Save Mart Center · at Fresno St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FRES | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FRES 76–71 · win probability FRES 64%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
SF 2, FRES 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SF 31.4%, FRES 27.9%. Defensive: SF 71.0%, FRES 69.4%
Free throws
Free throw rate: SF 40.1, FRES 33.8. Allowed: SF 29.6, FRES 28.6
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: SF plays 67.3 a game (271st fastest), FRES 69.3 (156th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
FRES at home. This season: FRES 0-0 at home, SF 0-0 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SF 15.9%, FRES 18.1%. Forced: SF 14.1%, FRES 18.2%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: SF 51.3 and allows 50.8; FRES 50.6 and allows 51.5
Even
SF offense vs FRES defense
Offense 178th of 366 against a defense 190th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
SF hits 34.6% and allows 34.1%; FRES hits 32.1% and allows 30.7%. Threes are 46.1% and 40.9% of their shots
Even
FRES offense vs SF defense
Offense 176th of 366 against a defense 165th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SF 3%, FRES 0%. Transfers in: SF 3, FRES 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
SF has played the 98th-hardest schedule, FRES the 103rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | FRES -4.1 | — |
| Total | — | 147.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | SF 71.4 · FRES 75.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | FRES -2.3 | — |
| 1H total | 68.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | SF 33.2 · FRES 35.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | |
| 2-8 20% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SF 3–0 FRESSF leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · SF has won the last 3 meetings · SF 2-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2023-24 | FRES 57 @ SF 77 | SF -11.5 | SF W |
| Nov 16, 2022-23 | SF 67 @ FRES 60 | FRES -0.5 | SF W |
| Dec 8, 2021-22 | FRES 63 @ SF 71 | SF -8.5 | FRES W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
San Francisco
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg −2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 70-76 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 80-70 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-64 | -9.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 84-64 | -16.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 77-65 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 69-79 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 65-81 | -5.5 | L −21.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 63-65 | -16.5 | L −18.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 65-62 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 75-85 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 85-71 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 94-64 | -25.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 67-59 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 62-70 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 74-64 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 73-68 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 82-84 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 80-60 | -7.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 68-82 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 85-80 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 66-68 | +15.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 73-88 | +9.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 87-82 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 75-84 | -8.5 | L −17.5 | 145.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 54-79 | +11.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 63-90 | -8.5 | L −35.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 92-79 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 59-80 | +15.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 73-94 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 72-61 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 82-65 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 77-78 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
MEM
L 70-76
−3.5
12
vs
PRST
W 80-70
−3.5
15
vs
BRAD
W 75-64
+1.5
18
vs
NWST
W 84-64
+3.5
22
vs
MINN
W 77-65
