Levien Gymnasium · at Columbia
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | COLU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects COLU 80–70 · win probability COLU 82%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: COLU has more of the edges
ARMY 1, COLU 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: ARMY 49.3 and allows 55.1; COLU 53.5 and allows 51.2
COLU offense vs ARMY defense
Offense 163rd of 366 against a defense 304th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
ARMY has played the 302nd-hardest schedule, COLU the 169th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
ARMY hits 32.0% and allows 35.5%; COLU hits 35.9% and allows 35.2%. Threes are 53.3% and 37.5% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ARMY 29.6%, COLU 36.0%. Defensive: ARMY 72.3%, COLU 72.8%
Free throws
Free throw rate: ARMY 26.8, COLU 28.6. Allowed: ARMY 39.6, COLU 33.5
ARMY offense vs COLU defense
Offense 271st of 366 against a defense 198th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ARMY 17.2%, COLU 19.3%. Forced: ARMY 15.4%, COLU 15.1%
Home court
COLU at home. This season: COLU 0-0 at home, ARMY 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: ARMY plays 68.6 a game (200th fastest), COLU 67.8 (237th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ARMY 65%, COLU 61%. Transfers in: ARMY 0, COLU 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | COLU -10.3 | — |
| Total | — | 149.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | ARMY 69.7 · COLU 80 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | COLU -6.0 | — |
| 1H total | 70.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | ARMY 32 · COLU 38 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 1-9 10% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Army
30 games played
Straight up
9-21
30% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-13
57% overs · avg +3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 76-83 | +18.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 59-114 | +33.5 | L −21.5 | 152.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 52-75 | +6.5 | L −16.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 73-86 | +17.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | U 159 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 65-76 | +12.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 67-84 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 81-73 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 81-78 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 70-84 | +19.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 12 | @ | W 63-60 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 95-85 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 140.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 85-78 | +5.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 69-76 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 76-84 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 91-100 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 75-82 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 67-78 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 87-84 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 56-84 | +10.5 | L −17.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 67-64 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 69-68 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 55-69 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 60-63 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 68-85 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 63-75 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 87-77 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 63-81 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 73-75 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 77-83 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 55-65 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
STMN
L 76-83
+11.5
11
vs
DUKE
L 59-114
−21.5
15
vs
HARV
L 52-75
