Northwestern Wildcats at Michigan Wolverines: Model Line and Edge

Sat, Dec 12, 4:30 PM ETCrisler Center · at Michigan · Conference game

#8MICHMichigan AP #16

LineNo line yet

Total—

Season records: Northwestern and Michigan
NU	This season	MICH
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects MICH 86–67 · win probability MICH 94%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Winner

Line

—

no line yet

Total

—

model 152.9

Model edge

—

No market line yet

Public

—

No split yet for this game

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: MICH has more of the edges

NU 1, MICH 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

MICHBig

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: NU 28.1%, MICH 34.7%. Defensive: NU 65.3%, MICH 71.8%

MICHBig

Three-pointers

NU hits 33.0% and allows 33.4%; MICH hits 36.8% and allows 30.4%. Threes are 34.0% and 41.5% of their shots

MICHBig

Shooting

Effective FG%: NU 51.7 and allows 51.0; MICH 58.3 and allows 44.6

NUBig

Turnovers

Turnover rate: NU 13.1%, MICH 16.3%. Forced: NU 17.5%, MICH 15.2%

Context

Tempo

About 69 possessions: NU plays 65.5 a game (328th fastest), MICH 71.7 (48th). Faster games mean more points

MICHBig

Free throws

Free throw rate: NU 33.9, MICH 38.0. Allowed: NU 34.8, MICH 26.0

MICHSmall

NU offense vs MICH defense

Offense 67th of 366 against a defense 10th, on the model’s ratings

MICHSmall

Home court

MICH at home. This season: MICH 0-0 at home, NU 0-0 away

Even

MICH offense vs NU defense

Offense 5th of 366 against a defense 42nd, on the model’s ratings

Context

Schedule so far

NU has played the 36th-hardest schedule, MICH the 3rd. A record against a soft schedule means less

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: NU 24%, MICH 38%. Transfers in: NU 8, MICH 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	—	MICH -18.1	—
Total	—	152.9	—
Projected score	—	NU 67.4 · MICH 85.5

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	MICH -10.6	—
1H total	71.5	—
1H projected score	NU 30.4 · MICH 41	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
NU WWWWW	18-16	53%	6-5	—
MICH WWWWL	19-21	48%	8-7	—

Venue/role: NU away; MICH home. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
NU UUUUO	15-19	44%	15-19
MICH OUOOU	17-23	43%	37-3

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
NU	5-5 50%	7-3 70%	3-7 30%
MICH	9-1 90%	4-6 40%	6-4 60%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Northwestern

No more games listed yet.

Michigan

No more games listed yet.

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22

NU 1–5 MICHMICH leads · 6 games since 2021-22 · MICH has won the last 2 meetings · NU 4-2 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Feb 11, 2025-26	MICH 87 @ NU 75	NU +15.5	NU W
Jan 19, 2024-25	NU 76 @ MICH 80	MICH -9.5	NU W
Feb 22, 2023-24	MICH 62 @ NU 76	NU -12.5	NU W
Feb 2, 2022-23	MICH 68 @ NU 51	NU -4.5	MICH W
Jan 15, 2022-23	NU 78 @ MICH 85	MICH -4.5	MICH W