+13.5
27
vs
COLO
L 69-79
−11.5
28
vs
NEV
L 65-81
−21.5
3
vs
UNA
L 63-65
−18.5
7
vs
MSST
W 65-62
+7.5
13
@
SLU
L 75-85
+2.5
17
vs
LUC
W 85-71
+2.5
21
vs
MORG
W 94-64
+4.5
28
@
SEA
W 67-59
+10.5
30
@
ORST
L 62-70
−12.5
2
vs
USD
W 74-64
−2.5
4
vs
PORT
W 73-68
−6.5
8
@
LMU
L 82-84
−0.5
10
@
PEPP
W 80-60
+12.5
13
vs
SMC
L 68-82
−8.5
18
vs
WSU
W 85-80
−0.5
24
@
GONZ
L 66-68
+13.5
28
@
SCU
L 73-88
−5.5
31
vs
PAC
W 87-82
+0.5
4
vs
LMU
L 75-84
−17.5
7
@
SMC
L 54-79
−13.5
12
vs
ORST
L 63-90
−35.5
15
@
USD
W 92-79
+7.5
18
vs
GONZ
L 59-80
−5.5
21
vs
SCU
L 73-94
−14.5
28
@
PAC
W 72-61
+14.5
7
vs
PORT
W 82-65
+10.5
8
vs
ORST
L 77-78
−4.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
MEM
L 70-76
−11.5
12
vs
PRST
W 80-70
−4.5
15
vs
BRAD
W 75-64
−7.5
18
vs
NWST
W 84-64
+4.5
22
vs
MINN
W 77-65
+1.5
27
vs
COLO
L 69-79
−2.5
28
vs
NEV
L 65-81
+3.5
3
vs
UNA
L 63-65
−17.5
7
vs
MSST
W 65-62
−23.5
13
@
SLU
L 75-85
+4.5
17
vs
LUC
W 85-71
+12.5
21
vs
MORG
W 94-64
+12.5
28
@
SEA
W 67-59
−20.5
30
@
ORST
L 62-70
−12.5
2
vs
USD
W 74-64
−14.5
4
vs
PORT
W 73-68
−6.5
8
@
LMU
L 82-84
+24.5
10
@
PEPP
W 80-60
−0.5
13
vs
SMC
L 68-82
+8.5
18
vs
WSU
W 85-80
+18.5
24
@
GONZ
L 66-68
−15.5
28
@
SCU
L 73-88
+10.5
31
vs
PAC
W 87-82
+30.5
4
vs
LMU
L 75-84
+13.5
7
@
SMC
L 54-79
−9.5
12
vs
ORST
L 63-90
+12.5
15
@
USD
W 92-79
+22.5
18
vs
GONZ
L 59-80
−12.5
21
vs
SCU
L 73-94
+8.5
28
@
PAC
W 72-61
−9.5
7
vs
PORT
W 82-65
+0.5
8
vs
ORST
L 77-78
+10.5
over 17under 15avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Fresno St
31 games played
Straight up
12-19
39% wins
Against the spread
21-10
68% covers · avg +2.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-19
39% overs · avg −4.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | L 66-67 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 82-62 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 73-78 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-74 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 80-78 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 85-76 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 76-53 | -2.5 | W +20.5 | 150.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 71-76 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 58-82 | +19.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 87-89 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 72-84 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 63-72 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 65-66 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 70-55 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 52-71 | +14.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 79-69 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 63-60 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 74-83 | +15.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 57-68 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-62 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 98-96 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 59-69 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 78-91 | +21.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 93-63 | -14.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 82-92 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 78-80 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 70-74 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 53-69 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 82-68 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 60-85 | +12.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 63-67 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
UPST
L 66-67
−10.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 82-62
+13.5
12
vs
UCSD
L 73-78
−6.5
15
vs
UVU
W 75-74
+5.5
18
vs
SFA
W 80-78
+4.5
21
vs
NOLA
W 85-76
+2.5
26
vs
PEPP
W 76-53
+20.5
30
vs
CSUB
L 71-76
−15.5
6
@
ARK
L 58-82
−4.5
10
@
CSUN
L 87-89
+1.5
20
@
UNLV
L 72-84
−3.5
30
vs
USU
L 63-72
+5.5
3
vs
NEV
L 65-66
+3.5
6
@
SJSU
W 70-55
+13.5
10
@
SDSU
L 52-71
−4.5
13
vs
CSU
W 79-69
+13.5
17
vs
WYO
W 63-60
+6.5
21
@
UNM
L 74-83
+6.5
24
vs
GCU
L 57-68
−6.5
31
@
AF
W 79-62
+7.5
3
vs
UNLV
W 98-96
+3.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-69
+1.5
10
@
USU
L 78-91
+8.5
14
vs
AF
W 93-63
+15.5
17
@
WYO
L 82-92
−0.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+7.5
24
@
CSU
L 70-74
+4.5
28
vs
BOIS
L 53-69
−8.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 82-68
