Casey's Center · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | IOWA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects IOWA 74–73 · win probability IOWA 55%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: IOWA has more of the edges
CREI 1, IOWA 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CREI 16.4%, IOWA 15.1%. Forced: CREI 13.7%, IOWA 20.3%
Three-pointers
CREI hits 34.1% and allows 35.1%; IOWA hits 35.6% and allows 33.3%. Threes are 48.2% and 43.0% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: CREI plays 68.9 a game (187th fastest), IOWA 63.0 (365th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CREI 26.9%, IOWA 30.2%. Defensive: CREI 70.5%, IOWA 70.8%
Free throws
Free throw rate: CREI 28.3, IOWA 35.1. Allowed: CREI 24.8, IOWA 38.5
Even
IOWA offense vs CREI defense
Offense 69th of 366 against a defense 43rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CREI 53%, IOWA 61%. Transfers in: CREI 6, IOWA 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
CREI offense vs IOWA defense
Offense 33rd of 366 against a defense 20th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
CREI has played the 40th-hardest schedule, IOWA the 30th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: CREI 53.0 and allows 51.1; IOWA 56.4 and allows 52.6
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | IOWA -1.3 | — |
| Total | — | 147.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | CREI 72.9 · IOWA 74.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | IOWA -0.7 | — |
| 1H total | 68.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | CREI 34.1 · IOWA 34.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
CREI 1–0 IOWACREI leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · CREI 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2023-24 | IOWA 84 @ CREI 92 | CREI -12.5 | IOWA W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Creighton
34 games played
Straight up
16-18
47% wins
Against the spread
11-23
32% covers · avg −2.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-18
47% overs · avg +0 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 92-76 | -29.5 | L −13.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 63-90 | +12.5 | L −14.5 | 164.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 84-45 | -33.5 | W +5.5 | 135.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 75-60 | -29.5 | L −14.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 74-81 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 60-78 | +9.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 76-66 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 96-76 | -18.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 50-71 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 155.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-83 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 98-57 | +2.5 | W +43.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 84-63 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 92-69 | -19.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 89-85 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 54-56 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 76-72 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 73-90 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 86-83 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 88-93 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 94-93 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 62-86 | -1.5 | L −25.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 58-85 | +6.5 | L −20.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 68-76 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 69-68 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 71-72 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 69-80 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 91-84 | +15.5 | W +22.5 | 143.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 52-81 | +12.5 | L −16.5 | 156.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 71-72 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 76-79 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 166.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 76-59 | +2.5 | W +19.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 61-72 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 136.5 | U 133 |
| Apr 2 | vs | W 82-69 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Apr 4 | vs | L 70-87 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 137.5 | O 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
SDAK
W 92-76
−13.5
11
@
GONZ
L 63-90
−14.5
14
vs
UMES
W 84-45
+5.5
19
vs
UND
W 75-60
−14.5
24
vs
BAY
L 74-81
−3.5
25
vs
ISU
L 60-78
−8.5
27
vs
ORE
W 76-66
+7.5
2
vs
NICH
W 96-76
+1.5
7
@
NEB
L 50-71
−15.5
13
vs
KSU
L 76-83
−11.5
17
@
XAV
W 98-57
+43.5
20
vs
MARQ
W 84-63
+14.5
22
