FedExForum · at Memphis
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MEM | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MEM 78–76 · win probability MEM 55%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 153.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: GCU has more of the edges
GCU 4, MEM 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: GCU 31.3%, MEM 35.3%. Defensive: GCU 74.7%, MEM 64.3%
Free throws
Free throw rate: GCU 39.5, MEM 34.7. Allowed: GCU 39.0, MEM 42.4
Shooting
Effective FG%: GCU 51.7 and allows 47.4; MEM 48.7 and allows 48.7
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: GCU 51%, MEM 15%. Transfers in: GCU 9, MEM 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: GCU plays 69.3 a game (166th fastest), MEM 71.9 (37th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
MEM at home. This season: MEM 0-0 at home, GCU 0-0 away
Even
GCU offense vs MEM defense
Offense 83rd of 366 against a defense 116th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
GCU has played the 107th-hardest schedule, MEM the 81st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
MEM offense vs GCU defense
Offense 62nd of 366 against a defense 78th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
GCU hits 31.8% and allows 31.9%; MEM hits 31.6% and allows 30.6%. Threes are 38.9% and 33.7% of their shots
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: GCU 17.6%, MEM 18.9%. Forced: GCU 17.4%, MEM 18.6%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MEM -1.6 | — |
| Total | — | 153.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | GCU 75.9 · MEM 77.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MEM -0.8 | — |
| 1H total | 71.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | GCU 35.5 · MEM 36.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | |
| 2-8 20% | 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Grand Canyon
32 games played
Straight up
20-12
63% wins
Against the spread
17-15
53% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-19
41% overs · avg −3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 90-71 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 81-90 | -15.5 | L −24.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 88-59 | -22.5 | W +6.5 | 163.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 64-78 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 167.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 85-72 | -18.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 68-58 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 46-59 | +8.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 105 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 67-45 | -24.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | U 112 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 78-84 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 82-61 | -17.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 82-70 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 91-78 | -23.5 | L −10.5 | 169.5 | U 169 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 60-70 | -6.5 | L −16.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 75-58 | +8.5 | W +25.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 76-58 | -16.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 64-87 | +6.5 | L −16.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 84-74 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 70-69 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 68-57 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 60-66 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 86-69 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 141.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 81-57 | -26.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 78-80 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 64-70 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 94-79 | -11.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 73-63 | +7.5 | W +17.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 65-70 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 80-67 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 69-74 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 86-60 | -19.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 85-60 | -12.5 | W +12.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 80-84 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
PFW
W 90-71
+4.5
7
vs
YSU
L 81-90
−24.5
10
vs
NIU
W 88-59
+6.5
15
