CHI Health Center Omaha · at Creighton
Closing line
CREI -29.5✓ SDAK covered by 13.5
Closing total169.5Under by 1.5
| This season | CREI | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-1 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-1 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-1 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: SDAK 70–97 CREI · ✓ CREI (99%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SDAK | 35 | 41 | 76 |
| CREI | 48 | 44 | 92 |
1st half: SDAK 35, CREI 48 (CREI by 13). The model had CREI by 16.2 and a total of 77.8 (actual 83).
Team stats
| SDAK | CREI | |
|---|---|---|
| 31-74 42% | Field goals | 37-74 50% |
| 5-15 33% | 3-pointers | 8-26 31% |
| 9-14 64% | Free throws | 10-11 91% |
| 37 21 off | Rebounds | 44 19 off |
| 7 | Assists | 20 |
| 7 | Steals | 7 |
| 7 | Blocks | 4 |
| 13 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 13 | Fouls | 16 |
| 48 | Points in paint | 54 |
| 14 | Fast-break points | 24 |
Players
| SDAK | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shey Eberwein G | 27 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 4-11 | 0-3 |
| Jordan Crawford G | 26 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 4-9 | 3-4 |
| Isaac Bruns G | 25 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 6-13 | 1-3 |
| Evan Anderson G | 22 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Cameron Fens C | 22 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 3-11 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Vince Buzelis G | 20 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 5-8 | 1-2 |
| Jake Brack F | 16 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| Jesse McIntosh G | 14 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 2-9 | 0-2 |
| Uzziah Buntyn G | 13 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| Ethan Kizer F | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| Porter Ihnen G | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Caleb Kizer F | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Luke Bruns, Jonah Funk, Jalen Hayes, Josiah Dotzler, Ashton Smith
| CREI | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blake Harper G | 26 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 3-6 | 1-1 |
| Josh Dix G | 26 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 5-9 | 1-3 |
| Jackson McAndrew F | 25 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 4-12 | 2-7 |
| Nik Graves G | 24 | 15 | 2 | 5 | 5-9 | 1-4 |
| Isaac Traudt F | 20 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 3-8 | 2-5 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Owen Freeman F | 19 | 19 | 4 | 0 | 9-11 | 0-0 |
| Austin Swartz G | 18 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-3 |
| Ty Davis G | 16 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| Fedor Zugic G | 14 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-2 |
| Josh Townley-Thomas F | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| Liam McChesney F | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Shane Thomas G | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Aleksa Dimitrijevic, Kerem Konan, Jasen Green, Hudson Greer
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenCREI -27.5
2 → CREI
CloseCREI -29.5
2 pts toward CREI
Total
Open167.5
▲ 2
Close169.5
Up 2 since the open
Moneyline
SDAK +3000 · CREI -20000
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened CREI -27.5 · closed CREI -29.5 · moved 2 toward CREImodel CREI -27
model CREI -27
Opened 167.5 · closed 169.5 · moved 2 upmodel 166.5
model 166.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | CREI -29.5 | CREI -26.9 | SDAK +2.6 | W SDAK covered |
| Total | 169.5 | 166.4 | Under 3.1 | W Under |
| Projected score | — | SDAK 69.7 · CREI 96.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CREI -16.2 | CREI -13.0 |
| 1H total | 77.8 | 83 |
| 1H projected score | SDAK 30.8 · CREI 47 | SDAK 35 · CREI 48 |
Showing 2024-25 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2024-25
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2024-25
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
South Dakota
30 games played
Straight up
16-14
53% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-9
70% overs · avg +6.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 93-79 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 91-83 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 77-96 | +19.5 | W +0.5 | 174.5 | U 173 |
