Bramlage Coliseum · at Kansas St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | KSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects KSU 83–70 · win probability KSU 88%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: KSU has more of the edges
SDST 2, KSU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
SDST has played the 271st-hardest schedule, KSU the 43rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SDST 30.3%, KSU 29.2%. Defensive: SDST 74.9%, KSU 66.0%
KSU offense vs SDST defense
Offense 74th of 366 against a defense 221st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: SDST plays 68.2 a game (220th fastest), KSU 73.8 (11th). Faster games mean more points
SDST offense vs KSU defense
Offense 185th of 366 against a defense 97th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SDST 51%, KSU 7%. Transfers in: SDST 3, KSU 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Three-pointers
SDST hits 34.0% and allows 34.1%; KSU hits 36.4% and allows 33.7%. Threes are 38.8% and 40.9% of their shots
Home court
KSU at home. This season: KSU 0-0 at home, SDST 0-0 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SDST 16.2%, KSU 17.4%. Forced: SDST 14.5%, KSU 17.1%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SDST 29.7, KSU 26.9. Allowed: SDST 34.5, KSU 35.2
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: SDST 52.0 and allows 51.8; KSU 53.3 and allows 52.5
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | KSU -13.6 | — |
| Total | — | 152.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | SDST 69.6 · KSU 83.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | KSU -8.0 | — |
| 1H total | 71.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | SDST 31.7 · KSU 39.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | |
| 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SDST 0–1 KSUKSU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · SDST 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2023-24 | SDST 68 @ KSU 91 | KSU -9.5 | KSU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
S Dakota St
29 games played
Straight up
11-18
38% wins
Against the spread
12-17
41% covers · avg −1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg −2.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 75-66 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 58-65 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 69-83 | +16.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 105-58 | -12.5 | W +34.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 52-75 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 151.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 52-64 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 116 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 75-62 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 81-84 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 9 | @ | W 68-64 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 15 | vs | L 72-87 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 87-88 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 71-99 | +31.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 84-69 | -9.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 87-90 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 87-79 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 65-76 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 90-62 | -13.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 69-74 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 71-80 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 95-72 | -13.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 62-77 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 157.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 67-68 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 61-79 | -2.5 | L −20.5 | 160.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 87-69 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 66-74 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 91-83 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 73-59 | -12.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 70-75 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 67-80 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MRMK
W 75-66
+2.5
9
@
UNI
L 58-65
+3.5
12
@
ORE
L 69-83
+2.5
21
vs
GAST
W 105-58
+34.5
25
vs
UVU
L 52-75
−21.5
26
vs
UCI
L 52-64
−9.5
3
@
NAU
W 75-62
+10.5
6
vs
IDHO
L 81-84
−8.5
9
@
BALL
W 68-64
−1.5
15
vs
WYO
L 72-87
−11.5
19
@
MILW
L 87-88
−2.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 71-99
+3.5
1
vs
OMA
W 84-69
+5.5
3
@
UND
L 87-90
−10.5
8
vs
DEN
W 87-79
−0.5
14
@
