Athletics-Recreation Center · at Valparaiso
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | VAL | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects VAL 77–74 · win probability VAL 60%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TOL has more of the edges
TOL 3, VAL 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: TOL 29.5%, VAL 32.5%. Defensive: TOL 66.3%, VAL 69.9%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: TOL 14.7%, VAL 15.7%. Forced: TOL 17.9%, VAL 16.9%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: TOL plays 69.5 a game (146th fastest), VAL 67.4 (258th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
VAL at home. This season: VAL 0-0 at home, TOL 0-0 away
TOL offense vs VAL defense
Offense 121st of 366 against a defense 170th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: TOL 54.5 and allows 54.3; VAL 47.6 and allows 50.5
Even
VAL offense vs TOL defense
Offense 199th of 366 against a defense 234th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
TOL has played the 172nd-hardest schedule, VAL the 143rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: TOL 30.5, VAL 39.1. Allowed: TOL 26.6, VAL 35.1
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: TOL 43%, VAL 51%. Transfers in: TOL 2, VAL 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Three-pointers
TOL hits 37.0% and allows 34.4%; VAL hits 33.9% and allows 32.1%. Threes are 32.5% and 36.8% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | VAL -3.0 | — |
| Total | — | 150.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | TOL 73.7 · VAL 76.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | VAL -1.7 | — |
| 1H total | 70.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | TOL 34.4 · VAL 36 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | |
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
TOL 2–0 VALTOL leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · TOL has won the last 2 meetings · TOL 2-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2022-23 | VAL 70 @ TOL 85 | TOL -13 | TOL W |
| Nov 9, 2021-22 | TOL 69 @ VAL 61 | VAL +5 | TOL W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Toledo
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-19
41% overs · avg −0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 74-76 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 73-85 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 81-71 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 159.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 90-83 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 92-75 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 75-68 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 72-87 | +4.5 | L −10.5 | 163.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 97-98 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 166.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 70-75 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 69-92 | +23.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 84-79 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 78-75 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 75-61 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 73-87 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 166.5 | U 160 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 101-85 | -2.5 | W +13.5 | 161.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 84-87 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 168.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 82-84 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 164.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 73-72 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 81-91 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 168.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 73-55 | -8.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 72-75 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 161.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 71-73 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 90-79 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 70-80 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 94-75 | -8.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 79-69 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 79-67 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 72-74 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 99-78 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 155.5 | O 177 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 77-76 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 77-67 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 76-79 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
