Bramlage Coliseum · at Kansas St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | KSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects KSU 86–69 · win probability KSU 92%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: KSU has more of the edges
CAM 2, KSU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
KSU offense vs CAM defense
Offense 74th of 366 against a defense 275th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
CAM hits 32.3% and allows 35.5%; KSU hits 36.4% and allows 33.7%. Threes are 36.9% and 40.9% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: CAM 43.5, KSU 26.9. Allowed: CAM 37.0, KSU 35.2
CAM offense vs KSU defense
Offense 217th of 366 against a defense 97th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CAM 33.5%, KSU 29.2%. Defensive: CAM 68.0%, KSU 66.0%
Shooting
Effective FG%: CAM 50.1 and allows 53.9; KSU 53.3 and allows 52.5
Context
Schedule so far
CAM has played the 134th-hardest schedule, KSU the 43rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: CAM plays 70.0 a game (118th fastest), KSU 73.8 (11th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
KSU at home. This season: KSU 0-0 at home, CAM 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CAM 0%, KSU 7%. Transfers in: CAM 2, KSU 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CAM 17.6%, KSU 17.4%. Forced: CAM 17.0%, KSU 17.1%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | KSU -16.3 | — |
| Total | — | 154.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | CAM 69.2 · KSU 85.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | KSU -9.5 | — |
| 1H total | 72.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | CAM 31.4 · KSU 40.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Campbell
32 games played
Straight up
14-18
44% wins
Against the spread
18-14
56% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 64-96 | +20.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 65-73 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 91-82 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 85-91 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 159.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 71-67 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 51-99 | +17.5 | L −30.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 76-87 | +14.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 69-64 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 70-98 | +36.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 50-78 | +13.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 102-79 | -5.5 | W +17.5 | 145.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 72-86 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 68-65 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 97-82 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 154.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 86-72 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 82-83 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 75-78 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 83-87 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 73-88 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 69-81 | -4.5 | L −16.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 104-96 | +8.5 | W +16.5 | 168.5 | O 200 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 81-60 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 79-71 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 57-62 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 84-83 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 167.5 | U 167 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 68-73 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 60-65 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 67-71 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 90-72 | -8.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 96-89 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | O 185 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 85-70 | +6.5 | W +21.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 64-74 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
WIS
L 64-96
−11.5
6
@
WVU
L 65-73
+7.5
9
vs
WMU
W 91-82
−0.5
19
@
WEB
L 85-91
−4.5
21
vs
UTA
W 71-67
+2.5
25
@
WAKE
L 51-99
−30.5
2
@
PSU
L 76-87
+3.5
14
vs
BALL
W 69-64
−3.5
17
@
GONZ
L 70-98
+8.5
21
@
MINN
L 50-78
−14.5
23
vs
GB
W 102-79
+17.5
29
@
HOF
L 72-86
−7.5
31
@
MONM
W 68-65
+4.5
3
vs
NE
W 97-82
+11.5
8
vs
HAMP
W 86-72
+7.5
10
@
ELON
L 82-83
+3.5
17
@
UNCW
L 75-78
+3.5
22
@
COFC
L 83-87
−0.5
