Marriott Center · at BYU
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BYU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BYU 93–65 · win probability BYU 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 157.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BYU has more of the edges
CSUF 1, BYU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
BYU offense vs CSUF defense
Offense 24th of 366 against a defense 344th, on the model’s ratings
CSUF offense vs BYU defense
Offense 272nd of 366 against a defense 33rd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
CSUF has played the 164th-hardest schedule, BYU the 14th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: CSUF 51.4 and allows 54.3; BYU 54.4 and allows 51.2
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CSUF 24.6%, BYU 34.3%. Defensive: CSUF 71.7%, BYU 70.3%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CSUF 15.3%, BYU 15.2%. Forced: CSUF 19.4%, BYU 16.4%
Home court
BYU at home. This season: BYU 0-0 at home, CSUF 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 73 possessions: CSUF plays 75.5 a game (3rd fastest), BYU 70.6 (90th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
CSUF hits 34.2% and allows 34.0%; BYU hits 34.5% and allows 35.3%. Threes are 43.1% and 39.8% of their shots
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: CSUF 37.8, BYU 34.4. Allowed: CSUF 35.3, BYU 28.9
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CSUF 39%, BYU 35%. Transfers in: CSUF 1, BYU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | BYU -28.7 | — |
| Total | — | 157.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | CSUF 64.6 · BYU 93.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BYU -16.9 | — |
| 1H total | 73.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | CSUF 28.4 · BYU 45.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
| Date | Game | Last meeting |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 15 | vs WEB | W63–57LU |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Fullerton
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
19-12
61% covers · avg +2.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-18
42% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 82-92 | +15.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 65-93 | +22.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 73-85 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 85-103 | +6.5 | L −11.5 | 164.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 88-80 | +11.5 | W +19.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 93-97 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | O 190 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 83-69 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 4 | vs | L 91-94 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 177.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 59-69 | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 105-86 | +3.5 | W +22.5 | 165.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 89-94 | +19.5 | W +14.5 | 176.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 63-110 | +21.5 | L −25.5 | 170.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 95-84 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 64-86 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 160.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 88-71 | +13.5 | W +30.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 86-79 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 173.5 | U 165 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 69-74 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 166.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 72-81 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 71-61 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 160.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 93-78 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 173.5 | U 171 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 69-83 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 78-72 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-66 | -9.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 86-82 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 65-86 | +7.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 93-92 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 88-80 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 85-87 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 75-71 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 90-77 | +5.5 | W +18.5 | 170.5 | U 167 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 82-70 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 63-78 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
