Michigan Wolverines at Rutgers Scarlet Knights: Model Line and Edge

Wed, Dec 9, 6:30 PM ETJersey Mike’s Arena · at Rutgers · Conference game

#8MICHMichigan AP #16

LineNo line yet

Total—

Season records: Michigan and Rutgers
MICH	This season	RUTG
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects MICH 84–71 · win probability MICH 88%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Winner

Line

—

no line yet

Total

—

model 155.5

Model edge

—

No market line yet

Public

—

No split yet for this game

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: MICH has more of the edges

MICH 6, RUTG 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

MICHBig

Shooting

Effective FG%: MICH 58.3 and allows 44.6; RUTG 47.2 and allows 53.0

MICHBig

Three-pointers

MICH hits 36.8% and allows 30.4%; RUTG hits 32.4% and allows 35.6%. Threes are 41.5% and 34.2% of their shots

MICHBig

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: MICH 34.7%, RUTG 29.7%. Defensive: MICH 71.8%, RUTG 67.2%

RUTGBig

Turnovers

Turnover rate: MICH 16.3%, RUTG 14.9%. Forced: MICH 15.2%, RUTG 17.1%

Context

Tempo

About 70 possessions: MICH plays 71.7 a game (48th fastest), RUTG 67.5 (254th). Faster games mean more points

MICHSmall

Free throws

Free throw rate: MICH 38.0, RUTG 36.3. Allowed: MICH 26.0, RUTG 31.7

MICHSmall

MICH offense vs RUTG defense

Offense 5th of 366 against a defense 65th, on the model’s ratings

RUTGSmall

Home court

RUTG at home. This season: RUTG 0-0 at home, MICH 0-0 away

MICHSmall

RUTG offense vs MICH defense

Offense 58th of 366 against a defense 10th, on the model’s ratings

Context

Schedule so far

MICH has played the 3rd-hardest schedule, RUTG the 50th. A record against a soft schedule means less

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: MICH 38%, RUTG 58%. Transfers in: MICH 4, RUTG 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	—	MICH -13.3	—
Total	—	155.5	—
Projected score	—	MICH 84.4 · RUTG 71.1

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	MICH -8.1	—
1H total	72.7	—
1H projected score	MICH 40.4 · RUTG 32.3	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
MICH WWWWL	19-21	48%	4-7	—
RUTG WWWLL	17-17	50%	8-9	—

Venue/role: MICH away; RUTG home. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
MICH OUOOU	17-23	43%	37-3
RUTG OUOUU	19-15	56%	14-20

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
MICH	9-1 90%	4-6 40%	6-4 60%
RUTG	5-5 50%	6-4 60%	5-5 50%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Michigan

Date	Game	Last meeting
Dec 12	vs NU	W87–75LO

Rutgers

Date	Game	Last meeting
Dec 12	vs HALL	L59–81LO

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22

MICH 5–4 RUTGMICH leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · MICH has won the last 3 meetings · MICH 3-6 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Dec 6, 2025-26	RUTG 60 @ MICH 101	MICH -25.5	MICH W
Feb 27, 2024-25	RUTG 82 @ MICH 84	MICH -9.5	RUTG W
Feb 1, 2024-25	MICH 66 @ RUTG 63	RUTG +6.5	RUTG W
Feb 29, 2023-24	MICH 52 @ RUTG 82	RUTG -8.5	RUTG W
Feb 3, 2023-24	RUTG 69 @ MICH 59	MICH -4.5	RUTG W

