MGM Grand Garden Arena · Neutral site · Postseason
Closing line
CREI -4.5✓ CREI covered by 8.5
CREI -4.5✓ CREI covered by 8.5Closing total151.5Under by 0.5
 RUTG | This season | CREI |
|---|---|---|
| 14-19 | Record | 15-17 |
| 17-16 | ATS | 10-22 |
| 19-14 | O/U | 15-17 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: RUTG 72–77 CREI · ✓ CREI (68%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUTG | 28 | 41 | 69 |
| CREI | 31 | 51 | 82 |
1st half: RUTG 28, CREI 31 (CREI by 3). The model had CREI by 3.0 and a total of 69.8 (actual 59).
Team stats
| RUTG | CREI | |
|---|---|---|
| 24-65 37% | Field goals | 27-59 46% |
| 2-14 14% | 3-pointers | 8-28 29% |
| 19-26 73% | Free throws | 20-24 83% |
| 38 12 off | Rebounds | 40 8 off |
| 8 | Assists | 16 |
| 5 | Steals | 4 |
| 2 | Blocks | 8 |
| 8 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 18 | Fouls | 19 |
| 36 | Points in paint | 36 |
| 7 | Fast-break points | 9 |
Players
| RUTG | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tariq Francis G | 28 | 19 | 3 | 3 | 3-15 | 1-5 |
| Dylan Grant F | 26 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
| Lino Mark G | 24 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 5-14 | 1-3 |
| Emmanuel Ogbole C | 23 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| Darren Buchanan Jr. G | 16 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jamichael Davis G | 23 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 7-9 | 0-1 |
| Chris Nwuli F | 18 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-3 |
| Kaden Powers G | 15 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| Harun Zrno G | 14 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| Bryce Ruglass Dortch F | 13 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Denis Badalau, Max Fradkin, Gevonte Ware, Dorian Jones, Baye Fall
| CREI | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasen Green F | 33 | 16 | 9 | 2 | 7-10 | 0-0 |
| Nik Graves G | 32 | 28 | 5 | 8 | 7-13 | 2-5 |
| Josh Dix G | 31 | 14 | 6 | 0 | 5-11 | 4-8 |
| Fedor Zugic G | 26 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-5 |
| Isaac Traudt F | 24 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-5 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Blake Harper G | 24 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 3-5 | 1-2 |
| Hudson Greer G | 13 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-2 |
| Owen Freeman F | 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Ty Davis G | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Kerem Konan F | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Shane Thomas G | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Aleksa Dimitrijevic, Liam McChesney, Josh Townley-Thomas, Austin Swartz, Jackson McAndrew
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenCREI -2.5
2 → CREI
CloseCREI -4.5
2 pts toward CREI
Total
Open148.5
▲ 3
Close151.5
Up 3 since the open
Moneyline
RUTG +180 · CREI -218
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened CREI -2.5 · closed CREI -4.5 · moved 2 toward CREImodel CREI -5.5
model CREI -5.5
Opened 148.5 · closed 151.5 · moved 3 upmodel 149.5
model 149.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | CREI -4.5 | CREI -5.3 | CREI +0.8 | W CREI covered |
| Total | 151.5 | 149.3 | Under 2.2 | W Under |
| Projected score | — | RUTG 72 · CREI 77.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CREI -3.0 | CREI -3.0 |
| 1H total | 69.8 | 59 |
| 1H projected score | RUTG 33.4 · CREI 36.4 | RUTG 28 · CREI 31 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUTG | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% |
| CREI | 3-7 30% | 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Rutgers
33 games played
Straight up
14-19
42% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs RID | W 81-53 | -18.5 | W +9.5 | 139.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 10 | vs ME | W 72-60 | -18.5 | L −6.5 | 130.5 | O 132 |
