Convocation Center (VA) · at Hampton
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | HAMP | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects HAMP 79–66 · win probability HAMP 88%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: HAMP has more of the edges
NORF 2, HAMP 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
NORF offense vs HAMP defense
Offense 314th of 366 against a defense 153rd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
NORF has played the 343rd-hardest schedule, HAMP the 217th. A record against a soft schedule means less
HAMP offense vs NORF defense
Offense 186th of 366 against a defense 301st, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
NORF hits 34.2% and allows 32.0%; HAMP hits 28.8% and allows 32.1%. Threes are 30.6% and 37.0% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NORF 32.5%, HAMP 32.9%. Defensive: NORF 67.7%, HAMP 70.0%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: NORF plays 69.1 a game (172nd fastest), HAMP 66.5 (295th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
HAMP at home. This season: HAMP 0-0 at home, NORF 0-0 away
Shooting
Effective FG%: NORF 49.3 and allows 51.7; HAMP 45.7 and allows 52.0
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: NORF 43.5, HAMP 39.2. Allowed: NORF 45.3, HAMP 46.5
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NORF 8%, HAMP 18%. Transfers in: NORF 4, HAMP 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NORF 18.7%, HAMP 17.1%. Forced: NORF 18.8%, HAMP 17.2%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | HAMP -13.2 | — |
| Total | — | 145.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | NORF 66 · HAMP 79.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | HAMP -7.7 | — |
| 1H total | 68.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | NORF 30.1 · HAMP 37.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | |
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 7 since 2021-22
NORF 6–1 HAMPNORF leads · 7 games since 2021-22 · NORF has won the last 5 meetings · NORF 4-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2025-26 | HAMP 60 @ NORF 62 | NORF -2.5 | HAMP W |
| Nov 16, 2024-25 | NORF 67 @ HAMP 58 | HAMP +4.5 | NORF W |
| Nov 13, 2023-24 | HAMP 68 @ NORF 75 | NORF -9.5 | HAMP W |
| Feb 4, 2022-23 | NORF 83 vs HAMP 71 | HAMP +9.5 | NORF W |
| Dec 17, 2022-23 | HAMP 66 vs NORF 78 | NORF -11.5 | NORF W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Norfolk St
28 games played
Straight up
11-17
39% wins
Against the spread
13-15
46% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-10
64% overs · avg +4.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | L 78-81 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 57-60 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 41-51 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 92 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 62-60 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 67-75 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 61-98 | +35.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 67-68 | +10.5 | W +9.5 | 138.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 67-97 | +26.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 68-80 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 135.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 82-72 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 72-71 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 70-89 | +11.5 | L −7.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 54-63 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 126.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 67-69 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 66-64 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 132.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 70-74 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 132.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 89-82 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 103-76 | -13.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 26 | vs | L 78-79 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 60-88 | +7.5 | L −20.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 75-68 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 75-58 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 70-66 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 90-71 | -10.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 75-69 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 84-90 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 76-84 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 82-88 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