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Michigan

40 games played

Straight up

37-3

93% wins

Against the spread

19-21

48% covers · avg +3.7 pts vs the line

Over / Under

17-23

43% overs · avg −1.6 pts vs the total

Straight up

37-393%

W W W W W W W W W W W W W W L W W W W W W W W W W W L W W W W W W L W W W W W W

6 straight wins4 of last 4 won

Against the spread

19-2148%

W L L L W W W W W L W W W L L L L L L L W W W L W W L L W L L L L L L W W W W L

3 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

17-2343%

O O U U U O U O U O U O U U O U U U U U O O U O U O U U U U O U U O O O U O O U

2 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsOAK	W 121-78	-24.5	W +18.5	156.5	O 199
Nov 11	vsWAKE	W 85-84	-15.5	L −14.5	168.5	O 169
Nov 14	@TCU	W 67-63	-7.5	L −3.5	164.5	U 130
Nov 19	vsMTSU	W 86-61	-27.5	L −2.5	159.5	U 147
Nov 24	vsSDSU	W 94-54	-6.5	W +33.5	148.5	U 148
Nov 25	vsAUB	W 102-72	-4.5	W +25.5	163.5	O 174
Nov 26	vsGONZ	W 101-61	+3.5	W +43.5	165.5	U 162
Dec 6	vsRUTG	W 101-60	-25.5	W +15.5	153.5	O 161
Dec 9	vsVILL	W 89-61	-17.5	W +10.5	156.5	U 150
Dec 13	@MD	W 101-83	-19.5	L −1.5	163.5	O 184
Dec 21	vsLAS	W 102-50	-40.5	W +11.5	155.5	U 152
Dec 29	vsMCN	W 112-71	-24.5	W +16.5	161.5	O 183
Jan 2	vsUSC	W 96-66	-22.5	W +7.5	173.5	U 162
Jan 6	@PSU	W 74-72	-24.5	L −22.5	169.5	U 146
Jan 10	vsWIS	L 88-91	-19.5	L −22.5	169.5	O 179
Jan 14	@WASH	W 82-72	-12.5	L −2.5	165.5	U 154
Jan 17	@ORE	W 81-71	-18.5	L −8.5	157.5	U 152
Jan 20	vsIU	W 86-72	-15.5	L −1.5	163.5	U 158
Jan 23	vsOSU	W 74-62	-16.5	L −4.5	165.5	U 136
Jan 27	vsNEB	W 75-72	-11.5	L −8.5	157.5	U 147
Jan 30	@MSU	W 83-71	-2.5	W +9.5	149.5	O 154
Feb 5	vsPSU	W 110-69	-26.5	W +14.5	161.5	O 179
Feb 8	@OSU	W 82-61	-8.5	W +12.5	161.5	U 143
Feb 11	@NU	W 87-75	-15.5	L −3.5	153.5	O 162
Feb 14	vsUCLA	W 86-56	-15.5	W +14.5	156.5	U 142
Feb 17	@PUR	W 91-80	-2.5	W +8.5	156.5	O 171
Feb 21	vsDUKE	L 63-68	-3.5	L −8.5	151.5	U 131
Feb 24	vsMINN	W 77-67	-22.5	L −12.5	145.5	U 144
Feb 27	@ILL	W 84-70	-1.5	W +12.5	159.5	U 154
Mar 5	@IOWA	W 71-68	-9.5	L −6.5	146.5	U 139
Mar 8	vsMSU	W 90-80	-10.5	L −0.5	152.5	O 170
Mar 13	vsOSU	W 71-67	-12.5	L −8.5	155.5	U 138
Mar 14	vsWIS	W 68-65	-12.5	L −9.5	161.5	U 133
Mar 15	vsPUR	L 72-80	-4.5	L −12.5	149.5	O 152
Mar 19	vsHOW	W 101-80	-30.5	L −9.5	151.5	O 181
Mar 21	vsSLU	W 95-72	-12.5	W +10.5	161.5	O 167
Mar 27	vsALA	W 90-77	-9.5	W +3.5	172.5	U 167
Mar 29	vsTENN	W 95-62	-8.5	W +24.5	146.5	O 157
Apr 4	vsARIZ	W 91-73	+1.5	W +19.5	157.5	O 164
Apr 6	vsCONN	W 69-63	-6.5	L −0.5	146.5	U 132

