Halton Arena · at Charlotte
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CLT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects CLT 78–71 · win probability CLT 74%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CLT has more of the edges
WCU 2, CLT 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: WCU 50.5 and allows 54.9; CLT 53.4 and allows 50.9
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WCU 35.4%, CLT 33.9%. Defensive: WCU 73.7%, CLT 67.5%
Three-pointers
WCU hits 33.5% and allows 36.7%; CLT hits 35.2% and allows 33.5%. Threes are 40.9% and 45.4% of their shots
CLT offense vs WCU defense
Offense 164th of 366 against a defense 256th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: WCU 31.3, CLT 36.4. Allowed: WCU 37.8, CLT 36.2
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: WCU plays 69.3 a game (162nd fastest), CLT 65.5 (331st). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
WCU has played the 177th-hardest schedule, CLT the 113th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WCU 16.7%, CLT 18.1%. Forced: WCU 14.6%, CLT 13.6%
Home court
CLT at home. This season: CLT 0-0 at home, WCU 0-0 away
Even
WCU offense vs CLT defense
Offense 171st of 366 against a defense 129th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WCU 16%, CLT 10%. Transfers in: WCU 6, CLT 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | CLT -7.3 | — |
| Total | — | 149.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | WCU 70.9 · CLT 78.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CLT -4.3 | — |
| 1H total | 69.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | WCU 32.8 · CLT 37 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
WCU 0–2 CLTCLT leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · CLT has won the last 2 meetings · WCU 0-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2022-23 | CLT 65 vs WCU 56 | WCU +6 | CLT W |
| Dec 22, 2021-22 | WCU 82 @ CLT 98 | CLT -10 | CLT W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
W Carolina
29 games played
Straight up
13-16
45% wins
Against the spread
14-15
48% covers · avg +2.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg +2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 63-94 | +22.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 54-95 | +36.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 76-65 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 80-73 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 62-83 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 73-93 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 67-78 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 11 | @ | L 74-96 | +20.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 82-112 | +32.5 | W +2.5 | 167.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 74-79 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 80-77 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 77-82 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 77-79 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 72-68 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 82-90 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 76-88 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 88-58 | -8.5 | W +21.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 90-88 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 74-88 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 78-81 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 66-77 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 87-49 | -9.5 | W +28.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 81-76 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 91-77 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 81-62 | -8.5 | W +10.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 78-74 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 86-67 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 77-73 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 67-69 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
CIN
L 63-94
−8.5
8
@
DUKE
L 54-95
−4.5
16
vs
STET
W 76-65
−1.5
19
vs
UNCA
W 80-73
+8.5
22
@
LIP
L 62-83
−15.5
29
@
HPU
L 73-93
−3.5
6
@
UPST
L 67-78
−8.5
11
@
VT
L 74-96
−1.5
18
@
UGA
L 82-112
+2.5
31
vs
WOF
L 74-79
−2.5
3
@
FUR
W 80-77
+11.5
7
@
SAM
L 77-82