NDSU
L 65-76
−5.5
17
vs
KC
W 90-62
+14.5
22
@
STMN
L 69-74
+1.5
28
@
OMA
L 71-80
−10.5
31
vs
ORU
W 95-72
+9.5
4
vs
STMN
L 62-77
−16.5
7
vs
SDAK
L 67-68
−12.5
12
@
DEN
L 61-79
−20.5
14
@
ORU
W 87-69
+12.5
18
vs
NDSU
L 66-74
−6.5
21
vs
UND
W 91-83
−1.5
26
@
KC
W 73-59
+1.5
28
@
SDAK
L 70-75
−8.5
5
vs
STMN
L 67-80
−8.5
covered 12didn’t cover 17avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MRMK
W 75-66
−2.5
9
@
UNI
L 58-65
−27.5
12
@
ORE
L 69-83
+6.5
21
vs
GAST
W 105-58
+19.5
25
vs
UVU
L 52-75
−24.5
26
vs
UCI
L 52-64
−28.5
3
@
NAU
W 75-62
−11.5
6
vs
IDHO
L 81-84
+17.5
9
@
BALL
W 68-64
−10.5
15
vs
WYO
L 72-87
+9.5
19
@
MILW
L 87-88
+23.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 71-99
+10.5
1
vs
OMA
W 84-69
+0.5
3
@
UND
L 87-90
+24.5
8
vs
DEN
W 87-79
+3.5
14
@
NDSU
L 65-76
−10.5
17
vs
KC
W 90-62
+0.5
22
@
STMN
L 69-74
−12.5
28
@
OMA
L 71-80
+0.5
31
vs
ORU
W 95-72
+16.5
4
vs
STMN
L 62-77
−18.5
7
vs
SDAK
L 67-68
−24.5
12
@
DEN
L 61-79
−20.5
14
@
ORU
W 87-69
+8.5
18
vs
NDSU
L 66-74
−6.5
21
vs
UND
W 91-83
+22.5
26
@
KC
W 73-59
−20.5
28
@
SDAK
L 70-75
−6.5
5
vs
STMN
L 67-80
−3.5
over 14under 15avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Kansas St
32 games played
Straight up
12-20
38% wins
Against the spread
12-20
38% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 93-64 | -18.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 98-71 | -28.5 | L −1.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 99-96 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 164.5 | O 195 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 84-83 | -12.5 | L −11.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 98-77 | +2.5 | W +23.5 | 164.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 85-86 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 168.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 69-86 | +10.5 | L −6.5 | 164.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 1 | vs | L 66-82 | -12.5 | L −28.5 | 159.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 67-78 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 108-49 | -38.5 | W +20.5 | 160.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 83-76 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 106-76 | -21.5 | W +8.5 | 176.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 94-85 | -32.5 | L −23.5 | 169.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 73-83 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 174.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 76-101 | +17.5 | L −7.5 | 171.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 84-87 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 169.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 73-82 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 170.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 83-84 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 175.5 | U 167 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 81-78 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 168.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 62-86 | +4.5 | L −19.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 54-59 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 61-95 | +12.5 | L −21.5 | 156.5 | U 156 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 82-84 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 62-91 | +2.5 | L −26.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 64-78 | +22.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 90-74 | +3.5 | W +19.5 | 159.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 72-100 | +12.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 70-79 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 163.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 68-77 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 65-63 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 85-104 | +17.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 189 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 91-105 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 168.5 | O 196 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
UNCG
W 93-64
+10.5
8
vs
BELL
W 98-71
−1.5
13
vs
CAL
W 99-96
−3.5
17
vs
TLSA
W 84-83
−11.5
20
vs
MSST
W 98-77
+23.5
21
vs
NEB
L 85-86
+0.5
25
@
IU
L 69-86
−6.5
1
vs
BGSU
L 66-82
−28.5
6
vs
HALL
L 67-78
−13.5
8
vs
MVSU
W 108-49
+20.5
13
@
CREI
W 83-76
+11.5
20
vs
SDAK
W 106-76
+8.5
28
vs
ULM
W 94-85
−23.5
3
vs
BYU
L 73-83
−2.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 76-101
−7.5
10
@
ASU
L 84-87
−1.5
14
vs
UCF
L 73-82
−11.5
17
@
OKST
L 83-84
+1.5
20
vs
UTAH
W 81-78
−7.5
24
vs
KU
L 62-86
−19.5
27
@
WVU
L 54-59
+2.5
1
