Broadview Center · at UAlbany
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UALB | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SIE 71–69 · win probability SIE 55%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 140.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SIE has more of the edges
SIE 6, UALB 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: SIE 33.4, UALB 24.9. Allowed: SIE 27.5, UALB 35.7
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SIE 15.8%, UALB 18.5%. Forced: SIE 17.0%, UALB 15.8%
UALB offense vs SIE defense
Offense 313th of 366 against a defense 194th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: SIE 50.4 and allows 48.5; UALB 51.4 and allows 53.2
Three-pointers
SIE hits 30.6% and allows 32.4%; UALB hits 32.6% and allows 36.0%. Threes are 32.2% and 37.6% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
SIE has played the 320th-hardest schedule, UALB the 260th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SIE 31.8%, UALB 32.7%. Defensive: SIE 70.5%, UALB 67.6%
Home court
UALB at home. This season: UALB 0-0 at home, SIE 0-0 away
SIE offense vs UALB defense
Offense 309th of 366 against a defense 259th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SIE 28%, UALB 38%. Transfers in: SIE 1, UALB 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 65 possessions: SIE plays 64.4 a game (354th fastest), UALB 65.6 (324th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SIE -1.4 | — |
| Total | — | 140.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | SIE 70.8 · UALB 69.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SIE -0.9 | — |
| 1H total | 65.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | SIE 33.3 · UALB 32.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 1-9 10% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
| Date | Game | Last meeting |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 15 | @ MONM | W70–59WU |
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SIE 2–2 UALBSeries tied · 4 games since 2021-22 · SIE 1-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2025-26 | UALB 63 @ SIE 73 | SIE -10.5 | UALB W |
| Nov 16, 2024-25 | SIE 60 @ UALB 70 | UALB -4.5 | UALB W |
| Nov 26, 2023-24 | UALB 86 @ SIE 51 | SIE -3.5 | UALB W |
| Nov 12, 2022-23 | UALB 62 @ SIE 75 | SIE -4.5 | SIE W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Siena
35 games played
Straight up
23-12
66% wins
Against the spread
21-14
60% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-24
31% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 82-66 | -13.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 62-46 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 66-75 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 17 | vs | L 69-72 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 73-63 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 73-69 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 70-63 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 59-55 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 114 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 64-60 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 83-54 | -12.5 | W +16.5 | 129.5 | O 137 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 74-52 | -17.5 | W +4.5 | 131.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 69-83 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 134.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 60-81 | +21.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 72-75 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 74-65 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 59-63 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 132.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 67-50 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 80-86 | -8.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-59 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 85-77 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 69-50 | -1.5 | W +17.5 | 133.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 30 | @ | W 82-79 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 128.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 78-63 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 79-72 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 65-70 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 62-74 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 144.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 67-63 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 133.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 72-79 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 133.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 72-63 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 58-72 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 76-61 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 63-58 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 76-61 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 64-54 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 128.5 | U 118 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 65-71 | +28.5 | W +22.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BRY
