Newman Arena · at Cornell
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | COR | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects COR 83–72 · win probability COR 83%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 155.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: COR has more of the edges
UALB 0, COR 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
COR offense vs UALB defense
Offense 111th of 366 against a defense 259th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: UALB plays 65.6 a game (324th fastest), COR 72.0 (36th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
UALB has played the 260th-hardest schedule, COR the 144th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
UALB hits 32.6% and allows 36.0%; COR hits 38.3% and allows 37.5%. Threes are 37.6% and 51.6% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: UALB 51.4 and allows 53.2; COR 58.5 and allows 55.9
Home court
COR at home. This season: COR 0-0 at home, UALB 0-0 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UALB 18.5%, COR 16.1%. Forced: UALB 15.8%, COR 15.0%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UALB 38%, COR 53%. Transfers in: UALB 3, COR 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: UALB 24.9, COR 30.2. Allowed: UALB 35.7, COR 37.2
Even
UALB offense vs COR defense
Offense 313th of 366 against a defense 319th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UALB 32.7%, COR 30.2%. Defensive: UALB 67.6%, COR 69.4%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | COR -11.0 | — |
| Total | — | 155.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | UALB 72.2 · COR 83.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | COR -6.4 | — |
| 1H total | 72.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | UALB 33.1 · COR 39.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
| Date | Game | Last meeting |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 12 | vs SIE | L63–73WU |
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UALB 0–1 CORCOR leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · UALB 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2025-26 | COR 83 @ UALB 75 | UALB +6.5 | COR W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UAlbany
29 games played
Straight up
8-21
28% wins
Against the spread
11-18
38% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 53-80 | +24.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 62-83 | +9.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 61-80 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 63-73 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 67-69 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 68-88 | +10.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 65-93 | +13.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 82-93 | +17.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 79-105 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 71-55 | +10.5 | W +26.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 75-83 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 167.5 | U 158 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 67-96 | +19.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 71-83 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 71-46 | -3.5 | W +21.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 69-53 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 75-68 | +5.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 49-52 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 131.5 | U 101 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 72-80 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 68-77 | -5.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 65-68 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 65-63 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 79-89 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 77-74 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 81-63 | +3.5 | W +21.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 62-66 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 59-70 | -4.5 | L −15.5 | 130.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 84-61 | -3.5 | W +19.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 56-69 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 76-81 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MARQ
