Bramlage Coliseum · at Kansas St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | KSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects KSU 91–69 · win probability KSU 97%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 160.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: KSU has more of the edges
IUIN 1, KSU 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
KSU offense vs IUIN defense
Offense 74th of 366 against a defense 364th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
IUIN has played the 284th-hardest schedule, KSU the 43rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
IUIN hits 32.4% and allows 38.5%; KSU hits 36.4% and allows 33.7%. Threes are 42.1% and 40.9% of their shots
IUIN offense vs KSU defense
Offense 249th of 366 against a defense 97th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: IUIN 15.8%, KSU 17.4%. Forced: IUIN 19.2%, KSU 17.1%
Free throws
Free throw rate: IUIN 21.7, KSU 26.9. Allowed: IUIN 46.6, KSU 35.2
Shooting
Effective FG%: IUIN 52.2 and allows 58.2; KSU 53.3 and allows 52.5
Home court
KSU at home. This season: KSU 0-0 at home, IUIN 0-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: IUIN 28.7%, KSU 29.2%. Defensive: IUIN 64.5%, KSU 66.0%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: IUIN 14%, KSU 7%. Transfers in: IUIN 3, KSU 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 75 possessions: IUIN plays 75.3 a game (4th fastest), KSU 73.8 (11th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | KSU -21.9 | — |
| Total | — | 160.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | IUIN 69.2 · KSU 91.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | KSU -12.9 | — |
| 1H total | 74.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | IUIN 31 · KSU 43.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
IU Indy
30 games played
Straight up
5-25
17% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −2.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-17
43% overs · avg −0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 102-118 | +33.5 | W +17.5 | 172.5 | O 220 |
| Nov 6 | vs | L 90-94 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 185.5 | U 184 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 80-112 | +20.5 | L −11.5 | 192.5 | U 192 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 90-83 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 186.5 | U 173 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 91-103 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 188.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 80-101 | -2.5 | L −23.5 | 181.5 | U 181 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 85-98 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 175.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 85-80 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 181.5 | U 165 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 78-92 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 180.5 | U 170 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 55-78 | +6.5 | L −16.5 | 171.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 11 | vs | L 75-85 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 165.5 | U 160 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 78-91 | +23.5 | W +10.5 | 169.5 | U 169 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 86-99 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 172.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 72-81 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 176.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 77-81 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 9 | @ | L 59-75 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 83-95 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 165.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 96-93 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 189 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 77-80 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 169.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 103-85 | +14.5 | W +32.5 | 176.5 | O 188 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 58-74 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 76-85 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-74 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 169.5 | U 156 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 88-92 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 81-84 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 78-83 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 73-85 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 74-86 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 169.5 | U 160 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 81-87 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 93-101 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 169.5 | O 194 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
