Levien Gymnasium · at Columbia
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | COLU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects COLU 72–71 · win probability COLU 55%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 143.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: COLU has more of the edges
HOF 2, COLU 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
HOF hits 37.1% and allows 32.3%; COLU hits 35.9% and allows 35.2%. Threes are 42.9% and 37.5% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: HOF 34.7%, COLU 36.0%. Defensive: HOF 69.0%, COLU 72.8%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: HOF 12%, COLU 61%. Transfers in: HOF 4, COLU 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Turnovers
Turnover rate: HOF 16.1%, COLU 19.3%. Forced: HOF 15.0%, COLU 15.1%
HOF offense vs COLU defense
Offense 254th of 366 against a defense 198th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
COLU at home. This season: COLU 0-0 at home, HOF 0-0 away
Even
COLU offense vs HOF defense
Offense 163rd of 366 against a defense 120th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: HOF plays 65.9 a game (319th fastest), COLU 67.8 (237th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: HOF 51.4 and allows 46.3; COLU 53.5 and allows 51.2
Context
Schedule so far
HOF has played the 142nd-hardest schedule, COLU the 169th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: HOF 31.6, COLU 28.6. Allowed: HOF 35.1, COLU 33.5
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | COLU -1.4 | — |
| Total | — | 143.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | HOF 70.9 · COLU 72.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | COLU -0.7 | — |
| 1H total | 67.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | HOF 33.2 · COLU 33.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
HOF 0–1 COLUCOLU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · HOF 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2025-26 | HOF 70 @ COLU 72 | COLU -3.5 | HOF W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Hofstra
33 games played
Straight up
22-11
67% wins
Against the spread
21-12
64% covers · avg +3.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-15
55% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 78-82 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 73-81 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 83-77 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 76-81 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 63-58 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 78-58 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 135.5 | O 136 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 77-60 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 70-72 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 80-73 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 134.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 70-69 | +9.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 74-66 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 86-72 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 70-67 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 131.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 78-67 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 134.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 67-64 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 71-76 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 85-89 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 78-79 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 82-89 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 64-66 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 73-57 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 80-63 | -8.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 71-49 | -4.5 | W +17.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 66-62 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 66-70 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 79-43 | -11.5 | W +24.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 82-68 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 67-58 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 62-51 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 133.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 92-61 | -2.5 | W +28.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 68-65 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | O 133 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 75-69 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 133.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 70-90 | +11.5 | L −8.5 | 158.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UCF
