Pensacola Bay Center · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | VAL | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TROY 74–73 · win probability TROY 51%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: VAL has more of the edges
TROY 1, VAL 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: TROY 51.5 and allows 50.2; VAL 47.6 and allows 50.5
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: TROY 11%, VAL 51%. Transfers in: TROY 6, VAL 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Turnovers
Turnover rate: TROY 17.3%, VAL 15.7%. Forced: TROY 16.7%, VAL 16.9%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: TROY plays 69.6 a game (141st fastest), VAL 67.4 (258th). Faster games mean more points
Even
VAL offense vs TROY defense
Offense 199th of 366 against a defense 162nd, on the model’s ratings
Even
TROY offense vs VAL defense
Offense 143rd of 366 against a defense 170th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
TROY has played the 166th-hardest schedule, VAL the 143rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Three-pointers
TROY hits 33.0% and allows 31.6%; VAL hits 33.9% and allows 32.1%. Threes are 45.9% and 36.8% of their shots
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: TROY 34.5%, VAL 32.5%. Defensive: TROY 68.3%, VAL 69.9%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: TROY 36.2, VAL 39.1. Allowed: TROY 31.4, VAL 35.1
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TROY -0.2 | — |
| Total | — | 146.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | TROY 73.5 · VAL 73.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TROY -0.3 | — |
| 1H total | 68.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | TROY 34.5 · VAL 34.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 2-8 20% | |
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Troy
32 games played
Straight up
20-12
63% wins
Against the spread
18-14
56% covers · avg −1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg +2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 103-97 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | O 200 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 64-61 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 63-74 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 85-94 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 157.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 18 | @ | W 108-107 | +14.5 | W +15.5 | 137.5 | O 215 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 106-107 | +18.5 | W +17.5 | 159.5 | O 213 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 68-75 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 159.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 74-64 | -21.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 1 | vs | L 89-93 | -17.5 | L −21.5 | 150.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 14 | @ | W 86-85 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 70-63 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 100-80 | -8.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 59-49 | -9.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 108 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 74-86 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 160.5 | U 160 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 90-70 | -9.5 | W +10.5 | 136.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 91-65 | -8.5 | W +17.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 99-74 | -3.5 | W +21.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 83-77 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 83-78 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 64-73 | -9.5 | L −18.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 44-66 | -7.5 | L −29.5 | 137.5 | U 110 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 74-63 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 79-69 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 62-74 | -5.5 | L −17.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 65-69 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 77-76 | -17.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 54-65 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 78-59 | -11.5 | W +7.5 | 134.5 | O 137 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 80-65 | -18.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 78-70 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 77-61 | -5.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 47-76 | +13.5 | L −15.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
KENT
W 103-97
+9.5
7
@
FUR
W 64-61
+5.5
14
@
LMU
L 63-74
−6.5
16
@
CSUN
L 85-94
−13.5
18
@
SDSU
W 108-107
+15.5
20
@
USC
L 106-107
+17.5
24
vs
TOL
L 68-75
−9.5
26
vs
SFPA
W 74-64
−11.5
1
vs
WGA
L 89-93
−21.5
14
