McCamish Pavilion · at Georgia Tech
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | GT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects GT 84–66 · win probability GT 94%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: GT has more of the edges
UNCA 0, GT 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
UNCA offense vs GT defense
Offense 294th of 366 against a defense 123rd, on the model’s ratings
GT offense vs UNCA defense
Offense 71st of 366 against a defense 230th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
UNCA has played the 214th-hardest schedule, GT the 78th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: UNCA plays 68.0 a game (230th fastest), GT 71.9 (38th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
GT at home. This season: GT 0-0 at home, UNCA 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNCA 17.4%, GT 18.6%. Forced: UNCA 15.5%, GT 15.6%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNCA 30%, GT 16%. Transfers in: UNCA 4, GT 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNCA 40.0, GT 33.3. Allowed: UNCA 38.7, GT 34.2
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNCA 51.0 and allows 51.3; GT 50.0 and allows 49.9
Even
Three-pointers
UNCA hits 35.1% and allows 32.6%; GT hits 35.1% and allows 33.1%. Threes are 33.6% and 33.1% of their shots
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNCA 29.8%, GT 29.9%. Defensive: UNCA 68.7%, GT 69.3%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | GT -17.8 | — |
| Total | — | 149.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | UNCA 65.9 · GT 83.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | GT -10.5 | — |
| 1H total | 70.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNCA 29.7 · GT 40.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 0-10 0% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UNC Asheville
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
15-14
52% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg −3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 58-75 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 90-93 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 69-64 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 73-80 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 73-75 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 67-55 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 82-77 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 63-75 | +28.5 | W +16.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 87-90 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 59-80 | +3.5 | L −17.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 47-72 | +13.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 69-87 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 83-86 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 72-61 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 91-72 | +4.5 | W +23.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 70-71 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 67-69 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 83-69 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 69-50 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 71-84 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 76-67 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 79-74 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 57-58 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 48-74 | +14.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 74-73 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 77-71 | -12.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 75-92 | -4.5 | L −21.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 85-82 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 71-75 | +14.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
WICH
L 58-75
−10.5
8
@
GASO
L 90-93
+2.5
11
vs
LIP
W 69-64
−1.5
19
@
WCU
L 73-80
−8.5
25
vs
TNST
L 73-75
−7.5
30
vs
APP
W 67-55
+10.5
2
vs
UNCG
W 82-77
+0.5
6
@
NCSU
L 63-75
+16.5
10
vs
M-OH
L 87-90
+3.5
13
vs
STMN
L 59-80
−17.5
21
@
UAB
L 47-72
−11.5
31
vs
HPU
L 69-87
−7.5
3
@
CHSO
L 83-86
+1.5
7
vs
LONG
W 72-61
+8.5
10
@
RAD
W 91-72
+23.5
14
@
PRES
L 70-71
−3.5
17
vs
WIN
L 67-69
+3.5
21
@
UPST
W 83-69
+15.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 69-50
+1.5
31
@
WIN
L 71-84
−3.5
4
