First Bank & Trust Arena · at S Dakota St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SDST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SDST 74–73 · win probability SDST 51%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: VAL has more of the edges
VAL 3, SDST 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
VAL has played the 143rd-hardest schedule, SDST the 271st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: VAL 39.1, SDST 29.7. Allowed: VAL 35.1, SDST 34.5
Turnovers
Turnover rate: VAL 15.7%, SDST 16.2%. Forced: VAL 16.9%, SDST 14.5%
Three-pointers
VAL hits 33.9% and allows 32.1%; SDST hits 34.0% and allows 34.1%. Threes are 36.8% and 38.8% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: VAL 47.6 and allows 50.5; SDST 52.0 and allows 51.8
Home court
SDST at home. This season: SDST 0-0 at home, VAL 0-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: VAL 32.5%, SDST 30.3%. Defensive: VAL 69.9%, SDST 74.9%
Even
VAL offense vs SDST defense
Offense 199th of 366 against a defense 221st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: VAL plays 67.4 a game (258th fastest), SDST 68.2 (220th). Faster games mean more points
Even
SDST offense vs VAL defense
Offense 185th of 366 against a defense 170th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: VAL 51%, SDST 51%. Transfers in: VAL 2, SDST 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SDST -0.4 | — |
| Total | — | 146.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | VAL 73.2 · SDST 73.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SDST -0.1 | — |
| 1H total | 68.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | VAL 34.3 · SDST 34.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
VAL 0–1 SDSTSDST leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · VAL 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2022-23 | SDST 61 vs VAL 50 | VAL +9.5 | SDST W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Valparaiso
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +2.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg −0.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 66-63 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 59-107 | +32.5 | L −15.5 | 157.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 68-63 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 68-50 | -6.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 90-75 | +2.5 | W +17.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 56-64 | -9.5 | L −17.5 | 150.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 84-55 | -4.5 | W +24.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 72-75 | +17.5 | W +14.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 70-73 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 70-86 | +14.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 79-85 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 48-58 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 131.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 70-75 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 66-59 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 77-71 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 79-92 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 74-78 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 54-44 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 130.5 | U 98 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 69-63 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 77-78 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 76-72 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 65-72 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 70-63 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 81-76 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 64-86 | +8.5 | L −13.5 | 138.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 76-75 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 79-72 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 71-67 | +7.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 74-71 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 79-80 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 63-62 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 84-90 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | O 174 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
EIU
W 66-63
−2.5
7
@
UK
