The HTC Center · at Coastal
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CCU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects CCU 79–63 · win probability CCU 92%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 142.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CCU has more of the edges
WIU 1, CCU 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: WIU 44.5 and allows 54.2; CCU 47.9 and allows 46.8
Three-pointers
WIU hits 30.9% and allows 35.6%; CCU hits 33.5% and allows 32.8%. Threes are 33.3% and 43.1% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WIU 27.0%, CCU 26.9%. Defensive: WIU 65.2%, CCU 72.4%
WIU offense vs CCU defense
Offense 365th of 366 against a defense 246th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: WIU 37.7, CCU 32.3. Allowed: WIU 34.8, CCU 34.9
CCU offense vs WIU defense
Offense 295th of 366 against a defense 362nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: WIU plays 67.6 a game (246th fastest), CCU 69.9 (121st). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
WIU has played the 361st-hardest schedule, CCU the 301st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
CCU at home. This season: CCU 0-0 at home, WIU 0-0 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WIU 17.5%, CCU 15.3%. Forced: WIU 14.9%, CCU 12.3%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WIU 21%, CCU 21%. Transfers in: WIU 0, CCU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | CCU -16.0 | — |
| Total | — | 142.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | WIU 63.3 · CCU 79.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CCU -9.4 | — |
| 1H total | 66.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | WIU 28.7 · CCU 38.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
WIU 0–1 CCUCCU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · WIU 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2025-26 | CCU 84 @ WIU 64 | WIU +3.5 | CCU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
W Illinois
28 games played
Straight up
2-26
7% wins
Against the spread
11-17
39% covers · avg −5.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-15
46% overs · avg −0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 75-80 | +16.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 58-77 | +30.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 58-74 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 59-69 | +15.5 | W +5.5 | 140.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 64-84 | +3.5 | L −16.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 69-78 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 57-108 | +17.5 | L −33.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 69-66 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 76-92 | +12.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 61-66 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 60-67 | +13.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 50-73 | +13.5 | L −9.5 | 147.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 68-90 | +6.5 | L −15.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 54-59 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 55-57 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 132.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 79-86 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 66-71 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 64-96 | +6.5 | L −25.5 | 136.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 74-78 | +10.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 44-84 | +10.5 | L −29.5 | 137.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 72-97 | +9.5 | L −15.5 | 143.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 56-83 | +15.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 79-70 | +4.5 | W +13.5 | 133.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 58-77 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 70-77 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 59-81 | +8.5 | L −13.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 47-67 | +13.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 69-91 | +11.5 | L −10.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
RAD
L 75-80
+11.5
7
@
IOWA
L 58-77
+11.5
11
@
CSUB
L 58-74
−8.5
14
@
CBU
L 59-69
+5.5
21
vs
CCU