vs
UPST
W 76-67
+2.5
12
@
LONG
W 79-74
+7.5
14
vs
PRES
L 57-58
−6.5
19
@
HPU
L 48-74
−11.5
21
vs
RAD
W 74-73
−1.5
26
@
GWEB
W 77-71
−6.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 75-92
−21.5
6
vs
LONG
W 85-82
+4.5
7
vs
HPU
L 71-75
+10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 14avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
WICH
L 58-75
−24.5
8
@
GASO
L 90-93
+20.5
11
vs
LIP
W 69-64
−25.5
19
@
WCU
L 73-80
+0.5
25
vs
TNST
L 73-75
−16.5
30
vs
APP
W 67-55
−15.5
2
vs
UNCG
W 82-77
+15.5
6
@
NCSU
L 63-75
−17.5
10
vs
M-OH
L 87-90
+24.5
13
vs
STMN
L 59-80
−9.5
21
@
UAB
L 47-72
−32.5
31
vs
HPU
L 69-87
+4.5
3
@
CHSO
L 83-86
+17.5
7
vs
LONG
W 72-61
−15.5
10
@
RAD
W 91-72
+11.5
14
@
PRES
L 70-71
+2.5
17
vs
WIN
L 67-69
−16.5
21
@
UPST
W 83-69
+6.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 69-50
−30.5
31
@
WIN
L 71-84
+7.5
4
vs
UPST
W 76-67
+3.5
12
@
LONG
W 79-74
+11.5
14
vs
PRES
L 57-58
−22.5
19
@
HPU
L 48-74
−30.5
21
vs
RAD
W 74-73
−2.5
26
@
GWEB
W 77-71
+2.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 75-92
+18.5
6
vs
LONG
W 85-82
+26.5
7
vs
HPU
L 71-75
−1.5
over 15under 14avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Georgia Tech
31 games played
Straight up
11-20
35% wins
Against the spread
13-18
42% covers · avg −2.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-13
58% overs · avg +1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 56-52 | -28.5 | L −24.5 | 139.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 74-45 | -15.5 | W +13.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 70-60 | -14.5 | L −4.5 | 133.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 87-92 | +15.5 | W +10.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 68-66 | -10.5 | L −8.5 | 164.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 82-66 | -18.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 61-75 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 74-84 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 137.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 73-85 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 79-67 | -10.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 87-76 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 95-81 | -16.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 89-65 | -19.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 79-85 | +27.5 | W +21.5 | 153.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 65-53 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 72-82 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 81-91 | +15.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 66-89 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 78-74 | +17.5 | W +21.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 63-77 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 65-71 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 155.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 75-91 | +9.5 | L −6.5 | 160.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 85-90 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 72-95 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 67-83 | +3.5 | L −12.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 74-89 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 68-94 | +13.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 70-87 | +23.5 | W +6.5 | 167.5 | U 157 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 71-80 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 65-76 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 154.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 76-79 | +15.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UMES
W 56-52
−24.5
7
vs
BRY
W 74-45
+13.5
10
vs
SELA
W 70-60
−4.5
14
@
UGA
L 87-92
+10.5
18
vs
GASO
W 68-66
−8.5
23
vs
WGA
W 82-66
−2.5
28
vs
DEP
L 61-75
−12.5
29
vs
DRKE
L 74-84
−14.5
3
vs
MSST
L 73-85
−10.5
6
vs
MONM
W 79-67
+1.5
16
vs
MRST
W 87-76
+4.5
20
vs
LAF
W 95-81
−2.5
28
vs
FAMU
W 89-65
+4.5
31
@
DUKE
L 79-85
+21.5
3
vs
BC
W 65-53
+5.5
6
vs
SYR
L 72-82
−7.5
10
@
MIA
L 81-91
+5.5
14
vs
PITT
L 66-89
−21.5
17
@
NCSU
W 78-74
+21.5
24
vs
CLEM
L 63-77
−5.5
27
@
VT
L 65-71
+3.5
31
vs
UNC
L 75-91
−6.5
4
@
CAL
L 85-90
+2.5
7
@
STAN
L 72-95
−13.5
11
vs
WAKE
L 67-83
−12.5
14
@
ND
L 74-89
−9.5
18
vs
UVA
L 68-94
−12.5
21
@
LOU
L 70-87
+6.5
28
vs
FSU
L 71-80
−3.5
4
vs
CAL
L 65-76
−8.5
7
