Neville Arena · at Auburn
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | AUB | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects AUB 91–66 · win probability AUB 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 157.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: AUB has more of the edges
LIP 1, AUB 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
LIP has played the 267th-hardest schedule, AUB the 10th. A record against a soft schedule means less
AUB offense vs LIP defense
Offense 16th of 366 against a defense 226th, on the model’s ratings
LIP offense vs AUB defense
Offense 191st of 366 against a defense 41st, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LIP 25.8%, AUB 37.0%. Defensive: LIP 69.8%, AUB 69.1%
Free throws
Free throw rate: LIP 26.0, AUB 43.2. Allowed: LIP 29.0, AUB 34.3
Three-pointers
LIP hits 35.7% and allows 34.3%; AUB hits 34.4% and allows 36.7%. Threes are 47.9% and 40.2% of their shots
Home court
AUB at home. This season: AUB 0-0 at home, LIP 0-0 away
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: LIP 54.1 and allows 53.2; AUB 53.0 and allows 53.7
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: LIP plays 70.8 a game (83rd fastest), AUB 69.7 (136th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LIP 44%, AUB 38%. Transfers in: LIP 2, AUB 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LIP 16.0%, AUB 14.6%. Forced: LIP 17.7%, AUB 16.3%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | AUB -25.7 | — |
| Total | — | 157.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | LIP 65.7 · AUB 91.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | AUB -15.1 | — |
| 1H total | 73.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | LIP 29.1 · AUB 44.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Lipscomb
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg −0.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 61-105 | +26.5 | L −17.5 | 154.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 77-92 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 64-69 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 68-75 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 83-62 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 90-67 | +7.5 | W +30.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 88-77 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 83-80 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 92-58 | -11.5 | W +22.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 73-97 | +32.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 62-89 | +13.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 76-57 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 82-74 | -18.5 | L −10.5 | 172.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 83-91 | -11.5 | L −19.5 | 150.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 84-77 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 81-71 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 82-78 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 79-74 | -15.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 86-71 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 65-70 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 100-94 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 76-87 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 78-86 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 75-61 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 160.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 81-87 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 75-72 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 73-51 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 78-84 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 80-77 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 53-77 | -3.5 | L −27.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
VAN
L 61-105
−17.5
9
@
MER
L 77-92
−11.5
11
@
UNCA
L 64-69
+1.5
19
@
BEL
L 68-75
+5.5
22
vs
WCU
W 83-62
+15.5
26
@
MRSH
W 90-67
+30.5
29
@
SEMO
W 88-77
+14.5
3
vs
TNTC
W 83-80
−7.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 92-58
+22.5
16
@
DUKE
L 73-97
+8.5
29
@
CIN
L 62-89
−13.5
1
vs
JAX
W 76-57
+6.5
3
vs
UNF
W 82-74
−10.5
8
@
STET
L 83-91
−19.5
10
@
FGCU
W 84-77
+9.5
15
vs
BELL
W 81-71
−1.5
17
vs
APSU
W 82-78
+1.5
22
vs
STET
W 79-74
−10.5
23
vs
FGCU
W 86-71
+9.5
29
@
JAX
L 65-70
−8.5
31
@
UNF
W 100-94
−4.5
4
@
APSU
L 76-87
−6.5
7
vs
CARK
L 78-86
−11.5
11
vs
EKU
W 75-61
+7.5
14
@
QUC
L 81-87
−2.5
18
@
BELL
W 75-72
−0.5
21
vs
UNA
W 73-51
+9.5
25
@
WGA
L 78-84
−11.5
28
@
EKU
W 80-77
+1.5
6
vs
FGCU
L 53-77
−27.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
VAN
