Pete Hanna Center · at Samford
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SAM | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SAM 77–69 · win probability SAM 76%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SAM has more of the edges
UNCA 1, SAM 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
UNCA hits 35.1% and allows 32.6%; SAM hits 35.6% and allows 36.5%. Threes are 33.6% and 45.7% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNCA 40.0, SAM 41.9. Allowed: UNCA 38.7, SAM 32.9
SAM offense vs UNCA defense
Offense 147th of 366 against a defense 230th, on the model’s ratings
UNCA offense vs SAM defense
Offense 294th of 366 against a defense 224th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNCA 17.4%, SAM 13.4%. Forced: UNCA 15.5%, SAM 13.0%
Home court
SAM at home. This season: SAM 0-0 at home, UNCA 0-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNCA 29.8%, SAM 25.3%. Defensive: UNCA 68.7%, SAM 74.3%
Context
Schedule so far
UNCA has played the 214th-hardest schedule, SAM the 251st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: UNCA plays 68.0 a game (230th fastest), SAM 69.3 (163rd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNCA 51.0 and allows 51.3; SAM 53.1 and allows 51.9
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNCA 30%, SAM 41%. Transfers in: UNCA 4, SAM 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SAM -8.0 | — |
| Total | — | 146.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | UNCA 69.3 · SAM 77.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SAM -4.6 | — |
| 1H total | 68.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNCA 32 · SAM 36.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UNC Asheville
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
15-14
52% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg −3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 58-75 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 90-93 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 69-64 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 73-80 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 73-75 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 67-55 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 82-77 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 63-75 | +28.5 | W +16.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 87-90 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 59-80 | +3.5 | L −17.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 47-72 | +13.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 69-87 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 83-86 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 72-61 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 91-72 | +4.5 | W +23.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 70-71 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 67-69 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 83-69 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 69-50 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 71-84 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 76-67 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 79-74 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 57-58 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 48-74 | +14.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 74-73 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 77-71 | -12.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 75-92 | -4.5 | L −21.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 85-82 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 71-75 | +14.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
WICH
L 58-75
−10.5
8
@
GASO
L 90-93
+2.5
11
vs
LIP
W 69-64
−1.5
19
@
WCU
L 73-80
−8.5
25
vs
TNST
L 73-75
−7.5
30
vs
APP
W 67-55
+10.5
2
vs
UNCG
W 82-77
+0.5
6
@
NCSU
L 63-75
+16.5
10
vs
M-OH
L 87-90
+3.5
13
vs
STMN
L 59-80
−17.5
21
@
UAB
L 47-72
−11.5
31
vs
HPU
L 69-87
−7.5
3
@
CHSO
L 83-86
+1.5
7
vs
LONG
W 72-61
+8.5
10
@
RAD
W 91-72
+23.5
14
@
PRES
L 70-71
−3.5
17
vs
WIN
L 67-69
+3.5
21
@
UPST
W 83-69
+15.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 69-50
+1.5
31
