Baptist Health Arena · at E Kentucky
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | EKU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LIP 78–75 · win probability LIP 59%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: LIP has more of the edges
LIP 5, EKU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
LIP offense vs EKU defense
Offense 191st of 366 against a defense 340th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LIP 16.0%, EKU 16.9%. Forced: LIP 17.7%, EKU 14.8%
Free throws
Free throw rate: LIP 26.0, EKU 30.7. Allowed: LIP 29.0, EKU 38.5
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LIP 25.8%, EKU 32.5%. Defensive: LIP 69.8%, EKU 68.3%
Shooting
Effective FG%: LIP 54.1 and allows 53.2; EKU 52.1 and allows 56.1
Three-pointers
LIP hits 35.7% and allows 34.3%; EKU hits 35.0% and allows 36.2%. Threes are 47.9% and 50.8% of their shots
Home court
EKU at home. This season: EKU 0-0 at home, LIP 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LIP 44%, EKU 29%. Transfers in: LIP 2, EKU 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: LIP plays 70.8 a game (83rd fastest), EKU 69.8 (128th). Faster games mean more points
Even
EKU offense vs LIP defense
Offense 244th of 366 against a defense 226th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
LIP has played the 267th-hardest schedule, EKU the 273rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | LIP -2.6 | — |
| Total | — | 152.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | LIP 77.7 · EKU 75.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | LIP -1.7 | — |
| 1H total | 71.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | LIP 36.6 · EKU 34.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22
LIP 5–4 EKULIP leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · LIP has won the last 2 meetings · LIP 5-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2025-26 | LIP 80 @ EKU 77 | EKU +1.5 | LIP W |
| Feb 11, 2025-26 | EKU 61 @ LIP 75 | LIP -6.5 | LIP W |
| Feb 18, 2024-25 | LIP 57 @ EKU 66 | EKU +3.5 | EKU W |
| Jan 30, 2024-25 | EKU 80 @ LIP 71 | LIP -8.5 | EKU W |
| Mar 1, 2023-24 | EKU 67 @ LIP 81 | LIP -3.5 | LIP W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Lipscomb
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg −0.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 61-105 | +26.5 | L −17.5 | 154.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 77-92 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 64-69 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 68-75 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 83-62 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 90-67 | +7.5 | W +30.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 88-77 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 83-80 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 92-58 | -11.5 | W +22.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 73-97 | +32.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 62-89 | +13.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 76-57 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 82-74 | -18.5 | L −10.5 | 172.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 83-91 | -11.5 | L −19.5 | 150.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 84-77 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 81-71 | -11.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 82-78 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 79-74 | -15.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 86-71 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 65-70 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 100-94 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 76-87 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 78-86 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 75-61 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 160.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 81-87 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 75-72 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 73-51 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 78-84 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 80-77 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 53-77 | -3.5 | L −27.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
