Lee & Penny Anderson Arena · at St Thomas
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | STMN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects STMN 77–69 · win probability STMN 77%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: STMN has more of the edges
UNCA 0, STMN 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNCA 17.4%, STMN 14.4%. Forced: UNCA 15.5%, STMN 17.0%
Context
Schedule so far
UNCA has played the 214th-hardest schedule, STMN the 341st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNCA 51.0 and allows 51.3; STMN 58.9 and allows 50.7
UNCA offense vs STMN defense
Offense 294th of 366 against a defense 223rd, on the model’s ratings
Home court
STMN at home. This season: STMN 0-0 at home, UNCA 0-0 away
Three-pointers
UNCA hits 35.1% and allows 32.6%; STMN hits 36.0% and allows 31.7%. Threes are 33.6% and 46.3% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: UNCA plays 68.0 a game (230th fastest), STMN 69.7 (137th). Faster games mean more points
Even
STMN offense vs UNCA defense
Offense 192nd of 366 against a defense 230th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNCA 29.8%, STMN 22.6%. Defensive: UNCA 68.7%, STMN 73.4%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNCA 40.0, STMN 33.8. Allowed: UNCA 38.7, STMN 30.7
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNCA 30%, STMN 35%. Transfers in: UNCA 4, STMN 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | STMN -8.3 | — |
| Total | — | 145.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | UNCA 68.7 · STMN 77 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | STMN -4.8 | — |
| 1H total | 68.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNCA 31.6 · STMN 36.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UNCA 0–1 STMNSTMN leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · UNCA 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2025-26 | STMN 80 @ UNCA 59 | UNCA +3.5 | STMN W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UNC Asheville
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
15-14
52% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg −3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 58-75 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 90-93 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 69-64 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 73-80 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 73-75 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 67-55 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 82-77 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 63-75 | +28.5 | W +16.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 87-90 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 59-80 | +3.5 | L −17.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 47-72 | +13.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 69-87 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 83-86 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 72-61 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 91-72 | +4.5 | W +23.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 70-71 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 67-69 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 83-69 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 69-50 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 71-84 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 76-67 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 79-74 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 57-58 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 48-74 | +14.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 74-73 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 77-71 | -12.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 75-92 | -4.5 | L −21.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 85-82 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 71-75 | +14.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
WICH
L 58-75
−10.5
8
@
GASO
L 90-93
+2.5
11
vs
LIP
W 69-64
−1.5
19
@
WCU
L 73-80
−8.5
25
vs
TNST
L 73-75
−7.5
30
vs
APP
W 67-55
+10.5
2
vs
UNCG
W 82-77
+0.5
6
@
NCSU
L 63-75
+16.5
10
vs
M-OH
L 87-90
+3.5
13
vs
STMN
L 59-80
−17.5
21
@
UAB
L 47-72
−11.5
31
vs
HPU
L 69-87
−7.5
3
@
CHSO
L 83-86
+1.5
7
vs
LONG
W 72-61
+8.5
10
@
RAD
W 91-72
+23.5
14
@
PRES
L 70-71
−3.5
17
vs
WIN
L 67-69
+3.5
21