WYO
L 82-92
+5.5
10
@
CAL
L 65-93
−5.5
15
vs
PAC
L 73-85
−5.5
21
@
PORT
L 85-103
−11.5
22
vs
STMN
W 88-80
+19.5
23
vs
UNCO
L 93-97
+4.5
29
vs
PEPP
W 83-69
+12.5
4
vs
CP
L 91-94
−4.5
13
@
DEN
W 105-86
+22.5
21
@
OKST
L 89-94
+14.5
28
@
SMU
L 63-110
−25.5
1
vs
UCSB
W 95-84
+14.5
3
vs
UCI
L 64-86
−18.5
8
@
UCSD
W 88-71
+30.5
10
vs
CSUN
W 86-79
+5.5
15
@
UCD
L 69-74
−1.5
17
@
UCR
L 72-81
−12.5
22
vs
LBSU
W 71-61
+6.5
24
@
CP
W 93-78
+13.5
31
@
UCSB
L 69-83
−5.5
5
vs
UCR
W 78-72
+0.5
7
vs
CSUB
W 82-66
+6.5
12
@
LBSU
W 86-82
+6.5
14
@
UCI
L 65-86
−13.5
19
vs
UCD
W 93-92
−0.5
21
@
CSUB
W 88-80
+2.5
28
vs
HAW
L 85-87
+1.5
5
vs
UCSD
W 75-71
+6.5
7
@
CSUN
W 90-77
+18.5
12
vs
UCD
W 82-70
+10.5
13
vs
HAW
L 63-78
−9.5
covered 19didn’t cover 12avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
WYO
L 82-92
+19.5
10
@
CAL
L 65-93
−4.5
15
vs
PAC
L 73-85
−1.5
21
@
PORT
L 85-103
+23.5
22
vs
STMN
W 88-80
+5.5
23
vs
UNCO
L 93-97
+25.5
29
vs
PEPP
W 83-69
−9.5
4
vs
CP
L 91-94
+7.5
13
@
DEN
W 105-86
+25.5
21
@
OKST
L 89-94
+6.5
28
@
SMU
L 63-110
+2.5
1
vs
UCSB
W 95-84
+23.5
3
vs
UCI
L 64-86
−10.5
8
@
UCSD
W 88-71
−7.5
10
vs
CSUN
W 86-79
−8.5
15
@
UCD
L 69-74
−23.5
17
@
UCR
L 72-81
−4.5
22
vs
LBSU
W 71-61
−28.5
24
@
CP
W 93-78
−2.5
31
@
UCSB
L 69-83
−1.5
5
vs
UCR
W 78-72
−6.5
7
vs
CSUB
W 82-66
−9.5
12
@
LBSU
W 86-82
+11.5
14
@
UCI
L 65-86
−3.5
19
vs
UCD
W 93-92
+28.5
21
@
CSUB
W 88-80
+7.5
28
vs
HAW
L 85-87
+13.5
5
vs
UCSD
W 75-71
−10.5
7
@
CSUN
W 90-77
−3.5
12
vs
UCD
W 82-70
−3.5
13
vs
HAW
L 63-78
−16.5
over 13under 18avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
BYU
35 games played
Straight up
23-12
66% wins
Against the spread
16-19
46% covers · avg −1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-17
51% overs · avg −0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 71-66 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 98-53 | -38.5 | W +6.5 | 165.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 85-68 | -35.5 | L −18.5 | 164.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 84-86 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 98-70 | -4.5 | W +23.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 72-62 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 83-79 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 91-60 | -18.5 | W +12.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 67-64 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 100-53 | -33.5 | W +13.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 93-57 | -23.5 | W +12.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 85-67 | -33.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 109-81 | -34.5 | L −6.5 | 168.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 83-73 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 174.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 104-76 | -17.5 | W +10.5 | 168.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 89-84 | -14.5 | L −9.5 | 168.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 76-70 | -13.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 71-84 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 165.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 91-78 | -19.5 | L −6.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 26 | vs | L 83-86 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 166.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 82-90 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 92-99 | -8.5 | L −15.5 | 167.5 | O 191 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 66-77 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 99-94 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 90-86 | -15.5 | L −11.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 68-75 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 79-69 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 84-97 | -14.5 | L −27.5 | 162.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 71-79 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 68-90 | +1.5 | L −20.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 82-76 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | U 158 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 105-91 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 168.5 | O 196 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 68-48 | -3.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 66-73 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 71-79 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
VILL
W 71-66
−4.5
8
vs
HC
W 98-53
+6.5
11
vs
DEL
W 85-68
−18.5
15
vs
CONN
L 84-86
+4.5
21
vs
WIS
W 98-70
+23.5
27
vs
MIA
W 72-62
+2.5
28
vs
DAY
W 83-79
−5.5
3
vs
CBU
W 91-60
+12.5