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

OAK

W 121-78

+18.5

WAKE

W 85-84

−14.5

TCU

W 67-63

−3.5

MTSU

W 86-61

−2.5

SDSU

W 94-54

+33.5

AUB

W 102-72

+25.5

GONZ

W 101-61

+43.5

RUTG

W 101-60

+15.5

VILL

W 89-61

+10.5

W 101-83

−1.5

LAS

W 102-50

+11.5

MCN

W 112-71

+16.5

USC

W 96-66

+7.5

PSU

W 74-72

−22.5

WIS

L 88-91

−22.5

WASH

W 82-72

−2.5

ORE

W 81-71

−8.5

W 86-72

−1.5

OSU

W 74-62

−4.5

NEB

W 75-72

−8.5

MSU

W 83-71

+9.5

PSU

W 110-69

+14.5

OSU

W 82-61

+12.5

W 87-75

−3.5

UCLA

W 86-56

+14.5

PUR

W 91-80

+8.5

DUKE

L 63-68

−8.5

MINN

W 77-67

−12.5

ILL

W 84-70

+12.5

IOWA

W 71-68

−6.5

MSU

W 90-80

−0.5

OSU

W 71-67

−8.5

WIS

W 68-65

−9.5

PUR

L 72-80

−12.5

HOW

W 101-80

−9.5

SLU

W 95-72

+10.5

ALA

W 90-77

+3.5

TENN

W 95-62

+24.5

ARIZ

W 91-73

+19.5

CONN

W 69-63

−0.5

covered 19didn’t cover 21avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

OAK

W 121-78

+42.5

WAKE

W 85-84

+0.5

TCU

W 67-63

−34.5

MTSU

W 86-61

−12.5

SDSU

W 94-54

−0.5

AUB

W 102-72

+10.5

GONZ

W 101-61

−3.5

RUTG

W 101-60

+7.5

VILL

W 89-61

−6.5

W 101-83

+20.5

LAS

W 102-50

−3.5

MCN

W 112-71

+21.5

USC

W 96-66

−11.5

PSU

W 74-72

−23.5

WIS

L 88-91

+9.5

WASH

W 82-72

−11.5

ORE

W 81-71

−5.5

W 86-72

−5.5

OSU

W 74-62

−29.5

NEB

W 75-72

−10.5

MSU

W 83-71

+4.5

PSU

W 110-69

+17.5

OSU

W 82-61

−18.5

W 87-75

+8.5

UCLA

W 86-56

−14.5

PUR

W 91-80

+14.5

DUKE

L 63-68

−20.5

MINN

W 77-67

−1.5

ILL

W 84-70

−5.5

IOWA

W 71-68

−7.5

MSU

W 90-80

+17.5

OSU

W 71-67

−17.5

WIS

W 68-65

−28.5

PUR

L 72-80

+2.5

HOW

W 101-80

+29.5

SLU

W 95-72

+5.5

ALA

W 90-77

−5.5

TENN

W 95-62

+10.5

ARIZ

W 91-73

+6.5

CONN

W 69-63

−14.5

over 17under 23avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Rutgers

34 games played

Straight up

14-20

41% wins

Against the spread

17-17

50% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line

Over / Under

19-15

56% overs · avg +2.5 pts vs the total

Straight up

14-2041%

W W W W L L L W L L L W W L W L W L L L L L L L W W L L W L W W L L

2 straight losses2 of last 4 won

Against the spread

17-1750%

W L L L L L W W L L L L L W W L W W W L W W L W W W L L W W W W L L

2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

19-1556%

U O O O U O U U U O O U U O O U O O U U O O O O U O O O U O U O U U

2 straight unders1 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 5	vsRID	W 81-53	-18.5	W +9.5	139.5	U 134
Nov 10	vsME	W 72-60	-18.5	L −6.5	130.5	O 132
Nov 14	vsLEH	W 84-72	-18.5	L −6.5	136.5	O 156
Nov 18	vsAMER	W 80-71	-16.5	L −7.5	143.5	O 151
Nov 21	vsCCSU	L 54-67	-15.5	L −28.5	137.5	U 121
Nov 24	vsTENN	L 60-85	+14.5	L −10.5	141.5	O 145
Nov 25	vsND	L 63-68	+6.5	W +1.5	140.5	U 131
Nov 27	vsUNLV	W 80-65	+4.5	W +19.5	153.5	U 145
Dec 2	vsPUR	L 65-81	+13.5	L −2.5	146.5	U 146
Dec 6	@MICH	L 60-101	+25.5	L −15.5	153.5	O 161
Dec 13	@HALL	L 59-81	+13.5	L −8.5	136.5	O 140
Dec 20	vsPENN	W 70-69	-11.5	L −10.5	150.5	U 139
Dec 29	vsDSU	W 65-50	-20.5	L −5.5	135.5	U 115
Jan 2	vsOSU	L 73-80	+9.5	W +2.5	151.5	O 153
Jan 5	vsORE	W 88-85	+4.5	W +7.5	139.5	O 173
Jan 8	@ILL	L 55-81	+22.5	L −3.5	149.5	U 136
Jan 11	vsNU	W 77-75	+4.5	W +6.5	144.5	O 152
Jan 17	@WIS	L 87-96	+15.5	W +6.5	149.5	O 183
Jan 20	@IOWA	L 62-68	+17.5	W +11.5	140.5	U 130
Jan 23	vsIU	L 59-82	+7.5	L −15.5	147.5	U 141
Jan 27	vsMSU	L 79-88	+14.5	W +5.5	138.5	O 167
Jan 31	@USC	L 75-78	+11.5	W +8.5	146.5	O 153
Feb 3	@UCLA	L 66-98	+13.5	L −18.5	142.5	O 164
Feb 7	vsNEB	L 68-80	+12.5	W +0.5	145.5	O 148
Feb 15	vsMD	W 68-57	-2.5	W +8.5	144.5	U 125
Feb 18	@PSU	W 85-72	+4.5	W +17.5	148.5	O 157
Feb 21	@MINN	L 61-80	+8.5	L −10.5	136.5	O 141
Feb 24	vsWASH	L 72-79	+4.5	L −2.5	139.5	O 151
Mar 1	@MD	W 69-65	+4.5	W +8.5	143.5	U 134
Mar 5	@MSU	L 87-91	+20.5	W +16.5	141.5	O 178
Mar 8	vsPSU	W 74-62	-4.5	W +7.5	149.5	U 136
Mar 11	vsMINN	W 72-67	+6.5	W +11.5	135.5	O 139
Mar 12	vsUCLA	L 59-72	+10.5	L −2.5	141.5	U 131
Apr 2	vsCREI	L 69-82	+4.5	L −8.5	151.5	U 151

