Jack and Ruth Ann Hill Convocation Center · at GA Southern
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | GASO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNCW 80–72 · win probability UNCW 76%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UNCW has more of the edges
UNCW 6, GASO 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNCW 35.3%, GASO 28.8%. Defensive: UNCW 72.4%, GASO 64.8%
UNCW offense vs GASO defense
Offense 131st of 366 against a defense 347th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
UNCW hits 35.0% and allows 29.7%; GASO hits 33.4% and allows 34.4%. Threes are 38.8% and 48.9% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: UNCW plays 66.1 a game (310th fastest), GASO 71.8 (42nd). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNCW 14.9%, GASO 14.7%. Forced: UNCW 14.9%, GASO 18.7%
GASO offense vs UNCW defense
Offense 233rd of 366 against a defense 119th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNCW 40.4, GASO 39.6. Allowed: UNCW 31.7, GASO 41.4
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNCW 50.4 and allows 47.5; GASO 51.4 and allows 52.3
Home court
GASO at home. This season: GASO 0-0 at home, UNCW 0-0 away
Context
Schedule so far
UNCW has played the 228th-hardest schedule, GASO the 279th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNCW 35%, GASO 16%. Transfers in: UNCW 4, GASO 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNCW -8.0 | — |
| Total | — | 151.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | UNCW 79.7 · GASO 71.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNCW -4.9 | — |
| 1H total | 70.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNCW 37.8 · GASO 32.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UNCW 2–0 GASOUNCW leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · UNCW has won the last 2 meetings · UNCW 1-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2024-25 | GASO 84 @ UNCW 92 | UNCW -5.5 | UNCW W |
| Dec 16, 2023-24 | UNCW 82 @ GASO 77 | GASO +9.5 | GASO W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UNC Wilmington
32 games played
Straight up
25-7
78% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-14
56% overs · avg −2.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | @ | L 77-86 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 73-60 | -14.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 85-60 | -6.5 | W +18.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 81-73 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 70-57 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 87-57 | -8.5 | W +21.5 | 138.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 88-62 | -18.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 70-69 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 70-63 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 130.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 73-70 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 66-67 | -15.5 | L −16.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 87-78 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 65-53 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 49-45 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | U 94 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 87-78 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 75-71 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 78-75 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 70-77 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 75-67 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 82-73 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 78-85 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 76-64 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 65-54 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 70-66 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 79-69 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 73-68 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 88-65 | -13.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 76-79 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 76-57 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 70-85 | -6.5 | L −21.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 17 | @ | W 68-67 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 21 | vs | L 61-80 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
10
@
KENT
L 77-86
−5.5
15
vs
UPST
W 73-60
−1.5
18
vs
ECU
W 85-60
+18.5
21
@
RAD
W 81-73
+3.5
26
vs
SELA
W 70-57
+1.5
28
vs
NAVY
W 87-57
+21.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 88-62
+7.5
3
vs
MRSH
W 70-69
−7.5
6
@
UL
W 70-63
−5.5
13
@
VAL
W 73-70
−1.5
20
vs
HOW
L 66-67