9
vs
CLEM
W 67-64
−1.5
13
vs
UCR
W 100-53
+13.5
16
vs
PAC
W 93-57
+12.5
19
vs
ACU
W 85-67
−15.5
22
vs
EWU
W 109-81
−6.5
3
@
KSU
W 83-73
+2.5
7
vs
ASU
W 104-76
+10.5
10
@
UTAH
W 89-84
−9.5
14
vs
TCU
W 76-70
−7.5
17
@
TTU
L 71-84
−10.5
24
vs
UTAH
W 91-78
−6.5
26
vs
ARIZ
L 83-86
−1.5
31
@
KU
L 82-90
−5.5
4
@
OKST
L 92-99
−15.5
7
vs
HOU
L 66-77
−9.5
10
@
BAY
W 99-94
+1.5
14
vs
COLO
W 90-86
−11.5
18
@
ARIZ
L 68-75
+4.5
21
vs
ISU
W 79-69
+12.5
24
vs
UCF
L 84-97
−27.5
28
@
WVU
L 71-79
−10.5
3
@
CIN
L 68-90
−20.5
7
vs
TTU
W 82-76
+3.5
10
vs
KSU
W 105-91
+2.5
11
vs
WVU
W 68-48
+16.5
12
vs
HOU
L 66-73
+2.5
19
vs
TEX
L 71-79
−10.5
covered 16didn’t cover 19avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
VILL
W 71-66
−16.5
8
vs
HC
W 98-53
−14.5
11
vs
DEL
W 85-68
−11.5
15
vs
CONN
L 84-86
+13.5
21
vs
WIS
W 98-70
+2.5
27
vs
MIA
W 72-62
−31.5
28
vs
DAY
W 83-79
+11.5
3
vs
CBU
W 91-60
−2.5
9
vs
CLEM
W 67-64
−21.5
13
vs
UCR
W 100-53
−2.5
16
vs
PAC
W 93-57
+0.5
19
vs
ACU
W 85-67
+5.5
22
vs
EWU
W 109-81
+21.5
3
@
KSU
W 83-73
−18.5
7
vs
ASU
W 104-76
+11.5
10
@
UTAH
W 89-84
+4.5
14
vs
TCU
W 76-70
−16.5
17
@
TTU
L 71-84
−10.5
24
vs
UTAH
W 91-78
+0.5
26
vs
ARIZ
L 83-86
+2.5
31
@
KU
L 82-90
+12.5
4
@
OKST
L 92-99
+23.5
7
vs
HOU
L 66-77
−8.5
10
@
BAY
W 99-94
+34.5
14
vs
COLO
W 90-86
+14.5
18
@
ARIZ
L 68-75
−22.5
21
vs
ISU
W 79-69
−6.5
24
vs
UCF
L 84-97
+18.5
28
@
WVU
L 71-79
+8.5
3
@
CIN
L 68-90
+6.5
7
vs
TTU
W 82-76
−1.5
10
vs
KSU
W 105-91
+27.5
11
vs
WVU
W 68-48
−25.5
12
vs
HOU
L 66-73
−7.5
19
vs
TEX
L 71-79
−6.5
over 18under 17avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
BYU has the better starters
Position by position: Fullerton 0, BYU 3, even 2
FullertonBetterBYU
G C. Williams9.4 pts · 3.5 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 39
→BYUBig
G R. Wright18.1 pts · 3.5 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 97
G B. Nunn5 pts · 2 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 13
→BYUBig
G C. Chandler TR9.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 84
G D. White2.8 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 0
→BYUBig
F J. Kohler TR12.5 pts · 8.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 96
G T. Jenkins TR0 pts · 0 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F J. Wahlin TR5.3 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 44
F K. De Luna4.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 7
=No call
F D. Baker7.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
FullertonBetterBYU
CSUF offense272nd of 366 · -8.3
→BYUBig
BYU defense33rd of 366 · +3.5
CSUF defense344th of 366 · -9.2
→BYUBig
BYU offense24th of 366 · +7.2
Backcourt-6.1 · 4 players
→BYUBig
Backcourt+6.9 · 2 players
Frontcourt-2.1 · 1 player
→BYUBig
Frontcourt+4.5 · 3 players
Bench-0.1 · 1 player
=Even
Bench-0.8 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestCSUF betterBYU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Williams27 minB. Nunn19 minD. White13 minT. Jenkins3 min · TRM. Quinlan2 minD. McConnellNew
Forwards
K. De Luna18 minR. ReynoldsNew
Guards
R. Wright35 minC. Chandler27 min · TRN. PickensNew
Forwards
J. Kohler28 min · TRJ. Wahlin21 min · TRD. Baker20 minT. Betsey18 min · TRK. Mboup16 minB. KozlowskiNew
Centers
A. Stewart1 min · TRP. OstojicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.3 #60 | Points per game | 83.5 #22 |
| 1.07 #208 | Points per possession | 1.18 #32 |
| 75.5 #3 | Pace (possessions) | 70.6 #90 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.4 #180 | Effective FG% | 54.4 #54 |
| 34.2 #162 | 3-point % | 34.5 #145 |
| 43.1 #108 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.8 #177 |
| 37.8 #107 | Free throw rate | 34.4 #198 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.3 #82 | Turnover rate | 15.2 #78 |
| 24.6 #345 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.3 #61 |
| 15.0 #85 | Assists per game | 13.3 #192 |
| Defense | ||
| 82.2 #342 | Points allowed | 75.4 #202 |
| 1.08 #181 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #133 |
| 54.3 #307 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.2 #174 |
| 34.0 #185 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.3 #269 |
| 19.4 #34 | Turnovers forced | 16.4 #194 |
| 71.7 #80 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.3 #145 |
| 7.9 #45 | Steals per game | 7.2 #109 |
| 2.8 #258 | Blocks per game | 4.4 #40 |
Fullerton
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Hawai'i63–78
- Wvs UC Davis82–70
- W@ CSU Northridge90–77
- Wvs UC San Diego75–71
- Lvs Hawai'i85–87
A week or more of rest.
BYU
23-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas71–79
- Lvs Houston66–73
- Wvs West Virginia68–48
- Wvs Kansas St105–91
- Wvs Texas Tech82–76
A week or more of rest.