−0.5
10
@
CIT
L 77-79
−8.5
14
vs
ETSU
W 72-68
+10.5
17
vs
UTC
L 82-90
−9.5
21
@
MER
L 76-88
−3.5
24
vs
VMI
W 88-58
+21.5
29
@
ETSU
W 90-88
+11.5
1
vs
SAM
L 74-88
−12.5
4
@
UNCG
L 78-81
−4.5
7
@
WOF
L 66-77
−7.5
11
vs
CIT
W 87-49
+28.5
14
@
UTC
W 81-76
+6.5
18
vs
UNCG
W 91-77
+8.5
21
@
VMI
W 81-62
+10.5
25
vs
MER
W 78-74
+5.5
28
vs
FUR
W 86-67
+20.5
7
vs
MER
W 77-73
+5.5
8
vs
ETSU
L 67-69
+0.5
covered 14didn’t cover 15avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
CIN
L 63-94
+13.5
8
@
DUKE
L 54-95
−3.5
16
vs
STET
W 76-65
−14.5
19
vs
UNCA
W 80-73
+0.5
22
@
LIP
L 62-83
−6.5
29
@
HPU
L 73-93
+6.5
6
@
UPST
L 67-78
−4.5
11
@
VT
L 74-96
+17.5
18
@
UGA
L 82-112
+26.5
31
vs
WOF
L 74-79
−1.5
3
@
FUR
W 80-77
−0.5
7
@
SAM
L 77-82
+5.5
10
@
CIT
L 77-79
+7.5
14
vs
ETSU
W 72-68
−7.5
17
vs
UTC
L 82-90
+21.5
21
@
MER
L 76-88
+5.5
24
vs
VMI
W 88-58
−6.5
29
@
ETSU
W 90-88
+32.5
1
vs
SAM
L 74-88
+7.5
4
@
UNCG
L 78-81
+3.5
7
@
WOF
L 66-77
−11.5
11
vs
CIT
W 87-49
−9.5
14
@
UTC
W 81-76
+5.5
18
vs
UNCG
W 91-77
+12.5
21
@
VMI
W 81-62
−11.5
25
vs
MER
W 78-74
−4.5
28
vs
FUR
W 86-67
+5.5
7
vs
MER
W 77-73
−4.5
8
vs
ETSU
L 67-69
−9.5
over 15under 14avg +2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Charlotte
33 games played
Straight up
16-17
48% wins
Against the spread
18-15
55% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +3.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 92-76 | -4.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 70-65 | -12.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 55-62 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 76-84 | +18.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 63-65 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 132.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 69-79 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 66-71 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 74-57 | -7.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 53-79 | +10.5 | L −15.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 67-74 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 81-67 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 88-76 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 73-76 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 104-100 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 204 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 74-58 | -6.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 74-73 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 74-86 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 73-70 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 73-70 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 80-76 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 139.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 80-70 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 64-74 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 54-77 | +10.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 79-88 | -13.5 | L −22.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 74-79 | +12.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 68-56 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 80-79 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 76-77 | +6.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 74-80 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 60-83 | +17.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 74-60 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 83-78 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 64-86 | +15.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
INST
W 92-76
+11.5
7
vs
TNTC
W 70-65
−7.5
11
vs
DAV
L 55-62
−8.5
16
@
VT
L 76-84
+10.5
21
@
APP
L 63-65
−0.5
27
vs
ILST
L 69-79
−4.5
28
vs
RICH
L 66-71
+1.5
2
vs
NCAT
W 74-57
+9.5
7
vs
USU
L 53-79
−15.5
14
@
COFC
L 67-74
−1.5
18
vs
LAF
W 81-67
+2.5
21
vs
UIC
W 88-76
+10.5
30
vs
TEM
L 73-76
−4.5
3
vs
WICH
W 104-100
+9.5
7
@
UTSA
W 74-58
+9.5
11
@
RICE
W 74-73
−0.5
14
vs
TLSA
L 74-86
−8.5
18
@
ECU
W 73-70
+4.5
23
vs
TULN
W 73-70
+0.5
28
@
TEM
W 80-76
+8.5
30
vs
RICE
W 80-70
+5.5
4
@
WICH
L 64-74
−0.5
8
@
MEM
L 54-77
−12.5
15
vs
UTSA
L 79-88
−22.5
18
@
TLSA
L 74-79
+7.5
21
vs
ECU
W 68-56
+7.5
25
vs
UNT
W 80-79
+3.5
1
@
FAU
L 76-77
+5.5
4
vs
UAB
L 74-80
−3.5
8
@
USF
L 60-83
−5.5
12
vs
TULN
W 74-60