W 82-66
+2.5
7
@
BRWN
W 62-46
+12.5
12
@
SBU
L 66-75
+0.5
17
vs
COLG
L 69-72
−9.5
21
vs
UALB
W 73-63
−0.5
24
@
HC
W 73-69
−5.5
28
vs
LONG
W 70-63
+1.5
29
@
AMER
W 59-55
+1.5
30
vs
ME
W 64-60
−5.5
5
vs
NIA
W 83-54
+16.5
7
vs
CAN
W 74-52
+4.5
17
@
UVM
L 69-83
−11.5
22
@
IU
L 60-81
+0.5
2
@
IONA
L 72-75
−4.5
4
@
RID
W 74-65
+0.5
9
vs
MRMK
L 59-63
−9.5
11
@
MSM
W 67-50
+14.5
14
vs
SHU
L 80-86
−14.5
17
@
MAN
W 74-59
+8.5
19
vs
FAIR
W 85-77
+1.5
22
vs
MRST
W 69-50
+17.5
30
@
NIA
W 82-79
−6.5
1
@
CAN
W 78-63
+6.5
5
vs
IONA
W 79-72
−1.5
7
@
SPU
L 65-70
−6.5
13
vs
QUIN
L 62-74
−15.5
15
@
MRST
W 67-63
+6.5
20
@
MRMK
L 72-79
−4.5
22
vs
SPU
W 72-63
+3.5
27
@
FAIR
L 58-72
−15.5
1
vs
RID
W 76-61
+0.5
7
vs
MSM
W 63-58
+2.5
8
vs
FAIR
W 76-61
+13.5
10
vs
MRMK
W 64-54
+12.5
19
vs
DUKE
L 65-71
+22.5
covered 21didn’t cover 14avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BRY
W 82-66
−0.5
7
@
BRWN
W 62-46
−34.5
12
@
SBU
L 66-75
+0.5
17
vs
COLG
L 69-72
−5.5
21
vs
UALB
W 73-63
−4.5
24
@
HC
W 73-69
+4.5
28
vs
LONG
W 70-63
−12.5
29
@
AMER
W 59-55
−23.5
30
vs
ME
W 64-60
−3.5
5
vs
NIA
W 83-54
+7.5
7
vs
CAN
W 74-52
−5.5
17
@
UVM
L 69-83
+17.5
22
@
IU
L 60-81
−4.5
2
@
IONA
L 72-75
−2.5
4
@
RID
W 74-65
+3.5
9
vs
MRMK
L 59-63
−10.5
11
@
MSM
W 67-50
−22.5
14
vs
SHU
L 80-86
+26.5
17
@
MAN
W 74-59
−11.5
19
vs
FAIR
W 85-77
+19.5
22
vs
MRST
W 69-50
−14.5
30
@
NIA
W 82-79
+32.5
1
@
CAN
W 78-63
+5.5
5
vs
IONA
W 79-72
+10.5
7
@
SPU
L 65-70
−0.5
13
vs
QUIN
L 62-74
−8.5
15
@
MRST
W 67-63
−3.5
20
@
MRMK
L 72-79
+17.5
22
vs
SPU
W 72-63
−0.5
27
@
FAIR
L 58-72
−12.5
1
vs
RID
W 76-61
−0.5
7
vs
MSM
W 63-58
−14.5
8
vs
FAIR
W 76-61
−1.5
10
vs
MRMK
W 64-54
−10.5
19
vs
DUKE
L 65-71
−1.5
over 11under 24avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
UAlbany
29 games played
Straight up
8-21
28% wins
Against the spread
11-18
38% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 53-80 | +24.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 62-83 | +9.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 61-80 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 63-73 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 67-69 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 68-88 | +10.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 65-93 | +13.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 82-93 | +17.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 79-105 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 71-55 | +10.5 | W +26.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 75-83 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 167.5 | U 158 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 67-96 | +19.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 71-83 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 71-46 | -3.5 | W +21.5 | 136.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 69-53 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 75-68 | +5.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 49-52 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 131.5 | U 101 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 72-80 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 68-77 | -5.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 65-68 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 65-63 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 79-89 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 77-74 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 81-63 | +3.5 | W +21.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 62-66 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 59-70 | -4.5 | L −15.5 | 130.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 84-61 | -3.5 | W +19.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 56-69 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 76-81 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MARQ
L 53-80
−2.5
8
@
MASS
L 62-83
