Carver-Hawkeye Arena · at Iowa
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | IOWA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects IOWA 84–61 · win probability IOWA 98%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: IOWA has more of the edges
LIP 0, IOWA 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
LIP has played the 267th-hardest schedule, IOWA the 30th. A record against a soft schedule means less
LIP offense vs IOWA defense
Offense 191st of 366 against a defense 20th, on the model’s ratings
IOWA offense vs LIP defense
Offense 69th of 366 against a defense 226th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: LIP plays 70.8 a game (83rd fastest), IOWA 63.0 (365th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LIP 25.8%, IOWA 30.2%. Defensive: LIP 69.8%, IOWA 70.8%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LIP 16.0%, IOWA 15.1%. Forced: LIP 17.7%, IOWA 20.3%
Home court
IOWA at home. This season: IOWA 0-0 at home, LIP 0-0 away
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: LIP 54.1 and allows 53.2; IOWA 56.4 and allows 52.6
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LIP 44%, IOWA 61%. Transfers in: LIP 2, IOWA 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Three-pointers
LIP hits 35.7% and allows 34.3%; IOWA hits 35.6% and allows 33.3%. Threes are 47.9% and 43.0% of their shots
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: LIP 26.0, IOWA 35.1. Allowed: LIP 29.0, IOWA 38.5
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | IOWA -23.1 | — |
| Total | — | 144.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | LIP 60.8 · IOWA 83.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | IOWA -13.6 | — |
| 1H total | 67.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | LIP 27 · IOWA 40.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Lipscomb
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg −0.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 61-105 | +26.5 | L −17.5 | 154.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 77-92 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 64-69 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 68-75 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 83-62 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 90-67 | +7.5 | W +30.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 88-77 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 83-80 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 92-58 | -11.5 | W +22.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 73-97 | +32.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 62-89 | +13.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 76-57 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 82-74 | -18.5 | L −10.5 | 172.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 83-91 | -11.5 | L −19.5 | 150.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 84-77 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 81-71 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 82-78 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 79-74 | -15.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 86-71 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 65-70 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 100-94 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 76-87 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 78-86 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 75-61 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 160.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 81-87 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 75-72 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 73-51 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 78-84 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 80-77 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 53-77 | -3.5 | L −27.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
VAN
L 61-105
−17.5
9
@
MER
L 77-92
−11.5
11
@
UNCA
L 64-69
+1.5
19
@
BEL
L 68-75
+5.5
22
vs
WCU
W 83-62
+15.5
26
@
MRSH
W 90-67
+30.5
29
@
SEMO
W 88-77
+14.5
3
vs
TNTC
W 83-80
−7.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 92-58
+22.5
16
@
DUKE
L 73-97
+8.5
29
@
CIN
L 62-89
−13.5
1
vs
JAX
W 76-57
+6.5
3
vs
UNF
W 82-74
−10.5
8
@
STET
L 83-91
−19.5
10
@
FGCU
W 84-77
+9.5
15
vs
BELL
W 81-71
−1.5
17
vs
APSU
W 82-78
+1.5
22
vs
STET
W 79-74
−10.5
23
vs
FGCU
W 86-71
+9.5
29
@
JAX
L 65-70
−8.5
31
@
UNF
W 100-94
−4.5
4
@
APSU
L 76-87
−6.5
7
vs
CARK
L 78-86
−11.5
11
vs
EKU
W 75-61
+7.5
14
@
QUC
L 81-87
−2.5
18
@
BELL
W 75-72
−0.5