@
CLEM
L 76-79
+12.5
covered 13didn’t cover 18avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UMES
W 56-52
−31.5
7
vs
BRY
W 74-45
−19.5
10
vs
SELA
W 70-60
−3.5
14
@
UGA
L 87-92
+23.5
18
vs
GASO
W 68-66
−30.5
23
vs
WGA
W 82-66
+3.5
28
vs
DEP
L 61-75
−11.5
29
vs
DRKE
L 74-84
+20.5
3
vs
MSST
L 73-85
+7.5
6
vs
MONM
W 79-67
+1.5
16
vs
MRST
W 87-76
+21.5
20
vs
LAF
W 95-81
+28.5
28
vs
FAMU
W 89-65
+7.5
31
@
DUKE
L 79-85
+10.5
3
vs
BC
W 65-53
−27.5
6
vs
SYR
L 72-82
+7.5
10
@
MIA
L 81-91
+15.5
14
vs
PITT
L 66-89
+9.5
17
@
NCSU
W 78-74
−2.5
24
vs
CLEM
L 63-77
−2.5
27
@
VT
L 65-71
−19.5
31
vs
UNC
L 75-91
+5.5
4
@
CAL
L 85-90
+22.5
7
@
STAN
L 72-95
+15.5
11
vs
WAKE
L 67-83
−8.5
14
@
ND
L 74-89
+12.5
18
vs
UVA
L 68-94
+11.5
21
@
LOU
L 70-87
−10.5
28
vs
FSU
L 71-80
−7.5
4
vs
CAL
L 65-76
−13.5
7
@
CLEM
L 76-79
+9.5
over 18under 13avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Georgia Tech has the better starters
Position by position: UNC Asheville 0, Georgia Tech 3, even 2
UNC AshevilleBetterGeorgia Tech
G K. Phipps TR4.1 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 15
→GTBig
G N. Whitlock TR20.4 pts · 3.3 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 87
G K. Dunn TR7.2 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 9
→GTBig
G C. Garland TR20.4 pts · 3.2 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 98
G J. Anderson TR1.7 pts · 3.3 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G K. Craft7.3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 43
F M. Mayfield4 pts · 4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 5
→GTBig
F V. Valdes TR14.9 pts · 4 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 74
F D. Thomas2.6 pts · 5 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 5
=No call
F J. Fields TR4.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Not ranked
UNC AshevilleBetterGeorgia Tech
UNCA offense294th of 366 · -9.1
→GTBig
GT defense123rd of 366 · -2.1
UNCA defense230th of 366 · -6.1
→GTBig
GT offense71st of 366 · +1.7
Backcourt-4.7 · 3 players
→GTBig
Backcourt+7.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt-5.8 · 2 players
→GTBig
Frontcourt+2.6 · 2 players
Bench-2.6 · 3 players
→GTSmall
Bench-1.0 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestUNCA betterGT betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Phipps18 min · TRK. Dunn17 min · TRJ. Anderson17 min · TRC. Jones7 minT. ChatmanNewC. DubskyNew
Forwards
M. Mayfield23 minD. Thomas21 minA. Magassa10 min · TRS. Tolentino8 minB. RiversNewQ. MansfieldNew
Guards
N. Whitlock35 min · TRC. Garland35 min · TRK. Craft21 minC. Muldrew14 min · TRK. BaileyNewK. AllenNew
Forwards
V. Valdes30 min · TRJ. Fields14 min · TRT. JordanNewM. DiopNewI. KurucsNew
Centers
C. Kirouac12 minJ. McVeyNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.9 #248 | Points per game | 73.8 #208 |
| 1.06 #236 | Points per possession | 1.03 #292 |
| 68.0 #230 | Pace (possessions) | 71.9 #38 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #194 | Effective FG% | 50.0 #234 |
| 35.1 #110 | 3-point % | 35.1 #109 |
| 33.6 #307 | 3-point attempt rate | 33.1 #313 |
| 40.0 #60 | Free throw rate | 33.3 #229 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.4 #230 | Turnover rate | 18.6 #306 |
| 29.8 #211 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.9 #203 |
| 10.1 #358 | Assists per game | 15.8 #55 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.2 #161 | Points allowed | 77.4 #247 |
| 1.09 #203 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #148 |
| 51.3 #175 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.9 #94 |
| 32.6 #93 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.1 #134 |
| 15.5 #251 | Turnovers forced | 15.6 #244 |
| 68.7 #218 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.3 #189 |
| 5.1 #324 | Steals per game | 6.1 #229 |
| 3.5 #133 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #80 |
UNC Asheville
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 9-9 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs High Point71–75
- Wvs Longwood85–82
- Lvs Charleston So75–92
- W@ Gardner-Webb77–71
- Wvs Radford74–73
A week or more of rest.
Georgia Tech
11-20 in 2025-26 overall · 2-16 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Clemson76–79
- Lvs California65–76
- Lvs Florida St71–80
- L@ Louisville70–87
- Lvs Virginia68–94
A week or more of rest.