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Northwestern

34 games played

Straight up

15-19

44% wins

Against the spread

18-16

53% covers · avg +0.8 pts vs the line

Over / Under

15-19

44% overs · avg −1.2 pts vs the total

Straight up

15-1944%

W W W W L W L L L W W L W L L L L L W L W L L L L L W W W L L W W L

2 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

18-1653%

L W W L L L L L L W W W W L W L L L W W W L L W W L L W L W W W W W

5 straight covers4 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

15-1944%

U U O O O O O O O U O U U O U O U U U U O U U O O U O U U U U U U O

1 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsMERC	W 70-47	-26.5	L −3.5	140.5	U 117
Nov 7	vsBU	W 76-52	-17.5	W +6.5	136.5	U 128
Nov 10	vsCLE	W 110-63	-23.5	W +23.5	151.5	O 173
Nov 14	@DEP	W 81-79	-5.5	L −3.5	145.5	O 160
Nov 21	vsUVA	L 78-83	+4.5	L −0.5	149.5	O 161
Nov 23	vsSC	W 79-77	-4.5	L −2.5	146.5	O 156
Nov 27	vsOKST	L 81-86	-2.5	L −7.5	159.5	O 167
Dec 3	@WIS	L 73-85	+10.5	L −1.5	155.5	O 158
Dec 6	vsOSU	L 82-86	+1.5	L −2.5	155.5	O 168
Dec 13	vsJKST	W 93-53	-30.5	W +9.5	146.5	U 146
Dec 16	vsVAL	W 86-70	-14.5	W +1.5	145.5	O 156
Dec 20	vsBTLR	L 58-61	+3.5	W +0.5	154.5	U 119
Dec 30	vsHOW	W 80-60	-19.5	W +0.5	148.5	U 140
Jan 3	vsMINN	L 78-84	-4.5	L −10.5	138.5	O 162
Jan 8	@MSU	L 66-76	+13.5	W +3.5	143.5	U 142
Jan 11	@RUTG	L 75-77	-4.5	L −6.5	144.5	O 152
Jan 14	vsILL	L 68-79	+9.5	L −1.5	151.5	U 147
Jan 17	vsNEB	L 58-77	+4.5	L −14.5	149.5	U 135
Jan 21	@USC	W 74-68	+6.5	W +12.5	149.5	U 142
Jan 24	@UCLA	L 64-71	+7.5	W +0.5	143.5	U 135
Jan 29	vsPSU	W 94-73	-7.5	W +13.5	148.5	O 167
Jan 31	vsWASH	L 62-76	-1.5	L −15.5	146.5	U 138
Feb 4	@ILL	L 44-84	+16.5	L −23.5	149.5	U 128
Feb 8	@IOWA	L 70-76	+10.5	W +4.5	139.5	O 146
Feb 11	vsMICH	L 75-87	+15.5	W +3.5	153.5	O 162
Feb 14	@NEB	L 49-68	+13.5	L −5.5	146.5	U 117
Feb 18	vsMD	W 78-74	-7.5	L −3.5	142.5	O 152
Feb 24	@IU	W 72-68	+9.5	W +13.5	145.5	U 140
Feb 28	vsORE	W 63-62	-3.5	L −2.5	141.5	U 125
Mar 4	vsPUR	L 66-70	+12.5	W +8.5	145.5	U 136
Mar 7	@MINN	L 66-67	+4.5	W +3.5	133.5	U 133
Mar 10	vsPSU	W 76-66	-4.5	W +5.5	143.5	U 142
Mar 11	vsIU	W 74-61	+6.5	W +19.5	142.5	U 135
Mar 12	vsPUR	L 68-81	+13.5	W +0.5	139.5	O 149