−16.5
18
@
COR
L 73-86
+4.5
21
@
MRST
L 65-76
+1.5
25
vs
ETAM
L 67-84
−14.5
26
@
FDU
W 81-73
+12.5
29
vs
MAN
W 81-78
+4.5
2
vs
GW
L 70-84
+5.5
12
@
UMBC
W 63-60
+10.5
23
vs
BING
W 95-85
−2.5
31
@
LEH
W 85-78
+12.5
3
vs
COLG
L 69-76
+0.5
7
vs
L-MD
L 76-84
−12.5
10
@
BU
L 91-100
−1.5
14
@
HC
L 75-82
−2.5
18
vs
AMER
L 67-78
−6.5
21
@
BUCK
W 87-84
+7.5
24
@
NAVY
L 56-84
−17.5
28
vs
LEH
W 67-64
+4.5
31
vs
HC
W 69-68
−1.5
4
@
COLG
L 55-69
−3.5
7
vs
LAF
L 60-63
−1.5
11
vs
BU
L 68-85
−14.5
14
@
AMER
L 63-75
−2.5
18
@
L-MD
W 87-77
+14.5
21
vs
NAVY
L 63-81
−9.5
25
vs
BUCK
L 73-75
−4.5
28
@
LAF
L 77-83
−2.5
3
@
BUCK
L 55-65
−8.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
STMN
L 76-83
+7.5
11
vs
DUKE
L 59-114
+20.5
15
vs
HARV
L 52-75
−19.5
18
@
COR
L 73-86
−5.5
21
@
MRST
L 65-76
+8.5
25
vs
ETAM
L 67-84
+7.5
26
@
FDU
W 81-73
+1.5
29
vs
MAN
W 81-78
+6.5
2
vs
GW
L 70-84
−2.5
12
@
UMBC
W 63-60
−23.5
23
vs
BING
W 95-85
+39.5
31
@
LEH
W 85-78
+16.5
3
vs
COLG
L 69-76
−2.5
7
vs
L-MD
L 76-84
+13.5
10
@
BU
L 91-100
+50.5
14
@
HC
L 75-82
+14.5
18
vs
AMER
L 67-78
−2.5
21
@
BUCK
W 87-84
+26.5
24
@
NAVY
L 56-84
−3.5
28
vs
LEH
W 67-64
−16.5
31
vs
HC
W 69-68
−7.5
4
@
COLG
L 55-69
−26.5
7
vs
LAF
L 60-63
−19.5
11
vs
BU
L 68-85
+12.5
14
@
AMER
L 63-75
−6.5
18
@
L-MD
W 87-77
+14.5
21
vs
NAVY
L 63-81
+4.5
25
vs
BUCK
L 73-75
+5.5
28
@
LAF
L 77-83
+15.5
3
@
BUCK
L 55-65
−24.5
over 17under 13avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Columbia
26 games played
Straight up
14-12
54% wins
Against the spread
14-12
54% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-12
54% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | W 71-53 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 62-89 | +32.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 86-72 | -13.5 | W +0.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 54-49 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 103 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 82-67 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 95-70 | -3.5 | W +21.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 106-77 | -3.5 | W +25.5 | 150.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 72-70 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 93-65 | -13.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 73-77 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 56-74 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 90-82 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 104-99 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 170.5 | O 203 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 54-79 | -5.5 | L −30.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 80-86 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 74-91 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 79-69 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 72-67 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 68-80 | -5.5 | L −17.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 67-88 | +1.5 | L −19.5 | 171.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 67-76 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 75-65 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 63-64 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 80-62 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 54-60 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 114 |
| Mar 6 | @ | L 71-81 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | O 152 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
NHVN
W 71-53
+10.5
10
@
CONN
L 62-89
+5.5
13
vs
UML
W 86-72
+0.5
18
vs
BU
W 54-49
+0.5
21
@
LEH
W 82-67
+12.5
23
vs
LONG
W 95-70
+21.5
26
@
FAIR
W 106-77
+25.5
3
vs
HOF
W 72-70
−1.5
6
vs
UALB
W 93-65
+14.5
9
@
STBK
L 73-77
−8.5
21
@
CAL
L 56-74
−9.5
28
@
UNF
W 90-82
−3.5
5
@
COR
W 104-99
+8.5
10
vs
HARV
L 54-79
−30.5
17
@
BRWN
L 80-86
−8.5
19
@
YALE
L 74-91
−7.5
24
@
DART
W 79-69
+7.5
30
vs
PENN
W 72-67
+0.5
31
vs
PRIN
L 68-80
−17.5
7
vs
COR
L 67-88
−19.5
13
@
PENN
L 67-76
−7.5
14
@
PRIN
W 75-65
+8.5
21
vs
DART
L 63-64
