Kimmel Arena · at UNC Asheville
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UNCA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNCA 77–73 · win probability UNCA 64%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UNCA has more of the edges
GASO 1, UNCA 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: GASO 14.7%, UNCA 17.4%. Forced: GASO 18.7%, UNCA 15.5%
Three-pointers
GASO hits 33.4% and allows 34.4%; UNCA hits 35.1% and allows 32.6%. Threes are 48.9% and 33.6% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: GASO plays 71.8 a game (42nd fastest), UNCA 68.0 (230th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: GASO 28.8%, UNCA 29.8%. Defensive: GASO 64.8%, UNCA 68.7%
Context
Schedule so far
GASO has played the 279th-hardest schedule, UNCA the 214th. A record against a soft schedule means less
UNCA offense vs GASO defense
Offense 294th of 366 against a defense 347th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
UNCA at home. This season: UNCA 0-0 at home, GASO 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: GASO 16%, UNCA 30%. Transfers in: GASO 3, UNCA 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: GASO 39.6, UNCA 40.0. Allowed: GASO 41.4, UNCA 38.7
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: GASO 51.4 and allows 52.3; UNCA 51.0 and allows 51.3
Even
GASO offense vs UNCA defense
Offense 233rd of 366 against a defense 230th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNCA -4.0 | — |
| Total | — | 149.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | GASO 72.5 · UNCA 76.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNCA -2.3 | — |
| 1H total | 69.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | GASO 33.7 · UNCA 36 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
GASO 1–0 UNCAGASO leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · GASO 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2025-26 | UNCA 90 @ GASO 93 | GASO -5.5 | UNCA W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
GA Southern
35 games played
Straight up
19-16
54% wins
Against the spread
17-17
50% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-15
56% overs · avg +2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 89-92 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 93-90 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 95-94 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | O 189 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 66-68 | +10.5 | W +8.5 | 164.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 72-98 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 175.5 | U 170 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 61-67 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 64-77 | -3.5 | L −16.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 80-62 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 77-69 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 88-84 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 91-85 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 90-67 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 159.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 96-92 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 188 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 82-81 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 93-86 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 71-87 | +2.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 87-84 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 75-79 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 68-85 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 172.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 78-83 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 79-76 | — | — | — | — |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 60-69 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 71-77 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 65-81 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 101-87 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 162.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 64-66 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 74-89 | +7.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 66-82 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 99-82 | +7.5 | W +24.5 | 168.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 88-84 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 80-77 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 165.5 | U 157 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 94-85 | +4.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 96-72 | +1.5 | W +25.5 | 151.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 82-78 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 166.5 | U 160 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 61-77 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
