MGM Grand Garden Arena · Neutral site · Postseason
Closing line
WVU -2.5✓ WVU covered by 2.5
Closing total135.5Over by 23.5
| This season | WVU | |
|---|---|---|
| 20-12 | Record | 18-14 |
| 17-15 | ATS | 15-17 |
| 14-18 | O/U | 10-22 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: STAN 65–68 WVU · ✓ WVU (62%) won
Loading the game…
Team stats
| STAN | WVU | |
|---|---|---|
| 28-69 41% | Field goals | 29-65 45% |
| 6-27 22% | 3-pointers | 2-20 10% |
| 15-20 75% | Free throws | 22-26 85% |
| 47 16 off | Rebounds | 37 9 off |
| 9 | Assists | 6 |
| 4 | Steals | 6 |
| 8 | Blocks | 5 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 6 |
| 18 | Fouls | 15 |
| 38 | Points in paint | 44 |
| 4 | Fast-break points | 4 |
Players
| STAN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ebuka Okorie G | 43 | 34 | 3 | 5 | 13-23 | 1-6 |
| Benny Gealer G | 40 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 2-8 | 2-8 |
| AJ Rohosy F | 33 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 4-8 | 0-0 |
| Aidan Cammann F | 27 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 3-11 | 2-3 |
| Jaylen Thompson F | 15 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Ryan Agarwal G | 28 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 3-9 | 1-5 |
| Donavin Young F | 18 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Oskar Giltay C | 12 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Jeremy Dent-Smith G | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
Did not play: Cameron Grant, Anthony Batson Jr., Evan Stinson, Ethan Kitch, Tallis Toure, Myles Jones, Kristers Skrinda, Chisom Okpara
| WVU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honor Huff G | 41 | 21 | 4 | 3 | 5-14 | 0-6 |
| Jasper Floyd G | 38 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 2-7 | 0-3 |
| Brenen Lorient F | 36 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 6-9 | 0-1 |
| Treysen Eaglestaff G | 33 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 5-11 | 2-4 |
| Harlan Obioha C | 23 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Chance Moore G | 23 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 4-8 | 0-2 |
| DJ Thomas F | 18 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 4-7 | 0-0 |
| Morris Ugusuk G | 13 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-4 |
Did not play: Jayden Forsythe, Abraham Oyeadier, Niyol Hauet, Amir Jenkins, Jackson Fields, Evans Barning Jr., MJ Feenane
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketWVU -2.5
ModelWVU -3.5
Model edgeWVU +1.0
W WVU covered
Total
Market135.5
Model133.1
Model edgeUnder 2.4
L Over
Projected score
STAN 64.8 · WVU 68.3
STAN 77 · WVU 82
Win probability
WVU 62%
1st half
Spread
WVU -1.9
WVU -6.0
Total
62.4
64 points
Projected score
STAN 30.2 · WVU 32.2
STAN 29 · WVU 35
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenSTAN -1.5
4 → WVU
CloseWVU -2.5
4 pts toward WVU
Total
Open133.5
▲ 2
Close135.5
Up 2 since the open
Moneyline
STAN +114 · WVU -135
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened STAN -1.5 · closed WVU -2.5 · moved 4 toward WVUmodel WVU -3.5
model WVU -3.5
Opened 133.5 · closed 135.5 · moved 2 upmodel 133
model 133
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Stanford
32 games played
Straight up
20-12
63% wins
Against the spread
17-15
53% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 89-79 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 91-68 | -12.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 77-68 | -14.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 93-66 | -20.5 | W +6.5 | 139.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 69-77 | -10.5 | L −18.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 72-68 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 78-77 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 94-72 | -19.5 | W +2.5 | 156.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 74-75 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 86-82 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 76-60 | -10.