Cotterell Court · at Colgate
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | COLG | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects COLG 80–80 · win probability COLG 51%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 159.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: COLG has more of the edges
COR 1, COLG 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
COLG offense vs COR defense
Offense 205th of 366 against a defense 319th, on the model’s ratings
COR offense vs COLG defense
Offense 111th of 366 against a defense 214th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: COR plays 72.0 a game (36th fastest), COLG 68.6 (202nd). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: COR 16.1%, COLG 14.7%. Forced: COR 15.0%, COLG 15.2%
Home court
COLG at home. This season: COLG 0-0 at home, COR 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: COR 30.2, COLG 29.7. Allowed: COR 37.2, COLG 33.8
Context
Schedule so far
COR has played the 144th-hardest schedule, COLG the 178th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: COR 30.2%, COLG 26.6%. Defensive: COR 69.4%, COLG 70.7%
Even
Three-pointers
COR hits 38.3% and allows 37.5%; COLG hits 35.6% and allows 34.8%. Threes are 51.6% and 35.0% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: COR 58.5 and allows 55.9; COLG 53.3 and allows 52.2
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: COR 53%, COLG 59%. Transfers in: COR 0, COLG 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | COLG -0.3 | — |
| Total | — | 159.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | COR 79.7 · COLG 80 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | COLG -0.0 | — |
| 1H total | 74.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | COR 37.3 · COLG 37.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
COR 5–0 COLGCOR leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · COR has won the last 5 meetings · COR 4-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2025-26 | COLG 94 @ COR 95 | COR -5.5 | COLG W |
| Dec 4, 2024-25 | COR 84 @ COLG 57 | COLG +2.5 | COR W |
| Dec 30, 2023-24 | COLG 64 @ COR 77 | COR -4.5 | COR W |
| Dec 22, 2022-23 | COR 91 @ COLG 80 | COLG -4.5 | COR W |
| Nov 16, 2021-22 | COLG 68 @ COR 78 | COR +11.5 | COR W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Cornell
26 games played
Straight up
13-13
50% wins
Against the spread
11-15
42% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-12
54% overs · avg +6.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 102-110 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 164.5 | O 212 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 65-76 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 13 | @ | W 97-78 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 86-73 | -17.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | U 159 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 95-94 | -5.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | O 189 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 101-72 | -5.5 | W +23.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 81-99 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 80-93 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 90-93 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 166.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 83-75 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | U 158 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 97-114 | +23.5 | W +6.5 | 160.5 | O 211 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 99-104 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 170.5 | O 203 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 91-102 | -9.5 | L −20.5 | 175.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 68-102 | +9.5 | L −24.5 | 174.5 | U 170 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 89-67 | -2.5 | W +19.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 86-79 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 87-64 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 81-91 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 173.5 | U 172 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 88-67 | -1.5 | W +19.5 | 171.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 89-65 | -3.5 | W +20.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 76-82 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 169.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 54-73 | -4.5 | L −23.5 | 155.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 72-69 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 86-80 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 111-90 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 166.5 | O 201 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 76-88 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