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

MERC

W 70-47

−3.5

W 76-52

+6.5

CLE

W 110-63

+23.5

DEP

W 81-79

−3.5

UVA

L 78-83

−0.5

W 79-77

−2.5

OKST

L 81-86

−7.5

WIS

L 73-85

−1.5

OSU

L 82-86

−2.5

JKST

W 93-53

+9.5

VAL

W 86-70

+1.5

BTLR

L 58-61

+0.5

HOW

W 80-60

+0.5

MINN

L 78-84

−10.5

MSU

L 66-76

+3.5

RUTG

L 75-77

−6.5

ILL

L 68-79

−1.5

NEB

L 58-77

−14.5

USC

W 74-68

+12.5

UCLA

L 64-71

+0.5

PSU

W 94-73

+13.5

WASH

L 62-76

−15.5

ILL

L 44-84

−23.5

IOWA

L 70-76

+4.5

MICH

L 75-87

+3.5

NEB

L 49-68

−5.5

W 78-74

−3.5

W 72-68

+13.5

ORE

W 63-62

−2.5

PUR

L 66-70

+8.5

MINN

L 66-67

+3.5

PSU

W 76-66

+5.5

W 74-61

+19.5

PUR

L 68-81

+0.5

covered 18didn’t cover 16avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

MERC

W 70-47

−23.5

W 76-52

−8.5

CLE

W 110-63

+21.5

DEP

W 81-79

+14.5

UVA

L 78-83

+11.5

W 79-77

+9.5

OKST

L 81-86

+7.5

WIS

L 73-85

+2.5

OSU

L 82-86

+12.5

JKST

W 93-53

−0.5

VAL

W 86-70

+10.5

BTLR

L 58-61

−35.5

HOW

W 80-60

−8.5

MINN

L 78-84

+23.5

MSU

L 66-76

−1.5

RUTG

L 75-77

+7.5

ILL

L 68-79

−4.5

NEB

L 58-77

−14.5

USC

W 74-68

−7.5

UCLA

L 64-71

−8.5

PSU

W 94-73

+18.5

WASH

L 62-76

−8.5

ILL

L 44-84

−21.5

IOWA

L 70-76

+6.5

MICH

L 75-87

+8.5

NEB

L 49-68

−29.5

W 78-74

+9.5

W 72-68

−5.5

ORE

W 63-62

−16.5

PUR

L 66-70

−9.5

MINN

L 66-67

−0.5

PSU

W 76-66

−1.5

W 74-61

−7.5

PUR

L 68-81

+9.5

over 15under 19avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin

Michigan

40 games played

Straight up

37-3

93% wins

Against the spread

19-21

48% covers · avg +3.7 pts vs the line

Over / Under

17-23

43% overs · avg −1.6 pts vs the total

Straight up

37-393%

W W W W W W W W W W W W W W L W W W W W W W W W W W L W W W W W W L W W W W W W

6 straight wins4 of last 4 won

Against the spread

19-2148%

W L L L W W W W W L W W W L L L L L L L W W W L W W L L W L L L L L L W W W W L

3 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

17-2343%

O O U U U O U O U O U O U U O U U U U U O O U O U O U U U U O U U O O O U O O U

2 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsOAK	W 121-78	-24.5	W +18.5	156.5	O 199
Nov 11	vsWAKE	W 85-84	-15.5	L −14.5	168.5	O 169
Nov 14	@TCU	W 67-63	-7.5	L −3.5	164.5	U 130
Nov 19	vsMTSU	W 86-61	-27.5	L −2.5	159.5	U 147
Nov 24	vsSDSU	W 94-54	-6.5	W +33.5	148.5	U 148
Nov 25	vsAUB	W 102-72	-4.5	W +25.5	163.5	O 174
Nov 26	vsGONZ	W 101-61	+3.5	W +43.5	165.5	U 162
Dec 6	vsRUTG	W 101-60	-25.5	W +15.5	153.5	O 161
Dec 9	vsVILL	W 89-61	-17.5	W +10.5	156.5	U 150
Dec 13	@MD	W 101-83	-19.5	L −1.5	163.5	O 184
Dec 21	vsLAS	W 102-50	-40.5	W +11.5	155.5	U 152
Dec 29	vsMCN	W 112-71	-24.5	W +16.5	161.5	O 183
Jan 2	vsUSC	W 96-66	-22.5	W +7.5	173.5	U 162
Jan 6	@PSU	W 74-72	-24.5	L −22.5	169.5	U 146
Jan 10	vsWIS	L 88-91	-19.5	L −22.5	169.5	O 179
Jan 14	@WASH	W 82-72	-12.5	L −2.5	165.5	U 154
Jan 17	@ORE	W 81-71	-18.5	L −8.5	157.5	U 152
Jan 20	vsIU	W 86-72	-15.5	L −1.5	163.5	U 158
Jan 23	vsOSU	W 74-62	-16.5	L −4.5	165.5	U 136
Jan 27	vsNEB	W 75-72	-11.5	L −8.5	157.5	U 147
Jan 30	@MSU	W 83-71	-2.5	W +9.5	149.5	O 154
Feb 5	vsPSU	W 110-69	-26.5	W +14.5	161.5	O 179
Feb 8	@OSU	W 82-61	-8.5	W +12.5	161.5	U 143
Feb 11	@NU	W 87-75	-15.5	L −3.5	153.5	O 162
Feb 14	vsUCLA	W 86-56	-15.5	W +14.5	156.5	U 142
Feb 17	@PUR	W 91-80	-2.5	W +8.5	156.5	O 171
Feb 21	vsDUKE	L 63-68	-3.5	L −8.5	151.5	U 131
Feb 24	vsMINN	W 77-67	-22.5	L −12.5	145.5	U 144
Feb 27	@ILL	W 84-70	-1.5	W +12.5	159.5	U 154
Mar 5	@IOWA	W 71-68	-9.5	L −6.5	146.5	U 139
Mar 8	vsMSU	W 90-80	-10.5	L −0.5	152.5	O 170
Mar 13	vsOSU	W 71-67	-12.5	L −8.5	155.5	U 138
Mar 14	vsWIS	W 68-65	-12.5	L −9.5	161.5	U 133
Mar 15	vsPUR	L 72-80	-4.5	L −12.5	149.5	O 152
Mar 19	vsHOW	W 101-80	-30.5	L −9.5	151.5	O 181
Mar 21	vsSLU	W 95-72	-12.5	W +10.5	161.5	O 167
Mar 27	vsALA	W 90-77	-9.5	W +3.5	172.5	U 167
Mar 29	vsTENN	W 95-62	-8.5	W +24.5	146.5	O 157
Apr 4	vsARIZ	W 91-73	+1.5	W +19.5	157.5	O 164
Apr 6	vsCONN	W 69-63	-6.5	L −0.5	146.5	U 132