| Nov 14 | vs LEH | W 84-72 | -18.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 18 | vs AMER | W 80-71 | -16.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 21 | vs CCSU | L 54-67 | -15.5 | L −28.5 | 137.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 24 | vs TENN | L 60-85 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 25 | vs ND | L 63-68 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 27 | vs UNLV | W 80-65 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 2 | vs PUR | L 65-81 | +13.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 6 | @ MICH | L 60-101 | +25.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 13 | @ HALL | L 59-81 | +13.5 | L −8.5 | 136.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 20 | vs PENN | W 70-69 | -11.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 29 | vs DSU | W 65-50 | -20.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 2 | vs OSU | L 73-80 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 5 | vs ORE | W 88-85 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 139.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 8 | @ ILL | L 55-81 | +22.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 11 | vs NU | W 77-75 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 17 | @ WIS | L 87-96 | +15.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 20 | @ IOWA | L 62-68 | +17.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 23 | vs IU | L 59-82 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 27 | vs MSU | L 79-88 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 31 | @ USC | L 75-78 | +11.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 3 | @ UCLA | L 66-98 | +13.5 | L −18.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | vs NEB | L 68-80 | +12.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 15 | vs MD | W 68-57 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 18 | @ PSU | W 85-72 | +4.5 | W +17.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 21 | @ MINN | L 61-80 | +8.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 24 | vs WASH | L 72-79 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 1 | @MD | W 69-65 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 5 | @MSU | L 87-91 | +20.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | O 178 |
| Mar 8 | vsPSU | W 74-62 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 11 | vsMINN | W 72-67 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Mar 12 | vsUCLA | L 59-72 | +10.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vsRID
RIDW 81-53
+9.5
10
vsME
MEW 72-60
−6.5
14
vsLEH
LEHW 84-72
−6.5
18
vsAMER
AMERW 80-71
−7.5
21
vsCCSU
CCSUL 54-67
−28.5
24
vsTENN
TENNL 60-85
−10.5
25
vsND
NDL 63-68
+1.5
27
vsUNLV
UNLVW 80-65
+19.5
2
vsPUR
PURL 65-81
−2.5
6
@MICH
MICHL 60-101
−15.5
13
@HALL
HALLL 59-81
−8.5
20
vsPENN
PENNW 70-69
−10.5
29
vsDSU
DSUW 65-50
−5.5
2
vsOSU
OSUL 73-80
+2.5
5
vsORE
OREW 88-85
+7.5
8
@ILL
ILLL 55-81
−3.5
11
vsNU
NUW 77-75
+6.5
17
@WIS
WISL 87-96
+6.5
20
@IOWA
IOWAL 62-68
+11.5
23
vsIU
IUL 59-82
−15.5
27
vsMSU
MSUL 79-88
+5.5
31
@USC
USCL 75-78
+8.5
3
@UCLA
UCLAL 66-98
−18.5
7
vsNEB
NEBL 68-80
+0.5
15
vsMD
MDW 68-57
+8.5
18
@PSU
PSUW 85-72
+17.5
21
@MINN
MINNL 61-80
−10.5
24
vsWASH
WASHL 72-79
−2.5
1
@MD
MDW 69-65
+8.5
5
@MSU
MSUL 87-91
+16.5
8
vsPSU
PSUW 74-62
+7.5
11
vsMINN
MINNW 72-67
+11.5
12
vsUCLA
UCLAL 59-72
−2.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vsRID
RIDW 81-53
−5.5
10
vsME
MEW 72-60
+1.5
14
vsLEH
LEHW 84-72
+19.5
18
vsAMER
AMERW 80-71
+7.5
21
vsCCSU
CCSUL 54-67
−16.5
24
vsTENN
TENNL 60-85
+3.5
25
vsND
NDL 63-68
−9.5
27
vsUNLV
UNLVW 80-65
−8.5
2
vsPUR
PURL 65-81
−0.5
6
@MICH
MICHL 60-101
+7.5
13
@HALL
HALLL 59-81
+3.5
20
vsPENN
PENNW 70-69
−11.5
29
vsDSU
DSUW 65-50
−20.5
2
vsOSU
OSUL 73-80
+1.5
5
vsORE
OREW 88-85
+33.5
8
@ILL
ILLL 55-81
−13.5
11
vsNU
NUW 77-75
+7.5
17
@WIS
WISL 87-96
+33.5
20
@IOWA
IOWAL 62-68
−10.5
23
vsIU
IUL 59-82
−6.5
27
vsMSU
MSUL 79-88
+28.5
31
@USC
USCL 75-78
+6.5
3
@UCLA
UCLAL 66-98
+21.5
7
vsNEB
NEBL 68-80
+2.5
15
vsMD
MDW 68-57
−19.5
18
@PSU
PSUW 85-72
+8.5
21
@MINN
MINNL 61-80
+4.5
24
vsWASH
WASHL 72-79
+11.5
1
@MD
MDW 69-65
−9.5
5
@MSU
MSUL 87-91
+36.5
8
vsPSU
PSUW 74-62
−13.5
11
vsMINN
MINNW 72-67
+3.5
12
vsUCLA
UCLAL 59-72
−10.5
over 19under 14avg +2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Creighton
32 games played
Straight up
15-17
47% wins
Against the spread
10-22