@
UPST
W 83-69
+15.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 69-50
+1.5
31
@
WIN
L 71-84
−3.5
4
vs
UPST
W 76-67
+2.5
12
@
LONG
W 79-74
+7.5
14
vs
PRES
L 57-58
−6.5
19
@
HPU
L 48-74
−11.5
21
vs
RAD
W 74-73
−1.5
26
@
GWEB
W 77-71
−6.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 75-92
−21.5
6
vs
LONG
W 85-82
+4.5
7
vs
HPU
L 71-75
+10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 14avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
WICH
L 58-75
−24.5
8
@
GASO
L 90-93
+20.5
11
vs
LIP
W 69-64
−25.5
19
@
WCU
L 73-80
+0.5
25
vs
TNST
L 73-75
−16.5
30
vs
APP
W 67-55
−15.5
2
vs
UNCG
W 82-77
+15.5
6
@
NCSU
L 63-75
−17.5
10
vs
M-OH
L 87-90
+24.5
13
vs
STMN
L 59-80
−9.5
21
@
UAB
L 47-72
−32.5
31
vs
HPU
L 69-87
+4.5
3
@
CHSO
L 83-86
+17.5
7
vs
LONG
W 72-61
−15.5
10
@
RAD
W 91-72
+11.5
14
@
PRES
L 70-71
+2.5
17
vs
WIN
L 67-69
−16.5
21
@
UPST
W 83-69
+6.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 69-50
−30.5
31
@
WIN
L 71-84
+7.5
4
vs
UPST
W 76-67
+3.5
12
@
LONG
W 79-74
+11.5
14
vs
PRES
L 57-58
−22.5
19
@
HPU
L 48-74
−30.5
21
vs
RAD
W 74-73
−2.5
26
@
GWEB
W 77-71
+2.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 75-92
+18.5
6
vs
LONG
W 85-82
+26.5
7
vs
HPU
L 71-75
−1.5
over 15under 14avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
St Thomas
31 games played
Straight up
21-10
68% wins
Against the spread
15-16
48% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-15
52% overs · avg −0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 58-84 | +13.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 83-76 | -18.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 71-81 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 157.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 80-61 | -13.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 84-72 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 73-72 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 80-88 | -11.5 | L −19.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 23 | @ | W 76-66 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 74-82 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 88-65 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 80-59 | -3.5 | W +17.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 92-78 | -14.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 92-88 | -11.5 | L −7.5 | 163.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 99-86 | -14.5 | L −1.5 | 162.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 82-71 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 91-80 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 65-68 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 74-69 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 90-78 | -10.5 | W +1.5 | 161.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 80-81 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 99-64 | -17.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 77-62 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 157.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 92-75 | -15.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 94-98 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | O 192 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 104-64 | -12.5 | W +27.5 | 154.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 80-82 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 168.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 84-62 | -3.5 | W +18.5 | 155.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 68-53 | -11.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 80-67 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 66-67 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 17 | @ | L 52-67 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | U 119 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SMC
L 58-84
−12.5
8
vs
ARMY
W 83-76
−11.5
10
@
WSU
L 71-81
−7.5
13
vs
GB
W 80-61
+5.5
15
@
SEMO
W 84-72
+9.5
21
vs
UNCO
W 73-72
−3.5
22
vs
CSUF
L 80-88
−19.5
23
@
PORT
W 76-66
+4.5
3
@
MTST
L 74-82
−5.5
7
vs
WEB
W 88-65
+15.5
13
@
UNCA
W 80-59
+17.5
20
vs
UCR
W 92-78
−0.5
4
vs
DEN
W 92-88
−7.5
7
vs
SDAK
W 99-86
−1.5
10
@
ORU
W 82-71
+2.5
15
@
UND
W 91-80
+0.5
17
@
NDSU
L 65-68
−0.5
22
vs
SDST
W 74-69
−1.5
24
@
SDAK
W 90-78
+1.5
29
vs
UND
L 80-81
−12.5
1
vs
KC
W 99-64
+17.5
4
@
SDST
W 77-62
+16.5
7
vs
ORU
W 92-75
+1.5
12
@
OMA
L 94-98