+12.5
13
vs
UAB
W 83-78
+10.5
14
vs
USF
L 64-86
−6.5
covered 18didn’t cover 15avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
INST
W 92-76
+15.5
7
vs
TNTC
W 70-65
−11.5
11
vs
DAV
L 55-62
−26.5
16
@
VT
L 76-84
+14.5
21
@
APP
L 63-65
−4.5
27
vs
ILST
L 69-79
+8.5
28
vs
RICH
L 66-71
−4.5
2
vs
NCAT
W 74-57
−13.5
7
vs
USU
L 53-79
−7.5
14
@
COFC
L 67-74
+0.5
18
vs
LAF
W 81-67
+10.5
21
vs
UIC
W 88-76
+26.5
30
vs
TEM
L 73-76
+10.5
3
vs
WICH
W 104-100
+63.5
7
@
UTSA
W 74-58
−13.5
11
@
RICE
W 74-73
+9.5
14
vs
TLSA
L 74-86
+13.5
18
@
ECU
W 73-70
+3.5
23
vs
TULN
W 73-70
−0.5
28
@
TEM
W 80-76
+16.5
30
vs
RICE
W 80-70
+8.5
4
@
WICH
L 64-74
−5.5
8
@
MEM
L 54-77
−13.5
15
vs
UTSA
L 79-88
+18.5
18
@
TLSA
L 74-79
+1.5
21
vs
ECU
W 68-56
−21.5
25
vs
UNT
W 80-79
+25.5
1
@
FAU
L 76-77
+5.5
4
vs
UAB
L 74-80
+7.5
8
@
USF
L 60-83
−13.5
12
vs
TULN
W 74-60
−10.5
13
vs
UAB
W 83-78
+13.5
14
vs
USF
L 64-86
−3.5
over 19under 14avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Charlotte has the better starters
Position by position: W Carolina 1, Charlotte 2, even 2
W CarolinaBetterCharlotte
G M. Brown TR11.9 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 48
→CLTBig
G D. Finister TR14.9 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 84
G I. Manning TR9.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 64
=Even
G K. Tillery TR3.8 pts · 1.2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 63
G T. Bryson TR8.6 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 70
=Even
F D. Grant TR9.5 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 71
G J. Prunty TR3.9 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 20
→CLTSmall
F A. Conyers7.5 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 37
F S. Dada6.2 pts · 7.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 77
←WCUSmall
F J. Fort TR3.3 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 49
W CarolinaBetterCharlotte
WCU offense171st of 366 · -5.2
=Even
CLT defense129th of 366 · -2.3
WCU defense256th of 366 · -6.7
→CLTSmall
CLT offense164th of 366 · -5.0
Backcourt-1.7 · 4 players
→CLTBig
Backcourt+2.1 · 2 players
Frontcourt+1.1 · 1 player
←WCUSmall
Frontcourt-0.1 · 3 players
Bench-1.5 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-0.8 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestWCU betterCLT betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Brown31 min · TRI. Manning20 min · TRT. Bryson18 min · TRJ. Prunty16 min · TRJ. Roberts8 min · TRD. Hollifield2 min
Forwards
S. Dada20 minT. Smith10 minD. Raymond6 min · TRF. SodipoNew
Guards
D. Finister33 min · TRK. Tillery12 min · TRJ. Rodriguez-Stegemeijer8 min · TRR. EvansNewF. OgucheNewL. BarnesNew
Forwards
D. Grant24 min · TRA. Conyers20 minJ. Fort14 min · TRT. McKinley12 min · TRM. AllenNew
Centers
P. Marshall11 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.3 #134 | Points per game | 73.0 #225 |
| 1.10 #140 | Points per possession | 1.12 #105 |
| 69.3 #162 | Pace (possessions) | 65.5 #331 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.5 #218 | Effective FG% | 53.4 #86 |
| 33.5 #198 | 3-point % | 35.2 #101 |
| 40.9 #147 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.4 #58 |
| 31.3 #274 | Free throw rate | 36.4 #140 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.7 #179 | Turnover rate | 18.1 #278 |
| 35.4 #36 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.9 #71 |
| 12.0 #286 | Assists per game | 12.9 #217 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.0 #299 | Points allowed | 74.3 #164 |
| 1.14 #307 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #291 |
| 54.9 #327 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.9 #152 |
| 36.7 #337 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.5 #153 |
| 14.6 #318 | Turnovers forced | 13.6 #345 |
| 73.7 #22 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.5 #283 |
| 5.8 #266 | Steals per game | 4.5 #353 |
| 2.4 #315 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #150 |
W Carolina
13-16 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs ETSU67–69
- Wvs Mercer77–73
- Wvs Furman86–67
- Wvs Mercer78–74
- W@ VMI81–62
A week or more of rest.
Charlotte
16-17 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs South Florida64–86
- Wvs UAB83–78
- Wvs Tulane74–60
- L@ South Florida60–83
- Lvs UAB74–80
A week or more of rest.