KENT
L 102-110
−1.5
9
@
ILST
L 65-76
−4.5
13
@
LAF
W 97-78
+14.5
18
vs
ARMY
W 86-73
−4.5
20
vs
COLG
W 95-94
−4.5
30
@
BUCK
W 101-72
+23.5
2
@
GMU
L 81-99
−7.5
3
@
TOW
L 80-93
−6.5
7
@
SAM
L 90-93
−0.5
21
@
UALB
W 83-75
+1.5
29
@
MSU
L 97-114
+6.5
5
vs
COLU
L 99-104
−8.5
10
vs
DART
L 91-102
−20.5
17
@
YALE
L 68-102
−24.5
19
@
BRWN
W 89-67
+19.5
24
@
HARV
W 86-79
+8.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 87-64
+15.5
31
vs
PENN
L 81-91
−17.5
7
@
COLU
W 88-67
+19.5
13
@
PRIN
W 89-65
+20.5
14
@
PENN
L 76-82
−8.5
21
vs
HARV
L 54-73
−23.5
27
vs
YALE
W 72-69
+7.5
28
vs
BRWN
W 86-80
−3.5
7
@
DART
W 111-90
+16.5
14
vs
YALE
L 76-88
−6.5
covered 11didn’t cover 15avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
KENT
L 102-110
+47.5
9
@
ILST
L 65-76
−23.5
13
@
LAF
W 97-78
+14.5
18
vs
ARMY
W 86-73
−5.5
20
vs
COLG
W 95-94
+27.5
30
@
BUCK
W 101-72
+13.5
2
@
GMU
L 81-99
+24.5
3
@
TOW
L 80-93
+18.5
7
@
SAM
L 90-93
+16.5
21
@
UALB
W 83-75
−9.5
29
@
MSU
L 97-114
+50.5
5
vs
COLU
L 99-104
+32.5
10
vs
DART
L 91-102
+17.5
17
@
YALE
L 68-102
−4.5
19
@
BRWN
W 89-67
−7.5
24
@
HARV
W 86-79
+4.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 87-64
−7.5
31
vs
PENN
L 81-91
−1.5
7
@
COLU
W 88-67
−16.5
13
@
PRIN
W 89-65
−1.5
14
@
PENN
L 76-82
−11.5
21
vs
HARV
L 54-73
−28.5
27
vs
YALE
W 72-69
−23.5
28
vs
BRWN
W 86-80
+9.5
7
@
DART
W 111-90
+34.5
14
vs
YALE
L 76-88
+0.5
over 14under 12avg +6.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Colgate
31 games played
Straight up
16-15
52% wins
Against the spread
12-19
39% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-14
55% overs · avg +4.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 69-80 | +22.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 65-68 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 90-83 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 65-84 | +30.5 | W +11.5 | 164.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 17 | @ | W 72-69 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 94-95 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | O 189 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 69-67 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 72-62 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 77-85 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 60-90 | +27.5 | L −2.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 69-78 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 85-77 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 76-69 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 64-62 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 77-78 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 86-80 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 95-76 | -8.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 66-70 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 80-79 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 79-74 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 76-77 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 69-55 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 78-59 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 74-70 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 80-84 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 58-85 | -2.5 | L −29.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 101-98 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 199 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 69-70 | -8.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 69-85 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 90-77 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 69-76 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MSU
L 69-80
+11.5
7
vs
NE
L 65-68
−8.5
11
vs
DREX
W 90-83
+3.5
14
@
ILL
L 65-84
+11.5
17
@
SIE
W 72-69
+9.5
20
@
COR
L 94-95
+4.5
28
vs
UALB
W 69-67
−5.5
30
vs
FOR
W 72-62
+8.5
10
@
SBU
L 77-85
+1.5
21
@
FLA
L 60-90
−2.5
28
vs
HARV
L 69-78
−12.5
31
@
LAF
W 85-77
+1.5
3
@
ARMY
W 76-69
−0.5
7
vs
AMER
W 64-62
−3.5
10
vs
LEH
L 77-78
−12.5
14
@
L-MD
