John W. Pope Jr. Convocation Center · at Campbell
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CAM | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects CAM 80–70 · win probability CAM 80%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CAM has more of the edges
NORF 1, CAM 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
NORF has played the 343rd-hardest schedule, CAM the 134th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
NORF hits 34.2% and allows 32.0%; CAM hits 32.3% and allows 35.5%. Threes are 30.6% and 36.9% of their shots
CAM offense vs NORF defense
Offense 217th of 366 against a defense 301st, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: NORF 43.5, CAM 43.5. Allowed: NORF 45.3, CAM 37.0
Home court
CAM at home. This season: CAM 0-0 at home, NORF 0-0 away
Even
NORF offense vs CAM defense
Offense 314th of 366 against a defense 275th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: NORF plays 69.1 a game (172nd fastest), CAM 70.0 (118th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: NORF 49.3 and allows 51.7; CAM 50.1 and allows 53.9
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NORF 32.5%, CAM 33.5%. Defensive: NORF 67.7%, CAM 68.0%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NORF 8%, CAM 0%. Transfers in: NORF 4, CAM 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NORF 18.7%, CAM 17.6%. Forced: NORF 18.8%, CAM 17.0%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | CAM -9.6 | — |
| Total | — | 149.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | NORF 70.1 · CAM 79.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CAM -5.6 | — |
| 1H total | 70.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | NORF 32.2 · CAM 37.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Norfolk St
28 games played
Straight up
11-17
39% wins
Against the spread
13-15
46% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-10
64% overs · avg +4.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | L 78-81 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 57-60 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 41-51 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 92 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 62-60 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 67-75 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 61-98 | +35.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 67-68 | +10.5 | W +9.5 | 138.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 67-97 | +26.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 68-80 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 135.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 82-72 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 72-71 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 70-89 | +11.5 | L −7.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 54-63 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 126.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 67-69 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 66-64 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 132.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 70-74 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 132.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 89-82 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 103-76 | -13.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 26 | vs | L 78-79 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 60-88 | +7.5 | L −20.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 75-68 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 75-58 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 70-66 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 90-71 | -10.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 75-69 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 84-90 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 76-84 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 82-88 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
W&M
L 78-81
−0.5
11
@
ODU
L 57-60
+5.5
14
@
TOW
L 41-51
+3.5
21
vs
HAMP
W 62-60
−0.5
23
@
WYO
L 67-75
+7.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 61-98
−1.5
6
@
JMU
L 67-68
+9.5
10
@
BAY
L 67-97
−3.5
18
