XFINITY Center · at Maryland
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MD 82–64 · win probability MD 94%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MD has more of the edges
AMER 4, MD 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
AMER has played the 263rd-hardest schedule, MD the 28th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: AMER 15.6%, MD 18.6%. Forced: AMER 19.2%, MD 14.9%
AMER offense vs MD defense
Offense 201st of 366 against a defense 34th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: AMER 28.7, MD 36.4. Allowed: AMER 42.1, MD 35.8
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: AMER 26.9%, MD 33.8%. Defensive: AMER 70.6%, MD 70.9%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: AMER 96%, MD 47%. Transfers in: AMER 0, MD 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Shooting
Effective FG%: AMER 51.5 and allows 54.4; MD 48.1 and allows 54.4
MD offense vs AMER defense
Offense 63rd of 366 against a defense 122nd, on the model’s ratings
Home court
MD at home. This season: MD 0-0 at home, AMER 0-0 away
Three-pointers
AMER hits 33.0% and allows 35.5%; MD hits 31.7% and allows 36.3%. Threes are 46.5% and 46.9% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: AMER plays 66.7 a game (289th fastest), MD 67.0 (281st). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MD -17.8 | — |
| Total | — | 145.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | AMER 63.9 · MD 81.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MD -10.4 | — |
| 1H total | 68.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | AMER 28.8 · MD 39.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
American
30 games played
Straight up
14-16
47% wins
Against the spread
16-14
53% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 74-88 | +19.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 84-78 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 67-107 | +17.5 | L −22.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 71-80 | +16.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 74-61 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 133.5 | O 135 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 55-59 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | U 114 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 92-66 | -5.5 | W +20.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 75-73 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 78-60 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 130.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 83-105 | +19.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 51-95 | +27.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 84-69 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 64-62 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 62-64 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 73-84 | -8.5 | L −19.5 | 137.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 65-51 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 78-67 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 70-66 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 76-67 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 68-77 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 65-67 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 59-60 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 73-82 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 134.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 82-90 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 75-63 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 75-57 | -3.5 | W +14.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 22 | @ | W 75-61 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 73-78 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 65-68 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 73-75 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
WAKE
L 74-88
+5.5
9
vs
PENN
W 84-78
+7.5
12
@
GW
L 67-107
−22.5
18
@
RUTG
L 71-80
+7.5
28
vs
ME
W 74-61
+5.5
29
vs
SIE
L 55-59
−1.5
30
vs
LONG
W 92-66
+20.5
3
vs
DREX
W 75-73
−2.5
6
vs
UMES
W 78-60
+7.5
18
@
VCU
L 83-105
−2.5
22
@
UVA
L 51-95
−16.5
31
vs
L-MD
W 84-69
+6.5
3
@
BU
W 64-62
+3.5
7
@
COLG
L 62-64
+3.5
10
vs
HC
L 73-84
−19.5
12
vs
NAVY
W 65-51
+16.5
18
@
ARMY
W 78-67
+6.5
21