ECU
L 89-92
+2.5
8
vs
UNCA
W 93-90
−2.5
11
@
FGCU
W 95-94
+4.5
18
@
GT
L 66-68
+8.5
21
@
FSU
L 72-98
−7.5
24
vs
YSU
L 61-67
−4.5
25
vs
UTSA
L 64-77
−16.5
29
vs
HCU
W 80-62
+10.5
3
vs
LT
W 77-69
+6.5
6
@
GWEB
W 88-84
−6.5
13
@
WGA
W 91-85
+2.5
18
vs
GAST
W 90-67
+13.5
20
vs
JMU
W 96-92
+1.5
1
@
CCU
W 82-81
+2.5
3
@
ODU
W 93-86
+5.5
10
@
USA
L 71-87
−13.5
15
vs
ODU
W 87-84
−2.5
17
vs
CCU
L 75-79
−10.5
22
vs
ARST
L 68-85
−15.5
24
vs
TROY
L 78-83
−0.5
31
@
UL
L 60-69
−11.5
4
vs
TXST
L 71-77
−10.5
11
vs
APP
L 65-81
−14.5
14
vs
MRSH
W 101-87
+16.5
19
@
GAST
L 64-66
−3.5
21
@
APP
L 74-89
−7.5
25
@
JMU
L 66-82
−10.5
27
@
MRSH
W 99-82
+24.5
4
vs
ODU
W 88-84
+1.5
5
vs
ARST
W 80-77
+10.5
6
vs
USA
W 94-85
+13.5
7
vs
CCU
W 96-72
+25.5
8
vs
MRSH
W 82-78
+6.5
9
vs
TROY
L 61-77
−10.5
covered 17didn’t cover 17avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
ECU
L 89-92
+29.5
8
vs
UNCA
W 93-90
+20.5
11
@
FGCU
W 95-94
+25.5
18
@
GT
L 66-68
−30.5
21
@
FSU
L 72-98
−5.5
24
vs
YSU
L 61-67
−35.5
25
vs
UTSA
L 64-77
−19.5
29
vs
HCU
W 80-62
−6.5
3
vs
LT
W 77-69
+0.5
6
@
GWEB
W 88-84
+9.5
13
@
WGA
W 91-85
+21.5
18
vs
GAST
W 90-67
−2.5
20
vs
JMU
W 96-92
+34.5
1
@
CCU
W 82-81
+5.5
3
@
ODU
W 93-86
+17.5
10
@
USA
L 71-87
+9.5
15
vs
ODU
W 87-84
+8.5
17
vs
CCU
L 75-79
−3.5
22
vs
ARST
L 68-85
−19.5
24
vs
TROY
L 78-83
+1.5
31
@
UL
L 60-69
−15.5
4
vs
TXST
L 71-77
−3.5
11
vs
APP
L 65-81
+2.5
14
vs
MRSH
W 101-87
+25.5
19
@
GAST
L 64-66
−24.5
21
@
APP
L 74-89
+15.5
25
@
JMU
L 66-82
−5.5
27
@
MRSH
W 99-82
+12.5
4
vs
ODU
W 88-84
+14.5
5
vs
ARST
W 80-77
−8.5
6
vs
USA
W 94-85
+29.5
7
vs
CCU
W 96-72
+16.5
8
vs
MRSH
W 82-78
−6.5
9
vs
TROY
L 61-77
−14.5
over 19under 15avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
UNC Asheville
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
15-14
52% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg −3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 58-75 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 90-93 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 69-64 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 73-80 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 73-75 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 67-55 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 82-77 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 63-75 | +28.5 | W +16.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 87-90 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 59-80 | +3.5 | L −17.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 47-72 | +13.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 69-87 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 83-86 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 72-61 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 91-72 | +4.5 | W +23.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 70-71 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 67-69 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 83-69 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 69-50 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 71-84 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 76-67 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 79-74 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 57-58 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 48-74 | +14.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 74-73 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 77-71 | -12.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 75-92 | -4.5 | L −21.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 85-82 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 71-75 | +14.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
WICH
L 58-75
−10.5
8
@
GASO
L 90-93
+2.5
11
vs
LIP
W 69-64
−1.5
19
@
WCU
L 73-80
−8.5
25
vs
TNST
L 73-75
−7.5
30
vs
APP
W 67-55
+10.5
2
vs
UNCG
W 82-77
+0.5
6
@
NCSU
L 63-75
+16.5
10
vs
M-OH
L 87-90
+3.5
13
vs
STMN
L 59-80
−17.5
21
@
UAB
L 47-72
−11.5
31
vs
HPU
L 69-87
−7.5
3
@
CHSO
L 83-86
+1.5
7
vs
LONG
W 72-61
+8.5
10
@
RAD
W 91-72
+23.5
14
@
PRES
L 70-71
−3.5
17
vs
WIN
L 67-69
+3.5
21
@
UPST
W 83-69
+15.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 69-50
+1.5
31
@
WIN
L 71-84
−3.5
4
vs
UPST
W 76-67
+2.5
12
@
LONG
