Ramsey Center · at W Carolina
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | WCU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WCU 78–75 · win probability WCU 59%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: LIP has more of the edges
LIP 6, WCU 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LIP 25.8%, WCU 35.4%. Defensive: LIP 69.8%, WCU 73.7%
Three-pointers
LIP hits 35.7% and allows 34.3%; WCU hits 33.5% and allows 36.7%. Threes are 47.9% and 40.9% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LIP 16.0%, WCU 16.7%. Forced: LIP 17.7%, WCU 14.6%
Shooting
Effective FG%: LIP 54.1 and allows 53.2; WCU 50.5 and allows 54.9
Context
Schedule so far
LIP has played the 267th-hardest schedule, WCU the 177th. A record against a soft schedule means less
LIP offense vs WCU defense
Offense 191st of 366 against a defense 256th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: LIP 26.0, WCU 31.3. Allowed: LIP 29.0, WCU 37.8
WCU offense vs LIP defense
Offense 171st of 366 against a defense 226th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
WCU at home. This season: WCU 0-0 at home, LIP 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LIP 44%, WCU 16%. Transfers in: LIP 2, WCU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: LIP plays 70.8 a game (83rd fastest), WCU 69.3 (162nd). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WCU -2.7 | — |
| Total | — | 152.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | LIP 74.9 · WCU 77.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WCU -1.5 | — |
| 1H total | 71.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | LIP 34.9 · WCU 36.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
LIP 1–0 WCULIP leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · LIP 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2025-26 | WCU 62 @ LIP 83 | LIP -5.5 | LIP W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Lipscomb
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg −0.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 61-105 | +26.5 | L −17.5 | 154.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 77-92 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 64-69 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 68-75 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 83-62 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 90-67 | +7.5 | W +30.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 88-77 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 83-80 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 92-58 | -11.5 | W +22.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 73-97 | +32.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 62-89 | +13.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 76-57 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 82-74 | -18.5 | L −10.5 | 172.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 83-91 | -11.5 | L −19.5 | 150.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 84-77 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 81-71 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 82-78 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 79-74 | -15.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 86-71 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 65-70 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 100-94 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 76-87 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 78-86 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 75-61 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 160.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 81-87 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 75-72 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 73-51 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 78-84 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 80-77 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 53-77 | -3.5 | L −27.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
VAN
L 61-105
−17.5
9
@
MER
L 77-92
−11.5
11
@
UNCA
L 64-69
+1.5
19
@
BEL
L 68-75
+5.5
22
vs