vs
ISU
L 61-95
−21.5
7
@
TCU
L 82-84
+7.5
11
vs
CIN
L 62-91
−26.5
14
@
HOU
L 64-78
+8.5
17
vs
BAY
W 90-74
+19.5
21
@
TTU
L 72-100
−15.5
25
@
COLO
L 70-79
−3.5
28
vs
TCU
L 68-77
−5.5
3
vs
WVU
W 65-63
+5.5
7
@
KU
L 85-104
−1.5
10
vs
BYU
L 91-105
−2.5
covered 12didn’t cover 20avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
UNCG
W 93-64
+8.5
8
vs
BELL
W 98-71
+0.5
13
vs
CAL
W 99-96
+30.5
17
vs
TLSA
W 84-83
+6.5
20
vs
MSST
W 98-77
+10.5
21
vs
NEB
L 85-86
+2.5
25
@
IU
L 69-86
−9.5
1
vs
BGSU
L 66-82
−11.5
6
vs
HALL
L 67-78
−3.5
8
vs
MVSU
W 108-49
−3.5
13
@
CREI
W 83-76
−0.5
20
vs
SDAK
W 106-76
+5.5
28
vs
ULM
W 94-85
+9.5
3
vs
BYU
L 73-83
−18.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 76-101
+5.5
10
@
ASU
L 84-87
+1.5
14
vs
UCF
L 73-82
−15.5
17
@
OKST
L 83-84
−8.5
20
vs
UTAH
W 81-78
−9.5
24
vs
KU
L 62-86
−10.5
27
@
WVU
L 54-59
−33.5
1
vs
ISU
L 61-95
−0.5
7
@
TCU
L 82-84
+10.5
11
vs
CIN
L 62-91
+5.5
14
@
HOU
L 64-78
−2.5
17
vs
BAY
W 90-74
+4.5
21
@
TTU
L 72-100
+13.5
25
@
COLO
L 70-79
−14.5
28
vs
TCU
L 68-77
−14.5
3
vs
WVU
W 65-63
−15.5
7
@
KU
L 85-104
+31.5
10
vs
BYU
L 91-105
+27.5
over 16under 16avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Kansas St has the better starters
Position by position: S Dakota St 0, Kansas St 2, even 3
S Dakota StBetterKansas St
G J. Sayler14.8 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 54
→KSUSmall
G B. Rechsteiner TR12 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 71
G K. Garry10.6 pts · 5.1 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 49
=Even
G J. Schutt TR7.7 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 39
G E. Ryans TR7.7 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 12
→KSUBig
G M. Wheeler TR8.4 pts · 1.2 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 50
F M. Thompson TR10.8 pts · 6.1 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 38
=Even
F D. Lindsay TR5.3 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 51
C A. Squires4.4 pts · 3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 29
=Even
F I. Abraham TR4.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 31
S Dakota StBetterKansas St
SDST offense185th of 366 · -5.7
→KSUSmall
KSU defense97th of 366 · -0.7
SDST defense221st of 366 · -5.7
→KSUBig
KSU offense74th of 366 · +1.4
Backcourt-4.4 · 3 players
→KSUBig
Backcourt-1.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.8 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-1.2 · 2 players
Bench-1.4 · 4 players
→KSUSmall
Bench-0.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSDST betterKSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Sayler33 minK. Garry30 minE. Ryans27 min · TRT. Buchanan13 minJ. Rogers9 minJ. Cascio Jensen2 min
Forwards
M. Thompson29 min · TRJ. Mekonnen4 min · TRJ. Van KalsbeekNewD. KernNewY. YatabareNewB. EllweinNew
Centers
A. Squires14 min
Guards
B. Rechsteiner28 min · TRJ. Schutt25 min · TRM. Wheeler22 min · TRA. Kostic14 minJ. AlexanderNew
Forwards
D. Lindsay21 min · TRI. Abraham20 min · TRT. Malovec15 min · TRP. N'Diaye9 min · TRB. Vice6 min · TRM. GilhoolNew
Centers
J. Rock13 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.4 #182 | Points per game | 79.6 #74 |
| 1.09 #150 | Points per possession | 1.08 #191 |
| 68.2 #220 | Pace (possessions) | 73.8 #11 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.0 #143 | Effective FG% | 53.3 #88 |
| 34.0 #174 | 3-point % | 36.4 #43 |
| 38.8 #193 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.9 #148 |
| 29.7 #317 | Free throw rate | 26.9 #351 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.2 #150 | Turnover rate | 17.4 #233 |
| 30.3 #186 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.2 #229 |
| 13.8 #160 | Assists per game | 16.8 #29 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.5 #177 | Points allowed | 81.8 #339 |
| 1.09 #198 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #244 |
| 51.8 #204 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.5 #239 |
| 34.1 #191 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.7 #166 |
| 14.5 #323 | Turnovers forced | 17.1 #145 |
| 74.9 #9 | Defensive rebound rate | 66.0 #317 |
| 5.5 #291 | Steals per game | 7.0 #121 |
| 2.2 #336 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #137 |
S Dakota St
11-18 in 2025-26 overall · 7-10 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs St Thomas67–80
- L@ South Dakota70–75
- W@ Kansas City73–59
- Wvs North Dakota91–83
- Lvs N Dakota St66–74
A week or more of rest.
Kansas St
12-20 in 2025-26 overall · 3-16 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs BYU91–105
- L@ Kansas85–104
- Wvs West Virginia65–63
- Lvs TCU68–77
- L@ Colorado70–79
A week or more of rest.