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 77-68 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 27 | vs | W 88-80 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 160.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 40-47 | -6.5 | L −13.5 | 143.5 | U 87 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 80-76 | +7.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 69-68 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 55-70 | +12.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 95-90 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 147.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 50-80 | +11.5 | L −18.5 | 148.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 66-78 | -4.5 | L −16.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 70-79 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 80-88 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 64-66 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 95-72 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 151.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 70-64 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 63-68 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 66-72 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 75-67 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 95-75 | +1.5 | W +21.5 | 155.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 86-78 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 85-84 | +9.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 63-64 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | U 127 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
PRST
W 89-79
−1.5
8
vs
MONT
W 91-68
+10.5
12
vs
MTST
W 77-68
−5.5
18
vs
UL
W 93-66
+6.5
21
vs
SEA
L 69-77
−18.5
27
vs
MINN
W 72-68
+1.5
28
vs
SLU
W 78-77
+2.5
1
vs
PORT
W 94-72
+2.5
7
vs
UNLV
L 74-75
−10.5
13
@
SJSU
W 86-82
−4.5
17
vs
UTA
W 76-60
+5.5
20
vs
COLO
W 77-68
+11.5
27
vs
CSUN
W 88-80
−7.5
30
vs
ND
L 40-47
−13.5
2
vs
LOU
W 80-76
+11.5
7
@
VT
W 69-68
+4.5
10
@
UVA
L 55-70
−2.5
14
vs
UNC
W 95-90
+9.5
17
vs
DUKE
L 50-80
−18.5
24
vs
CAL
L 66-78
−16.5
28
@
MIA
L 70-79
+0.5
31
@
FSU
L 80-88
−4.5
4
vs
CLEM
L 64-66
+1.5
7
vs
GT
W 95-72
+13.5
11
@
BC
W 70-64
+2.5
14
@
WAKE
L 63-68
−0.5
21
@
CAL
L 66-72
−4.5
25
vs
PITT
W 75-67
−0.5
28
vs
SMU
W 95-75
+21.5
4
@
ND
W 86-78
+6.5
7
@
NCSU
W 85-84
+10.5
10
vs
PITT
L 63-64
−5.5
covered 17didn’t cover 15avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
PRST
W 89-79
+23.5
8
vs
MONT
W 91-68
+8.5
12
vs
MTST
W 77-68
−3.5
18
vs
UL
W 93-66
+19.5
21
vs
SEA
L 69-77
−6.5
27
vs
MINN
W 72-68
−2.5
28
vs
SLU
W 78-77
−5.5
1
vs
PORT
W 94-72
+9.5
7
vs
UNLV
L 74-75
−15.5
13
@
SJSU
W 86-82
+22.5
17
vs
UTA
W 76-60
−3.5
20
vs
COLO
W 77-68
−9.5
27
vs
CSUN
W 88-80
+7.5
30
vs
ND
L 40-47
−56.5
2
vs
LOU
W 80-76
−1.5
7
@
VT
W 69-68
−11.5
10
@
UVA
L 55-70
−18.5
14
vs
UNC
W 95-90
+37.5
17
vs
DUKE
L 50-80
−18.5
24
vs
CAL
L 66-78
−2.5
28
@
MIA
L 70-79
+1.5
31
@
FSU
L 80-88
+15.5
4
vs
CLEM
L 64-66
−8.5
7
vs
GT
W 95-72
+15.5
11
@
BC
W 70-64
−5.5
14
@
WAKE
L 63-68
−19.5
21
@
CAL
L 66-72
−11.5
25
vs
PITT
W 75-67
+3.5
28
vs
SMU
W 95-75
+14.5
4
@
ND
W 86-78
+16.5
7
@
NCSU
W 85-84
+16.5
10
vs
PITT
L 63-64
−9.5
over 14under 18avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
West Virginia
32 games played
Straight up
18-14
56% wins
Against the spread
15-17
47% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-22