USA
L 74-76
−4.5
8
vs
MRSH
L 73-85
−14.5
11
@
WRST
W 81-71
+15.5
15
vs
DETM
W 90-83
−3.5
19
vs
YSU
W 92-75
+15.5
24
vs
TROY
W 75-68
+9.5
26
vs
BEL
L 72-87
−10.5
6
@
OAK
L 97-98
+3.5
13
@
RMU
L 70-75
−6.5
16
@
MSU
L 69-92
+0.5
30
vs
WMU
W 84-79
−5.5
3
@
CMU
W 78-75
−4.5
6
@
NIU
W 75-61
+6.5
9
vs
M-OH
L 73-87
−15.5
13
vs
OHIO
W 101-85
+13.5
16
@
KENT
L 84-87
+2.5
20
@
MASS
L 82-84
+0.5
24
vs
BGSU
W 73-72
+2.5
27
@
AKR
L 81-91
+2.5
31
vs
BALL
W 73-55
+9.5
3
vs
KENT
L 72-75
−1.5
7
@
JMU
L 71-73
−3.5
11
@
WMU
W 90-79
+4.5
14
@
BGSU
L 70-80
−6.5
21
vs
EMU
W 94-75
+10.5
24
vs
NIU
W 79-69
−2.5
28
@
OHIO
W 79-67
+13.5
3
@
M-OH
L 72-74
+5.5
6
vs
BUF
W 99-78
+15.5
12
vs
BGSU
W 77-76
−0.5
13
vs
MASS
W 77-67
+7.5
14
vs
AKR
L 76-79
+4.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
USA
L 74-76
−0.5
8
vs
MRSH
L 73-85
−2.5
11
@
WRST
W 81-71
−7.5
15
vs
DETM
W 90-83
+13.5
19
vs
YSU
W 92-75
+6.5
24
vs
TROY
W 75-68
−16.5
26
vs
BEL
L 72-87
−4.5
6
@
OAK
L 97-98
+28.5
13
@
RMU
L 70-75
−9.5
16
@
MSU
L 69-92
+10.5
30
vs
WMU
W 84-79
+2.5
3
@
CMU
W 78-75
−5.5
6
@
NIU
W 75-61
−25.5
9
vs
M-OH
L 73-87
−6.5
13
vs
OHIO
W 101-85
+24.5
16
@
KENT
L 84-87
+2.5
20
@
MASS
L 82-84
+1.5
24
vs
BGSU
W 73-72
−10.5
27
@
AKR
L 81-91
+3.5
31
vs
BALL
W 73-55
−18.5
3
vs
KENT
L 72-75
−14.5
7
@
JMU
L 71-73
−9.5
11
@
WMU
W 90-79
+14.5
14
@
BGSU
L 70-80
−0.5
21
vs
EMU
W 94-75
+23.5
24
vs
NIU
W 79-69
−2.5
28
@
OHIO
W 79-67
−12.5
3
@
M-OH
L 72-74
−16.5
6
vs
BUF
W 99-78
+21.5
12
vs
BGSU
W 77-76
+2.5
13
vs
MASS
W 77-67
−14.5
14
vs
AKR
L 76-79
−2.5
over 13under 19avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Valparaiso
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +2.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg −0.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 66-63 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 59-107 | +32.5 | L −15.5 | 157.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 68-63 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 68-50 | -6.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 90-75 | +2.5 | W +17.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 56-64 | -9.5 | L −17.5 | 150.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 84-55 | -4.5 | W +24.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 72-75 | +17.5 | W +14.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 70-73 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 70-86 | +14.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 79-85 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 48-58 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 131.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 70-75 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 66-59 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 77-71 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 79-92 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 74-78 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 54-44 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 130.5 | U 98 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 69-63 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 77-78 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 76-72 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 65-72 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 70-63 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 81-76 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 64-86 | +8.5 | L −13.5 | 138.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 76-75 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 79-72 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 71-67 | +7.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 74-71 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 79-80 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 63-62 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 84-90 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | O 174 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
EIU
W 66-63
−2.5
7
@
UK
L 59-107
−15.5
12
vs
NICH
W 68-63
+2.5
16
vs
BRY
W 68-50
+11.5
19
@
CLE
W 90-75
+17.5
26
vs
USI
L 56-64
−17.5
29
vs
WMU
W 84-55
+24.5
2
@
MARQ
L 72-75
+14.5
13
vs
UNCW
L 70-73
+1.5
16
@
NU
L 70-86
−1.5
21
vs
MUR
L 79-85
−0.5
29
@
UNI
L 48-58
−1.5
1
@
SIU
L 70-75
+2.5
4
vs
UIC
W 66-59
+4.5
7
vs
ILST
W 77-71
+12.5
10
@