@
WIN
L 71-84
−3.5
4
vs
UPST
W 76-67
+2.5
12
@
LONG
W 79-74
+7.5
14
vs
PRES
L 57-58
−6.5
19
@
HPU
L 48-74
−11.5
21
vs
RAD
W 74-73
−1.5
26
@
GWEB
W 77-71
−6.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 75-92
−21.5
6
vs
LONG
W 85-82
+4.5
7
vs
HPU
L 71-75
+10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 14avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
WICH
L 58-75
−24.5
8
@
GASO
L 90-93
+20.5
11
vs
LIP
W 69-64
−25.5
19
@
WCU
L 73-80
+0.5
25
vs
TNST
L 73-75
−16.5
30
vs
APP
W 67-55
−15.5
2
vs
UNCG
W 82-77
+15.5
6
@
NCSU
L 63-75
−17.5
10
vs
M-OH
L 87-90
+24.5
13
vs
STMN
L 59-80
−9.5
21
@
UAB
L 47-72
−32.5
31
vs
HPU
L 69-87
+4.5
3
@
CHSO
L 83-86
+17.5
7
vs
LONG
W 72-61
−15.5
10
@
RAD
W 91-72
+11.5
14
@
PRES
L 70-71
+2.5
17
vs
WIN
L 67-69
−16.5
21
@
UPST
W 83-69
+6.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 69-50
−30.5
31
@
WIN
L 71-84
+7.5
4
vs
UPST
W 76-67
+3.5
12
@
LONG
W 79-74
+11.5
14
vs
PRES
L 57-58
−22.5
19
@
HPU
L 48-74
−30.5
21
vs
RAD
W 74-73
−2.5
26
@
GWEB
W 77-71
+2.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 75-92
+18.5
6
vs
LONG
W 85-82
+26.5
7
vs
HPU
L 71-75
−1.5
over 15under 14avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Samford
30 games played
Straight up
16-14
53% wins
Against the spread
18-12
60% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-11
63% overs · avg +2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 72-85 | +7.5 | L −5.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 82-72 | -14.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 12 | @ | W 93-90 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 75-79 | +24.5 | W +20.5 | 158.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 84-77 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 62-77 | -5.5 | L −20.5 | 154.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 72-81 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 78-63 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 45-89 | +7.5 | L −36.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 57-83 | +19.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 93-90 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 166.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 78-58 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 82-89 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 82-77 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 79-88 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 73-77 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 75-76 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 78-88 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 75-64 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 73-78 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 88-74 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 78-64 | -13.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 69-49 | +1.5 | W +21.5 | 160.5 | U 118 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 97-80 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 82-72 | +7.5 | W +17.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 78-75 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 86-89 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 156.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 80-61 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 87-78 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 156.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 81-86 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
TULN
L 72-85
−5.5
7
vs
SCST
W 82-72
−4.5
12
@
TXSO
W 93-90
+0.5
14
@
ARK
L 75-79
+20.5
16
@
CARK
W 84-77
+0.5
19
vs
FGCU
L 62-77
−20.5
21
@
NMSU
L 72-81
−0.5
25
vs
GAST
W 78-63
+9.5
26
vs
UVU
L 45-89
−36.5
5
@
VCU
L 57-83
−6.5
7
vs
COR
W 93-90
+0.5
1
@
VMI
W 78-58
+13.5
3
@
UNCG
L 82-89
−9.5
7
vs
WCU
W 82-77
+0.5
10
@
UTC
L 79-88
−7.5
14
vs
FUR
L 73-77
−2.5
17
vs
ETSU
L 75-76
+2.5
21
@
WOF
L 78-88
−6.5
24
vs
UTC
W 75-64
+6.5
29
@
FUR
L 73-78
+0.5
1
@
WCU
W 88-74
+12.5
5
vs
CIT
W 78-64
+0.5
7
vs
MER
W 69-49
+21.5
11
vs
WOF
W 97-80
+10.5
14
@
ETSU
W 82-72
+17.5
19
@
CIT
W 78-75
−7.5
21
@
MER
L 86-89
+0.5
26
vs
VMI
W 80-61
+1.5
28
vs
UNCG
W 87-78
+0.5
7
vs
FUR
L 81-86
