Convocation Center (OH) · at Ohio · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | OHIO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects OHIO 83–79 · win probability OHIO 65%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 161.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TOL has more of the edges
TOL 4, OHIO 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
TOL hits 37.0% and allows 34.4%; OHIO hits 30.1% and allows 36.8%. Threes are 32.5% and 38.1% of their shots
OHIO offense vs TOL defense
Offense 81st of 366 against a defense 234th, on the model’s ratings
TOL offense vs OHIO defense
Offense 121st of 366 against a defense 260th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: TOL 14.7%, OHIO 15.4%. Forced: TOL 17.9%, OHIO 16.2%
Shooting
Effective FG%: TOL 54.5 and allows 54.3; OHIO 51.0 and allows 53.0
Home court
OHIO at home. This season: OHIO 0-0 at home, TOL 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: TOL 30.5, OHIO 36.9. Allowed: TOL 26.6, OHIO 38.2
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: TOL plays 69.5 a game (146th fastest), OHIO 71.0 (78th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
TOL has played the 172nd-hardest schedule, OHIO the 162nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: TOL 43%, OHIO 41%. Transfers in: TOL 2, OHIO 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: TOL 29.5%, OHIO 28.4%. Defensive: TOL 66.3%, OHIO 67.2%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | OHIO -4.6 | — |
| Total | — | 161.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | TOL 78.6 · OHIO 83.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | OHIO -2.6 | — |
| 1H total | 75.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | TOL 36.5 · OHIO 39 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
TOL 11–0 OHIOTOL leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · TOL has won the last 11 meetings · TOL 10-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2025-26 | TOL 79 @ OHIO 67 | OHIO -1.5 | TOL W |
| Jan 13, 2025-26 | OHIO 85 @ TOL 101 | TOL -2.5 | TOL W |
| Mar 13, 2024-25 | OHIO 85 vs TOL 90 | TOL +2.5 | TOL W |
| Mar 7, 2024-25 | OHIO 82 @ TOL 96 | TOL +1.5 | TOL W |
| Jan 28, 2024-25 | TOL 86 @ OHIO 83 | OHIO -3.5 | TOL W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Toledo
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-19
41% overs · avg −0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 74-76 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 73-85 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 81-71 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 159.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 90-83 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 92-75 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 75-68 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 72-87 | +4.5 | L −10.5 | 163.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 97-98 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 166.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 70-75 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 69-92 | +23.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 84-79 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 78-75 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 75-61 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 73-87 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 166.5 | U 160 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 101-85 | -2.5 | W +13.5 | 161.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 84-87 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 168.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 82-84 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 164.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 73-72 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 81-91 | +12.5 | W +2.5 | 168.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 73-55 | -8.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 72-75 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 161.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 71-73 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 90-79 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 70-80 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 94-75 | -8.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 79-69 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 79-67 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 72-74 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 99-78 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 155.5 | O 177 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 77-76 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 77-67 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 76-79 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