−8.5
14
@
KC
W 104-64
+27.5
21
@
DEN
L 80-82
−5.5
26
vs
NDSU
W 84-62
+18.5
28
vs
OMA
W 68-53
+3.5
5
vs
SDST
W 80-67
+8.5
7
vs
UND
L 66-67
−12.5
17
@
SEA
L 52-67
−12.5
covered 15didn’t cover 16avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SMC
L 58-84
+0.5
8
vs
ARMY
W 83-76
+7.5
10
@
WSU
L 71-81
−5.5
13
vs
GB
W 80-61
−9.5
15
@
SEMO
W 84-72
+3.5
21
vs
UNCO
W 73-72
−12.5
22
vs
CSUF
L 80-88
+5.5
23
@
PORT
W 76-66
−13.5
3
@
MTST
L 74-82
+8.5
7
vs
WEB
W 88-65
−1.5
13
@
UNCA
W 80-59
−9.5
20
vs
UCR
W 92-78
+17.5
4
vs
DEN
W 92-88
+16.5
7
vs
SDAK
W 99-86
+22.5
10
@
ORU
W 82-71
+0.5
15
@
UND
W 91-80
+19.5
17
@
NDSU
L 65-68
−18.5
22
vs
SDST
W 74-69
−12.5
24
@
SDAK
W 90-78
+6.5
29
vs
UND
L 80-81
+8.5
1
vs
KC
W 99-64
+11.5
4
@
SDST
W 77-62
−18.5
7
vs
ORU
W 92-75
+15.5
12
@
OMA
L 94-98
+35.5
14
@
KC
W 104-64
+13.5
21
@
DEN
L 80-82
−6.5
26
vs
NDSU
W 84-62
−9.5
28
vs
OMA
W 68-53
−37.5
5
vs
SDST
W 80-67
−3.5
7
vs
UND
L 66-67
−20.5
17
@
SEA
L 52-67
−26.5
over 16under 15avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
St Thomas has the better starters
Position by position: UNC Asheville 0, St Thomas 2, even 3
UNC AshevilleBetterSt Thomas
G K. Phipps TR4.1 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 15
→STMNBig
G A. Herro5.7 pts · 4 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 57
G K. Dunn TR7.2 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 9
→STMNSmall
G H. Tibbits2.7 pts · 1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 24
G J. Anderson TR1.7 pts · 3.3 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F C. Bjerke9.2 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 25
F M. Mayfield4 pts · 4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 5
=Even
F C. Wilkins TR6.9 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 9
F D. Thomas2.6 pts · 5 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 5
=No call
F J. Lorenz TR2.2 pts · 1.8 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
UNC AshevilleBetterSt Thomas
UNCA offense294th of 366 · -9.1
→STMNSmall
STMN defense223rd of 366 · -5.8
UNCA defense230th of 366 · -6.1
=Even
STMN offense192nd of 366 · -5.9
Backcourt-4.7 · 3 players
→STMNBig
Backcourt-1.0 · 2 players
Frontcourt-5.8 · 2 players
→STMNSmall
Frontcourt-4.0 · 3 players
Bench-2.6 · 3 players
→STMNSmall
Bench-1.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUNCA betterSTMN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Phipps18 min · TRK. Dunn17 min · TRJ. Anderson17 min · TRC. Jones7 minT. ChatmanNewC. DubskyNew
Forwards
M. Mayfield23 minD. Thomas21 minA. Magassa10 min · TRS. Tolentino8 minB. RiversNewQ. MansfieldNew
Guards
A. Herro24 minH. Tibbits10 minK. Blue4 min · TRT. Franks3 minT. Humphries2 minA. Tauer2 min
Forwards
C. Bjerke25 minC. Wilkins22 min · TRJ. Lorenz10 min · TRK. Counts4 minL. MomcilovicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.9 #248 | Points per game | 80.9 #48 |
| 1.06 #236 | Points per possession | 1.16 #45 |
| 68.0 #230 | Pace (possessions) | 69.7 #137 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #194 | Effective FG% | 58.9 #5 |
| 35.1 #110 | 3-point % | 36.0 #57 |
| 33.6 #307 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.3 #41 |
| 40.0 #60 | Free throw rate | 33.8 #220 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.4 #230 | Turnover rate | 14.4 #37 |
| 29.8 #211 | Offensive rebound rate | 22.6 #353 |
| 10.1 #358 | Assists per game | 16.4 #37 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.2 #161 | Points allowed | 73.1 #135 |
| 1.09 #203 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #82 |
| 51.3 #175 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.7 #139 |
| 32.6 #93 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.7 #52 |
| 15.5 #251 | Turnovers forced | 17.0 #152 |
| 68.7 #218 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.4 #25 |
| 5.1 #324 | Steals per game | 7.5 #87 |
| 3.5 #133 | Blocks per game | 2.6 #296 |
UNC Asheville
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 9-9 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs High Point71–75
- Wvs Longwood85–82
- Lvs Charleston So75–92
- W@ Gardner-Webb77–71
- Wvs Radford74–73
A week or more of rest.
St Thomas
21-10 in 2025-26 overall · 13-5 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Seattle U52–67
- Lvs North Dakota66–67
- Wvs S Dakota St80–67
- Wvs Omaha68–53
- Wvs N Dakota St84–62
A week or more of rest.