WCU
W 83-62
+15.5
26
@
MRSH
W 90-67
+30.5
29
@
SEMO
W 88-77
+14.5
3
vs
TNTC
W 83-80
−7.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 92-58
+22.5
16
@
DUKE
L 73-97
+8.5
29
@
CIN
L 62-89
−13.5
1
vs
JAX
W 76-57
+6.5
3
vs
UNF
W 82-74
−10.5
8
@
STET
L 83-91
−19.5
10
@
FGCU
W 84-77
+9.5
15
vs
BELL
W 81-71
−1.5
17
vs
APSU
W 82-78
+1.5
22
vs
STET
W 79-74
−10.5
23
vs
FGCU
W 86-71
+9.5
29
@
JAX
L 65-70
−8.5
31
@
UNF
W 100-94
−4.5
4
@
APSU
L 76-87
−6.5
7
vs
CARK
L 78-86
−11.5
11
vs
EKU
W 75-61
+7.5
14
@
QUC
L 81-87
−2.5
18
@
BELL
W 75-72
−0.5
21
vs
UNA
W 73-51
+9.5
25
@
WGA
L 78-84
−11.5
28
@
EKU
W 80-77
+1.5
6
vs
FGCU
L 53-77
−27.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
VAN
L 61-105
+11.5
9
@
MER
L 77-92
+11.5
11
@
UNCA
L 64-69
−25.5
19
@
BEL
L 68-75
−15.5
22
vs
WCU
W 83-62
−6.5
26
@
MRSH
W 90-67
−0.5
29
@
SEMO
W 88-77
+11.5
3
vs
TNTC
W 83-80
+10.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 92-58
+3.5
16
@
DUKE
L 73-97
+18.5
29
@
CIN
L 62-89
+0.5
1
vs
JAX
W 76-57
−14.5
3
vs
UNF
W 82-74
−16.5
8
@
STET
L 83-91
+23.5
10
@
FGCU
W 84-77
+3.5
15
vs
BELL
W 81-71
−2.5
17
vs
APSU
W 82-78
+4.5
22
vs
STET
W 79-74
−4.5
23
vs
FGCU
W 86-71
+3.5
29
@
JAX
L 65-70
−7.5
31
@
UNF
W 100-94
+28.5
4
@
APSU
L 76-87
+6.5
7
vs
CARK
L 78-86
+8.5
11
vs
EKU
W 75-61
−24.5
14
@
QUC
L 81-87
+2.5
18
@
BELL
W 75-72
−7.5
21
vs
UNA
W 73-51
−25.5
25
@
WGA
L 78-84
+8.5
28
@
EKU
W 80-77
−0.5
6
vs
FGCU
L 53-77
−20.5
over 16under 14avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
W Carolina
29 games played
Straight up
13-16
45% wins
Against the spread
14-15
48% covers · avg +2.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg +2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 63-94 | +22.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 54-95 | +36.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 76-65 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 80-73 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 62-83 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 73-93 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 67-78 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 11 | @ | L 74-96 | +20.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 82-112 | +32.5 | W +2.5 | 167.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 74-79 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 80-77 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 77-82 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 77-79 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 72-68 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 82-90 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 76-88 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 88-58 | -8.5 | W +21.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 90-88 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 74-88 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 78-81 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 66-77 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 87-49 | -9.5 | W +28.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 81-76 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 91-77 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 81-62 | -8.5 | W +10.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 78-74 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 86-67 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 77-73 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 67-69 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
CIN
L 63-94
−8.5
8
@
DUKE
L 54-95
−4.5
16
vs
STET
W 76-65
−1.5
19
vs
UNCA
W 80-73
+8.5
22
@
LIP
L 62-83
−15.5
29
@
HPU
L 73-93
−3.5
6
@
UPST
L 67-78
−8.5
11
@
VT
L 74-96
−1.5
18
@
UGA
L 82-112
+2.5
31
vs
WOF
L 74-79
−2.5
3
@
FUR
W 80-77
+11.5
7
@
SAM
L 77-82
−0.5
10
@
CIT
L 77-79
−8.5
14
vs
ETSU
W 72-68
+10.5
17
vs
UTC
L 82-90
−9.5
21
@
MER
L 76-88
−3.5
24
vs
VMI
W 88-58
+21.5
29
@
ETSU
W 90-88
+11.5
1
vs
SAM
L 74-88
−12.5
4
@
UNCG
L 78-81
−4.5
7
@
WOF
L 66-77
−7.5
11
vs
CIT
W 87-49
+28.5
14
@
UTC
W 81-76
+6.5
18
vs
UNCG
W 91-77
+8.5
21
@
VMI
W 81-62
+10.5
25
vs
MER
W 78-74
+5.5
28
vs
FUR
W 86-67