L 53-80
−2.5
8
@
MASS
L 62-83
−11.5
14
@
URI
L 61-80
−3.5
21
@
SIE
L 63-73
+0.5
28
vs
COLG
L 67-69
+5.5
29
vs
FOR
L 68-88
−9.5
6
@
COLU
L 65-93
−14.5
10
vs
YALE
L 82-93
+6.5
13
@
FAU
L 79-105
−7.5
17
@
STBK
W 71-55
+26.5
21
vs
COR
L 75-83
−1.5
30
@
SC
L 67-96
−9.5
3
@
UML
L 71-83
−9.5
10
vs
BRY
W 71-46
+21.5
15
vs
BING
W 69-53
+7.5
19
vs
UVM
W 75-68
+12.5
22
@
ME
L 49-52
−5.5
24
@
UNH
L 72-80
−5.5
29
vs
NJIT
L 68-77
−14.5
31
vs
UMBC
L 65-68
−1.5
5
@
BRY
W 65-63
+3.5
7
vs
UML
L 79-89
−14.5
14
@
BING
W 77-74
−1.5
19
@
NJIT
W 81-63
+21.5
21
@
UMBC
L 62-66
+3.5
26
vs
ME
L 59-70
−15.5
28
vs
UNH
W 84-61
+19.5
3
@
UVM
L 56-69
−3.5
7
@
UML
L 76-81
−2.5
covered 11didn’t cover 18avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MARQ
L 53-80
−16.5
8
@
MASS
L 62-83
−10.5
14
@
URI
L 61-80
−9.5
21
@
SIE
L 63-73
−4.5
28
vs
COLG
L 67-69
−5.5
29
vs
FOR
L 68-88
+12.5
6
@
COLU
L 65-93
+13.5
10
vs
YALE
L 82-93
+29.5
13
@
FAU
L 79-105
+36.5
17
@
STBK
W 71-55
−20.5
21
vs
COR
L 75-83
−9.5
30
@
SC
L 67-96
+14.5
3
@
UML
L 71-83
+3.5
10
vs
BRY
W 71-46
−19.5
15
vs
BING
W 69-53
−16.5
19
vs
UVM
W 75-68
+3.5
22
@
ME
L 49-52
−30.5
24
@
UNH
L 72-80
+14.5
29
vs
NJIT
L 68-77
+5.5
31
vs
UMBC
L 65-68
−8.5
5
@
BRY
W 65-63
−5.5
7
vs
UML
L 79-89
+24.5
14
@
BING
W 77-74
+14.5
19
@
NJIT
W 81-63
+1.5
21
@
UMBC
L 62-66
−16.5
26
vs
ME
L 59-70
−1.5
28
vs
UNH
W 84-61
+6.5
3
@
UVM
L 56-69
−11.5
7
@
UML
L 76-81
+10.5
over 14under 15avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Cornell
26 games played
Straight up
13-13
50% wins
Against the spread
11-15
42% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-12
54% overs · avg +6.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 102-110 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 164.5 | O 212 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 65-76 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 13 | @ | W 97-78 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 86-73 | -17.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | U 159 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 95-94 | -5.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | O 189 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 101-72 | -5.5 | W +23.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 81-99 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 80-93 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 90-93 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 166.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 83-75 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | U 158 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 97-114 | +23.5 | W +6.5 | 160.5 | O 211 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 99-104 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 170.5 | O 203 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 91-102 | -9.5 | L −20.5 | 175.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 68-102 | +9.5 | L −24.5 | 174.5 | U 170 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 89-67 | -2.5 | W +19.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 86-79 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 87-64 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 81-91 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 173.5 | U 172 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 88-67 | -1.5 | W +19.5 | 171.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 89-65 | -3.5 | W +20.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 76-82 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 169.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 54-73 | -4.5 | L −23.5 | 155.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 72-69 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 86-80 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 111-90 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 166.5 | O 201 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 76-88 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
KENT
L 102-110
−1.5
9
@
ILST
L 65-76
−4.5
13
@
LAF
W 97-78
+14.5
18
vs
ARMY
W 86-73
−4.5
20
vs
COLG
W 95-94
−4.5
30
@
BUCK
W 101-72
+23.5
2
@
GMU
L 81-99
−7.5
3
@
TOW
L 80-93
−6.5
7
@
SAM
L 90-93
−0.5
21
@
UALB
W 83-75
+1.5
29
@
MSU
L 97-114
+6.5
5
vs
COLU
L 99-104
−8.5
10
vs
DART
L 91-102
−20.5
17
@