OSU
L 102-118
+17.5
6
vs
LIU
L 90-94
−8.5
8
@
BTLR
L 80-112
−11.5
14
@
EMU
W 90-83
+11.5
18
@
CHSO
L 91-103
−13.5
21
vs
ALST
L 80-101
−23.5
23
@
AF
L 85-98
−9.5
29
vs
MORE
W 85-80
+1.5
3
@
DETM
L 78-92
−10.5
6
vs
YSU
L 55-78
−16.5
11
vs
GB
L 75-85
−13.5
22
@
GCU
L 78-91
+10.5
29
@
CLE
L 86-99
−11.5
1
@
NKU
L 72-81
+4.5
4
vs
WRST
L 77-81
+4.5
9
@
GB
L 59-75
−9.5
11
@
MILW
L 83-95
−3.5
15
vs
RMU
W 96-93
+8.5
17
vs
DETM
L 77-80
−4.5
21
@
OAK
W 103-85
+32.5
28
@
RMU
L 58-74
−7.5
30
@
YSU
L 76-85
+1.5
7
vs
CLE
W 82-74
+5.5
10
vs
MILW
L 88-92
−1.5
12
vs
NKU
L 81-84
+2.5
15
@
PFW
L 78-83
+2.5
19
@
WRST
L 73-85
−0.5
25
vs
OAK
L 74-86
−6.5
28
vs
PFW
L 81-87
−4.5
2
@
CLE
L 93-101
−10.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
OSU
L 102-118
+47.5
6
vs
LIU
L 90-94
−1.5
8
@
BTLR
L 80-112
−0.5
14
@
EMU
W 90-83
−13.5
18
@
CHSO
L 91-103
+5.5
21
vs
ALST
L 80-101
−0.5
23
@
AF
L 85-98
+7.5
29
vs
MORE
W 85-80
−16.5
3
@
DETM
L 78-92
−10.5
6
vs
YSU
L 55-78
−38.5
11
vs
GB
L 75-85
−5.5
22
@
GCU
L 78-91
−0.5
29
@
CLE
L 86-99
+12.5
1
@
NKU
L 72-81
−23.5
4
vs
WRST
L 77-81
−4.5
9
@
GB
L 59-75
−22.5
11
@
MILW
L 83-95
+12.5
15
vs
RMU
W 96-93
+28.5
17
vs
DETM
L 77-80
−12.5
21
@
OAK
W 103-85
+11.5
28
@
RMU
L 58-74
−30.5
30
@
YSU
L 76-85
+7.5
7
vs
CLE
W 82-74
−13.5
10
vs
MILW
L 88-92
+21.5
12
vs
NKU
L 81-84
+0.5
15
@
PFW
L 78-83
+1.5
19
@
WRST
L 73-85
−2.5
25
vs
OAK
L 74-86
−9.5
28
vs
PFW
L 81-87
+4.5
2
@
CLE
L 93-101
+24.5
over 13under 17avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Kansas St
32 games played
Straight up
12-20
38% wins
Against the spread
12-20
38% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 93-64 | -18.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 98-71 | -28.5 | L −1.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 99-96 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 164.5 | O 195 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 84-83 | -12.5 | L −11.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 98-77 | +2.5 | W +23.5 | 164.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 85-86 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 168.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 69-86 | +10.5 | L −6.5 | 164.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 1 | vs | L 66-82 | -12.5 | L −28.5 | 159.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 67-78 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 108-49 | -38.5 | W +20.5 | 160.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 83-76 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 106-76 | -21.5 | W +8.5 | 176.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 94-85 | -32.5 | L −23.5 | 169.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 73-83 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 174.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 76-101 | +17.5 | L −7.5 | 171.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 84-87 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 169.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 73-82 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 170.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 83-84 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 175.5 | U 167 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 81-78 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 168.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 62-86 | +4.5 | L −19.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 54-59 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 61-95 | +12.5 | L −21.5 | 156.5 | U 156 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 82-84 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 62-91 | +2.5 | L −26.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 64-78 | +22.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 90-74 | +3.5 | W +19.5 | 159.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 72-100 | +12.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 70-79 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 163.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 68-77 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 65-63 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 85-104 | +17.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 189 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 91-105 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 168.5 | O 196 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
UNCG
W 93-64
+10.5
8
vs
BELL
W 98-71
−1.5
13
vs
CAL
W 99-96
−3.5
17
vs
TLSA
W 84-83
−11.5
20
vs
MSST
W 98-77
+23.5
21
vs
NEB
L 85-86
+0.5
25
@
IU
L 69-86
−6.5
1
vs
BGSU
L 66-82
−28.5
6
vs
HALL
L 67-78
−13.5
8
vs
MVSU
W 108-49
+20.5
13
@
CREI
W 83-76
+11.5