USA
L 74-76
−4.5
8
vs
MRSH
L 73-85
−14.5
11
@
WRST
W 81-71
+15.5
15
vs
DETM
W 90-83
−3.5
19
vs
YSU
W 92-75
+15.5
24
vs
TROY
W 75-68
+9.5
26
vs
BEL
L 72-87
−10.5
6
@
OAK
L 97-98
+3.5
13
@
RMU
L 70-75
−6.5
16
@
MSU
L 69-92
+0.5
30
vs
WMU
W 84-79
−5.5
3
@
CMU
W 78-75
−4.5
6
@
NIU
W 75-61
+6.5
9
vs
M-OH
L 73-87
−15.5
13
vs
OHIO
W 101-85
+13.5
16
@
KENT
L 84-87
+2.5
20
@
MASS
L 82-84
+0.5
24
vs
BGSU
W 73-72
+2.5
27
@
AKR
L 81-91
+2.5
31
vs
BALL
W 73-55
+9.5
3
vs
KENT
L 72-75
−1.5
7
@
JMU
L 71-73
−3.5
11
@
WMU
W 90-79
+4.5
14
@
BGSU
L 70-80
−6.5
21
vs
EMU
W 94-75
+10.5
24
vs
NIU
W 79-69
−2.5
28
@
OHIO
W 79-67
+13.5
3
@
M-OH
L 72-74
+5.5
6
vs
BUF
W 99-78
+15.5
12
vs
BGSU
W 77-76
−0.5
13
vs
MASS
W 77-67
+7.5
14
vs
AKR
L 76-79
+4.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
USA
L 74-76
−0.5
8
vs
MRSH
L 73-85
−2.5
11
@
WRST
W 81-71
−7.5
15
vs
DETM
W 90-83
+13.5
19
vs
YSU
W 92-75
+6.5
24
vs
TROY
W 75-68
−16.5
26
vs
BEL
L 72-87
−4.5
6
@
OAK
L 97-98
+28.5
13
@
RMU
L 70-75
−9.5
16
@
MSU
L 69-92
+10.5
30
vs
WMU
W 84-79
+2.5
3
@
CMU
W 78-75
−5.5
6
@
NIU
W 75-61
−25.5
9
vs
M-OH
L 73-87
−6.5
13
vs
OHIO
W 101-85
+24.5
16
@
KENT
L 84-87
+2.5
20
@
MASS
L 82-84
+1.5
24
vs
BGSU
W 73-72
−10.5
27
@
AKR
L 81-91
+3.5
31
vs
BALL
W 73-55
−18.5
3
vs
KENT
L 72-75
−14.5
7
@
JMU
L 71-73
−9.5
11
@
WMU
W 90-79
+14.5
14
@
BGSU
L 70-80
−0.5
21
vs
EMU
W 94-75
+23.5
24
vs
NIU
W 79-69
−2.5
28
@
OHIO
W 79-67
−12.5
3
@
M-OH
L 72-74
−16.5
6
vs
BUF
W 99-78
+21.5
12
vs
BGSU
W 77-76
+2.5
13
vs
MASS
W 77-67
−14.5
14
vs
AKR
L 76-79
−2.5
over 13under 19avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Ohio
30 games played
Straight up
13-17
43% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −3.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 85-89 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 159.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 72-68 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 60-90 | +17.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 81-106 | +31.5 | W +6.5 | 174.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 73-76 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 69-92 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 58-70 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 79-57 | -12.5 | W +9.5 | 138.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 88-81 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 88-83 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 58-68 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 80-64 | -6.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 68-67 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 86-83 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 91-80 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 85-101 | +2.5 | L −13.5 | 161.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 71-76 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 80-77 | -11.5 | L −8.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 65-86 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 167.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 57-72 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 162.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 95-83 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 156.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 91-71 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 72-78 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 74-90 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 163.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 69-57 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 74-66 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 67-79 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 82-94 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 156.5 | O 176 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 108-110 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 159.5 | O 218 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 75-86 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 161.5 | U 161 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
ARST
L 85-89
−7.5
6
vs
ILST
W 72-68
+2.5
11
@
SMC
L 60-90
−12.5
15
@
LOU
L 81-106
+6.5
19
vs
BCU
L 73-76
−9.5
24
vs
GMU
L 69-92
−15.5
25
vs
LMU
L 58-70
−8.5
3
vs
ME
W 79-57
+9.5
6
vs
MRSH
W 88-81
+3.5
13
vs
SBU
W 88-83
+11.5
20
vs
BGSU
L 58-68
−8.5
30