VAN
L 61-105
−17.5
9
@
MER
L 77-92
−11.5
11
@
UNCA
L 64-69
+1.5
19
@
BEL
L 68-75
+5.5
22
vs
WCU
W 83-62
+15.5
26
@
MRSH
W 90-67
+30.5
29
@
SEMO
W 88-77
+14.5
3
vs
TNTC
W 83-80
−7.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 92-58
+22.5
16
@
DUKE
L 73-97
+8.5
29
@
CIN
L 62-89
−13.5
1
vs
JAX
W 76-57
+6.5
3
vs
UNF
W 82-74
−10.5
8
@
STET
L 83-91
−19.5
10
@
FGCU
W 84-77
+9.5
15
vs
BELL
W 81-71
−1.5
17
vs
APSU
W 82-78
+1.5
22
vs
STET
W 79-74
−10.5
23
vs
FGCU
W 86-71
+9.5
29
@
JAX
L 65-70
−8.5
31
@
UNF
W 100-94
−4.5
4
@
APSU
L 76-87
−6.5
7
vs
CARK
L 78-86
−11.5
11
vs
EKU
W 75-61
+7.5
14
@
QUC
L 81-87
−2.5
18
@
BELL
W 75-72
−0.5
21
vs
UNA
W 73-51
+9.5
25
@
WGA
L 78-84
−11.5
28
@
EKU
W 80-77
+1.5
6
vs
FGCU
L 53-77
−27.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
VAN
L 61-105
+11.5
9
@
MER
L 77-92
+11.5
11
@
UNCA
L 64-69
−25.5
19
@
BEL
L 68-75
−15.5
22
vs
WCU
W 83-62
−6.5
26
@
MRSH
W 90-67
−0.5
29
@
SEMO
W 88-77
+11.5
3
vs
TNTC
W 83-80
+10.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 92-58
+3.5
16
@
DUKE
L 73-97
+18.5
29
@
CIN
L 62-89
+0.5
1
vs
JAX
W 76-57
−14.5
3
vs
UNF
W 82-74
−16.5
8
@
STET
L 83-91
+23.5
10
@
FGCU
W 84-77
+3.5
15
vs
BELL
W 81-71
−2.5
17
vs
APSU
W 82-78
+4.5
22
vs
STET
W 79-74
−4.5
23
vs
FGCU
W 86-71
+3.5
29
@
JAX
L 65-70
−7.5
31
@
UNF
W 100-94
+28.5
4
@
APSU
L 76-87
+6.5
7
vs
CARK
L 78-86
+8.5
11
vs
EKU
W 75-61
−24.5
14
@
QUC
L 81-87
+2.5
18
@
BELL
W 75-72
−7.5
21
vs
UNA
W 73-51
−25.5
25
@
WGA
L 78-84
+8.5
28
@
EKU
W 80-77
−0.5
6
vs
FGCU
L 53-77
−20.5
over 16under 14avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
E Kentucky
30 games played
Straight up
9-21
30% wins
Against the spread
11-19
37% covers · avg −3.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-11
63% overs · avg +4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | vs | L 79-87 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 62-92 | +28.5 | L −1.5 | 168.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 78-93 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 83-95 | -4.5 | L −16.5 | 163.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 71-82 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 77-83 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 78-89 | +12.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 10 | @ | W 68-59 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 69-79 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 62-59 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 57-88 | +14.5 | L −16.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 89-91 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 76-88 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 88-80 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 79-75 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 72-74 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 89-69 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 85-87 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 166.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 76-81 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 82-90 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 81-90 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 76-74 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 100-88 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 61-75 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 160.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 78-84 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 81-80 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 95-92 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 79-96 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 165.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 77-80 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 76-92 | -5.5 | L −21.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
10
vs
WKU
L 79-87
−6.5
12
@
VAN
L 62-92
−1.5
18
@
KENT
L 78-93
−4.5
22
vs
MER
L 83-95
−16.5
24
@
NKU
L 71-82
−6.5
29
vs
WOF
L 77-83
−4.5
3
@
ILST
L 78-89
+1.5
10
@
EIU
W 68-59
+2.5
13
vs
M-OH
L 69-79
−4.5
17
@
JXST
W 62-59
+5.5
21
@
WICH
L 57-88
−16.5
1
@
QUC
L 89-91
+2.5
3
@
WGA
L 76-88
−13.5
8
vs
UNA
W 88-80
+2.5
10
vs
CARK
W 79-75
+5.5
15
@
APSU
L 72-74
+5.5
17
vs
BELL
W 89-69
+14.5
22
@
UNF
L 85-87
−10.5
24
@
JAX
L 76-81
−3.5
28
vs