20
vs
SDAK
W 106-76
+8.5
28
vs
ULM
W 94-85
−23.5
3
vs
BYU
L 73-83
−2.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 76-101
−7.5
10
@
ASU
L 84-87
−1.5
14
vs
UCF
L 73-82
−11.5
17
@
OKST
L 83-84
+1.5
20
vs
UTAH
W 81-78
−7.5
24
vs
KU
L 62-86
−19.5
27
@
WVU
L 54-59
+2.5
1
vs
ISU
L 61-95
−21.5
7
@
TCU
L 82-84
+7.5
11
vs
CIN
L 62-91
−26.5
14
@
HOU
L 64-78
+8.5
17
vs
BAY
W 90-74
+19.5
21
@
TTU
L 72-100
−15.5
25
@
COLO
L 70-79
−3.5
28
vs
TCU
L 68-77
−5.5
3
vs
WVU
W 65-63
+5.5
7
@
KU
L 85-104
−1.5
10
vs
BYU
L 91-105
−2.5
covered 12didn’t cover 20avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
UNCG
W 93-64
+8.5
8
vs
BELL
W 98-71
+0.5
13
vs
CAL
W 99-96
+30.5
17
vs
TLSA
W 84-83
+6.5
20
vs
MSST
W 98-77
+10.5
21
vs
NEB
L 85-86
+2.5
25
@
IU
L 69-86
−9.5
1
vs
BGSU
L 66-82
−11.5
6
vs
HALL
L 67-78
−3.5
8
vs
MVSU
W 108-49
−3.5
13
@
CREI
W 83-76
−0.5
20
vs
SDAK
W 106-76
+5.5
28
vs
ULM
W 94-85
+9.5
3
vs
BYU
L 73-83
−18.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 76-101
+5.5
10
@
ASU
L 84-87
+1.5
14
vs
UCF
L 73-82
−15.5
17
@
OKST
L 83-84
−8.5
20
vs
UTAH
W 81-78
−9.5
24
vs
KU
L 62-86
−10.5
27
@
WVU
L 54-59
−33.5
1
vs
ISU
L 61-95
−0.5
7
@
TCU
L 82-84
+10.5
11
vs
CIN
L 62-91
+5.5
14
@
HOU
L 64-78
−2.5
17
vs
BAY
W 90-74
+4.5
21
@
TTU
L 72-100
+13.5
25
@
COLO
L 70-79
−14.5
28
vs
TCU
L 68-77
−14.5
3
vs
WVU
W 65-63
−15.5
7
@
KU
L 85-104
+31.5
10
vs
BYU
L 91-105
+27.5
over 16under 16avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Kansas St has the better starters
Position by position: IU Indy 1, Kansas St 4, even 0
IU IndyBetterKansas St
G B. Smith TR8.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 18
→KSUBig
G B. Rechsteiner TR12 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 71
G G. Etchison TR9 pts · 1.3 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 93
←IUINBig
G J. Schutt TR7.7 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 39
G J. Clarke TR3.3 pts · 1.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 34
→KSUSmall
G M. Wheeler TR8.4 pts · 1.2 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 50
F K. Tinsley7.7 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 17
→KSUSmall
F D. Lindsay TR5.3 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 51
F R. Hagy2.1 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 2
→KSUSmall
F I. Abraham TR4.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 31
IU IndyBetterKansas St
IUIN offense249th of 366 · -7.5
→KSUBig
KSU defense97th of 366 · -0.7
IUIN defense364th of 366 · -12.3
→KSUBig
KSU offense74th of 366 · +1.4
Backcourt-1.6 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-1.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-3.2 · 2 players
→KSUSmall
Frontcourt-1.2 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-0.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestIUIN betterKSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Smith24 min · TRG. Etchison14 min · TRJ. Clarke13 min · TRM. Pastorcic-StraunNewP. HeissNewT. DrexlerNew
Forwards
K. Tinsley18 minR. Hagy11 minP. IdiaruNewA. ArnettNewM. StackhouseNew
Guards
B. Rechsteiner28 min · TRJ. Schutt25 min · TRM. Wheeler22 min · TRA. Kostic14 minJ. AlexanderNew
Forwards
D. Lindsay21 min · TRI. Abraham20 min · TRT. Malovec15 min · TRP. N'Diaye9 min · TRB. Vice6 min · TRM. GilhoolNew
Centers
J. Rock13 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.9 #49 | Points per game | 79.6 #74 |
| 1.07 #200 | Points per possession | 1.08 #191 |
| 75.3 #4 | Pace (possessions) | 73.8 #11 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.2 #136 | Effective FG% | 53.3 #88 |
| 32.4 #258 | 3-point % | 36.4 #43 |
| 42.1 #134 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.9 #148 |
| 21.7 #365 | Free throw rate | 26.9 #351 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.8 #127 | Turnover rate | 17.4 #233 |
| 28.7 #243 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.2 #229 |
| 18.9 #3 | Assists per game | 16.8 #29 |
| Defense | ||
| 89.2 #364 | Points allowed | 81.8 #339 |
| 1.19 #353 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #244 |
| 58.2 #362 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.5 #239 |
| 38.5 #361 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.7 #166 |
| 19.2 #41 | Turnovers forced | 17.1 #145 |
| 64.5 #348 | Defensive rebound rate | 66.0 #317 |
| 8.0 #39 | Steals per game | 7.0 #121 |
| 2.9 #243 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #137 |
IU Indy
5-25 in 2025-26 overall · 3-18 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Cleveland St93–101
- Lvs Purdue FW81–87
- Lvs Oakland74–86
- L@ Wright St73–85
- L@ Purdue FW78–83
A week or more of rest.
Kansas St
12-20 in 2025-26 overall · 3-16 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs BYU91–105
- L@ Kansas85–104
- Wvs West Virginia65–63
- Lvs TCU68–77
- L@ Colorado70–79
A week or more of rest.