−16.5
29
@
NCAT
W 87-78
−1.5
31
vs
DREX
W 65-53
−0.5
3
vs
HAMP
W 49-45
−8.5
8
@
NE
W 87-78
+4.5
10
@
STBK
W 75-71
−2.5
17
vs
CAM
W 78-75
−3.5
22
@
W&M
L 70-77
−4.5
24
@
HAMP
W 75-67
+3.5
29
@
TOW
W 82-73
+10.5
5
vs
W&M
L 78-85
−11.5
9
@
COFC
W 76-64
+13.5
12
vs
ELON
W 65-54
+2.5
14
vs
HOF
W 70-66
+1.5
19
vs
MONM
W 79-69
+2.5
21
@
CAM
W 73-68
+1.5
26
vs
NCAT
W 88-65
+9.5
1
vs
COFC
L 76-79
−8.5
3
@
ELON
W 76-57
+14.5
8
vs
CAM
L 70-85
−21.5
17
@
YALE
W 68-67
+5.5
21
vs
DAY
L 61-80
−15.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
10
@
KENT
L 77-86
+6.5
15
vs
UPST
W 73-60
−22.5
18
vs
ECU
W 85-60
−0.5
21
@
RAD
W 81-73
+2.5
26
vs
SELA
W 70-57
−10.5
28
vs
NAVY
W 87-57
+5.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 88-62
+2.5
3
vs
MRSH
W 70-69
−11.5
6
@
UL
W 70-63
+2.5
13
@
VAL
W 73-70
+6.5
20
vs
HOW
L 66-67
−8.5
29
@
NCAT
W 87-78
+18.5
31
vs
DREX
W 65-53
−19.5
3
vs
HAMP
W 49-45
−46.5
8
@
NE
W 87-78
+22.5
10
@
STBK
W 75-71
+12.5
17
vs
CAM
W 78-75
+3.5
22
@
W&M
L 70-77
−12.5
24
@
HAMP
W 75-67
+5.5
29
@
TOW
W 82-73
+19.5
5
vs
W&M
L 78-85
+3.5
9
@
COFC
W 76-64
−8.5
12
vs
ELON
W 65-54
−30.5
14
vs
HOF
W 70-66
−1.5
19
vs
MONM
W 79-69
+3.5
21
@
CAM
W 73-68
−9.5
26
vs
NCAT
W 88-65
+6.5
1
vs
COFC
L 76-79
+8.5
3
@
ELON
W 76-57
−12.5
8
vs
CAM
L 70-85
+5.5
17
@
YALE
W 68-67
−13.5
21
vs
DAY
L 61-80
+2.5
over 18under 14avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
GA Southern
35 games played
Straight up
19-16
54% wins
Against the spread
17-17
50% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-15
56% overs · avg +2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 89-92 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 93-90 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 95-94 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | O 189 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 66-68 | +10.5 | W +8.5 | 164.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 72-98 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 175.5 | U 170 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 61-67 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 64-77 | -3.5 | L −16.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 80-62 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 77-69 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 88-84 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 91-85 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 90-67 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 159.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 96-92 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 188 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 82-81 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 93-86 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 71-87 | +2.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 87-84 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 75-79 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 68-85 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 172.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 78-83 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 79-76 | — | — | — | — |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 60-69 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 71-77 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 65-81 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 101-87 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 162.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 64-66 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 74-89 | +7.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 66-82 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 99-82 | +7.5 | W +24.5 | 168.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 88-84 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 80-77 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 165.5 | U 157 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 94-85 | +4.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 96-72 | +1.5 | W +25.5 | 151.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 82-78 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 166.5 | U 160 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 61-77 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
ECU
L 89-92
+2.5
8
vs
UNCA
W 93-90
−2.5
11
@
FGCU
W 95-94
+4.5
18
@
GT
L 66-68
+8.5
21
@
FSU
L 72-98
−7.5
24
vs
YSU
L 61-67
−4.5
25
vs
UTSA
L 64-77
−16.5
29
vs
HCU
W 80-62
+10.5
3
vs
LT
W 77-69
+6.5
6
@
GWEB
W 88-84
−6.5
13
@
WGA
W 91-85
+2.5
18
vs
GAST
W 90-67
+13.5
20
vs
JMU
W 96-92
+1.5
1
@
CCU
W 82-81
+2.5
3
@
ODU
W 93-86
+5.5
10
@
USA
L 71-87
−13.5
15
vs
ODU
W 87-84
−2.5
17
vs
CCU
L 75-79