24
vs
MONM
L 73-88
−19.5
29
vs
STBK
L 69-81
−16.5
31
@
W&M
W 104-96
+16.5
5
vs
DREX
W 81-60
+16.5
7
@
NCAT
W 79-71
+4.5
15
vs
COFC
L 57-62
−8.5
19
vs
W&M
W 84-83
+2.5
21
vs
UNCW
L 68-73
−1.5
26
@
DREX
L 60-65
−3.5
28
@
TOW
L 67-71
+0.5
3
vs
NCAT
W 90-72
+9.5
7
vs
STBK
W 96-89
+4.5
8
vs
UNCW
W 85-70
+21.5
9
vs
MONM
L 64-74
−8.5
covered 18didn’t cover 14avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
WIS
L 64-96
+8.5
6
@
WVU
L 65-73
−0.5
9
vs
WMU
W 91-82
+20.5
19
@
WEB
L 85-91
+16.5
21
vs
UTA
W 71-67
−13.5
25
@
WAKE
L 51-99
−9.5
2
@
PSU
L 76-87
+8.5
14
vs
BALL
W 69-64
−12.5
17
@
GONZ
L 70-98
+7.5
21
@
MINN
L 50-78
−17.5
23
vs
GB
W 102-79
+35.5
29
@
HOF
L 72-86
+8.5
31
@
MONM
W 68-65
−19.5
3
vs
NE
W 97-82
+24.5
8
vs
HAMP
W 86-72
+12.5
10
@
ELON
L 82-83
+3.5
17
@
UNCW
L 75-78
+3.5
22
@
COFC
L 83-87
+9.5
24
vs
MONM
L 73-88
+12.5
29
vs
STBK
L 69-81
−2.5
31
@
W&M
W 104-96
+31.5
5
vs
DREX
W 81-60
−0.5
7
@
NCAT
W 79-71
−6.5
15
vs
COFC
L 57-62
−40.5
19
vs
W&M
W 84-83
−0.5
21
vs
UNCW
L 68-73
−9.5
26
@
DREX
L 60-65
−18.5
28
@
TOW
L 67-71
−4.5
3
vs
NCAT
W 90-72
+7.5
7
vs
STBK
W 96-89
+36.5
8
vs
UNCW
W 85-70
+5.5
9
vs
MONM
L 64-74
−13.5
over 17under 15avg +2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Kansas St
32 games played
Straight up
12-20
38% wins
Against the spread
12-20
38% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 93-64 | -18.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 98-71 | -28.5 | L −1.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 99-96 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 164.5 | O 195 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 84-83 | -12.5 | L −11.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 98-77 | +2.5 | W +23.5 | 164.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 85-86 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 168.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 69-86 | +10.5 | L −6.5 | 164.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 1 | vs | L 66-82 | -12.5 | L −28.5 | 159.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 67-78 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 108-49 | -38.5 | W +20.5 | 160.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 83-76 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 106-76 | -21.5 | W +8.5 | 176.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 94-85 | -32.5 | L −23.5 | 169.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 73-83 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 174.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 76-101 | +17.5 | L −7.5 | 171.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 84-87 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 169.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 73-82 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 170.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 83-84 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 175.5 | U 167 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 81-78 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 168.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 62-86 | +4.5 | L −19.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 54-59 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 61-95 | +12.5 | L −21.5 | 156.5 | U 156 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 82-84 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 62-91 | +2.5 | L −26.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 64-78 | +22.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 90-74 | +3.5 | W +19.5 | 159.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 72-100 | +12.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 70-79 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 163.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 68-77 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 65-63 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 85-104 | +17.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 189 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 91-105 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 168.5 | O 196 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
UNCG
W 93-64
+10.5
8
vs
BELL
W 98-71
−1.5
13
vs
CAL
W 99-96
−3.5
17
vs
TLSA
W 84-83
−11.5
20
vs
MSST
W 98-77
+23.5
21
vs
NEB
L 85-86
+0.5
25
@
IU
L 69-86
−6.5
1
vs
BGSU
L 66-82
−28.5
6
vs
HALL
L 67-78
−13.5
8
vs
MVSU
W 108-49
+20.5
13
@
CREI
W 83-76
+11.5
20
vs
SDAK
W 106-76
+8.5
28
vs
ULM
W 94-85
−23.5
3
vs
BYU
L 73-83
−2.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 76-101
