 16.3 #202 |
| 71.4 #86 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.9 #68 |
| 6.3 #195 | Steals per game | 6.5 #172 |
| 3.1 #204 | Blocks per game | 3.1 #203 |
West Virginia
21-14 in 2025-26 overall · 9-10 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Oklahoma89–82
- Wvs Creighton87–70
- Wvs Stanford82–77
- Lvs BYU48–68
- Wvs UCF77–62
A week or more of rest.
Pitt
13-20 in 2025-26 overall · 6-14 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs NC State88–98
- Wvs Stanford64–63
- W@ Syracuse71–69
- Lvs Florida St74–75
- W@ California72–56
A week or more of rest.