21
vs
UNA
W 73-51
+9.5
25
@
WGA
L 78-84
−11.5
28
@
EKU
W 80-77
+1.5
6
vs
FGCU
L 53-77
−27.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
VAN
L 61-105
+11.5
9
@
MER
L 77-92
+11.5
11
@
UNCA
L 64-69
−25.5
19
@
BEL
L 68-75
−15.5
22
vs
WCU
W 83-62
−6.5
26
@
MRSH
W 90-67
−0.5
29
@
SEMO
W 88-77
+11.5
3
vs
TNTC
W 83-80
+10.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 92-58
+3.5
16
@
DUKE
L 73-97
+18.5
29
@
CIN
L 62-89
+0.5
1
vs
JAX
W 76-57
−14.5
3
vs
UNF
W 82-74
−16.5
8
@
STET
L 83-91
+23.5
10
@
FGCU
W 84-77
+3.5
15
vs
BELL
W 81-71
−2.5
17
vs
APSU
W 82-78
+4.5
22
vs
STET
W 79-74
−4.5
23
vs
FGCU
W 86-71
+3.5
29
@
JAX
L 65-70
−7.5
31
@
UNF
W 100-94
+28.5
4
@
APSU
L 76-87
+6.5
7
vs
CARK
L 78-86
+8.5
11
vs
EKU
W 75-61
−24.5
14
@
QUC
L 81-87
+2.5
18
@
BELL
W 75-72
−7.5
21
vs
UNA
W 73-51
−25.5
25
@
WGA
L 78-84
+8.5
28
@
EKU
W 80-77
−0.5
6
vs
FGCU
L 53-77
−20.5
over 16under 14avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Iowa
37 games played
Straight up
24-13
65% wins
Against the spread
21-16
57% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-17
54% overs · avg +0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 101-69 | -22.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 77-58 | -30.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 81-62 | -15.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 99-70 | -23.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 93-54 | -31.5 | W +7.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 74-69 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 143 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 59-46 | -8.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 105 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 52-71 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 133.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 83-64 | -10.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 11 | @ | L 62-66 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 91-51 | -25.5 | W +14.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 94-39 | -25.5 | W +29.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 90-62 | -33.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 74-61 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 67-70 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 130.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 69-75 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 72-79 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-57 | +3.5 | W +20.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 68-62 | -17.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 73-72 | -9.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 84-66 | -9.5 | W +8.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 84-74 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 76-70 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 70-77 | -10.5 | L −17.5 | 138.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 57-78 | +2.5 | L −18.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 57-52 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 109 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 71-84 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 74-57 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 69-71 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 68-71 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 75-84 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 75-64 | -11.5 | L −0.5 | 133.5 | O 139 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 69-72 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 67-61 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 130.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 73-72 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 26 | vs | W 77-71 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 131.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 28 | vs | L 59-71 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
RMU
W 101-69
+9.5
7
vs
WIU
W 77-58
−11.5
14
vs
XAV
W 81-62
+3.5
18
vs
SEMO
W 99-70
+5.5
20
vs
CHST
W 93-54
+7.5
25
vs
MISS
W 74-69
+0.5
26
vs
GCU
W 59-46
+4.5
2
@
MSU
L 52-71
−13.5
6
vs
MD
W 83-64
+8.5
11
@
ISU
L 62-66
+7.5
14
vs
WMU
W 91-51
+14.5
20
vs
BUCK
W 94-39
+29.5
29
vs
UML
W 90-62
−5.5
3
vs
UCLA
W 74-61
+6.5
6
@
MINN
L 67-70
−7.5
11
vs
ILL
L 69-75
−4.5
14
@
PUR
L 72-79
+3.5
17
@
IU
W 74-57
+20.5
20
vs
RUTG
W 68-62
−11.5
28
vs
USC
W 73-72
−8.5
1
@
ORE
W 84-66
+8.5
4
@
WASH
W 84-74
+7.5
8
vs
NU
W 76-70
−4.5
11
@
MD
L 70-77
−17.5
14
vs
PUR
L 57-78
−18.5
17
vs
NEB
W 57-52
+3.5
22
@
WIS
L 71-84