MUR
L 79-92
−0.5
13
@
BEL
L 74-78
+7.5
17
vs
UNI
W 54-44
+11.5
21
vs
SIU
W 69-63
+4.5
28
vs
BEL
L 77-78
+4.5
31
@
INST
W 76-72
+6.5
3
@
BRAD
L 65-72
+0.5
6
vs
EVAN
W 70-63
−1.5
9
@
DRKE
W 81-76
+8.5
12
@
ILST
L 64-86
−13.5
15
vs
INST
W 76-75
−3.5
18
vs
BRAD
W 79-72
+9.5
21
@
UIC
W 71-67
+11.5
25
vs
DRKE
W 74-71
+0.5
28
@
EVAN
L 79-80
−6.5
5
vs
INST
W 63-62
−1.5
6
vs
BRAD
L 84-90
−0.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
EIU
W 66-63
−15.5
7
@
UK
L 59-107
+8.5
12
vs
NICH
W 68-63
−13.5
16
vs
BRY
W 68-50
−25.5
19
@
CLE
W 90-75
+6.5
26
vs
USI
L 56-64
−30.5
29
vs
WMU
W 84-55
−7.5
2
@
MARQ
L 72-75
+0.5
13
vs
UNCW
L 70-73
+6.5
16
@
NU
L 70-86
+10.5
21
vs
MUR
L 79-85
+8.5
29
@
UNI
L 48-58
−25.5
1
@
SIU
L 70-75
−0.5
4
vs
UIC
W 66-59
−19.5
7
vs
ILST
W 77-71
+9.5
10
@
MUR
L 79-92
+18.5
13
@
BEL
L 74-78
+5.5
17
vs
UNI
W 54-44
−32.5
21
vs
SIU
W 69-63
−10.5
28
vs
BEL
L 77-78
+9.5
31
@
INST
W 76-72
+2.5
3
@
BRAD
L 65-72
−7.5
6
vs
EVAN
W 70-63
−3.5
9
@
DRKE
W 81-76
+12.5
12
@
ILST
L 64-86
+11.5
15
vs
INST
W 76-75
+5.5
18
vs
BRAD
W 79-72
+8.5
21
@
UIC
W 71-67
−0.5
25
vs
DRKE
W 74-71
−1.5
28
@
EVAN
L 79-80
+21.5
5
vs
INST
W 63-62
−15.5
6
vs
BRAD
L 84-90
+34.5
over 17under 15avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Toledo 2, Valparaiso 2, even 1
ToledoBetterValparaiso
G A. Montas TR16.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 89
←TOLSmall
G R. Chaney10.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 62
G S. Jones TR6.3 pts · 1.4 reb · 3.9 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G B. Alocen TR6.4 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 34
G M. Strong5.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 19
→VALBig
G J. McNair7.9 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 65
F J. Ouwinga6.1 pts · 3.3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 27
→VALBig
F J. Pettigrew12.6 pts · 6.9 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 70
C A. Parks10.3 pts · 5.5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 54
←TOLSmall
F C. Hopoi3.5 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 23
ToledoBetterValparaiso
TOL offense121st of 366 · -2.8
=Even
VAL defense170th of 366 · -3.9
TOL defense234th of 366 · -6.2
=Even
VAL offense199th of 366 · -6.1
Backcourt+0.8 · 3 players
←TOLSmall
Backcourt-1.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.6 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.1 · 2 players
Bench-1.5 · 3 players
→VALSmall
Bench-0.5 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestTOL betterVAL betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Montas31 min · TRS. Jones21 min · TRM. Strong18 minW. James9 minM. JohnsonNewM. MattucciNew
Forwards
J. Ouwinga19 minC. Riddle13 minT. Nwokolo2 minR. BarronNewR. PorterNew
Centers
A. Parks25 min
Guards
R. Chaney29 minB. Alocen22 min · TRJ. McNair18 minS. Servilus10 minN. Lombardi1 minC. Webster1 min
Forwards
J. Pettigrew28 minC. Hopoi15 minK. WalkerNewG. RichardsonNewH. ScrogginsNew
Centers
K. Yu8 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 79.8 #71 | Points per game | 71.2 #263 |
| 1.15 #62 | Points per possession | 1.06 #233 |
| 69.5 #146 | Pace (possessions) | 67.4 #258 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.5 #50 | Effective FG% | 47.6 #322 |
| 37.0 #29 | 3-point % | 33.9 #180 |
| 32.5 #323 | 3-point attempt rate | 36.8 #234 |
| 30.5 #298 | Free throw rate | 39.1 #79 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.7 #51 | Turnover rate | 15.7 #116 |
| 29.5 #220 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.5 #110 |
| 15.6 #61 | Assists per game | 11.7 #307 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.4 #250 | Points allowed | 71.9 #103 |
| 1.11 #257 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #116 |
| 54.3 #308 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.5 #130 |
| 34.4 #215 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.1 #70 |
| 17.9 #104 | Turnovers forced | 16.9 #161 |
| 66.3 #313 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.9 #167 |
| 7.7 #67 | Steals per game | 5.9 #245 |
| 2.9 #247 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #124 |
Toledo
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Akron76–79
- Wvs UMass77–67
- Wvs Bowling Green77–76
- Wvs Buffalo99–78
- L@ Miami OH72–74
A week or more of rest.
Valparaiso
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 12-10 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Bradley84–90
- Wvs Indiana St63–62
- L@ Evansville79–80
- Wvs Drake74–71
- W@ UIC71–67
A week or more of rest.