T-Mobile Center · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | KSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WICH 78–76 · win probability WICH 57%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 153.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: WICH has more of the edges
WICH 3, KSU 0 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WICH 38.0%, KSU 29.2%. Defensive: WICH 71.2%, KSU 66.0%
Free throws
Free throw rate: WICH 36.0, KSU 26.9. Allowed: WICH 34.3, KSU 35.2
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WICH 55%, KSU 7%. Transfers in: WICH 4, KSU 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: WICH plays 69.3 a game (164th fastest), KSU 73.8 (11th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
WICH has played the 106th-hardest schedule, KSU the 43rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WICH 15.0%, KSU 17.4%. Forced: WICH 15.7%, KSU 17.1%
Even
WICH offense vs KSU defense
Offense 78th of 366 against a defense 97th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
WICH hits 33.5% and allows 31.5%; KSU hits 36.4% and allows 33.7%. Threes are 33.9% and 40.9% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: WICH 49.4 and allows 47.2; KSU 53.3 and allows 52.5
Even
KSU offense vs WICH defense
Offense 74th of 366 against a defense 82nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WICH -2.0 | — |
| Total | — | 153.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | WICH 77.6 · KSU 75.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WICH -1.3 | — |
| 1H total | 71.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | WICH 36.4 · KSU 35.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
WICH 1–3 KSUKSU leads · 4 games since 2021-22 · WICH 2-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2024-25 | KSU 65 @ WICH 84 | WICH +1.5 | WICH W |
| Dec 21, 2023-24 | WICH 60 vs KSU 69 | KSU -5.5 | KSU W |
| Dec 3, 2022-23 | WICH 50 @ KSU 55 | KSU -7.5 | WICH W |
| Dec 5, 2021-22 | KSU 65 @ WICH 59 | WICH -5.5 | KSU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Wichita St
35 games played
Straight up
23-12
66% wins
Against the spread
23-12
66% covers · avg +3.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-20
43% overs · avg −1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 75-58 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 105-62 | -20.5 | W +22.5 | 156.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 95-74 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 59-62 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 75-58 | -10.5 | W +6.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 65-70 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 70-76 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 70-75 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 74-69 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 58-61 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 84-73 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 88-57 | -14.5 | W +16.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 75-70 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 100-104 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | O 204 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 64-66 | -13.5 | L −15.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 78-67 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 67-85 | +3.5 | L −14.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 86-85 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 158.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 77-60 | -12.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 74-59 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 83-93 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 74-64 | -9.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 75-61 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 58-66 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 160.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 81-77 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 92-89 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 69-57 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 88-82 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 84-67 | -15.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 88-70 | -8.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 81-68 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Mar 15 | vs | L 55-70 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 74-70 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 22 | @ | W 96-70 | +2.5 | W +28.5 | 164.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 24 | @ | L 79-83 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
UNCA
W 75-58
+10.5
8
vs
PV
W 105-62
+22.5
13
vs
LUC
W 95-74
+15.5
18
@
BOIS
L 59-62
+6.5
22
vs
MILW
W 75-58
+6.5
26