@
CMU
W 80-64
+9.5
3
@
EMU
W 68-67
−1.5
6
vs
MASS
W 86-83
−1.5
10
vs
BUF
W 91-80
+6.5
13
@
TOL
L 85-101
−13.5
16
@
BALL
L 71-76
−10.5
20
vs
NIU
W 80-77
−8.5
23
vs
AKR
L 65-86
−14.5
27
@
KENT
L 57-72
−9.5
31
@
BUF
W 95-83
+14.5
3
vs
WMU
W 91-71
+9.5
7
@
ODU
L 72-78
−9.5
13
@
M-OH
L 74-90
−8.5
17
vs
BALL
W 69-57
+2.5
21
@
NIU
W 74-66
+1.5
28
vs
TOL
L 67-79
−13.5
3
@
MASS
L 82-94
−10.5
6
vs
M-OH
L 108-110
+1.5
12
vs
KENT
L 75-86
−7.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
ARST
L 85-89
+14.5
6
vs
ILST
W 72-68
−21.5
11
@
SMC
L 60-90
+5.5
15
@
LOU
L 81-106
+12.5
19
vs
BCU
L 73-76
−8.5
24
vs
GMU
L 69-92
+18.5
25
vs
LMU
L 58-70
−16.5
3
vs
ME
W 79-57
−2.5
6
vs
MRSH
W 88-81
+11.5
13
vs
SBU
W 88-83
+20.5
20
vs
BGSU
L 58-68
−27.5
30
@
CMU
W 80-64
−7.5
3
@
EMU
W 68-67
−15.5
6
vs
MASS
W 86-83
+8.5
10
vs
BUF
W 91-80
+14.5
13
@
TOL
L 85-101
+24.5
16
@
BALL
L 71-76
−0.5
20
vs
NIU
W 80-77
+2.5
23
vs
AKR
L 65-86
−16.5
27
@
KENT
L 57-72
−33.5
31
@
BUF
W 95-83
+21.5
3
vs
WMU
W 91-71
+6.5
7
@
ODU
L 72-78
−6.5
13
@
M-OH
L 74-90
+0.5
17
vs
BALL
W 69-57
−19.5
21
@
NIU
W 74-66
−8.5
28
vs
TOL
L 67-79
−12.5
3
@
MASS
L 82-94
+19.5
6
vs
M-OH
L 108-110
+58.5
12
vs
KENT
L 75-86
−0.5
over 15under 15avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Ohio has the better starters
Position by position: Toledo 1, Ohio 2, even 2
ToledoBetterOhio
G A. Montas TR16.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 89
=Even
G J. Paveletzke17.8 pts · 3 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 89
G S. Jones TR6.3 pts · 1.4 reb · 3.9 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G K. D'Augustino TR19.2 pts · 3.4 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 79
G M. Strong5.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 19
→OHIOBig
G K. Mitchell TR13.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 76
F J. Ouwinga6.1 pts · 3.3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 27
←TOLSmall
G J. Burris3.1 pts · 1 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 11
C A. Parks10.3 pts · 5.5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 54
→OHIOBig
F J. Simmons15.4 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 90
ToledoBetterOhio
TOL offense121st of 366 · -2.8
←TOLBig
OHIO defense260th of 366 · -6.7
TOL defense234th of 366 · -6.2
→OHIOBig
OHIO offense81st of 366 · +0.5
Backcourt+0.8 · 3 players
→OHIOBig
Backcourt+4.4 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.6 · 2 players
→OHIOBig
Frontcourt+3.0 · 1 player
Bench-1.5 · 3 players
→OHIOSmall
Bench-0.4 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestTOL betterOHIO betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Montas31 min · TRS. Jones21 min · TRM. Strong18 minW. James9 minM. JohnsonNewM. MattucciNew
Forwards
J. Ouwinga19 minC. Riddle13 minT. Nwokolo2 minR. BarronNewR. PorterNew
Centers
A. Parks25 min
Guards
J. Paveletzke37 minK. D'Augustino33 min · TRK. Mitchell31 min · TRJ. Burris10 minC. ReeseNewS. LedegenNew
Forwards
J. Simmons28 minK. Kuany8 minZ. MosleyNewC. TrudicNewJ. BowensNewD. MakitanNew
Centers
M. IckeNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 79.8 #71 | Points per game | 76.7 #126 |
| 1.15 #62 | Points per possession | 1.08 #194 |
| 69.5 #146 | Pace (possessions) | 71.0 #78 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.5 #50 | Effective FG% | 51.0 #197 |
| 37.0 #29 | 3-point % | 30.1 #341 |
| 32.5 #323 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.1 #211 |
| 30.5 #298 | Free throw rate | 36.9 #132 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.7 #51 | Turnover rate | 15.4 #97 |
| 29.5 #220 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.4 #248 |
| 15.6 #61 | Assists per game | 12.6 #242 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.4 #250 | Points allowed | 80.0 #319 |
| 1.11 #257 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #295 |
| 54.3 #308 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.0 #269 |
| 34.4 #215 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.8 #340 |
| 17.9 #104 | Turnovers forced | 16.2 #213 |
| 66.3 #313 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.2 #289 |
| 7.7 #67 | Steals per game | 5.7 #267 |
| 2.9 #247 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #163 |
Toledo
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Akron76–79
- Wvs UMass77–67
- Wvs Bowling Green77–76
- Wvs Buffalo99–78
- L@ Miami OH72–74
A week or more of rest.
Ohio
13-17 in 2025-26 overall · 9-10 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Kent State75–86
- Lvs Miami OH108–110
- L@ UMass82–94
- Lvs Toledo67–79
- W@ N Illinois74–66
A week or more of rest.