−6.5
covered 18didn’t cover 12avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
TULN
L 72-85
+2.5
7
vs
SCST
W 82-72
−0.5
12
@
TXSO
W 93-90
+29.5
14
@
ARK
L 75-79
−4.5
16
@
CARK
W 84-77
+9.5
19
vs
FGCU
L 62-77
−15.5
21
@
NMSU
L 72-81
+7.5
25
vs
GAST
W 78-63
−5.5
26
vs
UVU
L 45-89
−14.5
5
@
VCU
L 57-83
−14.5
7
vs
COR
W 93-90
+16.5
1
@
VMI
W 78-58
−18.5
3
@
UNCG
L 82-89
+19.5
7
vs
WCU
W 82-77
+5.5
10
@
UTC
L 79-88
+18.5
14
vs
FUR
L 73-77
+0.5
17
vs
ETSU
L 75-76
+2.5
21
@
WOF
L 78-88
+11.5
24
vs
UTC
W 75-64
−13.5
29
@
FUR
L 73-78
+1.5
1
@
WCU
W 88-74
+7.5
5
vs
CIT
W 78-64
−4.5
7
vs
MER
W 69-49
−42.5
11
vs
WOF
W 97-80
+26.5
14
@
ETSU
W 82-72
+8.5
19
@
CIT
W 78-75
+9.5
21
@
MER
L 86-89
+18.5
26
vs
VMI
W 80-61
−14.5
28
vs
UNCG
W 87-78
+8.5
7
vs
FUR
L 81-86
+19.5
over 19under 11avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Samford has the better starters
Position by position: UNC Asheville 0, Samford 2, even 3
UNC AshevilleBetterSamford
G K. Phipps TR4.1 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 15
=Even
G N. George TR11.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 25
G K. Dunn TR7.2 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 9
→SAMSmall
G C. Norris8.9 pts · 4.4 reb · 2 ast
Score 34
G J. Anderson TR1.7 pts · 3.3 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G C. Noard TR19 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 94
F M. Mayfield4 pts · 4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 5
=Even
G I. Campbell-Finch7.5 pts · 1.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 13
F D. Thomas2.6 pts · 5 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 5
→SAMSmall
G T. Davis TR1.2 pts · 1.6 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 22
UNC AshevilleBetterSamford
UNCA offense294th of 366 · -9.1
→SAMSmall
SAM defense224th of 366 · -5.9
UNCA defense230th of 366 · -6.1
→SAMSmall
SAM offense147th of 366 · -4.5
Backcourt-4.7 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-4.7 · 5 players
Frontcourt-5.8 · 2 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-2.6 · 3 players
←UNCASmall
Bench-3.6 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUNCA betterSAM betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Phipps18 min · TRK. Dunn17 min · TRJ. Anderson17 min · TRC. Jones7 minT. ChatmanNewC. DubskyNew
Forwards
M. Mayfield23 minD. Thomas21 minA. Magassa10 min · TRS. Tolentino8 minB. RiversNewQ. MansfieldNew
Guards
N. George35 min · TRC. Norris31 minC. Noard29 min · TRI. Campbell-Finch24 minT. Davis11 min · TRW. Miller9 min · TR
Forwards
J. Bjornstad8 minB. MacVicar7 min · TRC. Harrison3 minJ. HughesNewB. KempNew
Centers
W. Shaver9 minL. LeeNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.9 #248 | Points per game | 77.8 #98 |
| 1.06 #236 | Points per possession | 1.12 #99 |
| 68.0 #230 | Pace (possessions) | 69.3 #163 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #194 | Effective FG% | 53.1 #101 |
| 35.1 #110 | 3-point % | 35.6 #84 |
| 33.6 #307 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.7 #54 |
| 40.0 #60 | Free throw rate | 41.9 #32 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.4 #230 | Turnover rate | 13.4 #11 |
| 29.8 #211 | Offensive rebound rate | 25.3 #333 |
| 10.1 #358 | Assists per game | 14.3 #128 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.2 #161 | Points allowed | 77.0 #240 |
| 1.09 #203 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #251 |
| 51.3 #175 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.9 #206 |
| 32.6 #93 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.5 #326 |
| 15.5 #251 | Turnovers forced | 13.0 #354 |
| 68.7 #218 | Defensive rebound rate | 74.3 #17 |
| 5.1 #324 | Steals per game | 4.4 #358 |
| 3.5 #133 | Blocks per game | 2.7 #277 |
UNC Asheville
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 9-9 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs High Point71–75
- Wvs Longwood85–82
- Lvs Charleston So75–92
- W@ Gardner-Webb77–71
- Wvs Radford74–73
A week or more of rest.
Samford
16-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Furman81–86
- Wvs UNC Greensboro87–78
- Wvs VMI80–61
- L@ Mercer86–89
- W@ The Citadel78–75
A week or more of rest.