W 86-80
−2.5
17
vs
BUCK
W 95-76
+10.5
21
@
AMER
L 66-70
−2.5
24
vs
BU
W 80-79
−6.5
28
vs
HC
W 79-74
−5.5
31
@
LEH
L 76-77
−4.5
4
vs
ARMY
W 69-55
+3.5
7
@
BUCK
W 78-59
+13.5
11
@
HC
W 74-70
−4.5
14
vs
NAVY
L 80-84
−5.5
16
@
BU
L 58-85
−29.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 101-98
−5.5
25
vs
LAF
L 69-70
−9.5
28
@
NAVY
L 69-85
−9.5
5
vs
L-MD
W 90-77
+6.5
8
@
LEH
L 69-76
−9.5
covered 12didn’t cover 19avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MSU
L 69-80
+4.5
7
vs
NE
L 65-68
−14.5
11
vs
DREX
W 90-83
+29.5
14
@
ILL
L 65-84
−15.5
17
@
SIE
W 72-69
−5.5
20
@
COR
L 94-95
+27.5
28
vs
UALB
W 69-67
−5.5
30
vs
FOR
W 72-62
−8.5
10
@
SBU
L 77-85
+19.5
21
@
FLA
L 60-90
−6.5
28
vs
HARV
L 69-78
+5.5
31
@
LAF
W 85-77
+15.5
3
@
ARMY
W 76-69
−2.5
7
vs
AMER
W 64-62
−22.5
10
vs
LEH
L 77-78
+12.5
14
@
L-MD
W 86-80
+15.5
17
vs
BUCK
W 95-76
+31.5
21
@
AMER
L 66-70
−10.5
24
vs
BU
W 80-79
+11.5
28
vs
HC
W 79-74
+8.5
31
@
LEH
L 76-77
+6.5
4
vs
ARMY
W 69-55
−26.5
7
@
BUCK
W 78-59
−4.5
11
@
HC
W 74-70
+1.5
14
vs
NAVY
L 80-84
+24.5
16
@
BU
L 58-85
−2.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 101-98
+48.5
25
vs
LAF
L 69-70
−9.5
28
@
NAVY
L 69-85
+12.5
5
vs
L-MD
W 90-77
+11.5
8
@
LEH
L 69-76
−1.5
over 17under 14avg +4.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Cornell 1, Colgate 1, even 3
CornellBetterColgate
G J. Beccles7.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 37
=Even
G J. Ahayere7.5 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 32
G A. Nimani5.3 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 30
→COLGBig
F A. Alekseyenko14.9 pts · 6.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 75
G M. Rafiq4.2 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F S. Wright12.5 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 60
F K. Sepp4.8 pts · 5.4 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 28
←CORSmall
F C. Wright1.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 8
F G. Panzini2.5 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 9
=Even
F A. Odetoyinbo1.9 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 20
CornellBetterColgate
COR offense111th of 366 · -1.8
←CORSmall
COLG defense214th of 366 · -5.5
COR defense319th of 366 · -8.3
→COLGSmall
COLG offense205th of 366 · -6.3
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-1.6 · 1 player
Frontcourt-2.3 · 2 players
→COLGSmall
Frontcourt-0.5 · 4 players
Bench-1.3 · 5 players
=Even
Bench-1.1 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestCOR betterCOLG betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Beccles24 minA. Nimani18 minM. Rafiq8 minD. Fishburn8 minR. Burbach8 minE. GriffinNew
Forwards
K. Sepp19 minG. Panzini10 minI. Imegwu5 minJ. Abalos5 minT. Iwanonkiw3 minB. LecklitnerNew
Guards
J. Ahayere25 minC. Pugh1 minJ. Niv1 minP. JonesNewB. ForrestNewI. SkinnNew
Forwards
A. Alekseyenko30 minS. Wright26 minC. Wright12 minA. Odetoyinbo11 minE. Brown7 minC. Brennan4 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 85.8 #13 | Points per game | 75.6 #154 |
| 1.20 #17 | Points per possession | 1.11 #121 |
| 72.0 #36 | Pace (possessions) | 68.6 #202 |
| Shooting | ||
| 58.5 #7 | Effective FG% | 53.3 #91 |
| 38.3 #14 | 3-point % | 35.6 #81 |
| 51.6 #8 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.0 #275 |
| 30.2 #304 | Free throw rate | 29.7 #316 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.1 #144 | Turnover rate | 14.7 #50 |
| 30.2 #193 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.6 #309 |
| 20.0 #1 | Assists per game | 14.2 #130 |
| Defense | ||
| 84.6 #358 | Points allowed | 76.2 #222 |
| 1.17 #343 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #230 |
| 55.9 #343 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.2 #224 |
| 37.5 #349 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.8 #238 |
| 15.0 #287 | Turnovers forced | 15.2 #268 |
| 69.4 #187 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.7 #125 |
| 5.8 #263 | Steals per game | 6.1 #230 |
| 2.8 #267 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #249 |
Cornell
13-13 in 2025-26 overall · 8-7 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Yale76–88
- W@ Dartmouth111–90
- Wvs Brown86–80
- Wvs Yale72–69
- Lvs Harvard54–73
A week or more of rest.
Colgate
16-15 in 2025-26 overall · 12-8 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Lehigh69–76
- Wvs Loyola MD90–77
- L@ Navy69–85
- Lvs Lafayette69–70
- Wvs Loyola MD101–98
A week or more of rest.