vs
COLG
W 70-66
+2.5
24
@
HC
W 76-67
+4.5
28
@
L-MD
L 68-77
−13.5
31
vs
LAF
L 65-67
−7.5
4
vs
BUCK
L 59-60
−8.5
7
@
NAVY
L 73-82
−4.5
11
@
LEH
L 82-90
−9.5
14
vs
ARMY
W 75-63
+2.5
18
@
BUCK
W 75-57
+14.5
22
@
LAF
W 75-61
+10.5
25
vs
LEH
L 73-78
−12.5
28
vs
BU
L 65-68
−6.5
5
@
BU
L 73-75
−0.5
covered 16didn’t cover 14avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
WAKE
L 74-88
+22.5
9
vs
PENN
W 84-78
+7.5
12
@
GW
L 67-107
+22.5
18
@
RUTG
L 71-80
+7.5
28
vs
ME
W 74-61
+1.5
29
vs
SIE
L 55-59
−23.5
30
vs
LONG
W 92-66
+9.5
3
vs
DREX
W 75-73
+10.5
6
vs
UMES
W 78-60
+7.5
18
@
VCU
L 83-105
+33.5
22
@
UVA
L 51-95
−7.5
31
vs
L-MD
W 84-69
−1.5
3
@
BU
W 64-62
−16.5
7
@
COLG
L 62-64
−22.5
10
vs
HC
L 73-84
+19.5
12
vs
NAVY
W 65-51
−23.5
18
@
ARMY
W 78-67
−2.5
21
vs
COLG
W 70-66
−10.5
24
@
HC
W 76-67
+3.5
28
@
L-MD
L 68-77
−2.5
31
vs
LAF
L 65-67
−10.5
4
vs
BUCK
L 59-60
−22.5
7
@
NAVY
L 73-82
+20.5
11
@
LEH
L 82-90
+31.5
14
vs
ARMY
W 75-63
−6.5
18
@
BUCK
W 75-57
−8.5
22
@
LAF
W 75-61
−5.5
25
vs
LEH
L 73-78
+10.5
28
vs
BU
L 65-68
−7.5
5
@
BU
L 73-75
+6.5
over 15under 15avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Maryland
33 games played
Straight up
12-21
36% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg −2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-15
55% overs · avg −1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 83-61 | -28.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 60-70 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 84-64 | -29.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 89-82 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 95-90 | -17.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 74-67 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 61-100 | +14.5 | L −24.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 72-105 | +14.5 | L −18.5 | 166.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 89-63 | -22.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 64-83 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 83-101 | +19.5 | W +1.5 | 163.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 72-80 | +16.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 73-58 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 54-64 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 66-84 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 55-67 | +13.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 71-88 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 96-73 | -1.5 | W +21.5 | 148.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 70-89 | +18.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 48-91 | +18.5 | L −24.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 63-93 | +15.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 62-82 | +6.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 67-62 | +10.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 77-70 | +10.5 | W +17.5 | 138.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 57-68 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 74-78 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 64-60 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 61-74 | +16.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 65-69 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 45-78 | +14.5 | L −18.5 | 153.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 72-78 | +14.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 70-60 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 64-75 | +11.5 | W +0.5 | 133.5 | O 139 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
COPP
W 83-61
−6.5
7
vs
GTWN
L 60-70
−14.5
11
vs
ALCN
W 84-64
−9.5
15
@
MARQ
W 89-82
+15.5
19
vs
MSM
W 95-90
−12.5
24
vs
UNLV
W 74-67
+4.5
25
vs
GONZ
L 61-100
−24.5
26
vs
ALA
L 72-105
−18.5
2
vs
WAG
W 89-63
+3.5
6
@
IOWA
L 64-83
−8.5
13
vs
MICH
L 83-101
+1.5
20
@
UVA
L 72-80
+8.5
28
vs
ODU
W 73-58
+0.5
2
vs
ORE
L 54-64
−8.5
7
vs
IU
L 66-84
−10.5
10
@
UCLA
L 55-67
+1.5
13
@
USC
L 71-88
−7.5
18
vs
PSU
W 96-73
+21.5
21
@
ILL
L 70-89
−0.5
24
@
MSU
L 48-91
−24.5
1
vs
PUR
L 63-93
−14.5
5
vs
OSU
L 62-82
−13.5
8
@
MINN
W 67-62
+15.5
11
vs
IOWA
W 77-70
+17.5
15
@
RUTG
L 57-68
−8.5
18
@
NU
L 74-78
+3.5
21
vs
WASH
W 64-60
+8.5
25
@
NEB
L 61-74
+3.5
1
vs
RUTG
L 65-69
−8.5
4
@
WIS
L 45-78
−18.5
8
vs
ILL
L 72-78
+8.5
10
vs
ORE
W 70-60
+14.5
11
vs
IOWA