−10.5
25
vs
OSU
W 74-57
+10.5
28
@
PSU
L 69-71
−11.5
5
vs
MICH
L 68-71
+6.5
8
@
NEB
L 75-84
−4.5
11
vs
MD
W 75-64
−0.5
12
vs
OSU
L 69-72
−4.5
20
vs
CLEM
W 67-61
+4.5
22
vs
FLA
W 73-72
+11.5
26
vs
NEB
W 77-71
+7.5
28
vs
ILL
L 59-71
−5.5
covered 21didn’t cover 16avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
RMU
W 101-69
+33.5
7
vs
WIU
W 77-58
−10.5
14
vs
XAV
W 81-62
−0.5
18
vs
SEMO
W 99-70
+21.5
20
vs
CHST
W 93-54
+4.5
25
vs
MISS
W 74-69
+2.5
26
vs
GCU
W 59-46
−38.5
2
@
MSU
L 52-71
−10.5
6
vs
MD
W 83-64
+9.5
11
@
ISU
L 62-66
−13.5
14
vs
WMU
W 91-51
+4.5
20
vs
BUCK
W 94-39
−0.5
29
vs
UML
W 90-62
+6.5
3
vs
UCLA
W 74-61
−5.5
6
@
MINN
L 67-70
+6.5
11
vs
ILL
L 69-75
+1.5
14
@
PUR
L 72-79
+5.5
17
@
IU
W 74-57
−15.5
20
vs
RUTG
W 68-62
−10.5
28
vs
USC
W 73-72
+3.5
1
@
ORE
W 84-66
+16.5
4
@
WASH
W 84-74
+16.5
8
vs
NU
W 76-70
+6.5
11
@
MD
L 70-77
+8.5
14
vs
PUR
L 57-78
−7.5
17
vs
NEB
W 57-52
−30.5
22
@
WIS
L 71-84
+7.5
25
vs
OSU
W 74-57
−10.5
28
@
PSU
L 69-71
−3.5
5
vs
MICH
L 68-71
−7.5
8
@
NEB
L 75-84
+22.5
11
vs
MD
W 75-64
+5.5
12
vs
OSU
L 69-72
+0.5
20
vs
CLEM
W 67-61
−2.5
22
vs
FLA
W 73-72
−0.5
26
vs
NEB
W 77-71
+16.5
28
vs
ILL
L 59-71
−8.5
over 20under 17avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Iowa has the better starters
Position by position: Lipscomb 1, Iowa 3, even 1
LipscombBetterIowa
G T. Simpkins TR12.5 pts · 2.9 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 79
←LIPSmall
G K. Combs6.1 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 54
G M. Esmeraldo9.8 pts · 3.9 reb · 6.9 ast
Score 81
=Even
G T. Coleman TR10 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 82
F T. Sargiunas9.9 pts · 2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 28
→IOWASmall
F C. Koch7.8 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 57
F O. Ashkenazi2.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 3
→IOWABig
F C. Manyawu6.6 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 90
F T. Byrne TR3.8 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 4
→IOWABig
C A. McKeever TR8.3 pts · 9.1 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 77
LipscombBetterIowa
LIP offense191st of 366 · -5.9
→IOWABig
IOWA defense20th of 366 · +5.4
LIP defense226th of 366 · -6.0
→IOWABig
IOWA offense69th of 366 · +1.8
Backcourt+3.0 · 2 players
←LIPSmall
Backcourt+0.9 · 2 players
Frontcourt-6.7 · 3 players
→IOWABig
Frontcourt+4.1 · 3 players
Bench-1.1 · 1 player
→IOWABig
Bench+2.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestLIP betterIOWA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Simpkins32 min · TRM. Esmeraldo31 minZ. WellsNewV. VisnjicNewH. TidareNewK. QuinnNew
Forwards
T. Sargiunas24 minO. Ashkenazi20 minT. Byrne16 min · TRK. Okpara13 minL. JackNewD. MartinNew
Guards
K. Combs26 minT. Coleman23 min · TRI. Howard18 minT. Sage16 minJ. Koch2 minP. McCollumNew
Forwards
C. Koch28 minC. Manyawu19 minJ. Matteoni4 minT. ThompsonNew
Centers
A. McKeever23 min · TRT. Jirak8 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.6 #104 | Points per game | 74.5 #177 |
| 1.10 #142 | Points per possession | 1.18 #28 |
| 70.8 #83 | Pace (possessions) | 63.0 #365 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.1 #67 | Effective FG% | 56.4 #17 |
| 35.7 #75 | 3-point % | 35.6 #85 |
| 47.9 #24 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.0 #117 |
| 26.0 #357 | Free throw rate | 35.1 #176 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.0 #142 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #75 |
| 25.8 #327 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.2 #192 |
| 17.2 #19 | Assists per game | 15.0 #88 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.0 #242 | Points allowed | 66.3 #16 |
| 1.09 #187 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #91 |
| 53.2 #273 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.6 #245 |
| 34.3 #207 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.3 #143 |
| 17.7 #113 | Turnovers forced | 20.3 #17 |
| 69.8 #171 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.8 #119 |
| 6.8 #141 | Steals per game | 6.8 #140 |
| 2.6 #291 | Blocks per game | 1.9 #349 |
Lipscomb
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 12-7 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs FGCU53–77
- W@ E Kentucky80–77
- L@ West Georgia78–84
- Wvs North Alabama73–51
- W@ Bellarmine75–72
A week or more of rest.
Iowa
24-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-11 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois59–71
- Wvs Nebraska77–71
- Wvs Florida73–72
- Wvs Clemson67–61
- Lvs Ohio State69–72
A week or more of rest.