John W. Pope Jr. Convocation Center · at Campbell
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CAM | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects CAM 79–72 · win probability CAM 75%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CAM has more of the edges
UPST 0, CAM 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
UPST has played the 281st-hardest schedule, CAM the 134th. A record against a soft schedule means less
CAM offense vs UPST defense
Offense 217th of 366 against a defense 338th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: UPST 32.8, CAM 43.5. Allowed: UPST 36.0, CAM 37.0
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UPST 29.2%, CAM 33.5%. Defensive: UPST 68.6%, CAM 68.0%
Home court
CAM at home. This season: CAM 0-0 at home, UPST 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UPST 18.1%, CAM 17.6%. Forced: UPST 16.5%, CAM 17.0%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: UPST 48.3 and allows 51.0; CAM 50.1 and allows 53.9
Even
Three-pointers
UPST hits 31.4% and allows 35.6%; CAM hits 32.3% and allows 35.5%. Threes are 35.6% and 36.9% of their shots
Even
UPST offense vs CAM defense
Offense 299th of 366 against a defense 275th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UPST 9%, CAM 0%. Transfers in: UPST 3, CAM 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: UPST plays 70.5 a game (97th fastest), CAM 70.0 (118th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | CAM -7.8 | — |
| Total | — | 150.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | UPST 71.5 · CAM 79.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CAM -4.5 | — |
| 1H total | 70.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | UPST 33 · CAM 37.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UPST 0–3 CAMCAM leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · CAM has won the last 3 meetings · UPST 0-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2022-23 | UPST 66 @ CAM 78 | CAM -4.5 | CAM W |
| Jan 11, 2022-23 | CAM 78 @ UPST 63 | UPST -1.5 | CAM W |
| Feb 5, 2021-22 | CAM 80 @ UPST 71 | UPST +2.5 | CAM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
SC Upstate
29 games played
Straight up
10-19
34% wins
Against the spread
13-16
45% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg −3.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 75-87 | +14.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 5 | @ | W 67-66 | +9.5 | W +10.5 | 164.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 60-73 | +14.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 84-88 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 64-72 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 82-67 | -7.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 63-72 | +25.5 | W +16.5 | 157.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 85-78 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 78-67 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 62-80 | +29.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 78-72 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 65-74 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 69-76 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 158.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 77-86 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 50-71 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 157.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 86-81 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 69-89 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 69-83 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 65-67 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 65-60 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 67-76 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 100-94 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 70-95 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 75-82 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 64-68 | +13.5 | W +9.5 | 158.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 76-74 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 59-71 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 71-61 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 64-65 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
CBU
L 75-87
+2.5
5
@
FRES
W 67-66