| Nov 20 | @ | W 80-76 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 83-92 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 27 | @ | L 79-96 | +22.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 94-80 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 82-95 | +0.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 82-81 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 89-66 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 87-92 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 163.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 81-98 | +18.5 | W +1.5 | 168.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 54-68 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 91-84 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 104-119 | +9.5 | L −5.5 | 167.5 | O 223 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 92-82 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 171.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 77-103 | +3.5 | L −22.5 | 169.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 102-93 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 175.5 | O 195 |
| Jan 25 | @ | L 71-90 | +12.5 | L −6.5 | 172.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 91-87 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 169.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 6 | @ | W 86-79 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 75-74 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 171.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 79-72 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 157.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 91-94 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 174.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 85-80 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 174.5 | U 165 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 85-93 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 172.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 78-82 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 170.5 | U 160 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 92-79 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 175.5 | U 171 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 85-84 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 164.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 75-100 | +5.5 | L −19.5 | 166.5 | O 175 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
SOU
W 93-79
+11.5
6
vs
ETAM
W 91-83
−2.5
12
@
IOWA
L 77-96
+0.5
20
@
WMU
W 80-76
+1.5
22
@
USI
L 83-92
−11.5
27
@
NEB
L 79-96
+5.5
4
vs
IDST
W 94-80
+10.5
7
@
NAU
L 82-95
−12.5
10
vs
WYO
W 82-81
−0.5
14
vs
WIU
W 89-66
+13.5
19
@
UTU
L 87-92
−7.5
21
@
SCU
L 81-98
+1.5
2
@
KC
L 54-68
−9.5
4
vs
DEN
W 91-84
−2.5
11
@
STMN
L 104-119
−5.5
16
vs
ORU
W 92-82
+2.5
18
vs
NDSU
L 77-103
−22.5
23
@
UND
W 102-93
+12.5
25
@
SDST
L 71-90
−6.5
29
vs
OMA
W 91-87
+5.5
6
@
DEN
W 86-79
+5.5
8
@
ORU
W 75-74
−0.5
13
vs
KC
W 79-72
+4.5
16
vs
SDST
L 91-94
+2.5
19
vs
STMN
W 85-80
+8.5
22
@
OMA
L 85-93
−3.5
26
@
NDSU
L 78-82
+2.5
1
vs
UND
W 92-79
+8.5
7
vs
NDSU
W 85-84
+2.5
8
vs
OMA
L 75-100
−19.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
SOU
W 93-79
+29.5
6
vs
ETAM
W 91-83
+24.5
12
@
IOWA
L 77-96
−1.5
20
@
WMU
W 80-76
−1.5
22
@
USI
L 83-92
+22.5
27
@
NEB
L 79-96
+17.5
4
vs
IDST
W 94-80
+22.5
7
@
NAU
L 82-95
+19.5
10
vs
WYO
W 82-81
+6.5
14
vs
WIU
W 89-66
+1.5
19
@
UTU
L 87-92
+15.5
21
@
SCU
L 81-98
+10.5
2
@
KC
L 54-68
−32.5
4
vs
DEN
W 91-84
+12.5
11
@
STMN
L 104-119
+55.5
16
vs
ORU
W 92-82
+2.5
18
vs
NDSU
L 77-103
+10.5
23
@
UND
W 102-93
+19.5
25
@
SDST
L 71-90
−11.5
29
vs
OMA
W 91-87
+8.5
6
@
DEN
W 86-79
+0.5
8
@
ORU
W 75-74
−22.5
13
vs
KC
W 79-72
−6.5
16
vs
SDST
L 91-94
+10.5
19
vs
STMN
W 85-80
−9.5
22
@
OMA
L 85-93
+5.5
26
@
NDSU
L 78-82
−10.5
1
vs
UND
W 92-79
−4.5
7
vs
NDSU
W 85-84
+4.5
8
vs
OMA
L 75-100
+8.5
over 21under 9avg +6.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Creighton
36 games played
Straight up
25-11
69% wins
Against the spread
21-15
58% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-18