−11.5
14
@
URI
L 61-80
−3.5
21
@
SIE
L 63-73
+0.5
28
vs
COLG
L 67-69
+5.5
29
vs
FOR
L 68-88
−9.5
6
@
COLU
L 65-93
−14.5
10
vs
YALE
L 82-93
+6.5
13
@
FAU
L 79-105
−7.5
17
@
STBK
W 71-55
+26.5
21
vs
COR
L 75-83
−1.5
30
@
SC
L 67-96
−9.5
3
@
UML
L 71-83
−9.5
10
vs
BRY
W 71-46
+21.5
15
vs
BING
W 69-53
+7.5
19
vs
UVM
W 75-68
+12.5
22
@
ME
L 49-52
−5.5
24
@
UNH
L 72-80
−5.5
29
vs
NJIT
L 68-77
−14.5
31
vs
UMBC
L 65-68
−1.5
5
@
BRY
W 65-63
+3.5
7
vs
UML
L 79-89
−14.5
14
@
BING
W 77-74
−1.5
19
@
NJIT
W 81-63
+21.5
21
@
UMBC
L 62-66
+3.5
26
vs
ME
L 59-70
−15.5
28
vs
UNH
W 84-61
+19.5
3
@
UVM
L 56-69
−3.5
7
@
UML
L 76-81
−2.5
covered 11didn’t cover 18avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MARQ
L 53-80
−16.5
8
@
MASS
L 62-83
−10.5
14
@
URI
L 61-80
−9.5
21
@
SIE
L 63-73
−4.5
28
vs
COLG
L 67-69
−5.5
29
vs
FOR
L 68-88
+12.5
6
@
COLU
L 65-93
+13.5
10
vs
YALE
L 82-93
+29.5
13
@
FAU
L 79-105
+36.5
17
@
STBK
W 71-55
−20.5
21
vs
COR
L 75-83
−9.5
30
@
SC
L 67-96
+14.5
3
@
UML
L 71-83
+3.5
10
vs
BRY
W 71-46
−19.5
15
vs
BING
W 69-53
−16.5
19
vs
UVM
W 75-68
+3.5
22
@
ME
L 49-52
−30.5
24
@
UNH
L 72-80
+14.5
29
vs
NJIT
L 68-77
+5.5
31
vs
UMBC
L 65-68
−8.5
5
@
BRY
W 65-63
−5.5
7
vs
UML
L 79-89
+24.5
14
@
BING
W 77-74
+14.5
19
@
NJIT
W 81-63
+1.5
21
@
UMBC
L 62-66
−16.5
26
vs
ME
L 59-70
−1.5
28
vs
UNH
W 84-61
+6.5
3
@
UVM
L 56-69
−11.5
7
@
UML
L 76-81
+10.5
over 14under 15avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UAlbany has the better starters
Position by position: Siena 0, UAlbany 2, even 3
SienaBetterUAlbany
G T. Yildizoglu TR10.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 30
=Even
G A. Fall9.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 27
G B. Coyle8.7 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 17
→UALBSmall
G Z. Matulu9.7 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 48
G I. Henderson3.8 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 12
→UALBBig
G P. Santos TR6.9 pts · 3.8 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 51
G O. Schlager2.8 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Rose2.8 pts · 1.5 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 1
G C. Torres0.5 pts · 0 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F B. Michaels TR1.9 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 3
SienaBetterUAlbany
SIE offense309th of 366 · -9.6
=Even
UALB defense259th of 366 · -6.7
SIE defense194th of 366 · -4.7
←SIESmall
UALB offense313th of 366 · -10.0
Backcourt-7.7 · 5 players
→UALBSmall
Backcourt-6.0 · 4 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt-1.8 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-0.2 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestSIE betterUALB betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Yildizoglu32 min · TRB. Coyle31 minI. Henderson14 minO. Schlager10 minC. Torres3 minR. DucharmeNew
Guards
A. Fall31 minZ. Matulu30 minP. Santos19 min · TRM. Rose15 minP. KountaNewO. EngenNew
Forwards
B. Michaels13 min · TRE. BussingNewP. MiovicNewU. GrahamNew
Centers
K. Webb3 min · TRC. SmithNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.4 #276 | Points per game | 68.7 #302 |
| 1.09 #154 | Points per possession | 1.05 #259 |
| 64.4 #354 | Pace (possessions) | 65.6 #324 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.4 #222 | Effective FG% | 51.4 #182 |
| 30.6 #330 | 3-point % | 32.6 #248 |
| 32.2 #327 | 3-point attempt rate | 37.6 #220 |
| 33.4 #226 | Free throw rate | 24.9 #364 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.8 #126 | Turnover rate | 18.5 #299 |
| 31.8 #133 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.7 #99 |
| 13.5 #182 | Assists per game | 12.8 #232 |
| Defense | ||
| 65.8 #12 | Points allowed | 74.5 #176 |
| 1.02 #44 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #302 |
| 48.5 #48 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.2 #275 |
| 32.4 #82 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.0 #302 |
| 17.0 #154 | Turnovers forced | 15.8 #228 |
| 70.5 #133 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.6 #277 |
| 5.8 #262 | Steals per game | 6.7 #153 |
| 3.1 #205 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #82 |
Siena
23-12 in 2025-26 overall · 16-7 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Duke65–71
- Wvs Merrimack64–54
- Wvs Fairfield76–61
- Wvs Mount St Marys63–58
- Wvs Rider76–61
A week or more of rest.
UAlbany
8-21 in 2025-26 overall · 7-10 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ UMass Lowell76–81
- L@ Vermont56–69
- Wvs New Hampshire84–61
- Lvs Maine59–70
- L@ UMBC62–66
A week or more of rest.