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

RID

W 81-53

+9.5

W 72-60

−6.5

LEH

W 84-72

−6.5

AMER

W 80-71

−7.5

CCSU

L 54-67

−28.5

TENN

L 60-85

−10.5

L 63-68

+1.5

UNLV

W 80-65

+19.5

PUR

L 65-81

−2.5

MICH

L 60-101

−15.5

HALL

L 59-81

−8.5

PENN

W 70-69

−10.5

DSU

W 65-50

−5.5

OSU

L 73-80

+2.5

ORE

W 88-85

+7.5

ILL

L 55-81

−3.5

W 77-75

+6.5

WIS

L 87-96

+6.5

IOWA

L 62-68

+11.5

L 59-82

−15.5

MSU

L 79-88

+5.5

USC

L 75-78

+8.5

UCLA

L 66-98

−18.5

NEB

L 68-80

+0.5

W 68-57

+8.5

PSU

W 85-72

+17.5

MINN

L 61-80

−10.5

WASH

L 72-79

−2.5

W 69-65

+8.5

MSU

L 87-91

+16.5

PSU

W 74-62

+7.5

MINN

W 72-67

+11.5

UCLA

L 59-72

−2.5

CREI

L 69-82

−8.5

covered 17didn’t cover 17avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

RID

W 81-53

−5.5

W 72-60

+1.5

LEH

W 84-72

+19.5

AMER

W 80-71

+7.5

CCSU

L 54-67

−16.5

TENN

L 60-85

+3.5

L 63-68

−9.5

UNLV

W 80-65

−8.5

PUR

L 65-81

−0.5

MICH

L 60-101

+7.5

HALL

L 59-81

+3.5

PENN

W 70-69

−11.5

DSU

W 65-50

−20.5

OSU

L 73-80

+1.5

ORE

W 88-85

+33.5

ILL

L 55-81

−13.5

W 77-75

+7.5

WIS

L 87-96

+33.5

IOWA

L 62-68

−10.5

L 59-82

−6.5

MSU

L 79-88

+28.5

USC

L 75-78

+6.5

UCLA

L 66-98

+21.5

NEB

L 68-80

+2.5

W 68-57

−19.5

PSU

W 85-72

+8.5

MINN

L 61-80

+4.5

WASH

L 72-79

+11.5

W 69-65

−9.5

MSU

L 87-91

+36.5

PSU

W 74-62

−13.5

MINN

W 72-67

+3.5

UCLA

L 59-72

−10.5

CREI

L 69-82

−0.5

over 19under 15avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Michigan has the better starters

Position by position: Michigan 2, Rutgers 0, even 3

MichiganBetterRutgers

G K. Noland TR17.7 pts · 3.5 reb · 3.6 ast Score 87

MICHSmall

G R. Jones TR15 pts · 4.5 reb · 2.8 ast Score 69

G E. Cadeau10.5 pts · 2.7 reb · 5.9 ast Score 87

Even

G D. Smith TR20.6 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.1 ast Score 88

G T. McKenney9.9 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.9 ast Score 88

Even

G T. Francis17 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.9 ast Score 99

G R. Gayle7.3 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.3 ast Score 76

Even

G J. Davis7.5 pts · 2.9 reb · 2.5 ast Score 72

C M. Thiam TR12.8 pts · 7.1 reb · 0.5 ast Score 92

MICHSmall

G D. Buchanan8.1 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.7 ast Score 68