W&M
L 78-81
−0.5
11
@
ODU
L 57-60
+5.5
14
@
TOW
L 41-51
+3.5
21
vs
HAMP
W 62-60
−0.5
23
@
WYO
L 67-75
+7.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 61-98
−1.5
6
@
JMU
L 67-68
+9.5
10
@
BAY
L 67-97
−3.5
18
vs
GRAM
L 68-80
−13.5
19
vs
JKST
W 82-72
+4.5
21
@
UTEP
W 72-71
+11.5
22
vs
UCI
L 70-89
−7.5
28
@
UL
L 54-63
−5.5
3
@
NCCU
L 67-69
−3.5
10
@
DSU
W 66-64
−2.5
12
vs
UMES
L 70-74
−9.5
17
@
SCST
W 89-82
+1.5
24
vs
COPP
W 103-76
+13.5
26
vs
MORG
L 78-79
−8.5
31
@
HOW
L 60-88
−20.5
7
vs
NCCU
W 75-68
+2.5
14
vs
DSU
W 75-58
+7.5
16
@
UMES
W 70-66
+2.5
21
vs
SCST
W 90-71
+8.5
28
@
COPP
W 75-69
+0.5
2
@
MORG
L 84-90
−9.5
5
vs
HOW
L 76-84
−1.5
12
vs
SCST
L 82-88
−13.5
covered 13didn’t cover 15avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
W&M
L 78-81
+0.5
11
@
ODU
L 57-60
−32.5
14
@
TOW
L 41-51
−46.5
21
vs
HAMP
W 62-60
−11.5
23
@
WYO
L 67-75
+0.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 61-98
+12.5
6
@
JMU
L 67-68
−3.5
10
@
BAY
L 67-97
+15.5
18
vs
GRAM
L 68-80
+12.5
19
vs
JKST
W 82-72
+13.5
21
@
UTEP
W 72-71
+6.5
22
vs
UCI
L 70-89
+22.5
28
@
UL
L 54-63
−9.5
3
@
NCCU
L 67-69
−5.5
10
@
DSU
W 66-64
−2.5
12
vs
UMES
L 70-74
+11.5
17
@
SCST
W 89-82
+31.5
24
vs
COPP
W 103-76
+35.5
26
vs
MORG
L 78-79
+4.5
31
@
HOW
L 60-88
+1.5
7
vs
NCCU
W 75-68
−5.5
14
vs
DSU
W 75-58
−1.5
16
@
UMES
W 70-66
−0.5
21
vs
SCST
W 90-71
+20.5
28
@
COPP
W 75-69
+3.5
2
@
MORG
L 84-90
+17.5
5
vs
HOW
L 76-84
+10.5
12
vs
SCST
L 82-88
+25.5
over 18under 10avg +4.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Hampton
30 games played
Straight up
11-19
37% wins
Against the spread
16-14
53% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-16
47% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 86-90 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 53-91 | +24.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 72-63 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 61-67 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 52-63 | +12.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 60-62 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 25 | @ | W 74-68 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 124.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 93-71 | -6.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 57-61 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 84-77 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 72-81 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 62-59 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 63-62 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 45-49 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | U 94 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 72-86 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 70-74 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 82-61 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 65-63 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 67-75 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 51-58 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 127.5 | U 109 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 50-82 | +8.5 | L −23.5 | 131.5 | O 132 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 87-79 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 77-74 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 70-71 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 43-79 | +11.5 | L −24.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 72-79 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 71-85 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 139.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 76-65 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 85-94 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 163.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 68-74 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | O 142 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MILW
L 86-90
+1.5
11
@
UVA
L 53-91
−13.5
14
@
BRWN
W 72-63
+10.5
16
vs
HC
L 61-67
−10.5
18
@
BC
L 52-63
+1.5
21
@
NORF
L 60-62
+0.5
25
@
UMES
W 74-68
−0.5
3
vs
L-MD
W 93-71
+15.5
13
vs
HOW
L 57-61
−6.5
18
vs
JKST
W 84-77
−1.5
19
vs
GRAM
L 72-81
−10.5
29
vs
STBK
W 62-59
+0.5
31
vs
TOW
W 63-62
+7.5
3
@
UNCW
L 45-49
+8.5
8
@
CAM
L 72-86
−7.5
10
@
COFC
L 70-74
+5.5
19
vs
NCAT
W 82-61
+14.5
22
vs
MONM
W 65-63
+0.5
24
vs
UNCW
L 67-75
−3.5
