Food City Center · at Tennessee
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | TENN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TENN 94–58 · win probability TENN 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TENN has more of the edges
WOF 2, TENN 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
WOF has played the 283rd-hardest schedule, TENN the 7th. A record against a soft schedule means less
TENN offense vs WOF defense
Offense 9th of 366 against a defense 258th, on the model’s ratings
WOF offense vs TENN defense
Offense 241st of 366 against a defense 9th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WOF 29.8%, TENN 44.7%. Defensive: WOF 71.0%, TENN 72.2%
Three-pointers
WOF hits 35.0% and allows 36.4%; TENN hits 33.4% and allows 30.5%. Threes are 43.1% and 32.1% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: WOF 52.5 and allows 53.8; TENN 51.4 and allows 47.8
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WOF 13.4%, TENN 17.4%. Forced: WOF 15.0%, TENN 16.1%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WOF 43%, TENN 13%. Transfers in: WOF 1, TENN 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
TENN at home. This season: TENN 0-0 at home, WOF 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: WOF 36.2, TENN 37.4. Allowed: WOF 36.9, TENN 36.3
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: WOF plays 68.7 a game (198th fastest), TENN 68.1 (226th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TENN -35.9 | — |
| Total | — | 152.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | WOF 58.2 · TENN 94.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TENN -21.2 | — |
| 1H total | 71.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | WOF 25 · TENN 46.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
WOF 0–2 TENNTENN leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · TENN has won the last 2 meetings · WOF 2-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2024-25 | WOF 62 vs TENN 77 | TENN -18.5 | WOF W |
| Nov 14, 2023-24 | WOF 61 @ TENN 82 | TENN -30.5 | WOF W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Wofford
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +4.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 46-70 | +14.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 86-76 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 62-93 | +27.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 94-86 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 86-78 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 83-93 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 83-77 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 63-56 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 52-73 | -4.5 | L −25.5 | 161.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 15 | @ | W 83-57 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 73-84 | +12.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 79-74 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 95-86 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 97-85 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 97-109 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | O 206 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 67-76 | -5.5 | L −14.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-70 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 88-78 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 80-77 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 81-55 | +1.5 | W +27.5 | 150.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 72-86 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 81-67 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 77-66 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 80-97 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 89-99 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 154.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 82-76 | -13.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 67-76 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 72-69 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 90-93 | -11.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 72-75 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | U 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
GMU
L 46-70
−9.5
8
vs
MILW
W 86-76
+13.5
11
@
AUB
L 62-93
−3.5
15
@
BELL
W 94-86
+4.5
19
vs
UNF
W 86-78
−2.5
26
@
NKU
L 83-93
−6.5
29
@
EKU
W 83-77
+4.5
3
vs
PRES
W 63-56
+2.5
6
vs
ELON
L 52-73
−25.5
15
@
GWEB
W 83-57
+15.5
17
@
WICH
L 73-84
+1.5
31
@
WCU
W 79-74
+2.5
3
@
CIT