MichiganBetterRutgers

MICH offense5th of 366 · +10.9

MICHSmall

RUTG defense65th of 366 · +1.0

MICH defense10th of 366 · +7.4

Even

RUTG offense58th of 366 · +2.7

Backcourt+7.0 · 4 players

RUTGSmall

Backcourt+9.4 · 5 players

Frontcourt+4.4 · 1 player

No call

FrontcourtNo numbers yet

Bench+5.5 · 4 players

MICHBig

Bench+0.3 · 5 players

Score, worst to bestMICH betterRUTG betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Michigan

Guards

K. Noland34 min · TRE. Cadeau27 minT. McKenney22 minR. Gayle21 minH. Eisley1 minR. LiburdNew

Forwards

J. Estrella18 min · TRJ. Reed18 min · TRO. Goodman5 minH. HochbergNewL. CosbyNewQ. CostelloNew

Centers

M. Thiam27 min · TRM. MollerNew

Rutgers

Guards

R. Jones37 min · TRD. Smith34 min · TRT. Francis28 minJ. Davis26 minD. Buchanan24 minL. Mark16 min

Forwards

W. SydnorNewM. MiteoNewM. TonejcNew

Centers

C. Gurdak17 min · TRD. Buca13 min · TRG. Ware6 min

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

MICH87.3 #4

RUTG70.5 #273

Points per possession

MICH1.21 #8

RUTG1.04 #261

Pace (possessions)

MICH71.7 #48

RUTG67.5 #254

Shooting

Effective FG%

MICH58.3 #8

RUTG47.2 #331

3-point %

MICH36.8 #33

RUTG32.4 #261

3-point attempt rate

MICH41.5 #141

RUTG34.2 #291

Free throw rate

MICH38.0 #102

RUTG36.3 #143

Possessions

Turnover rate

MICH16.3 #157

RUTG14.9 #61

Offensive rebound rate

MICH34.7 #55

RUTG29.7 #217

Assists per game

MICH18.6 #5

RUTG12.2 #274

Defense

Points allowed

MICH69.5 #55

RUTG75.3 #199

Points allowed per possession

MICH0.97 #8

RUTG1.12 #267

Opponent effective FG%

MICH44.6 #1

RUTG53.0 #268

Opponent 3-point %

MICH30.4 #18

RUTG35.6 #287

Turnovers forced

MICH15.2 #270

RUTG17.1 #141

Defensive rebound rate

MICH71.8 #70

RUTG67.2 #292

Steals per game

MICH5.6 #286

RUTG6.1 #226

Blocks per game

MICH6.0 #2

RUTG3.4 #166

MICH		RUTG
Scoring
87.3 #4	Points per game	70.5 #273
1.21 #8	Points per possession	1.04 #261
71.7 #48	Pace (possessions)	67.5 #254
Shooting
58.3 #8	Effective FG%	47.2 #331
36.8 #33	3-point %	32.4 #261
41.5 #141	3-point attempt rate	34.2 #291
38.0 #102	Free throw rate	36.3 #143
Possessions
16.3 #157	Turnover rate	14.9 #61
34.7 #55	Offensive rebound rate	29.7 #217
18.6 #5	Assists per game	12.2 #274
Defense
69.5 #55	Points allowed	75.3 #199
0.97 #8	Points allowed per possession	1.12 #267
44.6 #1	Opponent effective FG%	53.0 #268
30.4 #18	Opponent 3-point %	35.6 #287
15.2 #270	Turnovers forced	17.1 #141
71.8 #70	Defensive rebound rate	67.2 #292
5.6 #286	Steals per game	6.1 #226
6.0 #2	Blocks per game	3.4 #166

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Michigan

37-3 in 2025-26 overall · 21-2 in conference · Big Ten Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Wvs UConn69–63
Wvs Arizona91–73
Wvs Tennessee95–62
Wvs Alabama90–77
Wvs Saint Louis95–72

A week or more of rest.

Rutgers

14-20 in 2025-26 overall · 7-15 in conference · Big Ten Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Creighton69–82
Lvs UCLA59–72
Wvs Minnesota72–67
Wvs Penn State74–62
L@ Michigan St87–91

A week or more of rest.

Michigan Wolverines at Rutgers Scarlet Knights

What could decide it: MICH has more of the edges

Market

Model vs market

1st-half model

ATS

Totals

Last 10 games

Next 3 games

Recent meetings

ATS History · 2025-26

Michigan

Rutgers

Michigan has the better starters

Depth chart

Matchup stats

Michigan

Rutgers