L 78-82
+4.5
7
@
IONA
L 73-81
−9.5
14
@
BUCK
W 83-77
+1.5
19
@
TEM
L 76-81
+0.5
28
vs
LAS
W 63-58
+1.5
29
vs
MRMK
W 78-58
+14.5
30
@
PENN
W 77-60
+15.5
3
@
COLU
L 70-72
+1.5
7
@
PITT
W 80-73
+15.5
13
@
SYR
W 70-69
+10.5
21
vs
QUIN
W 74-66
+0.5
29
vs
CAM
W 86-72
+7.5
3
@
DREX
W 70-67
−1.5
8
@
TOW
W 78-67
+12.5
10
vs
MONM
W 67-64
−4.5
15
@
STBK
L 71-76
−11.5
17
vs
ELON
L 85-89
−9.5
22
@
NCAT
L 78-79
−10.5
24
@
W&M
L 82-89
−3.5
29
vs
COFC
L 64-66
−4.5
31
@
MONM
W 73-57
+14.5
5
vs
NE
W 80-63
+8.5
7
vs
TOW
W 71-49
+17.5
12
@
COFC
W 66-62
+5.5
14
@
UNCW
L 66-70
−1.5
19
vs
HAMP
W 79-43
+24.5
21
@
NE
W 82-68
+7.5
28
vs
STBK
W 67-58
−2.5
3
vs
DREX
W 62-51
+2.5
8
vs
W&M
W 92-61
+28.5
9
vs
TOW
W 68-65
−1.5
10
vs
MONM
W 75-69
+1.5
20
vs
ALA
L 70-90
−8.5
covered 21didn’t cover 12avg +3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UCF
L 78-82
+19.5
7
@
IONA
L 73-81
+9.5
14
@
BUCK
W 83-77
+20.5
19
@
TEM
L 76-81
+11.5
28
vs
LAS
W 63-58
−17.5
29
vs
MRMK
W 78-58
+0.5
30
@
PENN
W 77-60
−12.5
3
@
COLU
L 70-72
−2.5
7
@
PITT
W 80-73
+18.5
13
@
SYR
W 70-69
−0.5
21
vs
QUIN
W 74-66
−7.5
29
vs
CAM
W 86-72
+8.5
3
@
DREX
W 70-67
+5.5
8
@
TOW
W 78-67
+10.5
10
vs
MONM
W 67-64
−8.5
15
@
STBK
L 71-76
+10.5
17
vs
ELON
L 85-89
+24.5
22
@
NCAT
L 78-79
+10.5
24
@
W&M
L 82-89
+13.5
29
vs
COFC
L 64-66
−18.5
31
@
MONM
W 73-57
−10.5
5
vs
NE
W 80-63
−10.5
7
vs
TOW
W 71-49
−17.5
12
@
COFC
W 66-62
−18.5
14
@
UNCW
L 66-70
−1.5
19
vs
HAMP
W 79-43
−11.5
21
@
NE
W 82-68
+5.5
28
vs
STBK
W 67-58
−15.5
3
vs
DREX
W 62-51
−20.5
8
vs
W&M
W 92-61
+0.5
9
vs
TOW
W 68-65
+0.5
10
vs
MONM
W 75-69
+10.5
20
vs
ALA
L 70-90
+1.5
over 18under 15avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Columbia
26 games played
Straight up
14-12
54% wins
Against the spread
14-12
54% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-12
54% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | W 71-53 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 62-89 | +32.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 86-72 | -13.5 | W +0.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 54-49 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 103 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 82-67 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 95-70 | -3.5 | W +21.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 106-77 | -3.5 | W +25.5 | 150.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 72-70 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 93-65 | -13.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 73-77 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 56-74 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 90-82 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 104-99 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 170.5 | O 203 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 54-79 | -5.5 | L −30.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 80-86 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 74-91 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 79-69 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 72-67 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 68-80 | -5.5 | L −17.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 67-88 | +1.5 | L −19.5 | 171.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 67-76 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 75-65 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 63-64 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 80-62 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 54-60 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 114 |
| Mar 6 | @ | L 71-81 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | O 152 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
NHVN
W 71-53
+10.5
10
@
CONN
L 62-89
+5.5
13
vs
UML
W 86-72
+0.5
18
vs
BU
W 54-49
+0.5
21
@
LEH
W 82-67
+12.5
23
vs
LONG
W 95-70
+21.5
26
@
FAIR
W 106-77
+25.5
3
vs
HOF
W 72-70
−1.5
6
vs
UALB
W 93-65
+14.5
9
@
STBK
L 73-77
−8.5
21
@
CAL
L 56-74