L 64-75
+0.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg −2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
COPP
W 83-61
+4.5
7
vs
GTWN
L 60-70
−14.5
11
vs
ALCN
W 84-64
+1.5
15
@
MARQ
W 89-82
+24.5
19
vs
MSM
W 95-90
+39.5
24
vs
UNLV
W 74-67
−23.5
25
vs
GONZ
L 61-100
+3.5
26
vs
ALA
L 72-105
+10.5
2
vs
WAG
W 89-63
+8.5
6
@
IOWA
L 64-83
+9.5
13
vs
MICH
L 83-101
+20.5
20
@
UVA
L 72-80
−1.5
28
vs
ODU
W 73-58
−23.5
2
vs
ORE
L 54-64
−28.5
7
vs
IU
L 66-84
+2.5
10
@
UCLA
L 55-67
−25.5
13
@
USC
L 71-88
+8.5
18
vs
PSU
W 96-73
+20.5
21
@
ILL
L 70-89
+6.5
24
@
MSU
L 48-91
−2.5
1
vs
PUR
L 63-93
+7.5
5
vs
OSU
L 62-82
−6.5
8
@
MINN
W 67-62
−9.5
11
vs
IOWA
W 77-70
+8.5
15
@
RUTG
L 57-68
−19.5
18
@
NU
L 74-78
+9.5
21
vs
WASH
W 64-60
−19.5
25
@
NEB
L 61-74
−7.5
1
vs
RUTG
L 65-69
−9.5
4
@
WIS
L 45-78
−30.5
8
vs
ILL
L 72-78
+4.5
10
vs
ORE
W 70-60
−9.5
11
vs
IOWA
L 64-75
+5.5
over 18under 15avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Maryland has the better starters
Position by position: American 0, Maryland 4, even 1
AmericanBetterMaryland
G W. Nausadis7.5 pts · 1.4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 25
→MDBig
G M. McNair TR16.9 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 84
G M. Collins13.2 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 97
=Even
G A. Mills12.2 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 89
F G. Jones12.4 pts · 4.9 reb · 2 ast
Score 55
→MDSmall
G B. Boswell TR6.2 pts · 4.4 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 70
F M. Mayock8.4 pts · 3.7 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 36
→MDBig
F P. Payne17.5 pts · 7.2 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 100
F J. Iturbe10.4 pts · 4.6 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 55
→MDBig
F T. Buljan TR13.1 pts · 10.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 97
AmericanBetterMaryland
AMER offense201st of 366 · -6.3
→MDBig
MD defense34th of 366 · +3.3
AMER defense122nd of 366 · -2.1
→MDSmall
MD offense63rd of 366 · +2.4
Backcourt+1.4 · 2 players
→MDBig
Backcourt+4.9 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.4 · 3 players
→MDBig
Frontcourt+11.4 · 2 players
Bench-2.4 · 5 players
=Even
Bench-2.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestAMER betterMD betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
W. Nausadis23 minM. Collins22 minK. Sebastian22 minD. Hogans6 minJ. Anderson2 minM. Casey1 min
Forwards
G. Jones31 minM. Mayock29 minJ. Iturbe26 minC. McDonald18 minC. Eagan11 minN. JonesNew
Guards
M. McNair37 min · TRA. Mills27 minB. Boswell27 min · TRD. Wagner24 min · TRM. Jabriel20 minG. Turkson11 min
Forwards
P. Payne27 minT. Buljan26 min · TRR. Jennings13 min · TRA. BrownNewB. OladotunNewA. TambedouNew
Centers
A. K'MedehoutoNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.0 #242 | Points per game | 69.7 #291 |
| 1.08 #190 | Points per possession | 1.04 #270 |
| 66.7 #289 | Pace (possessions) | 67.0 #281 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.5 #169 | Effective FG% | 48.1 #311 |
| 33.0 #235 | 3-point % | 31.7 #293 |
| 46.5 #39 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.9 #35 |
| 28.7 #335 | Free throw rate | 36.4 #142 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.6 #110 | Turnover rate | 18.6 #300 |
| 26.9 #299 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.8 #73 |
| 12.5 #248 | Assists per game | 10.4 #351 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.7 #124 | Points allowed | 76.6 #232 |
| 1.09 #200 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #312 |
| 54.4 #313 | Opponent effective FG% | 54.4 #312 |
| 35.5 #283 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.3 #317 |
| 19.2 #40 | Turnovers forced | 14.9 #294 |
| 70.6 #127 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.9 #111 |
| 7.3 #100 | Steals per game | 4.8 #345 |
| 1.4 #363 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #237 |
American
14-16 in 2025-26 overall · 9-10 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Boston U73–75
- Lvs Boston U65–68
- Lvs Lehigh73–78
- W@ Lafayette75–61
- W@ Bucknell75–57
A week or more of rest.
Maryland
12-21 in 2025-26 overall · 5-17 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Iowa64–75
- Wvs Oregon70–60
- Lvs Illinois72–78
- L@ Wisconsin45–78
- Lvs Rutgers65–69
A week or more of rest.