+10.5
15
@
UNCW
L 60-73
+1.5
19
vs
TNTC
L 84-88
−6.5
21
@
WGA
L 64-72
−5.5
25
vs
NCCU
W 82-67
+7.5
29
@
NEB
L 63-72
+16.5
3
vs
CCU
W 85-78
+4.5
6
vs
WCU
W 78-67
+8.5
13
@
UNC
L 62-80
+11.5
16
@
SCST
W 78-72
−4.5
20
@
YSU
L 65-74
−2.5
31
vs
RAD
L 69-76
−8.5
3
@
PRES
L 77-86
−7.5
10
vs
WIN
L 50-71
−15.5
14
@
CHSO
W 86-81
+11.5
17
@
HPU
L 69-89
−3.5
21
vs
UNCA
L 69-83
−15.5
23
@
GWEB
L 65-67
−11.5
29
vs
LONG
W 65-60
+6.5
4
@
UNCA
L 67-76
−2.5
7
vs
CHSO
W 100-94
+7.5
12
vs
HPU
L 70-95
−10.5
14
@
LONG
L 75-82
−0.5
19
@
WIN
L 64-68
+9.5
21
vs
PRES
W 76-74
+3.5
26
@
RAD
L 59-71
−4.5
28
vs
GWEB
W 71-61
−1.5
4
vs
GWEB
L 64-65
−11.5
covered 13didn’t cover 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
CBU
L 75-87
+9.5
5
@
FRES
W 67-66
−31.5
15
@
UNCW
L 60-73
−22.5
19
vs
TNTC
L 84-88
+21.5
21
@
WGA
L 64-72
−17.5
25
vs
NCCU
W 82-67
+0.5
29
@
NEB
L 63-72
−22.5
3
vs
CCU
W 85-78
+18.5
6
vs
WCU
W 78-67
−4.5
13
@
UNC
L 62-80
−9.5
16
@
SCST
W 78-72
+2.5
20
@
YSU
L 65-74
−2.5
31
vs
RAD
L 69-76
−13.5
3
@
PRES
L 77-86
+25.5
10
vs
WIN
L 50-71
−36.5
14
@
CHSO
W 86-81
+11.5
17
@
HPU
L 69-89
+5.5
21
vs
UNCA
L 69-83
+6.5
23
@
GWEB
L 65-67
−21.5
29
vs
LONG
W 65-60
−22.5
4
@
UNCA
L 67-76
+3.5
7
vs
CHSO
W 100-94
+43.5
12
vs
HPU
L 70-95
+10.5
14
@
LONG
L 75-82
+9.5
19
@
WIN
L 64-68
−26.5
21
vs
PRES
W 76-74
+8.5
26
@
RAD
L 59-71
−22.5
28
vs
GWEB
W 71-61
−14.5
4
vs
GWEB
L 64-65
−14.5
over 14under 15avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Campbell
32 games played
Straight up
14-18
44% wins
Against the spread
18-14
56% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 64-96 | +20.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 65-73 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 91-82 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 85-91 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 159.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 71-67 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 51-99 | +17.5 | L −30.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 76-87 | +14.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 69-64 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 70-98 | +36.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 50-78 | +13.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 102-79 | -5.5 | W +17.5 | 145.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 72-86 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 68-65 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 97-82 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 154.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 86-72 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 82-83 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 75-78 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 83-87 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 73-88 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 69-81 | -4.5 | L −16.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 104-96 | +8.5 | W +16.5 | 168.5 | O 200 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 81-60 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 79-71 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 57-62 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 84-83 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 167.5 | U 167 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 68-73 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 60-65 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 67-71 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 90-72 | -8.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 96-89 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | O 185 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 85-70 | +6.5 | W +21.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 64-74 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
WIS
L 64-96
−11.5
6
@
WVU
L 65-73
+7.5
9
vs
WMU
W 91-82
−0.5
19
@
WEB
L 85-91
−4.5
21
vs
UTA
W 71-67
+2.5
25
@
WAKE
L 51-99
−30.5
2
@
PSU
L 76-87
+3.5
14
vs
BALL
W 69-64
−3.5
17
@
GONZ
L 70-98
+8.5
21
@
MINN
L 50-78
−14.5
23
vs
GB
W 102-79
+17.5
29
@
HOF
L 72-86
−7.5
31
@
MONM
W 68-65
+4.5
3
vs
NE
W 97-82
+11.5
8
vs
HAMP
W 86-72
+7.5
10
@
ELON
L 82-83
+3.5
17
@
UNCW
L 75-78
+3.5
22
@
COFC
L 83-87
−0.5
24
vs
MONM
L 73-88
−19.5
29
vs
STBK
L 69-81
−16.5
31
@
W&M
W 104-96