50% overs · avg −1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | vs | W 99-86 | -29.5 | L −16.5 | 155.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 96-70 | -36.5 | L −10.5 | 167.5 | U 166 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 78-43 | -35.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 79-56 | -20.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 63-74 | -9.5 | L −20.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 53-71 | -4.5 | L −22.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 73-77 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 80-76 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 76-63 | +3.5 | W +16.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 83-65 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 75-83 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 164.5 | U 158 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 57-81 | -4.5 | L −28.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 86-79 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 57-56 | -0.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 71-79 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 80-76 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 84-64 | -8.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 68-63 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 73-49 | -7.5 | W +16.5 | 143.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 25 | vs | W 79-54 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 136.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 86-77 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 62-60 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 80-69 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 142.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 77-67 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 66-70 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 73-79 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 23 | vs | W 80-69 | -13.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 75-65 | -15.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 61-83 | +1.5 | L −20.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 79-61 | -9.5 | W +8.5 | 134.5 | O 140 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 87-74 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 85-81 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 71-62 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 138.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 15 | @ | L 66-82 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 89-75 | +3.5 | W +17.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 70-82 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
vs
RGV
W 99-86
−16.5
10
vs
FDU
W 96-70
−10.5
13
vs
HCU
W 78-43
−0.5
16
vs
KC
W 79-56
+2.5
22
vs
NEB
L 63-74
−20.5
26
vs
SDSU
L 53-71
−22.5
27
vs
TA&M
L 73-77
−0.5
30
vs
ND
W 80-76
−3.5
4
vs
KU
W 76-63
+16.5
7
vs
UNLV
W 83-65
+7.5
14
@
ALA
L 75-83
+3.5
18
@
GTWN
L 57-81
−28.5
21
vs
VILL
W 86-79
+1.5
31
vs
SJU
W 57-56
+0.5
3
@
MARQ
L 71-79
+2.5
11
@
BTLR
W 80-76
+1.5
14
vs
PROV
W 84-64
+11.5
18
@
CONN
W 68-63
+12.5
21
@
DEP
W 73-49
+16.5
25
vs
HALL
W 79-54
+10.5
29
vs
XAV
W 86-77
+1.5
1
@
VILL
W 62-60
+3.5
5
@
PROV
W 80-69
+7.5
8
vs
MARQ
W 77-67
+6.5
11
vs
CONN
L 66-70
−7.5
16
@
SJU
L 73-79
+0.5
23
vs
GTWN
W 80-69
−2.5
26
vs
DEP
W 75-65
−5.5
1
@
XAV
L 61-83
−20.5
4
@
HALL
W 79-61
+8.5
8
vs
BTLR
W 87-74
+0.5
13
vs
DEP
W 85-81
−8.5
14
vs
CONN
W 71-62
+12.5
15
@
SJU
L 66-82
−9.5
20
vs
LOU
W 89-75
+17.5
22
vs
AUB
L 70-82
−3.5
covered 21didn’t cover 15avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
vs
RGV
W 99-86
+29.5
10
vs
FDU
W 96-70
−1.5
13
vs
HCU
W 78-43
−32.5
16
vs
KC
W 79-56
−11.5
22
vs
NEB
L 63-74
−14.5
26
vs
SDSU
L 53-71
−15.5
27
vs
TA&M
L 73-77
+4.5
30
vs
ND
W 80-76
+13.5
4
vs
KU
W 76-63
−14.5
7
vs
UNLV
W 83-65
+3.5
14
@
ALA
L 75-83
−6.5
18
@
GTWN
L 57-81
−7.5
21
vs
VILL
W 86-79
+22.5
31
vs
SJU
W 57-56
−38.5
3
@
MARQ
L 71-79
+2.5
11
@
BTLR
W 80-76
+10.5
14
vs
PROV
W 84-64
+3.5
18
@
CONN
W 68-63
−14.5
21
@
DEP
W 73-49
−21.5
25
vs
HALL
W 79-54
−3.5
29
vs
XAV
W 86-77
+19.5
1
@
VILL
W 62-60
−21.5
5
@
PROV
W 80-69
+6.5
8
vs
MARQ
W 77-67
−3.5
11
vs
CONN
L 66-70
−4.5
16
@
SJU
L 73-79
+9.5
23
vs
GTWN
W 80-69
+3.5
26
vs
DEP
W 75-65
−6.5
1
@
XAV
L 61-83
−7.5
4
@
HALL
W 79-61
+5.5
8
vs
BTLR
W 87-74
+9.5
13
vs
DEP
W 85-81
+23.5
14
vs
CONN
W 71-62
−5.5
15
@
SJU
L 66-82
+4.5
20
vs
LOU
W 89-75
+18.5
22
vs
AUB
L 70-82
+3.5
over 18under 18avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
South Dakota
0-1 overall · 0-0 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Utah Tech79–81
2 days since their last game.
Creighton
0-0 overall · 0-0 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- No games yet
A week or more of rest.