−7.5
27
vs
BRWN
W 80-62
+12.5
28
vs
YALE
L 54-60
+0.5
6
@
HARV
L 71-81
−5.5
covered 14didn’t cover 12avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
NHVN
W 71-53
−24.5
10
@
CONN
L 62-89
−4.5
13
vs
UML
W 86-72
+1.5
18
vs
BU
W 54-49
−41.5
21
@
LEH
W 82-67
+5.5
23
vs
LONG
W 95-70
+11.5
26
@
FAIR
W 106-77
+32.5
3
vs
HOF
W 72-70
−2.5
6
vs
UALB
W 93-65
+13.5
9
@
STBK
L 73-77
+3.5
21
@
CAL
L 56-74
−23.5
28
@
UNF
W 90-82
+9.5
5
@
COR
W 104-99
+32.5
10
vs
HARV
L 54-79
−12.5
17
@
BRWN
L 80-86
+22.5
19
@
YALE
L 74-91
+14.5
24
@
DART
W 79-69
−8.5
30
vs
PENN
W 72-67
−14.5
31
vs
PRIN
L 68-80
+8.5
7
vs
COR
L 67-88
−16.5
13
@
PENN
L 67-76
−5.5
14
@
PRIN
W 75-65
+2.5
21
vs
DART
L 63-64
−23.5
27
vs
BRWN
W 80-62
+1.5
28
vs
YALE
L 54-60
−33.5
6
@
HARV
L 71-81
+15.5
over 14under 12avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Army 1, Columbia 1, even 3
ArmyBetterColumbia
G R. Curry13.4 pts · 4.1 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 57
=Even
G M. Franklin9.4 pts · 4.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 48
G K. McCarthy7.2 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 13
→COLUSmall
G G. O'Keefe7.9 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 45
F J. Holloway10.7 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 37
=Even
G H. Sanders4.2 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 38
F T. Laczkowski5.3 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 38
←ARMYSmall
F M. Ritter6.9 pts · 5 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 21
F D. Benner1.4 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F C. Igoe8.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 72
ArmyBetterColumbia
ARMY offense271st of 366 · -8.2
→COLUSmall
COLU defense198th of 366 · -4.8
ARMY defense304th of 366 · -7.8
→COLUBig
COLU offense163rd of 366 · -4.9
Backcourt-3.1 · 2 players
=Even
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.6 · 3 players
→COLUSmall
Frontcourt-1.1 · 2 players
Bench-1.0 · 5 players
=Even
Bench-1.9 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestARMY betterCOLU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Curry34 minK. McCarthy24 minD. Watt5 minJ. Green3 minB. O'Keefe2 minJ. EllisNew
Forwards
J. Holloway29 minT. Laczkowski22 minD. Benner6 minN. Ikechi3 minD. Murans3 minH. RasmussenNew
Centers
P. HendersonNew
Guards
M. Franklin24 minG. O'Keefe21 minH. Sanders15 minJ. Cunningham4 minD. VesseyNewN. RomanelliNew
Forwards
M. Ritter25 minC. Igoe20 minD. Langford11 min · TRR. Nweke8 minL. Coleman4 minN. ClarksonNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.8 #268 | Points per game | 74.9 #167 |
| 1.03 #281 | Points per possession | 1.10 #130 |
| 68.6 #200 | Pace (possessions) | 67.8 #237 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.3 #279 | Effective FG% | 53.5 #83 |
| 32.0 #278 | 3-point % | 35.9 #61 |
| 53.3 #3 | 3-point attempt rate | 37.5 #221 |
| 26.8 #352 | Free throw rate | 28.6 #337 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.2 #221 | Turnover rate | 19.3 #332 |
| 29.6 #219 | Offensive rebound rate | 36.0 #23 |
| 14.5 #118 | Assists per game | 15.0 #90 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.0 #298 | Points allowed | 73.5 #145 |
| 1.15 #321 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #188 |
| 55.1 #334 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.2 #168 |
| 35.5 #285 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.2 #258 |
| 15.4 #257 | Turnovers forced | 15.1 #282 |
| 72.3 #54 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.8 #42 |
| 5.4 #307 | Steals per game | 5.7 #270 |
| 1.6 #359 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #235 |
Army
9-21 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Bucknell55–65
- L@ Lafayette77–83
- Lvs Bucknell73–75
- Lvs Navy63–81
- W@ Loyola MD87–77
A week or more of rest.
Columbia
14-12 in 2025-26 overall · 5-9 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Harvard71–81
- Lvs Yale54–60
- Wvs Brown80–62
- Lvs Dartmouth63–64
- W@ Princeton75–65
A week or more of rest.