−9.5
28
@
UNF
W 90-82
−3.5
5
@
COR
W 104-99
+8.5
10
vs
HARV
L 54-79
−30.5
17
@
BRWN
L 80-86
−8.5
19
@
YALE
L 74-91
−7.5
24
@
DART
W 79-69
+7.5
30
vs
PENN
W 72-67
+0.5
31
vs
PRIN
L 68-80
−17.5
7
vs
COR
L 67-88
−19.5
13
@
PENN
L 67-76
−7.5
14
@
PRIN
W 75-65
+8.5
21
vs
DART
L 63-64
−7.5
27
vs
BRWN
W 80-62
+12.5
28
vs
YALE
L 54-60
+0.5
6
@
HARV
L 71-81
−5.5
covered 14didn’t cover 12avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
NHVN
W 71-53
−24.5
10
@
CONN
L 62-89
−4.5
13
vs
UML
W 86-72
+1.5
18
vs
BU
W 54-49
−41.5
21
@
LEH
W 82-67
+5.5
23
vs
LONG
W 95-70
+11.5
26
@
FAIR
W 106-77
+32.5
3
vs
HOF
W 72-70
−2.5
6
vs
UALB
W 93-65
+13.5
9
@
STBK
L 73-77
+3.5
21
@
CAL
L 56-74
−23.5
28
@
UNF
W 90-82
+9.5
5
@
COR
W 104-99
+32.5
10
vs
HARV
L 54-79
−12.5
17
@
BRWN
L 80-86
+22.5
19
@
YALE
L 74-91
+14.5
24
@
DART
W 79-69
−8.5
30
vs
PENN
W 72-67
−14.5
31
vs
PRIN
L 68-80
+8.5
7
vs
COR
L 67-88
−16.5
13
@
PENN
L 67-76
−5.5
14
@
PRIN
W 75-65
+2.5
21
vs
DART
L 63-64
−23.5
27
vs
BRWN
W 80-62
+1.5
28
vs
YALE
L 54-60
−33.5
6
@
HARV
L 71-81
+15.5
over 14under 12avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Columbia has the better starters
Position by position: Hofstra 0, Columbia 1, even 4
HofstraBetterColumbia
G J. Moore TR10.9 pts · 2.2 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 46
=Even
G M. Franklin9.4 pts · 4.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 48
G D. Tavarez TR8.9 pts · 2.3 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 47
=Even
G G. O'Keefe7.9 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 45
F J. DeCady6.3 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 17
→COLUSmall
G H. Sanders4.2 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 38
F S. Wewe TR2.4 pts · 5.2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 17
=Even
F M. Ritter6.9 pts · 5 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 21
F I. Zorgvol TR5.2 pts · 2.7 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 62
=Even
F C. Igoe8.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 72
HofstraBetterColumbia
HOF offense254th of 366 · -7.7
→COLUSmall
COLU defense198th of 366 · -4.8
HOF defense120th of 366 · -1.9
=Even
COLU offense163rd of 366 · -4.9
Backcourt-1.5 · 2 players
=Even
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-3.3 · 3 players
→COLUSmall
Frontcourt-1.1 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-1.9 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestHOF betterCOLU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Moore30 min · TRD. Tavarez23 min · TRT. ThomasNewC. LopezNewT. BoydNewN. JeffersonNew
Forwards
J. DeCady25 minS. Wewe16 min · TRI. Zorgvol15 min · TRR. DunnNew
Guards
M. Franklin24 minG. O'Keefe21 minH. Sanders15 minJ. Cunningham4 minD. VesseyNewN. RomanelliNew
Forwards
M. Ritter25 minC. Igoe20 minD. Langford11 min · TRR. Nweke8 minL. Coleman4 minN. ClarksonNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.4 #184 | Points per game | 74.9 #167 |
| 1.13 #86 | Points per possession | 1.10 #130 |
| 65.9 #319 | Pace (possessions) | 67.8 #237 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.4 #178 | Effective FG% | 53.5 #83 |
| 37.1 #26 | 3-point % | 35.9 #61 |
| 42.9 #119 | 3-point attempt rate | 37.5 #221 |
| 31.6 #264 | Free throw rate | 28.6 #337 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.1 #148 | Turnover rate | 19.3 #332 |
| 34.7 #54 | Offensive rebound rate | 36.0 #23 |
| 12.3 #263 | Assists per game | 15.0 #90 |
| Defense | ||
| 68.2 #36 | Points allowed | 73.5 #145 |
| 1.04 #69 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #188 |
| 46.3 #14 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.2 #168 |
| 32.3 #78 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.2 #258 |
| 15.0 #292 | Turnovers forced | 15.1 #282 |
| 69.0 #201 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.8 #42 |
| 4.8 #343 | Steals per game | 5.7 #270 |
| 3.5 #135 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #235 |
Hofstra
22-11 in 2025-26 overall · 15-6 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Alabama70–90
- Wvs Monmouth75–69
- Wvs Towson68–65
- Wvs William & Mary92–61
- Wvs Drexel62–51
A week or more of rest.
Columbia
14-12 in 2025-26 overall · 5-9 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Harvard71–81
- Lvs Yale54–60
- Wvs Brown80–62
- Lvs Dartmouth63–64
- W@ Princeton75–65
A week or more of rest.