L 64-84
−16.5
23
vs
UND
L 69-78
−6.5
2
@
DRKE
L 57-108
−33.5
13
@
UND
W 69-66
+10.5
18
@
LIN
L 76-92
−3.5
22
vs
SIUE
L 61-66
+1.5
1
@
UTM
L 60-67
+6.5
3
@
SEMO
L 50-73
−9.5
8
vs
TNST
L 68-90
−15.5
10
vs
TNTC
L 54-59
−1.5
13
@
EIU
L 55-57
+4.5
17
@
LR
L 79-86
+3.5
22
@
MORE
L 66-71
+3.5
23
@
USI
L 64-96
−25.5
29
vs
SEMO
L 74-78
+6.5
31
vs
UTM
L 44-84
−29.5
5
@
TNTC
L 72-97
−15.5
7
@
TNST
L 56-83
−11.5
10
vs
EIU
W 79-70
+13.5
12
vs
LR
L 58-77
−11.5
19
vs
USI
L 70-77
−3.5
21
vs
MORE
L 59-81
−13.5
26
@
SIUE
L 47-67
−6.5
28
vs
LIN
L 69-91
−10.5
covered 11didn’t cover 17avg −5.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
RAD
L 75-80
+3.5
7
@
IOWA
L 58-77
−10.5
11
@
CSUB
L 58-74
−9.5
14
@
CBU
L 59-69
−12.5
21
vs
CCU
L 64-84
+9.5
23
vs
UND
L 69-78
+0.5
2
@
DRKE
L 57-108
+26.5
13
@
UND
W 69-66
−10.5
18
@
LIN
L 76-92
+21.5
22
vs
SIUE
L 61-66
−11.5
1
@
UTM
L 60-67
−13.5
3
@
SEMO
L 50-73
−24.5
8
vs
TNST
L 68-90
+12.5
10
vs
TNTC
L 54-59
−30.5
13
@
EIU
L 55-57
−20.5
17
@
LR
L 79-86
+29.5
22
@
MORE
L 66-71
−1.5
23
@
USI
L 64-96
+23.5
29
vs
SEMO
L 74-78
+9.5
31
vs
UTM
L 44-84
−9.5
5
@
TNTC
L 72-97
+25.5
7
@
TNST
L 56-83
−12.5
10
vs
EIU
W 79-70
+15.5
12
vs
LR
L 58-77
−6.5
19
vs
USI
L 70-77
+6.5
21
vs
MORE
L 59-81
−3.5
26
@
SIUE
L 47-67
−21.5
28
vs
LIN
L 69-91
+10.5
over 13under 15avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Coastal
31 games played
Straight up
18-13
58% wins
Against the spread
18-13
58% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-14
55% overs · avg −0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 71-76 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 72-66 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 165.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 67-74 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 84-64 | -3.5 | W +16.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 75-58 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 42-94 | +12.5 | L −39.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 67-60 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 78-85 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 88-84 | +16.5 | W +20.5 | 153.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 61-82 | +17.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 49-67 | +4.5 | L −13.5 | 137.5 | U 116 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 76-74 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 22 | @ | W 68-62 | +7.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 81-82 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 71-89 | -6.5 | L −24.5 | 148.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 66-70 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 67-62 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 133.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 85-83 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 79-75 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 72-70 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 85-67 | -2.5 | W +15.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 48-53 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | U 101 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 83-79 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 66-70 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 94-91 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 69-65 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 132.5 | O 134 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 65-67 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 79-75 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 76-71 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 69-68 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 72-96 | -1.5 | L −25.5 | 151.5 | O 168 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
WMU
L 71-76
−2.5
11
vs
WIN
W 72-66
+8.5
14
@
JXST
L 67-74
+0.5
21
@
WIU
W 84-64
+16.5
22
vs
UND
W 75-58
+13.5
23
@
ILST
L 42-94
−39.5
30
vs
AAMU
W 67-60
−0.5
3
@
UPST
L 78-85
−4.5
6
@
WIN
W 88-84
+20.5
13
@
GCU
L 61-82
−3.5
18
@
APP
L 49-67
−13.5
20
@
ODU
W 76-74
+5.5
22
@
JOES
W 68-62
+13.5
1
vs
GASO
L 81-82
−2.5
3
vs
GAST
L 71-89
−24.5
8
vs
ODU
L 66-70
−8.5
10
vs
APP
W 67-62
+6.5
14
@
MRSH
W 85-83
+11.5
17
@
GASO
W 79-75
+10.5
22
vs
TXST
W 72-70
+0.5
24
vs
USM
W 85-67
+15.5
29
@
USA