L 61-105
+11.5
9
@
MER
L 77-92
+11.5
11
@
UNCA
L 64-69
−25.5
19
@
BEL
L 68-75
−15.5
22
vs
WCU
W 83-62
−6.5
26
@
MRSH
W 90-67
−0.5
29
@
SEMO
W 88-77
+11.5
3
vs
TNTC
W 83-80
+10.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 92-58
+3.5
16
@
DUKE
L 73-97
+18.5
29
@
CIN
L 62-89
+0.5
1
vs
JAX
W 76-57
−14.5
3
vs
UNF
W 82-74
−16.5
8
@
STET
L 83-91
+23.5
10
@
FGCU
W 84-77
+3.5
15
vs
BELL
W 81-71
−2.5
17
vs
APSU
W 82-78
+4.5
22
vs
STET
W 79-74
−4.5
23
vs
FGCU
W 86-71
+3.5
29
@
JAX
L 65-70
−7.5
31
@
UNF
W 100-94
+28.5
4
@
APSU
L 76-87
+6.5
7
vs
CARK
L 78-86
+8.5
11
vs
EKU
W 75-61
−24.5
14
@
QUC
L 81-87
+2.5
18
@
BELL
W 75-72
−7.5
21
vs
UNA
W 73-51
−25.5
25
@
WGA
L 78-84
+8.5
28
@
EKU
W 80-77
−0.5
6
vs
FGCU
L 53-77
−20.5
over 16under 14avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Auburn
38 games played
Straight up
22-16
58% wins
Against the spread
16-22
42% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-16
58% overs · avg +4.3 pts vs the total
Against the spread
16-2242%
2 straight covers2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 95-90 | -24.5 | L −19.5 | 153.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 95-57 | -23.5 | W +14.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 93-62 | -27.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 72-73 | +7.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 112-66 | -30.5 | W +15.5 | 156.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 84-73 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 72-102 | +4.5 | L −25.5 | 163.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 85-74 | +4.5 | W +15.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 83-73 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 68-97 | +11.5 | L −17.5 | 162.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 92-78 | -19.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 60-88 | +7.5 | L −20.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 106-65 | -25.5 | W +15.5 | 171.5 | U 171 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 100-104 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 173.5 | O 204 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 88-90 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 168.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 95-73 | -2.5 | W +19.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 74-84 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 71-67 | -13.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 78-66 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 76-67 | +11.5 | W +20.5 | 159.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 88-82 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 69-77 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 92-96 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 175.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 76-84 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 161.5 | U 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 75-88 | +7.5 | L −5.5 | 165.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 85-91 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 75-74 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 79-91 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 157.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 79-85 | -10.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 88-74 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 155.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 84-96 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 175.5 | O 180 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 79-61 | -8.5 | W +9.5 | 160.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 62-72 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 78-67 | -18.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 91-85 | -14.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 176 |
| Mar 25 | vs | W 75-69 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Apr 2 | vs | W 88-66 | -7.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Apr 5 | vs | W 92-86 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 178 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BCU
W 95-90
−19.5
6
vs
MRMK
W 95-57
+14.5
11
vs
WOF
W 93-62
+3.5
16
vs
HOU
L 72-73
+6.5
19
vs
JKST
W 112-66
+15.5
24
vs
ORE
W 84-73
+6.5
25
vs
MICH
L 72-102
−25.5
26
vs
SJU
W 85-74
+15.5
3
vs
NCSU
W 83-73
+4.5
6
@
ARIZ
L 68-97
−17.5
13
vs
UTC
W 92-78
−5.5
20
vs
PUR
L 60-88
−20.5
29
vs
QUC
W 106-65
+15.5
3
@
UGA
L 100-104
+2.5
6
vs
TA&M
L 88-90
−8.5
10
vs
ARK
W 95-73
+19.5
14
@
MIZ
L 74-84
−11.5
17
vs
SC
W 71-67
−9.5
20
@
MISS
W 78-66
+8.5
24
@
FLA
W 76-67
+20.5
28
vs
TEX
W 88-82
−0.5
31
@
TENN
L 69-77
−2.5
