Credit Union 1 Arena · at UIC · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UIC | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UIC 77–68 · win probability UIC 79%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UIC has more of the edges
VAL 1, UIC 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
VAL hits 33.9% and allows 32.1%; UIC hits 31.6% and allows 33.4%. Threes are 36.8% and 32.8% of their shots
VAL offense vs UIC defense
Offense 199th of 366 against a defense 106th, on the model’s ratings
UIC offense vs VAL defense
Offense 117th of 366 against a defense 170th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
UIC at home. This season: UIC 0-0 at home, VAL 0-0 away
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: VAL 47.6 and allows 50.5; UIC 49.8 and allows 50.5
Context
Schedule so far
VAL has played the 143rd-hardest schedule, UIC the 161st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: VAL 39.1, UIC 36.2. Allowed: VAL 35.1, UIC 33.9
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: VAL 51%, UIC 60%. Transfers in: VAL 2, UIC 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: VAL plays 67.4 a game (258th fastest), UIC 68.1 (227th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: VAL 15.7%, UIC 17.6%. Forced: VAL 16.9%, UIC 19.7%
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: VAL 32.5%, UIC 36.3%. Defensive: VAL 69.9%, UIC 68.0%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UIC -9.3 | — |
| Total | — | 145.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | VAL 68 · UIC 77.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UIC -5.4 | — |
| 1H total | 68.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | VAL 31.3 · UIC 36.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
VAL 5–5 UICSeries tied · 10 games since 2021-22 · VAL has won the last 3 meetings · VAL 7-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2025-26 | VAL 71 @ UIC 67 | UIC -7.5 | VAL W |
| Jan 4, 2025-26 | UIC 59 @ VAL 66 | VAL -2.5 | VAL W |
| Mar 6, 2024-25 | VAL 67 vs UIC 50 | UIC -3.5 | VAL W |
| Mar 2, 2024-25 | VAL 73 @ UIC 77 | UIC -6.5 | VAL W |
| Jan 18, 2024-25 | UIC 81 @ VAL 74 | VAL +1.5 | UIC W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Valparaiso
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +2.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg −0.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 66-63 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 59-107 | +32.5 | L −15.5 | 157.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 68-63 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 68-50 | -6.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 90-75 | +2.5 | W +17.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 56-64 | -9.5 | L −17.5 | 150.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 84-55 | -4.5 | W +24.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 72-75 | +17.5 | W +14.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 70-73 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 70-86 | +14.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 79-85 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 48-58 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 131.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 70-75 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 66-59 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 77-71 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 79-92 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 74-78 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 54-44 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 130.5 | U 98 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 69-63 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 77-78 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 76-72 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 65-72 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 70-63 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 81-76 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 64-86 | +8.5 | L −13.5 | 138.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 76-75 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 79-72 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 71-67 | +7.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 74-71 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 79-80 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 63-62 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 84-90 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | O 174 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