29
@
DREX
L 51-58
−4.5
31
@
TOW
L 50-82
−23.5
5
vs
ELON
W 87-79
+9.5
7
vs
W&M
W 77-74
+8.5
13
vs
NCAT
L 70-71
−4.5
19
@
HOF
L 43-79
−24.5
21
@
STBK
L 72-79
−1.5
26
vs
COFC
L 71-85
−8.5
28
vs
NE
W 76-65
+7.5
3
@
W&M
L 85-94
+2.5
7
vs
TOW
L 68-74
+1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 14avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MILW
L 86-90
+29.5
11
@
UVA
L 53-91
−4.5
14
@
BRWN
W 72-63
−4.5
16
vs
HC
L 61-67
−20.5
18
@
BC
L 52-63
−20.5
21
@
NORF
L 60-62
−11.5
25
@
UMES
W 74-68
+17.5
3
vs
L-MD
W 93-71
+21.5
13
vs
HOW
L 57-61
−24.5
18
vs
JKST
W 84-77
+25.5
19
vs
GRAM
L 72-81
+15.5
29
vs
STBK
W 62-59
−19.5
31
vs
TOW
W 63-62
−11.5
3
@
UNCW
L 45-49
−46.5
8
@
CAM
L 72-86
+12.5
10
@
COFC
L 70-74
−1.5
19
vs
NCAT
W 82-61
−0.5
22
vs
MONM
W 65-63
−7.5
24
vs
UNCW
L 67-75
+5.5
29
@
DREX
L 51-58
−18.5
31
@
TOW
L 50-82
+0.5
5
vs
ELON
W 87-79
+23.5
7
vs
W&M
W 77-74
−1.5
13
vs
NCAT
L 70-71
+3.5
19
@
HOF
L 43-79
−11.5
21
@
STBK
L 72-79
+15.5
26
vs
COFC
L 71-85
+16.5
28
vs
NE
W 76-65
−4.5
3
@
W&M
L 85-94
+15.5
7
vs
TOW
L 68-74
+9.5
over 14under 16avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Hampton has the better starters
Position by position: Norfolk St 1, Hampton 3, even 1
Norfolk StBetterHampton
G B. Laster TR6.9 pts · 2.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 51
=Even
G J. Mitchell TR14.5 pts · 4.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 56
G A. Newton3.6 pts · 1.4 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 12
→HAMPBig
G S. Hubbard TR16.5 pts · 2.9 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 70
F J. Gupton TR7.7 pts · 4.9 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 22
→HAMPBig
G A. Davis TR9.3 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 59
F B. Gardner TR3.5 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 3
→HAMPBig
F M. Frazier TR12 pts · 7.1 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 77
F J. Riley TR3.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 56
←NORFSmall
F C. Robinson TR8.2 pts · 4 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 25
Norfolk StBetterHampton
NORF offense314th of 366 · -10.1
→HAMPBig
HAMP defense153rd of 366 · -3.4
NORF defense301st of 366 · -7.7
→HAMPSmall
HAMP offense186th of 366 · -5.7
Backcourt-2.2 · 2 players
→HAMPSmall
Backcourt+0.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-4.2 · 3 players
→HAMPBig
Frontcourt-0.1 · 2 players
Bench-0.0 · 1 player
←NORFSmall
Bench-2.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestNORF betterHAMP betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Laster19 min · TRA. Newton16 minA. Torrence1 minC. WalkerNewD. CamaraNewJ. SkyersNew
Forwards
J. Gupton25 min · TRB. Gardner16 min · TRJ. Riley11 min · TRM. MitchellNew
Centers
J. JordanNew
Guards
J. Mitchell33 min · TRS. Hubbard31 min · TRA. Davis24 min · TRE. Strothers19 minT. Jackson17 min · TRA. Haskins10 min
Forwards
M. Frazier29 min · TRC. Robinson26 min · TRP. Da CruzNewW. PrestonNewZ. IbekweNewS. TabeNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.6 #257 | Points per game | 68.0 #312 |
| 1.04 #274 | Points per possession | 1.02 #301 |
| 69.1 #172 | Pace (possessions) | 66.5 #295 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.3 #277 | Effective FG% | 45.7 #356 |
| 34.2 #157 | 3-point % | 28.8 #357 |
| 30.6 #347 | 3-point attempt rate | 37.0 #229 |
| 43.5 #13 | Free throw rate | 39.2 #73 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.7 #311 | Turnover rate | 17.1 #205 |
| 32.5 #108 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.9 #90 |
| 11.3 #326 | Assists per game | 11.2 #329 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.7 #181 | Points allowed | 72.1 #108 |
| 1.08 #160 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #176 |
| 51.7 #196 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.0 #212 |
| 32.0 #61 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.1 #65 |
| 18.8 #58 | Turnovers forced | 17.2 #137 |
| 67.7 #270 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.0 #165 |
| 6.5 #180 | Steals per game | 6.3 #207 |
| 2.8 #264 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #232 |
Norfolk St
11-17 in 2025-26 overall · 8-7 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs SC State82–88
- Lvs Howard76–84
- L@ Morgan St84–90
- W@ Coppin St75–69
- Wvs SC State90–71
A week or more of rest.
Hampton
11-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Towson68–74
- L@ William & Mary85–94
- Wvs Northeastern76–65
- Lvs Charleston71–85
- L@ Stony Brook72–79
A week or more of rest.