W 79-74
+7.5
14
vs
PRES
L 57-58
−6.5
19
@
HPU
L 48-74
−11.5
21
vs
RAD
W 74-73
−1.5
26
@
GWEB
W 77-71
−6.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 75-92
−21.5
6
vs
LONG
W 85-82
+4.5
7
vs
HPU
L 71-75
+10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 14avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
WICH
L 58-75
−24.5
8
@
GASO
L 90-93
+20.5
11
vs
LIP
W 69-64
−25.5
19
@
WCU
L 73-80
+0.5
25
vs
TNST
L 73-75
−16.5
30
vs
APP
W 67-55
−15.5
2
vs
UNCG
W 82-77
+15.5
6
@
NCSU
L 63-75
−17.5
10
vs
M-OH
L 87-90
+24.5
13
vs
STMN
L 59-80
−9.5
21
@
UAB
L 47-72
−32.5
31
vs
HPU
L 69-87
+4.5
3
@
CHSO
L 83-86
+17.5
7
vs
LONG
W 72-61
−15.5
10
@
RAD
W 91-72
+11.5
14
@
PRES
L 70-71
+2.5
17
vs
WIN
L 67-69
−16.5
21
@
UPST
W 83-69
+6.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 69-50
−30.5
31
@
WIN
L 71-84
+7.5
4
vs
UPST
W 76-67
+3.5
12
@
LONG
W 79-74
+11.5
14
vs
PRES
L 57-58
−22.5
19
@
HPU
L 48-74
−30.5
21
vs
RAD
W 74-73
−2.5
26
@
GWEB
W 77-71
+2.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 75-92
+18.5
6
vs
LONG
W 85-82
+26.5
7
vs
HPU
L 71-75
−1.5
over 15under 14avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
GA Southern has the better starters
Position by position: GA Southern 1, UNC Asheville 0, even 4
GA SouthernBetterUNC Asheville
G J. Dixon TR9 pts · 1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 39
←GASOSmall
G K. Phipps TR4.1 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 15
G D. Williams3.6 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 10
=Even
G K. Dunn TR7.2 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 9
G J. Williams1 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Anderson TR1.7 pts · 3.3 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
F T. Claytor TR6.5 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 8
=Even
F M. Mayfield4 pts · 4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 5
F T. Sotirov2.5 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 1
=Even
F D. Thomas2.6 pts · 5 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 5
GA SouthernBetterUNC Asheville
GASO offense233rd of 366 · -7.2
=Even
UNCA defense230th of 366 · -6.1
GASO defense347th of 366 · -9.4
=Even
UNCA offense294th of 366 · -9.1
Backcourt-3.8 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-4.7 · 3 players
Frontcourt-3.7 · 2 players
←GASOSmall
Frontcourt-5.8 · 2 players
Bench-0.8 · 1 player
←GASOSmall
Bench-2.6 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestGASO betterUNCA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Dixon19 min · TRD. Williams12 minJ. Williams8 minD. GardnerNewA. HendersonNewR. WilliamsNew
Forwards
T. Claytor17 min · TRT. Sotirov11 minE. Smith6 min · TRC. CrissmanNewE. SavaneNewE. JamesNew
Guards
K. Phipps18 min · TRK. Dunn17 min · TRJ. Anderson17 min · TRC. Jones7 minT. ChatmanNewC. DubskyNew
Forwards
M. Mayfield23 minD. Thomas21 minA. Magassa10 min · TRS. Tolentino8 minB. RiversNewQ. MansfieldNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 79.9 #69 | Points per game | 71.9 #248 |
| 1.12 #109 | Points per possession | 1.06 #236 |
| 71.8 #42 | Pace (possessions) | 68.0 #230 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.4 #176 | Effective FG% | 51.0 #194 |
| 33.4 #207 | 3-point % | 35.1 #110 |
| 48.9 #20 | 3-point attempt rate | 33.6 #307 |
| 39.6 #62 | Free throw rate | 40.0 #60 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.7 #49 | Turnover rate | 17.4 #230 |
| 28.8 #238 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.8 #211 |
| 10.7 #344 | Assists per game | 10.1 #358 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.3 #325 | Points allowed | 74.2 #161 |
| 1.11 #259 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #203 |
| 52.3 #230 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.3 #175 |
| 34.4 #208 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.6 #93 |
| 18.7 #65 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #251 |
| 64.8 #342 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.7 #218 |
| 8.1 #36 | Steals per game | 5.1 #324 |
| 3.6 #128 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #133 |
GA Southern
19-16 in 2025-26 overall · 13-11 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Troy61–77
- Wvs Marshall82–78
- Wvs Coastal96–72
- Wvs South Alabama94–85
- Wvs Arkansas St80–77
A week or more of rest.
UNC Asheville
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 9-9 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs High Point71–75
- Wvs Longwood85–82
- Lvs Charleston So75–92
- W@ Gardner-Webb77–71
- Wvs Radford74–73
A week or more of rest.