@
SLU
L 64-78
−5.5
21
vs
NWST
W 85-72
−5.5
25
vs
UTAH
W 68-58
+4.5
26
vs
IOWA
L 46-59
−4.5
2
vs
STET
W 67-45
−2.5
6
vs
OKST
L 78-84
−4.5
13
vs
CCU
W 82-61
+3.5
20
@
WYO
W 82-70
+14.5
22
vs
IUIN
W 91-78
−10.5
3
vs
CSU
L 60-70
−16.5
7
@
BOIS
W 75-58
+25.5
10
vs
SJSU
W 76-58
+1.5
13
@
UNM
L 64-87
−16.5
17
vs
USU
W 84-74
+15.5
21
vs
SDSU
W 70-69
+2.5
24
@
FRES
W 68-57
+6.5
27
@
NEV
L 60-66
−2.5
30
vs
BOIS
W 86-69
+15.5
3
vs
AF
W 81-57
−2.5
7
@
UNLV
L 78-80
−4.5
11
vs
UNM
L 64-70
−7.5
14
@
SJSU
W 94-79
+3.5
17
@
SDSU
W 73-63
+17.5
21
vs
WYO
L 65-70
−12.5
25
vs
UNLV
W 80-67
+5.5
28
@
USU
L 69-74
+4.5
3
@
AF
W 86-60
+6.5
7
vs
FRES
W 85-60
+12.5
12
vs
NEV
L 80-84
−7.5
covered 17didn’t cover 15avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
PFW
W 90-71
+5.5
7
vs
YSU
L 81-90
+18.5
10
vs
NIU
W 88-59
−16.5
15
@
SLU
L 64-78
−25.5
21
vs
NWST
W 85-72
+9.5
25
vs
UTAH
W 68-58
−27.5
26
vs
IOWA
L 46-59
−38.5
2
vs
STET
W 67-45
−29.5
6
vs
OKST
L 78-84
+6.5
13
vs
CCU
W 82-61
−0.5
20
@
WYO
W 82-70
+4.5
22
vs
IUIN
W 91-78
−0.5
3
vs
CSU
L 60-70
−13.5
7
@
BOIS
W 75-58
−7.5
10
vs
SJSU
W 76-58
−7.5
13
@
UNM
L 64-87
+4.5
17
vs
USU
W 84-74
+7.5
21
vs
SDSU
W 70-69
−6.5
24
@
FRES
W 68-57
−20.5
27
@
NEV
L 60-66
−17.5
30
vs
BOIS
W 86-69
+13.5
3
vs
AF
W 81-57
+0.5
7
@
UNLV
L 78-80
+9.5
11
vs
UNM
L 64-70
−14.5
14
@
SJSU
W 94-79
+33.5
17
@
SDSU
W 73-63
−3.5
21
vs
WYO
L 65-70
−9.5
25
vs
UNLV
W 80-67
−3.5
28
@
USU
L 69-74
−4.5
3
@
AF
W 86-60
+2.5
7
vs
FRES
W 85-60
−4.5
12
vs
NEV
L 80-84
+26.5
over 13under 19avg −3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Memphis
32 games played
Straight up
13-19
41% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg −2.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg −1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 76-70 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 77-83 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 78-92 | -9.5 | L −23.5 | 163.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 71-80 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 68-69 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 74-58 | -10.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 86-70 | -14.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 78-71 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 158.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 73-99 | +16.5 | L −9.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 70-77 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 66-71 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 88-67 | -20.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 57-48 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | U 105 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 76-70 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 78-89 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 55-53 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 108 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 95-69 | -20.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 66-83 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 59-74 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 92-65 | -3.5 | W +23.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 76-78 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 90-80 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 77-54 | -10.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 69-76 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 75-99 | +13.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 66-87 | +9.5 | L −11.5 | 163.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 22 | vs | L 67-78 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 82-88 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 68-84 | -4.5 | L −20.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 89-96 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | O 185 |
| Mar 8 | @ | W 96-95 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 191 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 69-81 | -4.5 | L −16.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
SF
W 76-70
+3.5
11
@
MISS
L 77-83
+3.5
16
vs
UNLV
L 78-92
−23.5
20
vs
PUR
L 71-80
+5.5
21
vs
WAKE
L 68-69
+1.5
26
vs
SIU
W 74-58
+5.5
3
vs
NOLA
W 86-70
+1.5
6
vs
BAY
W 78-71
+10.5
13
@
LOU
L 73-99
−9.5
17
vs
VAN
L 70-77
+2.5
20
@
MSST
L 66-71
−1.5
22
vs
ALST
W 88-67
+0.5
31
vs
UNT
W 57-48
−0.5
3
@
RICE
W 76-70
−1.5
11
@
FAU
L 78-89
−9.5
14
vs
TEM
W 55-53
−5.5
18
vs
UTSA
W 95-69
+5.5
21
@
TLSA
L 66-83
−10.5
24
@
WICH
L 59-74