L 48-53
−1.5
1
@
ULM
W 83-79
−6.5
4
vs
ARST
L 66-70
+0.5
7
vs
MASS
W 94-91
+5.5
12
@
UL
W 69-65
+2.5
18
vs
JMU
L 65-67
−0.5
21
vs
MRSH
W 79-75
+6.5
24
@
GAST
W 76-71
+3.5
27
@
JMU
W 69-68
+7.5
7
vs
GASO
L 72-96
−25.5
covered 18didn’t cover 13avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
WMU
L 71-76
+0.5
11
vs
WIN
W 72-66
−27.5
14
@
JXST
L 67-74
+1.5
21
@
WIU
W 84-64
+9.5
22
vs
UND
W 75-58
−14.5
23
@
ILST
L 42-94
−10.5
30
vs
AAMU
W 67-60
−13.5
3
@
UPST
L 78-85
+18.5
6
@
WIN
W 88-84
+18.5
13
@
GCU
L 61-82
−0.5
18
@
APP
L 49-67
−21.5
20
@
ODU
W 76-74
+2.5
22
@
JOES
W 68-62
−14.5
1
vs
GASO
L 81-82
+5.5
3
vs
GAST
L 71-89
+11.5
8
vs
ODU
L 66-70
−15.5
10
vs
APP
W 67-62
−4.5
14
@
MRSH
W 85-83
+16.5
17
@
GASO
W 79-75
−3.5
22
vs
TXST
W 72-70
+1.5
24
vs
USM
W 85-67
+10.5
29
@
USA
L 48-53
−38.5
1
@
ULM
W 83-79
+15.5
4
vs
ARST
L 66-70
−15.5
7
vs
MASS
W 94-91
+37.5
12
@
UL
W 69-65
+1.5
18
vs
JMU
L 65-67
−8.5
21
vs
MRSH
W 79-75
+0.5
24
@
GAST
W 76-71
+5.5
27
@
JMU
W 69-68
−4.5
7
vs
GASO
L 72-96
+16.5
over 17under 14avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: W Illinois 0, Coastal 0, even 5
W IllinoisBetterCoastal
G M. Kvamme5 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 9
=Even
G T. Thompson3.7 pts · 4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 15
F D. Stephens5.5 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 13
=Even
G D. Washington TR4.5 pts · 2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 25
F J. Riley NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G T. Perry TR4.7 pts · 1.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 38
F I. Davis NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G D. Craig4.4 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 31
F D. Traylor NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F A. Hardaway TR5.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 44
W IllinoisBetterCoastal
WIU offense365th of 366 · -15.6
→CCUSmall
CCU defense246th of 366 · -6.5
WIU defense362nd of 366 · -11.6
→CCUSmall
CCU offense295th of 366 · -9.1
Backcourt-3.1 · 1 player
←WIUSmall
Backcourt-4.7 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.7 · 4 players
→CCUSmall
Frontcourt-0.4 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-1.9 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestWIU betterCCU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Kvamme26 minD. FlowersNewH. VaughnNewA. KonateNewJ. CainNewT. MooreNew
Forwards
D. Stephens17 minJ. RileyNewI. DavisNewD. TraylorNewM. BiembongoNewS. HigginsNew
Guards
T. Thompson20 minD. Washington15 min · TRT. Perry13 min · TRD. Craig12 minJ. Cross6 min · TRJ. AlstonNew
Forwards
A. Hardaway20 min · TRD. Green11 minD. Fuquay8 min · TRF. BighamNewJ. BuzzardNew
Centers
C. Middleton10 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.2 #357 | Points per game | 71.8 #251 |
| 0.94 #359 | Points per possession | 1.03 #290 |
| 67.6 #246 | Pace (possessions) | 69.9 #121 |
| Shooting | ||
| 44.5 #361 | Effective FG% | 47.9 #314 |
| 30.9 #322 | 3-point % | 33.5 #196 |
| 33.3 #311 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.1 #113 |
| 37.7 #108 | Free throw rate | 32.3 #254 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.5 #239 | Turnover rate | 15.3 #84 |
| 27.0 #293 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.9 #296 |
| 8.1 #365 | Assists per game | 9.9 #359 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.5 #281 | Points allowed | 73.5 #143 |
| 1.16 #334 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #88 |
| 54.2 #303 | Opponent effective FG% | 46.8 #18 |
| 35.6 #288 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.8 #105 |
| 14.9 #300 | Turnovers forced | 12.3 #364 |
| 65.2 #334 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.4 #52 |
| 5.1 #331 | Steals per game | 4.3 #360 |
| 2.0 #346 | Blocks per game | 3.2 #187 |
W Illinois
2-26 in 2025-26 overall · 1-19 in conference · Ohio Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Lindenwood Lions69–91
- L@ SIUE47–67
- Lvs Morehead St59–81
- Lvs Southern Indiana Screaming Eagles70–77
- Lvs Little Rock58–77
A week or more of rest.
Coastal
18-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs GA Southern72–96
- W@ James Madison69–68
- W@ Georgia St76–71
- Wvs Marshall79–75
- Lvs James Madison65–67
A week or more of rest.