L 59-107
−15.5
12
vs
NICH
W 68-63
+2.5
16
vs
BRY
W 68-50
+11.5
19
@
CLE
W 90-75
+17.5
26
vs
USI
L 56-64
−17.5
29
vs
WMU
W 84-55
+24.5
2
@
MARQ
L 72-75
+14.5
13
vs
UNCW
L 70-73
+1.5
16
@
NU
L 70-86
−1.5
21
vs
MUR
L 79-85
−0.5
29
@
UNI
L 48-58
−1.5
1
@
SIU
L 70-75
+2.5
4
vs
UIC
W 66-59
+4.5
7
vs
ILST
W 77-71
+12.5
10
@
MUR
L 79-92
−0.5
13
@
BEL
L 74-78
+7.5
17
vs
UNI
W 54-44
+11.5
21
vs
SIU
W 69-63
+4.5
28
vs
BEL
L 77-78
+4.5
31
@
INST
W 76-72
+6.5
3
@
BRAD
L 65-72
+0.5
6
vs
EVAN
W 70-63
−1.5
9
@
DRKE
W 81-76
+8.5
12
@
ILST
L 64-86
−13.5
15
vs
INST
W 76-75
−3.5
18
vs
BRAD
W 79-72
+9.5
21
@
UIC
W 71-67
+11.5
25
vs
DRKE
W 74-71
+0.5
28
@
EVAN
L 79-80
−6.5
5
vs
INST
W 63-62
−1.5
6
vs
BRAD
L 84-90
−0.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
EIU
W 66-63
−15.5
7
@
UK
L 59-107
+8.5
12
vs
NICH
W 68-63
−13.5
16
vs
BRY
W 68-50
−25.5
19
@
CLE
W 90-75
+6.5
26
vs
USI
L 56-64
−30.5
29
vs
WMU
W 84-55
−7.5
2
@
MARQ
L 72-75
+0.5
13
vs
UNCW
L 70-73
+6.5
16
@
NU
L 70-86
+10.5
21
vs
MUR
L 79-85
+8.5
29
@
UNI
L 48-58
−25.5
1
@
SIU
L 70-75
−0.5
4
vs
UIC
W 66-59
−19.5
7
vs
ILST
W 77-71
+9.5
10
@
MUR
L 79-92
+18.5
13
@
BEL
L 74-78
+5.5
17
vs
UNI
W 54-44
−32.5
21
vs
SIU
W 69-63
−10.5
28
vs
BEL
L 77-78
+9.5
31
@
INST
W 76-72
+2.5
3
@
BRAD
L 65-72
−7.5
6
vs
EVAN
W 70-63
−3.5
9
@
DRKE
W 81-76
+12.5
12
@
ILST
L 64-86
+11.5
15
vs
INST
W 76-75
+5.5
18
vs
BRAD
W 79-72
+8.5
21
@
UIC
W 71-67
−0.5
25
vs
DRKE
W 74-71
−1.5
28
@
EVAN
L 79-80
+21.5
5
vs
INST
W 63-62
−15.5
6
vs
BRAD
L 84-90
+34.5
over 17under 15avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
S Dakota St
29 games played
Straight up
11-18
38% wins
Against the spread
12-17
41% covers · avg −1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg −2.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 75-66 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 58-65 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 69-83 | +16.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 105-58 | -12.5 | W +34.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 52-75 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 151.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 52-64 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 116 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 75-62 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 81-84 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 9 | @ | W 68-64 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 15 | vs | L 72-87 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 87-88 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 71-99 | +31.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 84-69 | -9.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 87-90 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 87-79 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 65-76 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 90-62 | -13.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 69-74 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 71-80 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 95-72 | -13.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 62-77 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 157.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 67-68 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 61-79 | -2.5 | L −20.5 | 160.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 87-69 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 66-74 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 91-83 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 73-59 | -12.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 70-75 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 67-80 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MRMK
W 75-66
+2.5
9
@
UNI
L 58-65
+3.5
12
@
ORE
L 69-83
+2.5
21
vs
GAST
W 105-58
+34.5
25
vs
UVU
L 52-75
−21.5
26
vs
UCI
L 52-64
−9.5
3
@
NAU
W 75-62
+10.5
6
vs
IDHO
L 81-84
−8.5
9
@
BALL
W 68-64
−1.5
15
vs
WYO
L 72-87
−11.5
19
@
MILW
L 87-88
−2.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 71-99
+3.5
1
vs
OMA
W 84-69
+5.5
3
@
UND
L 87-90
−10.5
8
vs
DEN
W 87-79
−0.5
14
@
NDSU
L 65-76
−5.5
17
vs
KC
W 90-62
+14.5
22
@
STMN
L 69-74
+1.5
28
@
OMA
L 71-80
−10.5
31
vs
ORU
W 95-72
+9.5
4
vs
STMN
L 62-77
−16.5
7
vs
SDAK
L 67-68
−12.5
12
@
DEN
L 61-79
−20.5
14
@
ORU
W 87-69
+12.5
18
vs
NDSU
L 66-74
−6.5
21
vs
UND
W 91-83