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

OAK

W 121-78

+18.5

WAKE

W 85-84

−14.5

TCU

W 67-63

−3.5

MTSU

W 86-61

−2.5

SDSU

W 94-54

+33.5

AUB

W 102-72

+25.5

GONZ

W 101-61

+43.5

RUTG

W 101-60

+15.5

VILL

W 89-61

+10.5

W 101-83

−1.5

LAS

W 102-50

+11.5

MCN

W 112-71

+16.5

USC

W 96-66

+7.5

PSU

W 74-72

−22.5

WIS

L 88-91

−22.5

WASH

W 82-72

−2.5

ORE

W 81-71

−8.5

W 86-72

−1.5

OSU

W 74-62

−4.5

NEB

W 75-72

−8.5

MSU

W 83-71

+9.5

PSU

W 110-69

+14.5

OSU

W 82-61

+12.5

W 87-75

−3.5

UCLA

W 86-56

+14.5

PUR

W 91-80

+8.5

DUKE

L 63-68

−8.5

MINN

W 77-67

−12.5

ILL

W 84-70

+12.5

IOWA

W 71-68

−6.5

MSU

W 90-80

−0.5

OSU

W 71-67

−8.5

WIS

W 68-65

−9.5

PUR

L 72-80

−12.5

HOW

W 101-80

−9.5

SLU

W 95-72

+10.5

ALA

W 90-77

+3.5

TENN

W 95-62

+24.5

ARIZ

W 91-73

+19.5

CONN

W 69-63

−0.5

covered 19didn’t cover 21avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

OAK

W 121-78

+42.5

WAKE

W 85-84

+0.5

TCU

W 67-63

−34.5

MTSU

W 86-61

−12.5

SDSU

W 94-54

−0.5

AUB

W 102-72

+10.5

GONZ

W 101-61

−3.5

RUTG

W 101-60

+7.5

VILL

W 89-61

−6.5

W 101-83

+20.5

LAS

W 102-50

−3.5

MCN

W 112-71

+21.5

USC

W 96-66

−11.5

PSU

W 74-72

−23.5

WIS

L 88-91

+9.5

WASH

W 82-72

−11.5

ORE

W 81-71

−5.5

W 86-72

−5.5

OSU

W 74-62

−29.5

NEB

W 75-72

−10.5

MSU

W 83-71

+4.5

PSU

W 110-69

+17.5

OSU

W 82-61

−18.5

W 87-75

+8.5

UCLA

W 86-56

−14.5

PUR

W 91-80

+14.5

DUKE

L 63-68

−20.5

MINN

W 77-67

−1.5

ILL

W 84-70

−5.5

IOWA

W 71-68

−7.5

MSU

W 90-80

+17.5

OSU

W 71-67

−17.5

WIS

W 68-65

−28.5

PUR

L 72-80

+2.5

HOW

W 101-80

+29.5

SLU

W 95-72

+5.5

ALA

W 90-77

−5.5

TENN

W 95-62

+10.5

ARIZ

W 91-73

+6.5

CONN

W 69-63

−14.5

over 17under 23avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Michigan has the better starters

Position by position: Northwestern 0, Michigan 2, even 3

NorthwesternBetterMichigan

G L. Pratt TR17 pts · 1.7 reb · 3.3 ast Not ranked

No call

G K. Noland TR17.7 pts · 3.5 reb · 3.6 ast Score 87

F J. Karasinski TR21.7 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.2 ast Score 97

Even

G E. Cadeau10.5 pts · 2.7 reb · 5.9 ast Score 87

F C. Smith TR11.9 pts · 4.2 reb · 1.5 ast Score 48

MICHBig

G T. McKenney9.9 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.9 ast Score 88

F L. McEldon TR11.7 pts · 6.2 reb · 1.3 ast Score 82

Even

G R. Gayle7.3 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.3 ast Score 76