31% overs · avg −4.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 70-54 | -19.5 | L −3.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 73-65 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 69-47 | -17.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 71-49 | -5.5 | W +16.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 81-59 | -24.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 140 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 67-70 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | O 137 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 68-78 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 70-38 | -21.5 | W +10.5 | 127.5 | U 108 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 91-49 | -31.5 | W +10.5 | 134.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 66-75 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 90-58 | -27.5 | W +4.5 | 132.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 88-89 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 86-51 | -42.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 59-80 | +16.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 62-60 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 132.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 86-75 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 48-77 | +13.5 | L −15.5 | 127.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 72-61 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 75-63 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 53-88 | +17.5 | L −17.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 59-54 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 53-63 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 59-54 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 127.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 63-70 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 74-67 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 56-61 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 133.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 54-60 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 84-91 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 79-71 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 63-65 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 77-62 | -4.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 48-68 | +3.5 | L −16.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
MSM
W 70-54
−3.5
6
vs
CAM
W 73-65
−7.5
9
vs
LEH
W 69-47
+4.5
13
vs
PITT
W 71-49
+16.5
17
vs
LAF
W 81-59
−2.5
21
vs
CLEM
L 67-70
+1.5
23
vs
XAV
L 68-78
−15.5
30
vs
MERC
W 70-38
+10.5
3
vs
COPP
W 91-49
+10.5
6
vs
WAKE
L 66-75
−11.5
9
vs
LR
W 90-58
+4.5
13
vs
OSU
L 88-89
+2.5
22
vs
MVSU
W 86-51
−7.5
2
@
ISU
L 59-80
−4.5
6
vs
CIN
W 62-60
+3.5
10
vs
KU
W 86-75
+13.5
13
@
HOU
L 48-77
−15.5
17
vs
COLO
W 72-61
+4.5
21
@
ASU
W 75-63
+13.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 53-88
−17.5
27
vs
KSU
W 59-54
−2.5
31
vs
BAY
L 53-63
−12.5
5
@
CIN
W 59-54
+10.5
8
vs
TTU
L 63-70
−2.5
14
@
UCF
W 74-67
+10.5
18
vs
UTAH
L 56-61
−15.5
21
@
TCU
L 54-60
−1.5
24
@
OKST
L 84-91
−5.5
28
vs
BYU
W 79-71
+10.5
3
@
KSU
L 63-65
−5.5
6
vs
UCF
W 77-62
+10.5
11
vs
BYU
L 48-68
−16.5
covered 15didn’t cover 17avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
MSM
W 70-54
−12.5
6
vs
CAM
W 73-65
−0.5
9
vs
LEH
W 69-47
−23.5
13
vs
PITT
W 71-49
−14.5
17
vs
LAF
W 81-59
+4.5
21
vs
CLEM
L 67-70
+4.5
23
vs
XAV
L 68-78
+5.5
30
vs
MERC
W 70-38
−19.5
3
vs
COPP
W 91-49
+5.5
6
vs
WAKE
L 66-75
−2.5
9
vs
LR
W 90-58
+15.5
13
vs
OSU
L 88-89
+31.5
22
vs
MVSU
W 86-51
−0.5
2
@
ISU
L 59-80
−3.5
6
vs
CIN
W 62-60
−10.5
10
vs
KU
W 86-75
+21.5
13
@
HOU
L 48-77
−2.5
17
vs
COLO
W 72-61
−8.5
21
@
ASU
W 75-63
−7.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 53-88
−2.5
27
vs
KSU
W 59-54
−33.5
31
vs
BAY
L 53-63
−23.5
5
@
CIN
W 59-54
−14.5
8
vs
TTU
L 63-70
−6.5
14
@
UCF
W 74-67
+0.5
18
vs
UTAH
L 56-61
−16.5
21
@
TCU
L 54-60
−19.5
24
@
OKST
L 84-91
+30.5
28
vs
BYU
W 79-71
+8.5
3
@
KSU
L 63-65
−15.5
6
vs
UCF
W 77-62
−3.5
11
vs
BYU
L 48-68
−25.5
over 10under 22avg −4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Stanford
20-12 overall · 9-10 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Pitt63–64
- W@ NC State85–84
- W@ Notre Dame86–78
- Wvs SMU95–75
- Wvs Pitt75–67
A week or more of rest.
West Virginia
18-14 overall · 9-10 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs BYU48–68
- Wvs UCF77–62
- L@ Kansas St63–65
- Wvs BYU79–71
- L@ Oklahoma St84–91
A week or more of rest.