vs
GRAM
L 68-80
−13.5
19
vs
JKST
W 82-72
+4.5
21
@
UTEP
W 72-71
+11.5
22
vs
UCI
L 70-89
−7.5
28
@
UL
L 54-63
−5.5
3
@
NCCU
L 67-69
−3.5
10
@
DSU
W 66-64
−2.5
12
vs
UMES
L 70-74
−9.5
17
@
SCST
W 89-82
+1.5
24
vs
COPP
W 103-76
+13.5
26
vs
MORG
L 78-79
−8.5
31
@
HOW
L 60-88
−20.5
7
vs
NCCU
W 75-68
+2.5
14
vs
DSU
W 75-58
+7.5
16
@
UMES
W 70-66
+2.5
21
vs
SCST
W 90-71
+8.5
28
@
COPP
W 75-69
+0.5
2
@
MORG
L 84-90
−9.5
5
vs
HOW
L 76-84
−1.5
12
vs
SCST
L 82-88
−13.5
covered 13didn’t cover 15avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
W&M
L 78-81
+0.5
11
@
ODU
L 57-60
−32.5
14
@
TOW
L 41-51
−46.5
21
vs
HAMP
W 62-60
−11.5
23
@
WYO
L 67-75
+0.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 61-98
+12.5
6
@
JMU
L 67-68
−3.5
10
@
BAY
L 67-97
+15.5
18
vs
GRAM
L 68-80
+12.5
19
vs
JKST
W 82-72
+13.5
21
@
UTEP
W 72-71
+6.5
22
vs
UCI
L 70-89
+22.5
28
@
UL
L 54-63
−9.5
3
@
NCCU
L 67-69
−5.5
10
@
DSU
W 66-64
−2.5
12
vs
UMES
L 70-74
+11.5
17
@
SCST
W 89-82
+31.5
24
vs
COPP
W 103-76
+35.5
26
vs
MORG
L 78-79
+4.5
31
@
HOW
L 60-88
+1.5
7
vs
NCCU
W 75-68
−5.5
14
vs
DSU
W 75-58
−1.5
16
@
UMES
W 70-66
−0.5
21
vs
SCST
W 90-71
+20.5
28
@
COPP
W 75-69
+3.5
2
@
MORG
L 84-90
+17.5
5
vs
HOW
L 76-84
+10.5
12
vs
SCST
L 82-88
+25.5
over 18under 10avg +4.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Campbell
32 games played
Straight up
14-18
44% wins
Against the spread
18-14
56% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 64-96 | +20.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 65-73 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 91-82 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 85-91 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 159.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 71-67 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 51-99 | +17.5 | L −30.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 76-87 | +14.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 69-64 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 70-98 | +36.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 50-78 | +13.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 102-79 | -5.5 | W +17.5 | 145.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 72-86 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 68-65 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 97-82 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 154.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 86-72 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 82-83 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 75-78 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 83-87 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 73-88 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 69-81 | -4.5 | L −16.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 104-96 | +8.5 | W +16.5 | 168.5 | O 200 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 81-60 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 79-71 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 57-62 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 84-83 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 167.5 | U 167 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 68-73 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 60-65 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 67-71 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 90-72 | -8.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 96-89 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | O 185 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 85-70 | +6.5 | W +21.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 64-74 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
WIS
L 64-96
−11.5
6
@
WVU
L 65-73
+7.5
9
vs
WMU
W 91-82
−0.5
19
@
WEB
L 85-91
−4.5
21
vs
UTA
W 71-67
+2.5
25
@
WAKE
L 51-99
−30.5
2
@
PSU
L 76-87
+3.5
14
vs
BALL
W 69-64
−3.5
17
@
GONZ
L 70-98
+8.5
21
@
MINN
L 50-78
−14.5
23
vs
GB
W 102-79
+17.5
29
@
HOF
L 72-86
−7.5
31
@
MONM
W 68-65
+4.5
3
vs
NE
W 97-82
+11.5
8
vs
HAMP
W 86-72
+7.5
10
@
ELON
L 82-83
+3.5
17
@
UNCW
L 75-78
+3.5
22
@
COFC
L 83-87
−0.5
24
vs
MONM
L 73-88
−19.5
29
vs
STBK
L 69-81
−16.5
31
@
W&M
W 104-96
+16.5
5
vs
DREX
W 81-60
+16.5
7
@
NCAT
W 79-71
+4.5
15
vs
COFC
L 57-62