31% covers · avg −2.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg −0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs SDAK | W 92-76 | -29.5 | L −13.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Nov 11 | @ GONZ | L 63-90 | +12.5 | L −14.5 | 164.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 14 | vs UMES | W 84-45 | -33.5 | W +5.5 | 135.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 19 | vs UND | W 75-60 | -29.5 | L −14.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 24 | vs BAY | L 74-81 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 25 | vs ISU | L 60-78 | +9.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 27 | vsORE | W 76-66 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 2 | vs NICH | W 96-76 | -18.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 7 | @NEB | L 50-71 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 155.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 13 | vs KSU | L 76-83 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 17 | @ XAV | W 98-57 | +2.5 | W +43.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 20 | vs MARQ | W 84-63 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 22 | vs UTU | W 92-69 | -19.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 30 | vs BTLR | W 89-85 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 4 | @HALL | L 54-56 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 7 | @ VILL | W 76-72 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | vs SJU | L 73-90 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 13 | vs GTWN | W 86-83 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 16 | @ PROV | L 88-93 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 21 | vsXAV | W 94-93 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 27 | @MARQ | L 62-86 | -1.5 | L −25.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 31 | vs CONN | L 58-85 | +6.5 | L −20.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 4 | @GTWN | L 68-76 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 7 | vsHALL | W 69-68 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 11 | @ DEP | L 71-72 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 14 | vsVILL | L 69-80 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 18 | @CONN | W 91-84 | +15.5 | W +22.5 | 143.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 21 | @SJU | L 52-81 | +12.5 | L −16.5 | 156.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 25 | vsDEP | L 71-72 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 28 | vsPROV | L 76-79 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 166.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 4 | @BTLR | W 76-59 | +2.5 | W +19.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 12 | vsHALL | L 61-72 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 136.5 | U 133 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vsSDAK
SDAKW 92-76
−13.5
11
@GONZ
GONZL 63-90
−14.5
14
vsUMES
UMESW 84-45
+5.5
19
vsUND
UNDW 75-60
−14.5
24
vsBAY
BAYL 74-81
−3.5
25
vsISU
ISUL 60-78
−8.5
27
vsORE
OREW 76-66
+7.5
2
vsNICH
NICHW 96-76
+1.5
7
@NEB
NEBL 50-71
−15.5
13
vsKSU
KSUL 76-83
−11.5
17
@XAV
XAVW 98-57
+43.5
20
vsMARQ
MARQW 84-63
+14.5
22
vsUTU
UTUW 92-69
+3.5
30
vsBTLR
BTLRW 89-85
−1.5
4
@HALL
HALLL 54-56
+1.5
7
@VILL
VILLW 76-72
+8.5
10
vsSJU
SJUL 73-90
−14.5
13
vsGTWN
GTWNW 86-83
−5.5
16
@PROV
PROVL 88-93
−7.5
21
vsXAV
XAVW 94-93
−7.5
27
@MARQ
MARQL 62-86
−25.5
31
vsCONN
CONNL 58-85
−20.5
4
@GTWN
GTWNL 68-76
−6.5
7
vsHALL
HALLW 69-68
−0.5
11
@DEP
DEPL 71-72
−2.5
14
vsVILL
VILLL 69-80
−9.5
18
@CONN
CONNW 91-84
+22.5
21
@SJU
SJUL 52-81
−16.5
25
vsDEP
DEPL 71-72
−4.5
28
vsPROV
PROVL 76-79
−6.5
4
@BTLR
BTLRW 76-59
+19.5
12
vsHALL
HALLL 61-72
−8.5
covered 10didn’t cover 22avg −2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vsSDAK
SDAKW 92-76
−1.5
11
@GONZ
GONZL 63-90
−11.5
14
vsUMES
UMESW 84-45
−6.5
19
vsUND
UNDW 75-60
−20.5
24
vsBAY
BAYL 74-81
+0.5
25
vsISU
ISUL 60-78
−14.5
27
vsORE
OREW 76-66
−8.5
2
vsNICH
NICHW 96-76
+28.5
7
@NEB
NEBL 50-71
−34.5
13
vsKSU
KSUL 76-83
−0.5
17
@XAV
XAVW 98-57
+3.5
20
vsMARQ
MARQW 84-63
−4.5
22
vsUTU
UTUW 92-69
+13.5
30
vsBTLR
BTLRW 89-85
+17.5
4
@HALL
HALLL 54-56
−33.5
7
@VILL
VILLW 76-72
+5.5
10
vsSJU
SJUL 73-90
+10.5
13
vsGTWN
GTWNW 86-83
+21.5
16
@PROV
PROVL 88-93
+19.5
21
vsXAV
XAVW 94-93
+31.5
27
@MARQ
MARQL 62-86
−6.5
31
vsCONN
CONNL 58-85
+0.5
4
@GTWN
GTWNL 68-76
−2.5
7
vsHALL
HALLW 69-68
−3.5
11
@DEP
DEPL 71-72
+1.5
14
vsVILL
VILLL 69-80
+3.5
18
@CONN
CONNW 91-84
+31.5
21
@SJU
SJUL 52-81
−23.5
25
vsDEP
DEPL 71-72
+0.5
28
vsPROV
PROVL 76-79
−11.5
4
@BTLR
BTLRW 76-59
−20.5
12
vsHALL
HALLL 61-72
−3.5
over 15under 17avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Rutgers
14-19 overall · 7-15 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UCLA59–72
- Wvs Minnesota72–67
- Wvs Penn State74–62
- L@ Michigan St87–91
- W@ Maryland69–65
A week or more of rest.
Creighton
15-17 overall · 9-12 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Seton Hall61–72
- W@ Butler76–59
- Lvs Providence76–79
- Lvs DePaul71–72
- L@ St John's52–81
A week or more of rest.