7
vs
ALA
L 92-96
−6.5
10
vs
VAN
L 76-84
−11.5
14
@
ARK
L 75-88
−5.5
18
@
MSST
L 85-91
−11.5
21
vs
UK
W 75-74
−2.5
24
@
OU
L 79-91
−15.5
28
vs
MISS
L 79-85
−16.5
3
vs
LSU
W 88-74
+3.5
7
@
ALA
L 84-96
−6.5
11
vs
MSST
W 79-61
+9.5
12
vs
TENN
L 62-72
−4.5
17
vs
USA
W 78-67
−7.5
22
vs
SEA
W 91-85
−8.5
25
vs
NEV
W 75-69
−2.5
2
vs
ILST
W 88-66
+14.5
5
vs
TLSA
W 92-86
+0.5
covered 16didn’t cover 22avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BCU
W 95-90
+31.5
6
vs
MRMK
W 95-57
+3.5
11
vs
WOF
W 93-62
+2.5
16
vs
HOU
L 72-73
+4.5
19
vs
JKST
W 112-66
+21.5
24
vs
ORE
W 84-73
+1.5
25
vs
MICH
L 72-102
+10.5
26
vs
SJU
W 85-74
−7.5
3
vs
NCSU
W 83-73
−6.5
6
@
ARIZ
L 68-97
+2.5
13
vs
UTC
W 92-78
+19.5
20
vs
PUR
L 60-88
−4.5
29
vs
QUC
W 106-65
−0.5
3
@
UGA
L 100-104
+30.5
6
vs
TA&M
L 88-90
+9.5
10
vs
ARK
W 95-73
−1.5
14
@
MIZ
L 74-84
+4.5
17
vs
SC
W 71-67
−14.5
20
@
MISS
W 78-66
−7.5
24
@
FLA
W 76-67
−16.5
28
vs
TEX
W 88-82
+15.5
31
@
TENN
L 69-77
−1.5
7
vs
ALA
L 92-96
+12.5
10
vs
VAN
L 76-84
−1.5
14
@
ARK
L 75-88
−2.5
18
@
MSST
L 85-91
+20.5
21
vs
UK
W 75-74
−4.5
24
@
OU
L 79-91
+12.5
28
vs
MISS
L 79-85
+10.5
3
vs
LSU
W 88-74
+6.5
7
@
ALA
L 84-96
+4.5
11
vs
MSST
W 79-61
−20.5
12
vs
TENN
L 62-72
−10.5
17
vs
USA
W 78-67
−6.5
22
vs
SEA
W 91-85
+30.5
25
vs
NEV
W 75-69
−7.5
2
vs
ILST
W 88-66
+4.5
5
vs
TLSA
W 92-86
+19.5
over 22under 16avg +4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Auburn has the better starters
Position by position: Lipscomb 0, Auburn 3, even 2
LipscombBetterAuburn
G T. Simpkins TR12.5 pts · 2.9 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 79
=Even
G T. Pettiford15.4 pts · 3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 88
G M. Esmeraldo9.8 pts · 3.9 reb · 6.9 ast
Score 81
=Even
G K. Overton14.1 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 90
F T. Sargiunas9.9 pts · 2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 28
→AUBBig
G K. King TR7.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 83
F O. Ashkenazi2.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 3
→AUBBig
F T. Dowd TR14.5 pts · 10.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 83
F T. Byrne TR3.8 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 4
→AUBBig
F A. Olsen TR17 pts · 4.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 66
LipscombBetterAuburn
LIP offense191st of 366 · -5.9
→AUBBig
AUB defense41st of 366 · +2.8
LIP defense226th of 366 · -6.0
→AUBBig
AUB offense16th of 366 · +8.7
Backcourt+3.0 · 2 players
→AUBBig
Backcourt+6.5 · 3 players
Frontcourt-6.7 · 3 players
→AUBBig
Frontcourt+3.6 · 2 players
Bench-1.1 · 1 player
→AUBBig
Bench+3.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestLIP betterAUB betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Simpkins32 min · TRM. Esmeraldo31 minZ. WellsNewV. VisnjicNewH. TidareNewK. QuinnNew
Forwards
T. Sargiunas24 minO. Ashkenazi20 minT. Byrne16 min · TRK. Okpara13 minL. JackNewD. MartinNew
Guards
T. Pettiford32 minK. Overton32 minK. King19 min · TRB. Muschalek6 minS. Walker5 minD. Cardwell1 min
Forwards
T. Dowd37 min · TRA. Olsen37 min · TRO. Freeman12 min · TRJ. BowmanNew
Centers
B. Oboye18 min · TRN. NgoyNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.6 #104 | Points per game | 83.0 #27 |
| 1.10 #142 | Points per possession | 1.19 #19 |
| 70.8 #83 | Pace (possessions) | 69.7 #136 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.1 #67 | Effective FG% | 53.0 #104 |
| 35.7 #75 | 3-point % | 34.4 #147 |
| 47.9 #24 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.2 #166 |
| 26.0 #357 | Free throw rate | 43.2 #19 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.0 #142 | Turnover rate | 14.6 #45 |
| 25.8 #327 | Offensive rebound rate | 37.0 #15 |
| 17.2 #19 | Assists per game | 13.2 #198 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.0 #242 | Points allowed | 78.8 #287 |
| 1.09 #187 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #281 |
| 53.2 #273 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.7 #291 |
| 34.3 #207 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.7 #336 |
| 17.7 #113 | Turnovers forced | 16.3 #201 |
| 69.8 #171 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.1 #196 |
| 6.8 #141 | Steals per game | 7.5 #83 |
| 2.6 #291 | Blocks per game | 4.1 #63 |
Lipscomb
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 12-7 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs FGCU53–77
- W@ E Kentucky80–77
- L@ West Georgia78–84
- Wvs North Alabama73–51
- W@ Bellarmine75–72
A week or more of rest.
Auburn
22-16 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Tulsa92–86
- Wvs Illinois St88–66
- Wvs Nevada75–69
- Wvs Seattle U91–85
- Wvs South Alabama78–67
A week or more of rest.