−8.5
19
vs
W&M
W 84-83
+2.5
21
vs
UNCW
L 68-73
−1.5
26
@
DREX
L 60-65
−3.5
28
@
TOW
L 67-71
+0.5
3
vs
NCAT
W 90-72
+9.5
7
vs
STBK
W 96-89
+4.5
8
vs
UNCW
W 85-70
+21.5
9
vs
MONM
L 64-74
−8.5
covered 18didn’t cover 14avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
WIS
L 64-96
+8.5
6
@
WVU
L 65-73
−0.5
9
vs
WMU
W 91-82
+20.5
19
@
WEB
L 85-91
+16.5
21
vs
UTA
W 71-67
−13.5
25
@
WAKE
L 51-99
−9.5
2
@
PSU
L 76-87
+8.5
14
vs
BALL
W 69-64
−12.5
17
@
GONZ
L 70-98
+7.5
21
@
MINN
L 50-78
−17.5
23
vs
GB
W 102-79
+35.5
29
@
HOF
L 72-86
+8.5
31
@
MONM
W 68-65
−19.5
3
vs
NE
W 97-82
+24.5
8
vs
HAMP
W 86-72
+12.5
10
@
ELON
L 82-83
+3.5
17
@
UNCW
L 75-78
+3.5
22
@
COFC
L 83-87
+9.5
24
vs
MONM
L 73-88
+12.5
29
vs
STBK
L 69-81
−2.5
31
@
W&M
W 104-96
+31.5
5
vs
DREX
W 81-60
−0.5
7
@
NCAT
W 79-71
−6.5
15
vs
COFC
L 57-62
−40.5
19
vs
W&M
W 84-83
−0.5
21
vs
UNCW
L 68-73
−9.5
26
@
DREX
L 60-65
−18.5
28
@
TOW
L 67-71
−4.5
3
vs
NCAT
W 90-72
+7.5
7
vs
STBK
W 96-89
+36.5
8
vs
UNCW
W 85-70
+5.5
9
vs
MONM
L 64-74
−13.5
over 17under 15avg +2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Norfolk St 0, Campbell 0, even 5
Norfolk StBetterCampbell
G B. Laster TR6.9 pts · 2.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 51
=Even
G L. Waddles TR11.7 pts · 4.7 reb · 2 ast
Score 48
G A. Newton3.6 pts · 1.4 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 12
=No call
G E. Butkus NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
F J. Gupton TR7.7 pts · 4.9 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 22
=No call
G A. Wright NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
F B. Gardner TR3.5 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 3
=No call
G J. Browder NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
F J. Riley TR3.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 56
=Even
F N. Kapic TR3.9 pts · 2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 55
Norfolk StBetterCampbell
NORF offense314th of 366 · -10.1
=Even
CAM defense275th of 366 · -6.9
NORF defense301st of 366 · -7.7
→CAMSmall
CAM offense217th of 366 · -6.7
Backcourt-2.2 · 2 players
→CAMSmall
Backcourt-0.7 · 4 players
Frontcourt-4.2 · 3 players
→CAMBig
Frontcourt-0.0 · 1 player
Bench-0.0 · 1 player
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestNORF betterCAM betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Laster19 min · TRA. Newton16 minA. Torrence1 minC. WalkerNewD. CamaraNewJ. SkyersNew
Forwards
J. Gupton25 min · TRB. Gardner16 min · TRJ. Riley11 min · TRM. MitchellNew
Centers
J. JordanNew
Guards
L. Waddles29 min · TRE. ButkusNewA. WrightNewJ. BrowderNewB. RitgerNewC. McAbeeNew
Forwards
N. Kapic11 min · TRK. RogersNewS. MooreNewB. ThetNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.6 #257 | Points per game | 76.1 #140 |
| 1.04 #274 | Points per possession | 1.08 #175 |
| 69.1 #172 | Pace (possessions) | 70.0 #118 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.3 #277 | Effective FG% | 50.1 #230 |
| 34.2 #157 | 3-point % | 32.3 #267 |
| 30.6 #347 | 3-point attempt rate | 36.9 #232 |
| 43.5 #13 | Free throw rate | 43.5 #16 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.7 #311 | Turnover rate | 17.6 #240 |
| 32.5 #108 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.5 #77 |
| 11.3 #326 | Assists per game | 11.4 #315 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.7 #181 | Points allowed | 78.8 #289 |
| 1.08 #160 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #282 |
| 51.7 #196 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.9 #295 |
| 32.0 #61 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.5 #277 |
| 18.8 #58 | Turnovers forced | 17.0 #153 |
| 67.7 #270 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.0 #254 |
| 6.5 #180 | Steals per game | 6.5 #179 |
| 2.8 #264 | Blocks per game | 1.5 #361 |
Norfolk St
11-17 in 2025-26 overall · 8-7 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs SC State82–88
- Lvs Howard76–84
- L@ Morgan St84–90
- W@ Coppin St75–69
- Wvs SC State90–71
A week or more of rest.
Campbell
14-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-11 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Monmouth64–74
- Wvs UNC Wilmington85–70
- Wvs Stony Brook96–89
- Wvs NC A&T90–72
- L@ Towson67–71
A week or more of rest.