YALE
L 68-102
−24.5
19
@
BRWN
W 89-67
+19.5
24
@
HARV
W 86-79
+8.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 87-64
+15.5
31
vs
PENN
L 81-91
−17.5
7
@
COLU
W 88-67
+19.5
13
@
PRIN
W 89-65
+20.5
14
@
PENN
L 76-82
−8.5
21
vs
HARV
L 54-73
−23.5
27
vs
YALE
W 72-69
+7.5
28
vs
BRWN
W 86-80
−3.5
7
@
DART
W 111-90
+16.5
14
vs
YALE
L 76-88
−6.5
covered 11didn’t cover 15avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
KENT
L 102-110
+47.5
9
@
ILST
L 65-76
−23.5
13
@
LAF
W 97-78
+14.5
18
vs
ARMY
W 86-73
−5.5
20
vs
COLG
W 95-94
+27.5
30
@
BUCK
W 101-72
+13.5
2
@
GMU
L 81-99
+24.5
3
@
TOW
L 80-93
+18.5
7
@
SAM
L 90-93
+16.5
21
@
UALB
W 83-75
−9.5
29
@
MSU
L 97-114
+50.5
5
vs
COLU
L 99-104
+32.5
10
vs
DART
L 91-102
+17.5
17
@
YALE
L 68-102
−4.5
19
@
BRWN
W 89-67
−7.5
24
@
HARV
W 86-79
+4.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 87-64
−7.5
31
vs
PENN
L 81-91
−1.5
7
@
COLU
W 88-67
−16.5
13
@
PRIN
W 89-65
−1.5
14
@
PENN
L 76-82
−11.5
21
vs
HARV
L 54-73
−28.5
27
vs
YALE
W 72-69
−23.5
28
vs
BRWN
W 86-80
+9.5
7
@
DART
W 111-90
+34.5
14
vs
YALE
L 76-88
+0.5
over 14under 12avg +6.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: UAlbany 1, Cornell 1, even 3
UAlbanyBetterCornell
G A. Fall9.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 27
=Even
G J. Beccles7.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 37
G Z. Matulu9.7 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 48
←UALBSmall
G A. Nimani5.3 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 30
G P. Santos TR6.9 pts · 3.8 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 51
=No call
G M. Rafiq4.2 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Not ranked
G M. Rose2.8 pts · 1.5 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 1
→CORSmall
F K. Sepp4.8 pts · 5.4 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 28
F B. Michaels TR1.9 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 3
=Even
F G. Panzini2.5 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 9
UAlbanyBetterCornell
UALB offense313th of 366 · -10.0
=Even
COR defense319th of 366 · -8.3
UALB defense259th of 366 · -6.7
→CORBig
COR offense111th of 366 · -1.8
Backcourt-6.0 · 4 players
→CORBig
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.8 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-2.3 · 2 players
Bench-0.2 · 1 player
←UALBSmall
Bench-1.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUALB betterCOR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Fall31 minZ. Matulu30 minP. Santos19 min · TRM. Rose15 minP. KountaNewO. EngenNew
Forwards
B. Michaels13 min · TRE. BussingNewP. MiovicNewU. GrahamNew
Centers
K. Webb3 min · TRC. SmithNew
Guards
J. Beccles24 minA. Nimani18 minM. Rafiq8 minD. Fishburn8 minR. Burbach8 minE. GriffinNew
Forwards
K. Sepp19 minG. Panzini10 minI. Imegwu5 minJ. Abalos5 minT. Iwanonkiw3 minB. LecklitnerNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.7 #302 | Points per game | 85.8 #13 |
| 1.05 #259 | Points per possession | 1.20 #17 |
| 65.6 #324 | Pace (possessions) | 72.0 #36 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.4 #182 | Effective FG% | 58.5 #7 |
| 32.6 #248 | 3-point % | 38.3 #14 |
| 37.6 #220 | 3-point attempt rate | 51.6 #8 |
| 24.9 #364 | Free throw rate | 30.2 #304 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.5 #299 | Turnover rate | 16.1 #144 |
| 32.7 #99 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.2 #193 |
| 12.8 #232 | Assists per game | 20.0 #1 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.5 #176 | Points allowed | 84.6 #358 |
| 1.14 #302 | Points allowed per possession | 1.17 #343 |
| 53.2 #275 | Opponent effective FG% | 55.9 #343 |
| 36.0 #302 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.5 #349 |
| 15.8 #228 | Turnovers forced | 15.0 #287 |
| 67.6 #277 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.4 #187 |
| 6.7 #153 | Steals per game | 5.8 #263 |
| 3.9 #82 | Blocks per game | 2.8 #267 |
UAlbany
8-21 in 2025-26 overall · 7-10 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ UMass Lowell76–81
- L@ Vermont56–69
- Wvs New Hampshire84–61
- Lvs Maine59–70
- L@ UMBC62–66
A week or more of rest.
Cornell
13-13 in 2025-26 overall · 8-7 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Yale76–88
- W@ Dartmouth111–90
- Wvs Brown86–80
- Wvs Yale72–69
- Lvs Harvard54–73
A week or more of rest.