EIU
W 66-63
−2.5
7
@
UK
L 59-107
−15.5
12
vs
NICH
W 68-63
+2.5
16
vs
BRY
W 68-50
+11.5
19
@
CLE
W 90-75
+17.5
26
vs
USI
L 56-64
−17.5
29
vs
WMU
W 84-55
+24.5
2
@
MARQ
L 72-75
+14.5
13
vs
UNCW
L 70-73
+1.5
16
@
NU
L 70-86
−1.5
21
vs
MUR
L 79-85
−0.5
29
@
UNI
L 48-58
−1.5
1
@
SIU
L 70-75
+2.5
4
vs
UIC
W 66-59
+4.5
7
vs
ILST
W 77-71
+12.5
10
@
MUR
L 79-92
−0.5
13
@
BEL
L 74-78
+7.5
17
vs
UNI
W 54-44
+11.5
21
vs
SIU
W 69-63
+4.5
28
vs
BEL
L 77-78
+4.5
31
@
INST
W 76-72
+6.5
3
@
BRAD
L 65-72
+0.5
6
vs
EVAN
W 70-63
−1.5
9
@
DRKE
W 81-76
+8.5
12
@
ILST
L 64-86
−13.5
15
vs
INST
W 76-75
−3.5
18
vs
BRAD
W 79-72
+9.5
21
@
UIC
W 71-67
+11.5
25
vs
DRKE
W 74-71
+0.5
28
@
EVAN
L 79-80
−6.5
5
vs
INST
W 63-62
−1.5
6
vs
BRAD
L 84-90
−0.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
EIU
W 66-63
−15.5
7
@
UK
L 59-107
+8.5
12
vs
NICH
W 68-63
−13.5
16
vs
BRY
W 68-50
−25.5
19
@
CLE
W 90-75
+6.5
26
vs
USI
L 56-64
−30.5
29
vs
WMU
W 84-55
−7.5
2
@
MARQ
L 72-75
+0.5
13
vs
UNCW
L 70-73
+6.5
16
@
NU
L 70-86
+10.5
21
vs
MUR
L 79-85
+8.5
29
@
UNI
L 48-58
−25.5
1
@
SIU
L 70-75
−0.5
4
vs
UIC
W 66-59
−19.5
7
vs
ILST
W 77-71
+9.5
10
@
MUR
L 79-92
+18.5
13
@
BEL
L 74-78
+5.5
17
vs
UNI
W 54-44
−32.5
21
vs
SIU
W 69-63
−10.5
28
vs
BEL
L 77-78
+9.5
31
@
INST
W 76-72
+2.5
3
@
BRAD
L 65-72
−7.5
6
vs
EVAN
W 70-63
−3.5
9
@
DRKE
W 81-76
+12.5
12
@
ILST
L 64-86
+11.5
15
vs
INST
W 76-75
+5.5
18
vs
BRAD
W 79-72
+8.5
21
@
UIC
W 71-67
−0.5
25
vs
DRKE
W 74-71
−1.5
28
@
EVAN
L 79-80
+21.5
5
vs
INST
W 63-62
−15.5
6
vs
BRAD
L 84-90
+34.5
over 17under 15avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
UIC
33 games played
Straight up
17-16
52% wins
Against the spread
18-15
55% covers · avg +3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-17
48% overs · avg −0.7 pts vs the total
Against the spread
18-1555%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 91-71 | -9.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 73-76 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 67-63 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 80-90 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 84-73 | -11.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 74-88 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 62-63 | -16.5 | L −17.5 | 163.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 66-80 | +12.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 84-87 | +12.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 54-60 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 133.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 76-88 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 77-81 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 159.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 59-66 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 70-57 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 63-59 | +10.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 69-61 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 128.5 | O 130 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 74-67 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 76-49 | -8.5 | W +18.5 | 139.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 85-70 | +7.5 | W +22.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 76-74 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 68-66 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 74-81 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 6 | vs | L 62-68 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 80-70 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 83-56 | +1.5 | W +28.5 | 140.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 84-46 | -8.5 | W +29.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 67-71 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 93-86 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 63-79 | -3.5 | L −19.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 92-79 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 72-51 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 144.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 69-84 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 125.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 18 | @ | L 73-91 | +6.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
DETM
W 91-71
+10.5
7
@
ORST
L 73-76
+3.5
15
@
CHST
W 67-63
−5.5
20
vs
HPU
L 80-90
+0.5
22
vs
USI
W 84-73
−0.5
26
@
RMU
L 74-88
−15.5
3
vs
UAPB
L 62-63
−17.5
7
@
YALE
L 66-80
−1.5
13
@
BEL
L 84-87
+9.5
17
vs
UNI
L 54-60
−0.5
21
@
CLT
L 76-88
−10.5
1
vs
MUR
L 77-81
+1.5
4
@
VAL
L 59-66
−4.5
7
vs
SIU
W 70-57
+14.5
10
@
ILST
W 63-59
+14.5
13
@
UNI