−10.5
22
vs
ARST
L 68-85
−15.5
24
vs
TROY
L 78-83
−0.5
31
@
UL
L 60-69
−11.5
4
vs
TXST
L 71-77
−10.5
11
vs
APP
L 65-81
−14.5
14
vs
MRSH
W 101-87
+16.5
19
@
GAST
L 64-66
−3.5
21
@
APP
L 74-89
−7.5
25
@
JMU
L 66-82
−10.5
27
@
MRSH
W 99-82
+24.5
4
vs
ODU
W 88-84
+1.5
5
vs
ARST
W 80-77
+10.5
6
vs
USA
W 94-85
+13.5
7
vs
CCU
W 96-72
+25.5
8
vs
MRSH
W 82-78
+6.5
9
vs
TROY
L 61-77
−10.5
covered 17didn’t cover 17avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
ECU
L 89-92
+29.5
8
vs
UNCA
W 93-90
+20.5
11
@
FGCU
W 95-94
+25.5
18
@
GT
L 66-68
−30.5
21
@
FSU
L 72-98
−5.5
24
vs
YSU
L 61-67
−35.5
25
vs
UTSA
L 64-77
−19.5
29
vs
HCU
W 80-62
−6.5
3
vs
LT
W 77-69
+0.5
6
@
GWEB
W 88-84
+9.5
13
@
WGA
W 91-85
+21.5
18
vs
GAST
W 90-67
−2.5
20
vs
JMU
W 96-92
+34.5
1
@
CCU
W 82-81
+5.5
3
@
ODU
W 93-86
+17.5
10
@
USA
L 71-87
+9.5
15
vs
ODU
W 87-84
+8.5
17
vs
CCU
L 75-79
−3.5
22
vs
ARST
L 68-85
−19.5
24
vs
TROY
L 78-83
+1.5
31
@
UL
L 60-69
−15.5
4
vs
TXST
L 71-77
−3.5
11
vs
APP
L 65-81
+2.5
14
vs
MRSH
W 101-87
+25.5
19
@
GAST
L 64-66
−24.5
21
@
APP
L 74-89
+15.5
25
@
JMU
L 66-82
−5.5
27
@
MRSH
W 99-82
+12.5
4
vs
ODU
W 88-84
+14.5
5
vs
ARST
W 80-77
−8.5
6
vs
USA
W 94-85
+29.5
7
vs
CCU
W 96-72
+16.5
8
vs
MRSH
W 82-78
−6.5
9
vs
TROY
L 61-77
−14.5
over 19under 15avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UNC Wilmington has the better starters
Position by position: UNC Wilmington 4, GA Southern 0, even 1
UNC WilmingtonBetterGA Southern
G W. Kermoury TR13.1 pts · 3.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 75
←UNCWBig
G J. Dixon TR9 pts · 1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 39
G T. Pettway TR8.8 pts · 2.1 reb · 2 ast
Score 64
←UNCWBig
G D. Williams3.6 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 10
F G. Walsh9.1 pts · 6.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 57
=No call
G J. Williams1 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
F S. Elliott TR4.1 pts · 2.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 23
←UNCWSmall
F T. Claytor TR6.5 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 8
C P. Wessler13.5 pts · 9.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 87
←UNCWBig
F T. Sotirov2.5 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 1
UNC WilmingtonBetterGA Southern
UNCW offense131st of 366 · -3.7
←UNCWBig
GASO defense347th of 366 · -9.4
UNCW defense119th of 366 · -1.8
←UNCWSmall
GASO offense233rd of 366 · -7.2
Backcourt+1.0 · 2 players
←UNCWBig
Backcourt-3.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt+2.5 · 3 players
←UNCWBig
Frontcourt-3.7 · 2 players
Bench-1.4 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-0.8 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestUNCW betterGASO betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
W. Kermoury27 min · TRT. Pettway22 min · TRJ. Lamothe15 minX. Brown12 min · TRM. Smith3 minC. LusterNew
Forwards
G. Walsh26 minS. Elliott17 min · TRT. NelsonNewM. ProdanovicNewW. SewardNew
Centers
P. Wessler27 min
Guards
J. Dixon19 min · TRD. Williams12 minJ. Williams8 minD. GardnerNewA. HendersonNewR. WilliamsNew
Forwards
T. Claytor17 min · TRT. Sotirov11 minE. Smith6 min · TRC. CrissmanNewE. SavaneNewE. JamesNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.6 #174 | Points per game | 79.9 #69 |
| 1.13 #84 | Points per possession | 1.12 #109 |
| 66.1 #310 | Pace (possessions) | 71.8 #42 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.4 #220 | Effective FG% | 51.4 #176 |
| 35.0 #124 | 3-point % | 33.4 #207 |
| 38.8 #194 | 3-point attempt rate | 48.9 #20 |
| 40.4 #54 | Free throw rate | 39.6 #62 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.9 #57 | Turnover rate | 14.7 #49 |
| 35.3 #40 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.8 #238 |
| 13.1 #204 | Assists per game | 10.7 #344 |
| Defense | ||
| 68.1 #32 | Points allowed | 80.3 #325 |
| 1.03 #56 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #259 |
| 47.5 #30 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.3 #230 |
| 29.7 #6 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.4 #208 |
| 14.9 #297 | Turnovers forced | 18.7 #65 |
| 72.4 #51 | Defensive rebound rate | 64.8 #342 |
| 5.1 #330 | Steals per game | 8.1 #36 |
| 2.4 #312 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #128 |
UNC Wilmington
25-7 in 2025-26 overall · 15-4 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Dayton61–80
- W@ Yale68–67
- Lvs Campbell70–85
- W@ Elon76–57
- Lvs Charleston76–79
A week or more of rest.
GA Southern
19-16 in 2025-26 overall · 13-11 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Troy61–77
- Wvs Marshall82–78
- Wvs Coastal96–72
- Wvs South Alabama94–85
- Wvs Arkansas St80–77
A week or more of rest.