vs
UTU
W 92-69
+3.5
30
vs
BTLR
W 89-85
−1.5
4
@
HALL
L 54-56
+1.5
7
@
VILL
W 76-72
+8.5
10
vs
SJU
L 73-90
−14.5
13
vs
GTWN
W 86-83
−5.5
16
@
PROV
L 88-93
−7.5
21
vs
XAV
W 94-93
−7.5
27
@
MARQ
L 62-86
−25.5
31
vs
CONN
L 58-85
−20.5
4
@
GTWN
L 68-76
−6.5
7
vs
HALL
W 69-68
−0.5
11
@
DEP
L 71-72
−2.5
14
vs
VILL
L 69-80
−9.5
18
@
CONN
W 91-84
+22.5
21
@
SJU
L 52-81
−16.5
25
vs
DEP
L 71-72
−4.5
28
vs
PROV
L 76-79
−6.5
4
@
BTLR
W 76-59
+19.5
12
vs
HALL
L 61-72
−8.5
2
vs
RUTG
W 82-69
+8.5
4
vs
WVU
L 70-87
−15.5
covered 11didn’t cover 23avg −2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
SDAK
W 92-76
−1.5
11
@
GONZ
L 63-90
−11.5
14
vs
UMES
W 84-45
−6.5
19
vs
UND
W 75-60
−20.5
24
vs
BAY
L 74-81
+0.5
25
vs
ISU
L 60-78
−14.5
27
vs
ORE
W 76-66
−8.5
2
vs
NICH
W 96-76
+28.5
7
@
NEB
L 50-71
−34.5
13
vs
KSU
L 76-83
−0.5
17
@
XAV
W 98-57
+3.5
20
vs
MARQ
W 84-63
−4.5
22
vs
UTU
W 92-69
+13.5
30
vs
BTLR
W 89-85
+17.5
4
@
HALL
L 54-56
−33.5
7
@
VILL
W 76-72
+5.5
10
vs
SJU
L 73-90
+10.5
13
vs
GTWN
W 86-83
+21.5
16
@
PROV
L 88-93
+19.5
21
vs
XAV
W 94-93
+31.5
27
@
MARQ
L 62-86
−6.5
31
vs
CONN
L 58-85
+0.5
4
@
GTWN
L 68-76
−2.5
7
vs
HALL
W 69-68
−3.5
11
@
DEP
L 71-72
+1.5
14
vs
VILL
L 69-80
+3.5
18
@
CONN
W 91-84
+31.5
21
@
SJU
L 52-81
−23.5
25
vs
DEP
L 71-72
+0.5
28
vs
PROV
L 76-79
−11.5
4
@
BTLR
W 76-59
−20.5
12
vs
HALL
L 61-72
−3.5
2
vs
RUTG
W 82-69
−0.5
4
vs
WVU
L 70-87
+19.5
over 16under 18avg +0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Iowa
37 games played
Straight up
24-13
65% wins
Against the spread
21-16
57% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-17
54% overs · avg +0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 101-69 | -22.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 77-58 | -30.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 81-62 | -15.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 99-70 | -23.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 93-54 | -31.5 | W +7.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 74-69 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 143 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 59-46 | -8.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 105 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 52-71 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 133.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 83-64 | -10.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 11 | @ | L 62-66 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 91-51 | -25.5 | W +14.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 94-39 | -25.5 | W +29.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 90-62 | -33.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 74-61 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 67-70 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 130.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 69-75 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 72-79 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-57 | +3.5 | W +20.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 68-62 | -17.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 73-72 | -9.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 84-66 | -9.5 | W +8.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 84-74 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 76-70 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 70-77 | -10.5 | L −17.5 | 138.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 57-78 | +2.5 | L −18.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 57-52 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 109 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 71-84 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 74-57 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 69-71 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 68-71 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 75-84 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 75-64 | -11.5 | L −0.5 | 133.5 | O 139 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 69-72 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 67-61 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 130.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 73-72 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 26 | vs | W 77-71 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 131.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 28 | vs | L 59-71 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
RMU
W 101-69
+9.5
7
vs
WIU
W 77-58
−11.5
14
vs
XAV
W 81-62
+3.5
18
vs
SEMO
W 99-70
+5.5
20
vs
CHST
W 93-54
+7.5
25
vs
MISS
W 74-69
+0.5
26
vs
GCU
W 59-46
+4.5
2
@
MSU
L 52-71
−13.5
6
vs
MD
W 83-64
+8.5
11
@
ISU
L 62-66
+7.5
14
vs
WMU
W 91-51
+14.5
20
vs
BUCK
W 94-39
+29.5
29
vs
UML
W 90-62
−5.5
3
vs
UCLA
W 74-61
+6.5
6
@
MINN
L 67-70
−7.5
11
vs
ILL
L 69-75
−4.5
14
@
PUR