+16.5
5
vs
DREX
W 81-60
+16.5
7
@
NCAT
W 79-71
+4.5
15
vs
COFC
L 57-62
−8.5
19
vs
W&M
W 84-83
+2.5
21
vs
UNCW
L 68-73
−1.5
26
@
DREX
L 60-65
−3.5
28
@
TOW
L 67-71
+0.5
3
vs
NCAT
W 90-72
+9.5
7
vs
STBK
W 96-89
+4.5
8
vs
UNCW
W 85-70
+21.5
9
vs
MONM
L 64-74
−8.5
covered 18didn’t cover 14avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
WIS
L 64-96
+8.5
6
@
WVU
L 65-73
−0.5
9
vs
WMU
W 91-82
+20.5
19
@
WEB
L 85-91
+16.5
21
vs
UTA
W 71-67
−13.5
25
@
WAKE
L 51-99
−9.5
2
@
PSU
L 76-87
+8.5
14
vs
BALL
W 69-64
−12.5
17
@
GONZ
L 70-98
+7.5
21
@
MINN
L 50-78
−17.5
23
vs
GB
W 102-79
+35.5
29
@
HOF
L 72-86
+8.5
31
@
MONM
W 68-65
−19.5
3
vs
NE
W 97-82
+24.5
8
vs
HAMP
W 86-72
+12.5
10
@
ELON
L 82-83
+3.5
17
@
UNCW
L 75-78
+3.5
22
@
COFC
L 83-87
+9.5
24
vs
MONM
L 73-88
+12.5
29
vs
STBK
L 69-81
−2.5
31
@
W&M
W 104-96
+31.5
5
vs
DREX
W 81-60
−0.5
7
@
NCAT
W 79-71
−6.5
15
vs
COFC
L 57-62
−40.5
19
vs
W&M
W 84-83
−0.5
21
vs
UNCW
L 68-73
−9.5
26
@
DREX
L 60-65
−18.5
28
@
TOW
L 67-71
−4.5
3
vs
NCAT
W 90-72
+7.5
7
vs
STBK
W 96-89
+36.5
8
vs
UNCW
W 85-70
+5.5
9
vs
MONM
L 64-74
−13.5
over 17under 15avg +2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Campbell has the better starters
Position by position: SC Upstate 0, Campbell 1, even 4
SC UpstateBetterCampbell
G C. Rich0 pts · 0 reb · 2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G L. Waddles TR11.7 pts · 4.7 reb · 2 ast
Score 48
F M. Webb TR9.9 pts · 5.6 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 56
=No call
G E. Butkus NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
F D. Tubek TR2 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G A. Wright NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
F Z. Johnson TR0 pts · 0.3 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Browder NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
C C. Collier1.4 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 10
→CAMBig
F N. Kapic TR3.9 pts · 2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 55
SC UpstateBetterCampbell
UPST offense299th of 366 · -9.2
=Even
CAM defense275th of 366 · -6.9
UPST defense338th of 366 · -8.9
→CAMSmall
CAM offense217th of 366 · -6.7
Backcourt-0.1 · 1 player
=Even
Backcourt-0.7 · 4 players
Frontcourt-2.0 · 4 players
→CAMSmall
Frontcourt-0.0 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestUPST betterCAM betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Rich5 minA. Allen-JohnsonNewW. TessemaNewR. NaugleNewJ. PattersonNewN. MvulaNew
Forwards
M. Webb27 min · TRD. Tubek7 min · TRZ. Johnson2 min · TRK. PayneNewD. EdmondNewA. PerottiNew
Centers
C. Collier14 min
Guards
L. Waddles29 min · TRE. ButkusNewA. WrightNewJ. BrowderNewB. RitgerNewC. McAbeeNew
Forwards
N. Kapic11 min · TRK. RogersNewS. MooreNewB. ThetNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.0 #265 | Points per game | 76.1 #140 |
| 1.00 #324 | Points per possession | 1.08 #175 |
| 70.5 #97 | Pace (possessions) | 70.0 #118 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.3 #307 | Effective FG% | 50.1 #230 |
| 31.4 #308 | 3-point % | 32.3 #267 |
| 35.6 #256 | 3-point attempt rate | 36.9 #232 |
| 32.8 #239 | Free throw rate | 43.5 #16 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.1 #274 | Turnover rate | 17.6 #240 |
| 29.2 #231 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.5 #77 |
| 11.7 #304 | Assists per game | 11.4 #315 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.7 #210 | Points allowed | 78.8 #289 |
| 1.08 #170 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #282 |
| 51.0 #156 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.9 #295 |
| 35.6 #289 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.5 #277 |
| 16.5 #185 | Turnovers forced | 17.0 #153 |
| 68.6 #224 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.0 #254 |
| 6.1 #220 | Steals per game | 6.5 #179 |
| 4.7 #24 | Blocks per game | 1.5 #361 |
SC Upstate
10-19 in 2025-26 overall · 5-12 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Gardner-Webb64–65
- Wvs Gardner-Webb71–61
- L@ Radford59–71
- Wvs Presbyterian76–74
- L@ Winthrop64–68
A week or more of rest.
Campbell
14-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-11 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Monmouth64–74
- Wvs UNC Wilmington85–70
- Wvs Stony Brook96–89
- Wvs NC A&T90–72
- L@ Towson67–71
A week or more of rest.