−1.5
26
@
KC
W 73-59
+1.5
28
@
SDAK
L 70-75
−8.5
5
vs
STMN
L 67-80
−8.5
covered 12didn’t cover 17avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MRMK
W 75-66
−2.5
9
@
UNI
L 58-65
−27.5
12
@
ORE
L 69-83
+6.5
21
vs
GAST
W 105-58
+19.5
25
vs
UVU
L 52-75
−24.5
26
vs
UCI
L 52-64
−28.5
3
@
NAU
W 75-62
−11.5
6
vs
IDHO
L 81-84
+17.5
9
@
BALL
W 68-64
−10.5
15
vs
WYO
L 72-87
+9.5
19
@
MILW
L 87-88
+23.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 71-99
+10.5
1
vs
OMA
W 84-69
+0.5
3
@
UND
L 87-90
+24.5
8
vs
DEN
W 87-79
+3.5
14
@
NDSU
L 65-76
−10.5
17
vs
KC
W 90-62
+0.5
22
@
STMN
L 69-74
−12.5
28
@
OMA
L 71-80
+0.5
31
vs
ORU
W 95-72
+16.5
4
vs
STMN
L 62-77
−18.5
7
vs
SDAK
L 67-68
−24.5
12
@
DEN
L 61-79
−20.5
14
@
ORU
W 87-69
+8.5
18
vs
NDSU
L 66-74
−6.5
21
vs
UND
W 91-83
+22.5
26
@
KC
W 73-59
−20.5
28
@
SDAK
L 70-75
−6.5
5
vs
STMN
L 67-80
−3.5
over 14under 15avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Valparaiso has the better starters
Position by position: Valparaiso 2, S Dakota St 1, even 2
ValparaisoBetterS Dakota St
G R. Chaney10.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 62
=Even
G J. Sayler14.8 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 54
G B. Alocen TR6.4 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 34
→SDSTSmall
G K. Garry10.6 pts · 5.1 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 49
G J. McNair7.9 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 65
←VALBig
G E. Ryans TR7.7 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 12
F J. Pettigrew12.6 pts · 6.9 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 70
←VALSmall
F M. Thompson TR10.8 pts · 6.1 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 38
F C. Hopoi3.5 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 23
=Even
C A. Squires4.4 pts · 3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 29
ValparaisoBetterS Dakota St
VAL offense199th of 366 · -6.1
=Even
SDST defense221st of 366 · -5.7
VAL defense170th of 366 · -3.9
=Even
SDST offense185th of 366 · -5.7
Backcourt-1.1 · 3 players
←VALBig
Backcourt-4.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.1 · 2 players
←VALSmall
Frontcourt-1.8 · 2 players
Bench-0.5 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-1.4 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestVAL betterSDST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Chaney29 minB. Alocen22 min · TRJ. McNair18 minS. Servilus10 minN. Lombardi1 minC. Webster1 min
Forwards
J. Pettigrew28 minC. Hopoi15 minK. WalkerNewG. RichardsonNewH. ScrogginsNew
Centers
K. Yu8 min · TR
Guards
J. Sayler33 minK. Garry30 minE. Ryans27 min · TRT. Buchanan13 minJ. Rogers9 minJ. Cascio Jensen2 min
Forwards
M. Thompson29 min · TRJ. Mekonnen4 min · TRJ. Van KalsbeekNewD. KernNewY. YatabareNewB. EllweinNew
Centers
A. Squires14 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.2 #263 | Points per game | 74.4 #182 |
| 1.06 #233 | Points per possession | 1.09 #150 |
| 67.4 #258 | Pace (possessions) | 68.2 #220 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.6 #322 | Effective FG% | 52.0 #143 |
| 33.9 #180 | 3-point % | 34.0 #174 |
| 36.8 #234 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.8 #193 |
| 39.1 #79 | Free throw rate | 29.7 #317 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.7 #116 | Turnover rate | 16.2 #150 |
| 32.5 #110 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.3 #186 |
| 11.7 #307 | Assists per game | 13.8 #160 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.9 #103 | Points allowed | 74.5 #177 |
| 1.06 #116 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #198 |
| 50.5 #130 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.8 #204 |
| 32.1 #70 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.1 #191 |
| 16.9 #161 | Turnovers forced | 14.5 #323 |
| 69.9 #167 | Defensive rebound rate | 74.9 #9 |
| 5.9 #245 | Steals per game | 5.5 #291 |
| 3.6 #124 | Blocks per game | 2.2 #336 |
Valparaiso
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 12-10 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Bradley84–90
- Wvs Indiana St63–62
- L@ Evansville79–80
- Wvs Drake74–71
- W@ UIC71–67
A week or more of rest.
S Dakota St
11-18 in 2025-26 overall · 7-10 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs St Thomas67–80
- L@ South Dakota70–75
- W@ Kansas City73–59
- Wvs North Dakota91–83
- Lvs N Dakota St66–74
A week or more of rest.