+6.5
7
@
GCU
L 60-85
−12.5
11
vs
CSU
L 63-67
+3.5
covered 21didn’t cover 10avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
UPST
L 66-67
−31.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 82-62
+1.5
12
vs
UCSD
L 73-78
+2.5
15
vs
UVU
W 75-74
−7.5
18
vs
SFA
W 80-78
+11.5
21
vs
NOLA
W 85-76
+6.5
26
vs
PEPP
W 76-53
−21.5
30
vs
CSUB
L 71-76
−3.5
6
@
ARK
L 58-82
−21.5
10
@
CSUN
L 87-89
+14.5
20
@
UNLV
L 72-84
−3.5
30
vs
USU
L 63-72
−19.5
3
vs
NEV
L 65-66
−15.5
6
@
SJSU
W 70-55
−24.5
10
@
SDSU
L 52-71
−23.5
13
vs
CSU
W 79-69
+8.5
17
vs
WYO
W 63-60
−22.5
21
@
UNM
L 74-83
+5.5
24
vs
GCU
L 57-68
−20.5
31
@
AF
W 79-62
−0.5
3
vs
UNLV
W 98-96
+40.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-69
−21.5
10
@
USU
L 78-91
+16.5
14
vs
AF
W 93-63
+13.5
17
@
WYO
L 82-92
+25.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+1.5
24
@
CSU
L 70-74
−5.5
28
vs
BOIS
L 53-69
−27.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 82-68
−1.5
7
@
GCU
L 60-85
−4.5
11
vs
CSU
L 63-67
−16.5
over 12under 19avg −4.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: San Francisco 0, Fresno St 0, even 5
San FranciscoBetterFresno St
G A. Bashir TR2.4 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G D. Lungu TR13.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 3 ast
Not ranked
G A. Braccia0.4 pts · 0.5 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G R. Candelino TR11.2 pts · 5 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 76
F B. Oosterbaan TR7.6 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 31
=Even
G B. Amuneke TR2.1 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 28
F N. Newbury NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F B. Henige TR4.9 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 38
C I. Diagne TR1.1 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C B. Fall TR0.6 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
San FranciscoBetterFresno St
SF offense178th of 366 · -5.5
=Even
FRES defense190th of 366 · -4.4
SF defense165th of 366 · -3.7
=Even
FRES offense176th of 366 · -5.4
Backcourt-0.9 · 2 players
→FRESSmall
Backcourt+1.3 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.6 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.8 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestSF betterFRES betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Bashir10 min · TRA. Braccia5 minW. FodeNewM. MageeNewY. VitlemNewD. BordonNew
Forwards
B. Oosterbaan25 min · TRN. NewburyNewA. TysonNewG. KnudsenNewD. WileyNewJ. PihtovsNew
Centers
I. Diagne7 min · TR
Guards
D. Lungu27 min · TRR. Candelino25 min · TRB. Amuneke8 min · TRN. ZulemieNewK. PerryNewQ. RhymesNew
Forwards
B. Henige20 min · TRR. ParsleyNewY. Kesse-BedaNewA. GrangerNewM. VuckovicNewC. SchroederNew
Centers
B. Fall5 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.9 #198 | Points per game | 72.3 #233 |
| 1.10 #131 | Points per possession | 1.04 #266 |
| 67.3 #271 | Pace (possessions) | 69.3 #156 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.3 #184 | Effective FG% | 50.6 #206 |
| 34.6 #140 | 3-point % | 32.1 #274 |
| 46.1 #45 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.9 #146 |
| 40.1 #59 | Free throw rate | 33.8 #218 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.9 #129 | Turnover rate | 18.1 #277 |
| 31.4 #148 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.9 #272 |
| 13.6 #174 | Assists per game | 12.6 #247 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.8 #149 | Points allowed | 73.5 #142 |
| 1.09 #206 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #110 |
| 50.8 #143 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.5 #184 |
| 34.1 #187 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.7 #30 |
| 14.1 #331 | Turnovers forced | 18.2 #88 |
| 71.0 #105 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.4 #183 |
| 5.1 #332 | Steals per game | 6.7 #154 |
| 2.9 #238 | Blocks per game | 2.2 #331 |
San Francisco
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 9-11 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Oregon St77–78
- Wvs Portland82–65
- W@ Pacific72–61
- Lvs Santa Clara73–94
- Lvs Gonzaga59–80
A week or more of rest.
Fresno St
12-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-14 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Colorado St63–67
- L@ Grand Canyon60–85
- Wvs San José St82–68
- Lvs Boise St53–69
- L@ Colorado St70–74
A week or more of rest.