+20.5
7
vs
MER
W 77-73
+5.5
8
vs
ETSU
L 67-69
+0.5
covered 14didn’t cover 15avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
CIN
L 63-94
+13.5
8
@
DUKE
L 54-95
−3.5
16
vs
STET
W 76-65
−14.5
19
vs
UNCA
W 80-73
+0.5
22
@
LIP
L 62-83
−6.5
29
@
HPU
L 73-93
+6.5
6
@
UPST
L 67-78
−4.5
11
@
VT
L 74-96
+17.5
18
@
UGA
L 82-112
+26.5
31
vs
WOF
L 74-79
−1.5
3
@
FUR
W 80-77
−0.5
7
@
SAM
L 77-82
+5.5
10
@
CIT
L 77-79
+7.5
14
vs
ETSU
W 72-68
−7.5
17
vs
UTC
L 82-90
+21.5
21
@
MER
L 76-88
+5.5
24
vs
VMI
W 88-58
−6.5
29
@
ETSU
W 90-88
+32.5
1
vs
SAM
L 74-88
+7.5
4
@
UNCG
L 78-81
+3.5
7
@
WOF
L 66-77
−11.5
11
vs
CIT
W 87-49
−9.5
14
@
UTC
W 81-76
+5.5
18
vs
UNCG
W 91-77
+12.5
21
@
VMI
W 81-62
−11.5
25
vs
MER
W 78-74
−4.5
28
vs
FUR
W 86-67
+5.5
7
vs
MER
W 77-73
−4.5
8
vs
ETSU
L 67-69
−9.5
over 15under 14avg +2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
W Carolina has the better starters
Position by position: Lipscomb 2, W Carolina 3, even 0
LipscombBetterW Carolina
G T. Simpkins TR12.5 pts · 2.9 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 79
←LIPSmall
G M. Brown TR11.9 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 48
G M. Esmeraldo9.8 pts · 3.9 reb · 6.9 ast
Score 81
←LIPSmall
G I. Manning TR9.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 64
F T. Sargiunas9.9 pts · 2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 28
→WCUBig
G T. Bryson TR8.6 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 70
F O. Ashkenazi2.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 3
→WCUSmall
G J. Prunty TR3.9 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 20
F T. Byrne TR3.8 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 4
→WCUBig
F S. Dada6.2 pts · 7.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 77
LipscombBetterW Carolina
LIP offense191st of 366 · -5.9
←LIPSmall
WCU defense256th of 366 · -6.7
LIP defense226th of 366 · -6.0
→WCUSmall
WCU offense171st of 366 · -5.2
Backcourt+3.0 · 2 players
←LIPBig
Backcourt-1.7 · 4 players
Frontcourt-6.7 · 3 players
→WCUBig
Frontcourt+1.1 · 1 player
Bench-1.1 · 1 player
=Even
Bench-1.5 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestLIP betterWCU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Simpkins32 min · TRM. Esmeraldo31 minZ. WellsNewV. VisnjicNewH. TidareNewK. QuinnNew
Forwards
T. Sargiunas24 minO. Ashkenazi20 minT. Byrne16 min · TRK. Okpara13 minL. JackNewD. MartinNew
Guards
M. Brown31 min · TRI. Manning20 min · TRT. Bryson18 min · TRJ. Prunty16 min · TRJ. Roberts8 min · TRD. Hollifield2 min
Forwards
S. Dada20 minT. Smith10 minD. Raymond6 min · TRF. SodipoNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.6 #104 | Points per game | 76.3 #134 |
| 1.10 #142 | Points per possession | 1.10 #140 |
| 70.8 #83 | Pace (possessions) | 69.3 #162 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.1 #67 | Effective FG% | 50.5 #218 |
| 35.7 #75 | 3-point % | 33.5 #198 |
| 47.9 #24 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.9 #147 |
| 26.0 #357 | Free throw rate | 31.3 #274 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.0 #142 | Turnover rate | 16.7 #179 |
| 25.8 #327 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.4 #36 |
| 17.2 #19 | Assists per game | 12.0 #286 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.0 #242 | Points allowed | 79.0 #299 |
| 1.09 #187 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #307 |
| 53.2 #273 | Opponent effective FG% | 54.9 #327 |
| 34.3 #207 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.7 #337 |
| 17.7 #113 | Turnovers forced | 14.6 #318 |
| 69.8 #171 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.7 #22 |
| 6.8 #141 | Steals per game | 5.8 #266 |
| 2.6 #291 | Blocks per game | 2.4 #315 |
Lipscomb
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 12-7 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs FGCU53–77
- W@ E Kentucky80–77
- L@ West Georgia78–84
- Wvs North Alabama73–51
- W@ Bellarmine75–72
A week or more of rest.
W Carolina
13-16 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs ETSU67–69
- Wvs Mercer77–73
- Wvs Furman86–67
- Wvs Mercer78–74
- W@ VMI81–62
A week or more of rest.