W 95-86
−0.5
7
vs
UNCG
W 97-85
+4.5
10
@
MER
L 97-109
−8.5
14
vs
UTC
L 67-76
−14.5
17
@
FUR
W 74-70
+8.5
21
vs
SAM
W 88-78
+6.5
24
vs
MER
W 80-77
+5.5
29
@
UTC
W 81-55
+27.5
1
vs
ETSU
L 72-86
−12.5
4
@
VMI
W 81-67
+5.5
7
vs
WCU
W 77-66
+7.5
11
@
SAM
L 80-97
−10.5
14
@
UNCG
L 89-99
−12.5
18
vs
VMI
W 82-76
−7.5
21
vs
FUR
L 67-76
−7.5
25
@
ETSU
W 72-69
+9.5
28
vs
CIT
L 90-93
−14.5
7
vs
UNCG
L 72-75
−7.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
GMU
L 46-70
−24.5
8
vs
MILW
W 86-76
+11.5
11
@
AUB
L 62-93
+2.5
15
@
BELL
W 94-86
+23.5
19
vs
UNF
W 86-78
+2.5
26
@
NKU
L 83-93
+26.5
29
@
EKU
W 83-77
+6.5
3
vs
PRES
W 63-56
−19.5
6
vs
ELON
L 52-73
−36.5
15
@
GWEB
W 83-57
−15.5
17
@
WICH
L 73-84
+12.5
31
@
WCU
W 79-74
−1.5
3
@
CIT
W 95-86
+36.5
7
vs
UNCG
W 97-85
+28.5
10
@
MER
L 97-109
+49.5
14
vs
UTC
L 67-76
−11.5
17
@
FUR
W 74-70
−5.5
21
vs
SAM
W 88-78
+11.5
24
vs
MER
W 80-77
−0.5
29
@
UTC
W 81-55
−14.5
1
vs
ETSU
L 72-86
+11.5
4
@
VMI
W 81-67
−1.5
7
vs
WCU
W 77-66
−11.5
11
@
SAM
L 80-97
+26.5
14
@
UNCG
L 89-99
+33.5
18
vs
VMI
W 82-76
−0.5
21
vs
FUR
L 67-76
−10.5
25
@
ETSU
W 72-69
−8.5
28
vs
CIT
L 90-93
+34.5
7
vs
UNCG
L 72-75
−8.5
over 15under 15avg +4.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Tennessee
37 games played
Straight up
25-12
68% wins
Against the spread
17-20
46% covers · avg −1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-19
49% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 76-61 | -28.5 | L −13.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 95-56 | -27.5 | W +11.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 99-66 | -41.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 91-66 | -26.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 89-60 | -31.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 85-60 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 76-73 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 76-81 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 60-62 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 62-75 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 83-62 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 156.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 94-52 | -42.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 105-54 | -44.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 75-86 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 158.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 85-71 | -12.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 67-91 | +4.5 | L −19.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 87-82 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 78-80 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 79-73 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 167.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 86-85 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 77-69 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 84-66 | -12.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 71-74 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 73-64 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 73-63 | -14.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 89-66 | -11.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 69-65 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 69-73 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 69-71 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 78-59 | -10.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 82-86 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 72-62 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 68-75 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 78-56 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 79-72 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 27 | vs | W 76-62 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 139.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 29 | vs | L 62-95 | +8.5 | L −24.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MER
W 76-61
−13.5
8
vs
NKU
W 95-56
+11.5
12
vs
UNF
W 99-66
−8.5
17
vs
RICE
W 91-66
−1.5
20
vs
TNST
W 89-60
−2.5
24
vs
RUTG
W 85-60
+10.5
25
vs
HOU
W 76-73
+5.5
26
vs
KU
L 76-81
−12.5
2
@
SYR
L 60-62
−9.5
6
vs
ILL
L 62-75
−14.5
16
vs
LOU
W 83-62
+16.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 94-52
−0.5
30
vs
SCST
W 105-54
+6.5
3
@
ARK
L 75-86
−12.5
6
vs
TEX
W 85-71
+1.5
10
@
FLA
L 67-91
−19.5
13
vs
TA&M
W 87-82
−6.5
17
vs
UK
L 78-80
−8.5
24
@
ALA
W 79-73
+10.5
28
@
UGA
W 86-85
−0.5
31
vs
AUB
W 77-69
+2.5
3
vs
MISS
W 84-66
+5.5
7
@
UK
L 71-74
−1.5
11
@
MSST
W 73-64