L 72-79
+3.5
17
@
IU
W 74-57
+20.5
20
vs
RUTG
W 68-62
−11.5
28
vs
USC
W 73-72
−8.5
1
@
ORE
W 84-66
+8.5
4
@
WASH
W 84-74
+7.5
8
vs
NU
W 76-70
−4.5
11
@
MD
L 70-77
−17.5
14
vs
PUR
L 57-78
−18.5
17
vs
NEB
W 57-52
+3.5
22
@
WIS
L 71-84
−10.5
25
vs
OSU
W 74-57
+10.5
28
@
PSU
L 69-71
−11.5
5
vs
MICH
L 68-71
+6.5
8
@
NEB
L 75-84
−4.5
11
vs
MD
W 75-64
−0.5
12
vs
OSU
L 69-72
−4.5
20
vs
CLEM
W 67-61
+4.5
22
vs
FLA
W 73-72
+11.5
26
vs
NEB
W 77-71
+7.5
28
vs
ILL
L 59-71
−5.5
covered 21didn’t cover 16avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
RMU
W 101-69
+33.5
7
vs
WIU
W 77-58
−10.5
14
vs
XAV
W 81-62
−0.5
18
vs
SEMO
W 99-70
+21.5
20
vs
CHST
W 93-54
+4.5
25
vs
MISS
W 74-69
+2.5
26
vs
GCU
W 59-46
−38.5
2
@
MSU
L 52-71
−10.5
6
vs
MD
W 83-64
+9.5
11
@
ISU
L 62-66
−13.5
14
vs
WMU
W 91-51
+4.5
20
vs
BUCK
W 94-39
−0.5
29
vs
UML
W 90-62
+6.5
3
vs
UCLA
W 74-61
−5.5
6
@
MINN
L 67-70
+6.5
11
vs
ILL
L 69-75
+1.5
14
@
PUR
L 72-79
+5.5
17
@
IU
W 74-57
−15.5
20
vs
RUTG
W 68-62
−10.5
28
vs
USC
W 73-72
+3.5
1
@
ORE
W 84-66
+16.5
4
@
WASH
W 84-74
+16.5
8
vs
NU
W 76-70
+6.5
11
@
MD
L 70-77
+8.5
14
vs
PUR
L 57-78
−7.5
17
vs
NEB
W 57-52
−30.5
22
@
WIS
L 71-84
+7.5
25
vs
OSU
W 74-57
−10.5
28
@
PSU
L 69-71
−3.5
5
vs
MICH
L 68-71
−7.5
8
@
NEB
L 75-84
+22.5
11
vs
MD
W 75-64
+5.5
12
vs
OSU
L 69-72
+0.5
20
vs
CLEM
W 67-61
−2.5
22
vs
FLA
W 73-72
−0.5
26
vs
NEB
W 77-71
+16.5
28
vs
ILL
L 59-71
−8.5
over 20under 17avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Creighton has the better starters
Position by position: Creighton 3, Iowa 1, even 1
CreightonBetterIowa
G B. Robinson TR17.6 pts · 2.8 reb · 6.7 ast
Score 86
←CREISmall
G K. Combs6.1 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 54
G W. Enis TR16.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 72
=Even
G T. Coleman TR10 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 82
F J. Green10.5 pts · 6.3 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 92
←CREIBig
F C. Koch7.8 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 57
F O. Erhunmwunse TR6.9 pts · 8.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 74
→IOWASmall
F C. Manyawu6.6 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 90
C F. King TR13.1 pts · 8.4 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 92
←CREISmall
C A. McKeever TR8.3 pts · 9.1 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 77
CreightonBetterIowa
CREI offense33rd of 366 · +5.5
=Even
IOWA defense20th of 366 · +5.4
CREI defense43rd of 366 · +2.7
=Even
IOWA offense69th of 366 · +1.8
Backcourt+3.2 · 2 players
←CREISmall
Backcourt+0.9 · 2 players
Frontcourt+8.6 · 3 players
←CREIBig
Frontcourt+4.1 · 3 players
Bench+5.7 · 5 players
←CREIBig
Bench+2.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCREI betterIOWA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Robinson36 min · TRW. Enis34 min · TRB. Davis23 min · TRA. Swartz22 minH. Greer14 minK. Edwards7 min · TR
Forwards
J. Green28 minO. Erhunmwunse25 min · TRJ. McAndrew21 minI. Traudt19 minT. Carter-GivensNew
Centers
F. King25 min · TRW. RosaNew
Guards
K. Combs26 minT. Coleman23 min · TRI. Howard18 minT. Sage16 minJ. Koch2 minP. McCollumNew
Forwards
C. Koch28 minC. Manyawu19 minJ. Matteoni4 minT. ThompsonNew
Centers
A. McKeever23 min · TRT. Jirak8 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.2 #159 | Points per game | 74.5 #177 |
| 1.09 #156 | Points per possession | 1.18 #28 |
| 68.9 #187 | Pace (possessions) | 63.0 #365 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.0 #103 | Effective FG% | 56.4 #17 |
| 34.1 #167 | 3-point % | 35.6 #85 |
| 48.2 #23 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.0 #117 |
| 28.3 #340 | Free throw rate | 35.1 #176 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.4 #161 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #75 |
| 26.9 #301 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.2 #192 |
| 15.4 #72 | Assists per game | 15.0 #88 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.2 #196 | Points allowed | 66.3 #16 |
| 1.09 #197 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #91 |
| 51.1 #165 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.6 #245 |
| 35.1 #256 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.3 #143 |
| 13.7 #341 | Turnovers forced | 20.3 #17 |
| 70.5 #132 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.8 #119 |
| 5.7 #278 | Steals per game | 6.8 #140 |
| 2.8 #255 | Blocks per game | 1.9 #349 |
Creighton
16-18 in 2025-26 overall · 9-12 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs West Virginia70–87
- Wvs Rutgers82–69
- Lvs Seton Hall61–72
- W@ Butler76–59
- Lvs Providence76–79
A week or more of rest.
Iowa
24-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-11 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois59–71
- Wvs Nebraska77–71
- Wvs Florida73–72
- Wvs Clemson67–61
- Lvs Ohio State69–72
A week or more of rest.