vs
SMC
L 65-70
+4.5
27
vs
CSU
L 70-76
−4.5
28
vs
WKU
L 70-75
−9.5
6
@
UNI
W 74-69
+6.5
13
vs
DEP
L 58-61
−10.5
17
vs
WOF
W 84-73
−1.5
21
vs
EKU
W 88-57
+16.5
31
@
UAB
W 75-70
+8.5
3
@
CLT
L 100-104
−9.5
7
vs
RICE
L 64-66
−15.5
11
vs
UNT
W 78-67
+2.5
15
@
FAU
L 67-85
−14.5
18
@
USF
W 86-85
+8.5
21
vs
ECU
W 77-60
+4.5
24
vs
MEM
W 74-59
+11.5
1
@
TLSA
L 83-93
−4.5
4
vs
CLT
W 74-64
+0.5
8
@
TULN
W 75-61
+8.5
11
vs
USF
L 58-66
−5.5
14
vs
TLSA
W 81-77
+2.5
18
@
ECU
W 92-89
−4.5
21
vs
TEM
W 69-57
+3.5
26
@
MEM
W 88-82
+7.5
1
@
UTSA
W 84-67
+1.5
7
vs
FAU
W 88-70
+9.5
14
vs
TLSA
W 81-68
+14.5
15
vs
USF
L 55-70
−8.5
17
vs
WYO
W 74-70
−1.5
22
@
OKST
W 96-70
+28.5
24
@
TLSA
L 79-83
+0.5
covered 23didn’t cover 12avg +3.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
UNCA
W 75-58
−24.5
8
vs
PV
W 105-62
+10.5
13
vs
LUC
W 95-74
+15.5
18
@
BOIS
L 59-62
−29.5
22
vs
MILW
W 75-58
−25.5
26
vs
SMC
L 65-70
−4.5
27
vs
CSU
L 70-76
+3.5
28
vs
WKU
L 70-75
−10.5
6
@
UNI
W 74-69
+7.5
13
vs
DEP
L 58-61
−26.5
17
vs
WOF
W 84-73
+12.5
21
vs
EKU
W 88-57
−3.5
31
@
UAB
W 75-70
−4.5
3
@
CLT
L 100-104
+63.5
7
vs
RICE
L 64-66
−15.5
11
vs
UNT
W 78-67
+9.5
15
@
FAU
L 67-85
−3.5
18
@
USF
W 86-85
+12.5
21
vs
ECU
W 77-60
−7.5
24
vs
MEM
W 74-59
−12.5
1
@
TLSA
L 83-93
+21.5
4
vs
CLT
W 74-64
−5.5
8
@
TULN
W 75-61
−12.5
11
vs
USF
L 58-66
−36.5
14
vs
TLSA
W 81-77
+5.5
18
@
ECU
W 92-89
+31.5
21
vs
TEM
W 69-57
−18.5
26
@
MEM
W 88-82
+20.5
1
@
UTSA
W 84-67
−0.5
7
vs
FAU
W 88-70
+7.5
14
vs
TLSA
W 81-68
−3.5
15
vs
USF
L 55-70
−26.5
17
vs
WYO
W 74-70
−4.5
22
@
OKST
W 96-70
+1.5
24
@
TLSA
L 79-83
+7.5
over 15under 20avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Kansas St
32 games played
Straight up
12-20
38% wins
Against the spread
12-20
38% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 93-64 | -18.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 98-71 | -28.5 | L −1.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 99-96 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 164.5 | O 195 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 84-83 | -12.5 | L −11.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 98-77 | +2.5 | W +23.5 | 164.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 85-86 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 168.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 69-86 | +10.5 | L −6.5 | 164.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 1 | vs | L 66-82 | -12.5 | L −28.5 | 159.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 67-78 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 108-49 | -38.5 | W +20.5 | 160.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 83-76 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 106-76 | -21.5 | W +8.5 | 176.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 94-85 | -32.5 | L −23.5 | 169.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 73-83 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 174.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 76-101 | +17.5 | L −7.5 | 171.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 84-87 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 169.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 73-82 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 170.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 83-84 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 175.5 | U 167 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 81-78 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 168.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 62-86 | +4.5 | L −19.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 54-59 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 61-95 | +12.5 | L −21.5 | 156.5 | U 156 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 82-84 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 62-91 | +2.5 | L −26.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 64-78 | +22.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 90-74 | +3.5 | W +19.5 | 159.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 72-100 | +12.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 70-79 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 163.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 68-77 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 65-63 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 85-104 | +17.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 189 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 91-105 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 168.5 | O 196 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
UNCG
W 93-64
+10.5
8
vs
BELL
W 98-71
−1.5
13
vs
CAL
W 99-96
−3.5
17
vs
TLSA
W 84-83
−11.5
20
vs
MSST
W 98-77
+23.5
21
vs
NEB
L 85-86
+0.5
25
@
IU
L 69-86
−6.5
1
vs
BGSU
L 66-82
−28.5
6
vs
HALL
L 67-78
−13.5
8
vs
MVSU
W 108-49
+20.5
13
@