−7.5
10
@
ASU
L 84-87
−1.5
14
vs
UCF
L 73-82
−11.5
17
@
OKST
L 83-84
+1.5
20
vs
UTAH
W 81-78
−7.5
24
vs
KU
L 62-86
−19.5
27
@
WVU
L 54-59
+2.5
1
vs
ISU
L 61-95
−21.5
7
@
TCU
L 82-84
+7.5
11
vs
CIN
L 62-91
−26.5
14
@
HOU
L 64-78
+8.5
17
vs
BAY
W 90-74
+19.5
21
@
TTU
L 72-100
−15.5
25
@
COLO
L 70-79
−3.5
28
vs
TCU
L 68-77
−5.5
3
vs
WVU
W 65-63
+5.5
7
@
KU
L 85-104
−1.5
10
vs
BYU
L 91-105
−2.5
covered 12didn’t cover 20avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
UNCG
W 93-64
+8.5
8
vs
BELL
W 98-71
+0.5
13
vs
CAL
W 99-96
+30.5
17
vs
TLSA
W 84-83
+6.5
20
vs
MSST
W 98-77
+10.5
21
vs
NEB
L 85-86
+2.5
25
@
IU
L 69-86
−9.5
1
vs
BGSU
L 66-82
−11.5
6
vs
HALL
L 67-78
−3.5
8
vs
MVSU
W 108-49
−3.5
13
@
CREI
W 83-76
−0.5
20
vs
SDAK
W 106-76
+5.5
28
vs
ULM
W 94-85
+9.5
3
vs
BYU
L 73-83
−18.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 76-101
+5.5
10
@
ASU
L 84-87
+1.5
14
vs
UCF
L 73-82
−15.5
17
@
OKST
L 83-84
−8.5
20
vs
UTAH
W 81-78
−9.5
24
vs
KU
L 62-86
−10.5
27
@
WVU
L 54-59
−33.5
1
vs
ISU
L 61-95
−0.5
7
@
TCU
L 82-84
+10.5
11
vs
CIN
L 62-91
+5.5
14
@
HOU
L 64-78
−2.5
17
vs
BAY
W 90-74
+4.5
21
@
TTU
L 72-100
+13.5
25
@
COLO
L 70-79
−14.5
28
vs
TCU
L 68-77
−14.5
3
vs
WVU
W 65-63
−15.5
7
@
KU
L 85-104
+31.5
10
vs
BYU
L 91-105
+27.5
over 16under 16avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Campbell 1, Kansas St 1, even 3
CampbellBetterKansas St
G L. Waddles TR11.7 pts · 4.7 reb · 2 ast
Score 48
→KSUSmall
G B. Rechsteiner TR12 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 71
G E. Butkus NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Schutt TR7.7 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 39
G A. Wright NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Wheeler TR8.4 pts · 1.2 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 50
G J. Browder NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F D. Lindsay TR5.3 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 51
F N. Kapic TR3.9 pts · 2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 55
←CAMSmall
F I. Abraham TR4.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 31
CampbellBetterKansas St
CAM offense217th of 366 · -6.7
→KSUSmall
KSU defense97th of 366 · -0.7
CAM defense275th of 366 · -6.9
→KSUBig
KSU offense74th of 366 · +1.4
Backcourt-0.7 · 4 players
=Even
Backcourt-1.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.0 · 1 player
←CAMSmall
Frontcourt-1.2 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-0.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCAM betterKSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
L. Waddles29 min · TRE. ButkusNewA. WrightNewJ. BrowderNewB. RitgerNewC. McAbeeNew
Forwards
N. Kapic11 min · TRK. RogersNewS. MooreNewB. ThetNew
Guards
B. Rechsteiner28 min · TRJ. Schutt25 min · TRM. Wheeler22 min · TRA. Kostic14 minJ. AlexanderNew
Forwards
D. Lindsay21 min · TRI. Abraham20 min · TRT. Malovec15 min · TRP. N'Diaye9 min · TRB. Vice6 min · TRM. GilhoolNew
Centers
J. Rock13 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.1 #140 | Points per game | 79.6 #74 |
| 1.08 #175 | Points per possession | 1.08 #191 |
| 70.0 #118 | Pace (possessions) | 73.8 #11 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.1 #230 | Effective FG% | 53.3 #88 |
| 32.3 #267 | 3-point % | 36.4 #43 |
| 36.9 #232 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.9 #148 |
| 43.5 #16 | Free throw rate | 26.9 #351 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.6 #240 | Turnover rate | 17.4 #233 |
| 33.5 #77 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.2 #229 |
| 11.4 #315 | Assists per game | 16.8 #29 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.8 #289 | Points allowed | 81.8 #339 |
| 1.13 #282 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #244 |
| 53.9 #295 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.5 #239 |
| 35.5 #277 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.7 #166 |
| 17.0 #153 | Turnovers forced | 17.1 #145 |
| 68.0 #254 | Defensive rebound rate | 66.0 #317 |
| 6.5 #179 | Steals per game | 7.0 #121 |
| 1.5 #361 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #137 |
Campbell
14-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-11 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Monmouth64–74
- Wvs UNC Wilmington85–70
- Wvs Stony Brook96–89
- Wvs NC A&T90–72
- L@ Towson67–71
A week or more of rest.
Kansas St
12-20 in 2025-26 overall · 3-16 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs BYU91–105
- L@ Kansas85–104
- Wvs West Virginia65–63
- Lvs TCU68–77
- L@ Colorado70–79
A week or more of rest.