+0.5
14
vs
LSU
W 73-63
−4.5
18
vs
OU
W 89-66
+11.5
21
@
VAN
W 69-65
+6.5
24
@
MIZ
L 69-73
−7.5
28
vs
ALA
L 69-71
−7.5
3
@
SC
W 78-59
+8.5
7
vs
VAN
L 82-86
−6.5
12
vs
AUB
W 72-62
+4.5
13
vs
VAN
L 68-75
−8.5
20
vs
M-OH
W 78-56
+9.5
22
vs
UVA
W 79-72
+5.5
27
vs
ISU
W 76-62
+16.5
29
vs
MICH
L 62-95
−24.5
covered 17didn’t cover 20avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MER
W 76-61
−6.5
8
vs
NKU
W 95-56
+13.5
12
vs
UNF
W 99-66
+9.5
17
vs
RICE
W 91-66
+13.5
20
vs
TNST
W 89-60
−8.5
24
vs
RUTG
W 85-60
+3.5
25
vs
HOU
W 76-73
+12.5
26
vs
KU
L 76-81
+16.5
2
@
SYR
L 60-62
−25.5
6
vs
ILL
L 62-75
−12.5
16
vs
LOU
W 83-62
−11.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 94-52
−6.5
30
vs
SCST
W 105-54
+11.5
3
@
ARK
L 75-86
+2.5
6
vs
TEX
W 85-71
+2.5
10
@
FLA
L 67-91
+6.5
13
vs
TA&M
W 87-82
+9.5
17
vs
UK
L 78-80
+12.5
24
@
ALA
W 79-73
−15.5
28
@
UGA
W 86-85
+13.5
31
vs
AUB
W 77-69
−1.5
3
vs
MISS
W 84-66
+10.5
7
@
UK
L 71-74
−2.5
11
@
MSST
W 73-64
−10.5
14
vs
LSU
W 73-63
−7.5
18
vs
OU
W 89-66
+5.5
21
@
VAN
W 69-65
−16.5
24
@
MIZ
L 69-73
−1.5
28
vs
ALA
L 69-71
−22.5
3
@
SC
W 78-59
−4.5
7
vs
VAN
L 82-86
+21.5
12
vs
AUB
W 72-62
−10.5
13
vs
VAN
L 68-75
−4.5
20
vs
M-OH
W 78-56
−14.5
22
vs
UVA
W 79-72
+13.5
27
vs
ISU
W 76-62
−1.5
29
vs
MICH
L 62-95
+10.5
over 18under 19avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Tennessee has the better starters
Position by position: Wofford 0, Tennessee 4, even 1
WoffordBetterTennessee
G L. Flynn5.6 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 10
→TENNBig
G J. Harris TR21.4 pts · 6.5 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 99
G C. Watley9.7 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 28
→TENNBig
G T. Lundblade TR15.8 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 63
G C. Arias TR6.9 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 44
→TENNBig
G D. Dai Ames TR17 pts · 2 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 83
F B. Sumpter6.6 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 34
→TENNSmall
F B. Lue TR10.9 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 53
F C. Richards3 pts · 2 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C M. Rubin TR11.3 pts · 7.1 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 83
WoffordBetterTennessee
WOF offense241st of 366 · -7.3
→TENNBig
TENN defense9th of 366 · +8.2
WOF defense258th of 366 · -6.7
→TENNBig
TENN offense9th of 366 · +10.4
Backcourt-5.7 · 3 players
→TENNBig
Backcourt+8.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.4 · 2 players
→TENNBig
Frontcourt+3.1 · 2 players
Bench-0.2 · 2 players
→TENNBig
Bench+11.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestWOF betterTENN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
L. Flynn27 minC. Watley25 minC. Arias18 min · TRD. Miller2 minG. Collins2 minC. LoweNew
Forwards
B. Sumpter23 minC. Richards8 minC. SiskNew
Centers
E. RamseyNew
Guards
J. Harris35 min · TRT. Lundblade35 min · TRD. Dai Ames32 min · TRJ. Haralson27 min · TRT. Hill25 min · TRT. Henderson7 min
Forwards
B. Lue27 min · TRJ. Washington21 min · TRD. Brown15 minC. Fermin13 min · TRC. WashingtonNewR. ScottNew
Centers
M. Rubin30 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.4 #90 | Points per game | 78.8 #81 |
| 1.14 #74 | Points per possession | 1.16 #49 |
| 68.7 #198 | Pace (possessions) | 68.1 #226 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.5 #127 | Effective FG% | 51.4 #174 |
| 35.0 #119 | 3-point % | 33.4 #201 |
| 43.1 #112 | 3-point attempt rate | 32.1 #328 |
| 36.2 #144 | Free throw rate | 37.4 #115 |
| Possessions | ||
| 13.4 #12 | Turnover rate | 17.4 #227 |
| 29.8 #212 | Offensive rebound rate | 44.7 #1 |
| 13.8 #161 | Assists per game | 17.1 #24 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.6 #282 | Points allowed | 69.6 #58 |
| 1.15 #317 | Points allowed per possession | 1.02 #43 |
| 53.8 #294 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.8 #37 |
| 36.4 #322 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.5 #21 |
| 15.0 #291 | Turnovers forced | 16.1 #215 |
| 71.0 #101 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.2 #61 |
| 5.6 #283 | Steals per game | 7.3 #101 |
| 3.1 #201 | Blocks per game | 3.7 #114 |
Wofford
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UNC Greensboro72–75
- Lvs The Citadel90–93
- W@ ETSU72–69
- Lvs Furman67–76
- Wvs VMI82–76
A week or more of rest.
Tennessee
25-12 in 2025-26 overall · 12-8 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan62–95
- Wvs Iowa State76–62
- Wvs Virginia79–72
- Wvs Miami OH78–56
- Lvs Vanderbilt68–75
A week or more of rest.