−11.5
29
vs
FAU
W 92-65
+23.5
1
vs
TULN
L 76-78
−10.5
5
@
UAB
W 90-80
+11.5
8
vs
CLT
W 77-54
+12.5
12
@
UNT
L 69-76
−9.5
14
@
USU
L 75-99
−10.5
19
@
USF
L 66-87
−11.5
22
vs
UAB
L 67-78
−16.5
26
vs
WICH
L 82-88
−7.5
1
@
ECU
L 68-84
−20.5
5
vs
USF
L 89-96
+0.5
8
@
TULN
W 96-95
−1.5
11
vs
TULN
L 69-81
−16.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg −2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
SF
W 76-70
−11.5
11
@
MISS
L 77-83
+7.5
16
vs
UNLV
L 78-92
+6.5
20
vs
PUR
L 71-80
−5.5
21
vs
WAKE
L 68-69
−23.5
26
vs
SIU
W 74-58
−24.5
3
vs
NOLA
W 86-70
+6.5
6
vs
BAY
W 78-71
−9.5
13
@
LOU
L 73-99
+9.5
17
vs
VAN
L 70-77
−12.5
20
@
MSST
L 66-71
−16.5
22
vs
ALST
W 88-67
+3.5
31
vs
UNT
W 57-48
−32.5
3
@
RICE
W 76-70
+1.5
11
@
FAU
L 78-89
+14.5
14
vs
TEM
W 55-53
−35.5
18
vs
UTSA
W 95-69
+16.5
21
@
TLSA
L 66-83
−4.5
24
@
WICH
L 59-74
−12.5
29
vs
FAU
W 92-65
+4.5
1
vs
TULN
L 76-78
+2.5
5
@
UAB
W 90-80
+14.5
8
vs
CLT
W 77-54
−13.5
12
@
UNT
L 69-76
+6.5
14
@
USU
L 75-99
+18.5
19
@
USF
L 66-87
−10.5
22
vs
UAB
L 67-78
−7.5
26
vs
WICH
L 82-88
+20.5
1
@
ECU
L 68-84
−0.5
5
vs
USF
L 89-96
+21.5
8
@
TULN
W 96-95
+36.5
11
vs
TULN
L 69-81
−1.5
over 16under 16avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Memphis has the better starters
Position by position: Grand Canyon 1, Memphis 2, even 2
Grand CanyonBetterMemphis
G J. Zimmerman TR15.2 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 32
→MEMBig
G L. Almodovar TR14.6 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 80
G M. Tucker TR13 pts · 2.1 reb · 3 ast
Score 56
→MEMSmall
G B. Cummings TR12.5 pts · 1.5 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 84
G J. Henley17.7 pts · 5.7 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 97
=Even
G J. Reid TR10.1 pts · 1.4 reb · 5 ast
Score 83
G M. Williams14 pts · 2.7 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 89
=Even
F T. Weeks TR20.1 pts · 5.5 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 88
F B. Barkley TR14.7 pts · 5.9 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 89
←GCUSmall
F C. Williams TR11.7 pts · 9.1 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 68
Grand CanyonBetterMemphis
GCU offense83rd of 366 · +0.4
=Even
MEM defense116th of 366 · -1.5
GCU defense78th of 366 · +0.5
=Even
MEM offense62nd of 366 · +2.6
Backcourt+4.6 · 4 players
=Even
Backcourt+4.5 · 3 players
Frontcourt+3.0 · 1 player
→MEMSmall
Frontcourt+4.1 · 2 players
Bench+2.6 · 5 players
→MEMSmall
Bench+4.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestGCU betterMEM betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Zimmerman33 min · TRM. Tucker32 min · TRJ. Henley32 minM. Williams27 minT. Holloman26 min · TRD. Skillings25 min · TR
Forwards
B. Barkley29 min · TRT. Behrend22 min · TRA. Dickerson22 min · TRO. Biliew20 min · TRJ. SawyerNewJ. WhortonNew
Centers
E. Demirel23 min
Guards
L. Almodovar28 min · TRB. Cummings26 min · TRJ. Reid26 min · TRJ. Thedford20 minJ. Holloway13 min · TRP. PoundsNew
Forwards
T. Weeks34 min · TRC. Williams33 min · TRR. Vavers25 min · TRJ. Deng13 min · TRM. Logue11 min · TRW. Whorton9 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.6 #153 | Points per game | 75.2 #158 |
| 1.09 #158 | Points per possession | 1.04 #264 |
| 69.3 #166 | Pace (possessions) | 71.9 #37 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.7 #162 | Effective FG% | 48.7 #298 |
| 31.8 #286 | 3-point % | 31.6 #303 |
| 38.9 #192 | 3-point attempt rate | 33.7 #305 |
| 39.5 #67 | Free throw rate | 34.7 #190 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.6 #245 | Turnover rate | 18.9 #316 |
| 31.3 #150 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.3 #41 |
| 12.8 #230 | Assists per game | 13.3 #193 |
| Defense | ||
| 68.7 #42 | Points allowed | 76.6 #234 |
| 0.99 #22 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #124 |
| 47.4 #28 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.7 #55 |
| 31.9 #60 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.6 #22 |
| 17.4 #129 | Turnovers forced | 18.6 #69 |
| 74.7 #12 | Defensive rebound rate | 64.3 #350 |
| 6.6 #165 | Steals per game | 8.4 #19 |
| 3.6 #123 | Blocks per game | 4.3 #49 |
Grand Canyon
20-12 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Nevada80–84
- Wvs Fresno St85–60
- W@ Air Force86–60
- L@ Utah State69–74
- Wvs UNLV80–67
A week or more of rest.
Memphis
13-19 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Tulane69–81
- W@ Tulane96–95
- Lvs South Florida89–96
- L@ East Carolina68–84
- Lvs Wichita St82–88
A week or more of rest.