F O. Federiko TR8.3 pts · 4.8 reb · 1.4 ast Score 61

MICHSmall

C M. Thiam TR12.8 pts · 7.1 reb · 0.5 ast Score 92

NorthwesternBetterMichigan

NU offense67th of 366 · +1.8

MICHSmall

MICH defense10th of 366 · +7.4

NU defense42nd of 366 · +2.7

Even

MICH offense5th of 366 · +10.9

Backcourt+0.9 · 1 player

MICHBig

Backcourt+7.0 · 4 players

Frontcourt+7.1 · 4 players

NUSmall

Frontcourt+4.4 · 1 player

Bench-2.1 · 5 players

MICHBig

Bench+5.5 · 4 players

Score, worst to bestNU betterMICH betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Northwestern

Guards

L. Pratt33 min · TRA. Ciaravino22 minJ. West22 minA. Kostic12 min · TRD. Williams9 min · TRP. Gill4 min

Forwards

J. Karasinski30 min · TRC. Smith30 min · TRL. McEldon26 min · TRO. Federiko23 min · TRR. Soulis20 min · TRE. EschmeyerNew

Centers

S. GhaiNew

Michigan

Guards

K. Noland34 min · TRE. Cadeau27 minT. McKenney22 minR. Gayle21 minH. Eisley1 minR. LiburdNew

Forwards

J. Estrella18 min · TRJ. Reed18 min · TRO. Goodman5 minH. HochbergNewL. CosbyNewQ. CostelloNew

Centers

M. Thiam27 min · TRM. MollerNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

NU73.2 #220

MICH87.3 #4

Points per possession

NU1.12 #100

MICH1.21 #8

Pace (possessions)

NU65.5 #328

MICH71.7 #48

Shooting

Effective FG%

NU51.7 #159

MICH58.3 #8

3-point %

NU33.0 #232

MICH36.8 #33

3-point attempt rate

NU34.0 #296

MICH41.5 #141

Free throw rate

NU33.9 #213

MICH38.0 #102

Possessions

Turnover rate

NU13.1 #6

MICH16.3 #157

Offensive rebound rate

NU28.1 #260

MICH34.7 #55

Assists per game

NU17.2 #18

MICH18.6 #5

Defense

Points allowed

NU72.0 #106

MICH69.5 #55

Points allowed per possession

NU1.09 #210

MICH0.97 #8

Opponent effective FG%

NU51.0 #157

MICH44.6 #1

Opponent 3-point %

NU33.4 #145

MICH30.4 #18

Turnovers forced

NU17.5 #120

MICH15.2 #270

Defensive rebound rate

NU65.3 #332

MICH71.8 #70

Steals per game

NU5.8 #256

MICH5.6 #286

Blocks per game

NU3.6 #131

MICH6.0 #2

NU		MICH
Scoring
73.2 #220	Points per game	87.3 #4
1.12 #100	Points per possession	1.21 #8
65.5 #328	Pace (possessions)	71.7 #48
Shooting
51.7 #159	Effective FG%	58.3 #8
33.0 #232	3-point %	36.8 #33
34.0 #296	3-point attempt rate	41.5 #141
33.9 #213	Free throw rate	38.0 #102
Possessions
13.1 #6	Turnover rate	16.3 #157
28.1 #260	Offensive rebound rate	34.7 #55
17.2 #18	Assists per game	18.6 #5
Defense
72.0 #106	Points allowed	69.5 #55
1.09 #210	Points allowed per possession	0.97 #8
51.0 #157	Opponent effective FG%	44.6 #1
33.4 #145	Opponent 3-point %	30.4 #18
17.5 #120	Turnovers forced	15.2 #270
65.3 #332	Defensive rebound rate	71.8 #70
5.8 #256	Steals per game	5.6 #286
3.6 #131	Blocks per game	6.0 #2

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Northwestern

15-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-16 in conference · Big Ten Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Purdue68–81
Wvs Indiana74–61
Wvs Penn State76–66
L@ Minnesota66–67
Lvs Purdue66–70

A week or more of rest.

Michigan

37-3 in 2025-26 overall · 21-2 in conference · Big Ten Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Wvs UConn69–63
Wvs Arizona91–73
Wvs Tennessee95–62
Wvs Alabama90–77
Wvs Saint Louis95–72

A week or more of rest.

Northwestern Wildcats at Michigan Wolverines

What could decide it: MICH has more of the edges

Market

Model vs market

1st-half model

ATS

Totals

Last 10 games

Next 3 games

Recent meetings

ATS History · 2025-26

Northwestern

Michigan

Michigan has the better starters

Depth chart

Matchup stats

Northwestern

Michigan