APSU
L 82-90
−5.5
31
@
CARK
L 81-90
−4.5
5
vs
FGCU
W 76-74
+0.5
7
vs
STET
W 100-88
+2.5
11
@
LIP
L 61-75
−7.5
15
@
UNA
L 78-84
−10.5
18
vs
WGA
W 81-80
−6.5
21
@
BELL
W 95-92
+1.5
25
vs
QUC
L 79-96
−14.5
28
vs
LIP
L 77-80
−1.5
4
vs
STET
L 76-92
−21.5
covered 11didn’t cover 19avg −3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
10
vs
WKU
L 79-87
+3.5
12
@
VAN
L 62-92
−14.5
18
@
KENT
L 78-93
+9.5
22
vs
MER
L 83-95
+14.5
24
@
NKU
L 71-82
−3.5
29
vs
WOF
L 77-83
+6.5
3
@
ILST
L 78-89
+12.5
10
@
EIU
W 68-59
−22.5
13
vs
M-OH
L 69-79
−10.5
17
@
JXST
W 62-59
−21.5
21
@
WICH
L 57-88
−3.5
1
@
QUC
L 89-91
+15.5
3
@
WGA
L 76-88
+7.5
8
vs
UNA
W 88-80
+19.5
10
vs
CARK
W 79-75
−2.5
15
@
APSU
L 72-74
−7.5
17
vs
BELL
W 89-69
+1.5
22
@
UNF
L 85-87
+5.5
24
@
JAX
L 76-81
+14.5
28
vs
APSU
L 82-90
+20.5
31
@
CARK
L 81-90
+19.5
5
vs
FGCU
W 76-74
−4.5
7
vs
STET
W 100-88
+36.5
11
@
LIP
L 61-75
−24.5
15
@
UNA
L 78-84
+11.5
18
vs
WGA
W 81-80
+6.5
21
@
BELL
W 95-92
+33.5
25
vs
QUC
L 79-96
+9.5
28
vs
LIP
L 77-80
−0.5
4
vs
STET
L 76-92
+12.5
over 19under 11avg +4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Lipscomb 1, E Kentucky 1, even 3
LipscombBetterE Kentucky
G T. Simpkins TR12.5 pts · 2.9 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 79
←LIPBig
G J. Holt7 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 38
G M. Esmeraldo9.8 pts · 3.9 reb · 6.9 ast
Score 81
=No call
G D. King TR2.3 pts · 0.5 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
F T. Sargiunas9.9 pts · 2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 28
=Even
F S. Lasu TR5.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 15
F O. Ashkenazi2.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 3
→EKUSmall
F A. Ball7.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 20
F T. Byrne TR3.8 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 4
=Even
F Y. Paul4.2 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 12
LipscombBetterE Kentucky
LIP offense191st of 366 · -5.9
←LIPBig
EKU defense340th of 366 · -9.1
LIP defense226th of 366 · -6.0
=Even
EKU offense244th of 366 · -7.4
Backcourt+3.0 · 2 players
←LIPBig
Backcourt-1.1 · 2 players
Frontcourt-6.7 · 3 players
→EKUSmall
Frontcourt-5.3 · 3 players
Bench-1.1 · 1 player
=Even
Bench-0.4 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestLIP betterEKU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Simpkins32 min · TRM. Esmeraldo31 minZ. WellsNewV. VisnjicNewH. TidareNewK. QuinnNew
Forwards
T. Sargiunas24 minO. Ashkenazi20 minT. Byrne16 min · TRK. Okpara13 minL. JackNewD. MartinNew
Guards
J. Holt20 minD. King8 min · TRO. Hamama7 min · TRM. Miles1 minJ. McCarterNewD. VasserNew
Forwards
S. Lasu23 min · TRA. Ball20 minY. Paul17 minD. DujmovicNewJ. LoweNewM. CamaraNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.6 #104 | Points per game | 77.5 #107 |
| 1.10 #142 | Points per possession | 1.11 #123 |
| 70.8 #83 | Pace (possessions) | 69.8 #128 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.1 #67 | Effective FG% | 52.1 #141 |
| 35.7 #75 | 3-point % | 35.0 #111 |
| 47.9 #24 | 3-point attempt rate | 50.8 #10 |
| 26.0 #357 | Free throw rate | 30.7 #286 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.0 #142 | Turnover rate | 16.9 #194 |
| 25.8 #327 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.5 #106 |
| 17.2 #19 | Assists per game | 14.1 #139 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.0 #242 | Points allowed | 83.1 #346 |
| 1.09 #187 | Points allowed per possession | 1.19 #354 |
| 53.2 #273 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.1 #346 |
| 34.3 #207 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.2 #312 |
| 17.7 #113 | Turnovers forced | 14.8 #304 |
| 69.8 #171 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.3 #241 |
| 6.8 #141 | Steals per game | 6.1 #228 |
| 2.6 #291 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #245 |
Lipscomb
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 12-7 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs FGCU53–77
- W@ E Kentucky80–77
- L@ West Georgia78–84
- Wvs North Alabama73–51
- W@ Bellarmine75–72
A week or more of rest.
E Kentucky
9-21 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Stetson76–92
- Lvs Lipscomb77–80
- Lvs Queens University Royals79–96
- W@ Bellarmine95–92
- Wvs West Georgia81–80
A week or more of rest.