CREI
W 83-76
+11.5
20
vs
SDAK
W 106-76
+8.5
28
vs
ULM
W 94-85
−23.5
3
vs
BYU
L 73-83
−2.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 76-101
−7.5
10
@
ASU
L 84-87
−1.5
14
vs
UCF
L 73-82
−11.5
17
@
OKST
L 83-84
+1.5
20
vs
UTAH
W 81-78
−7.5
24
vs
KU
L 62-86
−19.5
27
@
WVU
L 54-59
+2.5
1
vs
ISU
L 61-95
−21.5
7
@
TCU
L 82-84
+7.5
11
vs
CIN
L 62-91
−26.5
14
@
HOU
L 64-78
+8.5
17
vs
BAY
W 90-74
+19.5
21
@
TTU
L 72-100
−15.5
25
@
COLO
L 70-79
−3.5
28
vs
TCU
L 68-77
−5.5
3
vs
WVU
W 65-63
+5.5
7
@
KU
L 85-104
−1.5
10
vs
BYU
L 91-105
−2.5
covered 12didn’t cover 20avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
UNCG
W 93-64
+8.5
8
vs
BELL
W 98-71
+0.5
13
vs
CAL
W 99-96
+30.5
17
vs
TLSA
W 84-83
+6.5
20
vs
MSST
W 98-77
+10.5
21
vs
NEB
L 85-86
+2.5
25
@
IU
L 69-86
−9.5
1
vs
BGSU
L 66-82
−11.5
6
vs
HALL
L 67-78
−3.5
8
vs
MVSU
W 108-49
−3.5
13
@
CREI
W 83-76
−0.5
20
vs
SDAK
W 106-76
+5.5
28
vs
ULM
W 94-85
+9.5
3
vs
BYU
L 73-83
−18.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 76-101
+5.5
10
@
ASU
L 84-87
+1.5
14
vs
UCF
L 73-82
−15.5
17
@
OKST
L 83-84
−8.5
20
vs
UTAH
W 81-78
−9.5
24
vs
KU
L 62-86
−10.5
27
@
WVU
L 54-59
−33.5
1
vs
ISU
L 61-95
−0.5
7
@
TCU
L 82-84
+10.5
11
vs
CIN
L 62-91
+5.5
14
@
HOU
L 64-78
−2.5
17
vs
BAY
W 90-74
+4.5
21
@
TTU
L 72-100
+13.5
25
@
COLO
L 70-79
−14.5
28
vs
TCU
L 68-77
−14.5
3
vs
WVU
W 65-63
−15.5
7
@
KU
L 85-104
+31.5
10
vs
BYU
L 91-105
+27.5
over 16under 16avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Wichita St has the better starters
Position by position: Wichita St 3, Kansas St 0, even 2
Wichita StBetterKansas St
G J. Long TR11.8 pts · 3.3 reb · 4 ast
Score 72
=Even
G B. Rechsteiner TR12 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 71
G J. Frison TR16.5 pts · 3.4 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 93
←WICHBig
G J. Schutt TR7.7 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 39
G M. Gray7.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 37
=Even
G M. Wheeler TR8.4 pts · 1.2 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 50
G T. Williams8.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 80
←WICHSmall
F D. Lindsay TR5.3 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 51
C W. Berg8.8 pts · 8 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 85
←WICHBig
F I. Abraham TR4.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 31
Wichita StBetterKansas St
WICH offense78th of 366 · +0.8
=Even
KSU defense97th of 366 · -0.7
WICH defense82nd of 366 · +0.2
=Even
KSU offense74th of 366 · +1.4
Backcourt+3.8 · 4 players
←WICHBig
Backcourt-1.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt+2.8 · 1 player
←WICHBig
Frontcourt-1.2 · 2 players
Bench+0.8 · 5 players
←WICHSmall
Bench-0.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestWICH betterKSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Long34 min · TRJ. Frison31 min · TRM. Gray27 minT. Williams22 minB. Heard18 min · TRJ. IghovodjaNew
Forwards
D. Battie18 minJ. Valencia13 minN. Hill5 minH. Thengvall2 min
Centers
W. Berg22 minC. Malonga11 min · TR
Guards
B. Rechsteiner28 min · TRJ. Schutt25 min · TRM. Wheeler22 min · TRA. Kostic14 minJ. AlexanderNew
Forwards
D. Lindsay21 min · TRI. Abraham20 min · TRT. Malovec15 min · TRP. N'Diaye9 min · TRB. Vice6 min · TRM. GilhoolNew
Centers
J. Rock13 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.6 #105 | Points per game | 79.6 #74 |
| 1.12 #98 | Points per possession | 1.08 #191 |
| 69.3 #164 | Pace (possessions) | 73.8 #11 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.4 #274 | Effective FG% | 53.3 #88 |
| 33.5 #195 | 3-point % | 36.4 #43 |
| 33.9 #300 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.9 #148 |
| 36.0 #149 | Free throw rate | 26.9 #351 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.0 #62 | Turnover rate | 17.4 #233 |
| 38.0 #8 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.2 #229 |
| 11.3 #325 | Assists per game | 16.8 #29 |
| Defense | ||
| 70.8 #71 | Points allowed | 81.8 #339 |
| 1.02 #42 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #244 |
| 47.2 #24 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.5 #239 |
| 31.5 #44 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.7 #166 |
| 15.7 #238 | Turnovers forced | 17.1 #145 |
| 71.2 #93 | Defensive rebound rate | 66.0 #317 |
| 6.0 #235 | Steals per game | 7.0 #121 |
| 3.8 #100 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #137 |
Wichita St
23-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-6 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Tulsa79–83
- W@ Oklahoma St96–70
- Wvs Wyoming74–70
- Lvs South Florida55–70
- Wvs Tulsa81–68
A week or more of rest.
Kansas St
12-20 in 2025-26 overall · 3-16 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs BYU91–105
- L@ Kansas85–104
- Wvs West Virginia65–63
- Lvs TCU68–77
- L@ Colorado70–79
A week or more of rest.