W 69-61
+14.5
17
vs
DRKE
W 74-67
+1.5
20
vs
EVAN
W 76-49
+18.5
24
@
BRAD
W 85-70
+22.5
27
vs
INST
W 76-74
−3.5
31
@
SIU
W 68-66
+5.5
3
@
MUR
L 74-81
−0.5
6
vs
BEL
L 62-68
−4.5
12
@
DRKE
W 80-70
+8.5
15
vs
ILST
W 83-56
+28.5
18
@
EVAN
W 84-46
+29.5
21
vs
VAL
L 67-71
−11.5
24
vs
BRAD
W 93-86
+5.5
1
@
INST
L 63-79
−19.5
6
vs
MUR
W 92-79
+11.5
7
vs
DRKE
W 72-51
+16.5
8
vs
UNI
L 69-84
−12.5
18
@
CAL
L 73-91
−11.5
covered 18didn’t cover 15avg +3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
DETM
W 91-71
+19.5
7
@
ORST
L 73-76
+2.5
15
@
CHST
W 67-63
−26.5
20
vs
HPU
L 80-90
+11.5
22
vs
USI
W 84-73
+3.5
26
@
RMU
L 74-88
+10.5
3
vs
UAPB
L 62-63
−38.5
7
@
YALE
L 66-80
−2.5
13
@
BEL
L 84-87
+16.5
17
vs
UNI
L 54-60
−19.5
21
@
CLT
L 76-88
+26.5
1
vs
MUR
L 77-81
−1.5
4
@
VAL
L 59-66
−19.5
7
vs
SIU
W 70-57
−19.5
10
@
ILST
W 63-59
−19.5
13
@
UNI
W 69-61
+1.5
17
vs
DRKE
W 74-67
+1.5
20
vs
EVAN
W 76-49
−14.5
24
@
BRAD
W 85-70
+10.5
27
vs
INST
W 76-74
+2.5
31
@
SIU
W 68-66
−8.5
3
@
MUR
L 74-81
−2.5
6
vs
BEL
L 62-68
−21.5
12
@
DRKE
W 80-70
+3.5
15
vs
ILST
W 83-56
−1.5
18
@
EVAN
W 84-46
−10.5
21
vs
VAL
L 67-71
−0.5
24
vs
BRAD
W 93-86
+37.5
1
@
INST
L 63-79
−2.5
6
vs
MUR
W 92-79
+20.5
7
vs
DRKE
W 72-51
−21.5
8
vs
UNI
L 69-84
+27.5
18
@
CAL
L 73-91
+13.5
over 16under 17avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UIC has the better starters
Position by position: Valparaiso 0, UIC 3, even 2
ValparaisoBetterUIC
G R. Chaney10.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 62
→UICSmall
G B. Gealer TR10.9 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 79
G B. Alocen TR6.4 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 34
→UICSmall
G A. Johnson11 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 55
G J. McNair7.9 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 65
=Even
G A. Thomas TR11.7 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 69
F J. Pettigrew12.6 pts · 6.9 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 70
=Even
G M. Lowery7.8 pts · 5.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 59
F C. Hopoi3.5 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 23
→UICBig
G R. Washington8.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 77
ValparaisoBetterUIC
VAL offense199th of 366 · -6.1
→UICSmall
UIC defense106th of 366 · -1.0
VAL defense170th of 366 · -3.9
=Even
UIC offense117th of 366 · -2.6
Backcourt-1.1 · 3 players
→UICBig
Backcourt+2.1 · 5 players
Frontcourt-0.1 · 2 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-0.5 · 4 players
→UICSmall
Bench+0.5 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestVAL betterUIC betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Chaney29 minB. Alocen22 min · TRJ. McNair18 minS. Servilus10 minN. Lombardi1 minC. Webster1 min
Forwards
J. Pettigrew28 minC. Hopoi15 minK. WalkerNewG. RichardsonNewH. ScrogginsNew
Centers
K. Yu8 min · TR
Guards
B. Gealer30 min · TRA. Johnson29 minA. Thomas28 min · TRM. Lowery26 minR. Washington23 minA. Henderson21 min
Forwards
J. Nathaniel20 minL. Scroggins17 min · TRN. BarrantesNewD. HudsonNewD. ShawNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.2 #263 | Points per game | 73.9 #196 |
| 1.06 #233 | Points per possession | 1.09 #171 |
| 67.4 #258 | Pace (possessions) | 68.1 #227 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.6 #322 | Effective FG% | 49.8 #245 |
| 33.9 #180 | 3-point % | 31.6 #300 |
| 36.8 #234 | 3-point attempt rate | 32.8 #319 |
| 39.1 #79 | Free throw rate | 36.2 #145 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.7 #116 | Turnover rate | 17.6 #247 |
| 32.5 #110 | Offensive rebound rate | 36.3 #22 |
| 11.7 #307 | Assists per game | 14.1 #143 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.9 #103 | Points allowed | 71.2 #81 |
| 1.06 #116 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #83 |
| 50.5 #130 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.5 #125 |
| 32.1 #70 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.4 #147 |
| 16.9 #161 | Turnovers forced | 19.7 #30 |
| 69.9 #167 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.0 #255 |
| 5.9 #245 | Steals per game | 7.6 #70 |
| 3.6 #124 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #126 |
Valparaiso
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 12-10 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Bradley84–90
- Wvs Indiana St63–62
- L@ Evansville79–80
- Wvs Drake74–71
- W@ UIC71–67
A week or more of rest.
UIC
17-16 in 2025-26 overall · 14-9 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ California73–91
- Lvs Northern Iowa69–84
- Wvs Drake72–51
- Wvs Murray St92–79
- L@ Indiana St63–79
A week or more of rest.