@
UAB
W 86-85
+7.5
20
vs
MRSH
W 70-63
+2.5
31
vs
TXST
W 100-80
+11.5
3
vs
USA
W 59-49
+0.5
7
@
ARST
L 74-86
−7.5
10
@
UL
W 90-70
+10.5
14
vs
USM
W 91-65
+17.5
17
vs
ARST
W 99-74
+21.5
21
@
ODU
W 83-77
+0.5
24
@
GASO
W 83-78
+0.5
29
vs
JMU
L 64-73
−18.5
31
vs
APP
L 44-66
−29.5
4
@
GAST
W 74-63
+4.5
7
vs
AKR
W 79-69
+12.5
11
@
TXST
L 62-74
−17.5
14
@
USM
L 65-69
−9.5
18
@
ULM
W 77-76
−16.5
21
@
USA
L 54-65
−13.5
24
vs
UL
W 78-59
+7.5
27
vs
ULM
W 80-65
−3.5
8
vs
USM
W 78-70
+2.5
9
vs
GASO
W 77-61
+10.5
19
vs
NEB
L 47-76
−15.5
covered 18didn’t cover 14avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
KENT
W 103-97
+57.5
7
@
FUR
W 64-61
−27.5
14
@
LMU
L 63-74
−3.5
16
@
CSUN
L 85-94
+21.5
18
@
SDSU
W 108-107
+77.5
20
@
USC
L 106-107
+53.5
24
vs
TOL
L 68-75
−16.5
26
vs
SFPA
W 74-64
−13.5
1
vs
WGA
L 89-93
+31.5
14
@
UAB
W 86-85
+15.5
20
vs
MRSH
W 70-63
−22.5
31
vs
TXST
W 100-80
+34.5
3
vs
USA
W 59-49
−40.5
7
@
ARST
L 74-86
−0.5
10
@
UL
W 90-70
+23.5
14
vs
USM
W 91-65
+10.5
17
vs
ARST
W 99-74
+7.5
21
@
ODU
W 83-77
+7.5
24
@
GASO
W 83-78
+1.5
29
vs
JMU
L 64-73
−10.5
31
vs
APP
L 44-66
−27.5
4
@
GAST
W 74-63
−7.5
7
vs
AKR
W 79-69
−9.5
11
@
TXST
L 62-74
−4.5
14
@
USM
L 65-69
−10.5
18
@
ULM
W 77-76
−0.5
21
@
USA
L 54-65
−23.5
24
vs
UL
W 78-59
+2.5
27
vs
ULM
W 80-65
−8.5
8
vs
USM
W 78-70
+5.5
9
vs
GASO
W 77-61
−14.5
19
vs
NEB
L 47-76
−16.5
over 14under 18avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Valparaiso
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +2.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg −0.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 66-63 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 59-107 | +32.5 | L −15.5 | 157.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 68-63 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 68-50 | -6.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 90-75 | +2.5 | W +17.5 | 158.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 56-64 | -9.5 | L −17.5 | 150.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 84-55 | -4.5 | W +24.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 72-75 | +17.5 | W +14.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 70-73 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 70-86 | +14.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 79-85 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 48-58 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 131.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 70-75 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 66-59 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 77-71 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 79-92 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 74-78 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 54-44 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 130.5 | U 98 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 69-63 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 77-78 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 76-72 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 65-72 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 70-63 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 81-76 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 64-86 | +8.5 | L −13.5 | 138.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 76-75 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 79-72 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 71-67 | +7.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 74-71 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 79-80 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 63-62 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 84-90 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | O 174 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
EIU
W 66-63
−2.5
7
@
UK
L 59-107
−15.5
12
vs
NICH
W 68-63
+2.5
16
vs
BRY
W 68-50
+11.5
19
@
CLE
W 90-75
+17.5
26
vs
USI
L 56-64
−17.5
29
vs
WMU
W 84-55
+24.5
2
@
MARQ
L 72-75
+14.5
13
vs
UNCW
L 70-73
+1.5
16
@
NU
L 70-86
−1.5
21
vs
MUR
L 79-85
−0.5
29
@
UNI
L 48-58
−1.5
1
@
SIU
L 70-75
+2.5
4
vs
UIC
W 66-59
+4.5
7
vs
ILST
W 77-71
+12.5
10
@
MUR
L 79-92
−0.5
13
@
BEL
L 74-78
+7.5
17
vs
UNI
W 54-44
+11.5
21
vs
SIU
W 69-63
+4.5
28
vs
BEL
L 77-78
+4.5
31
@
INST
W 76-72
+6.5
3
@
BRAD
L 65-72
+0.5
6
vs
EVAN
W 70-63
−1.5
9
@
DRKE
W 81-76
+8.5
12
@
ILST
L 64-86
−13.5
15
vs
INST
W 76-75
−3.5
18
vs
BRAD
W 79-72
+9.5
21
@
UIC
W 71-67
+11.5
25
vs
DRKE
W 74-71
+0.5
28
@
EVAN
L 79-80
−6.5
5
vs
INST
W 63-62
−1.5
6
vs
BRAD
L 84-90
−0.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
EIU
W 66-63
−15.5
7
@
UK
L 59-107
+8.5
12
vs
NICH
W 68-63
−13.5
16
vs
BRY
W 68-50
−25.5
19
@
CLE
W 90-75
+6.5
26
vs
USI
L 56-64
−30.5
29
vs
WMU
W 84-55
−7.5
2
@
MARQ
L 72-75
+0.5
13
vs
UNCW
L 70-73
+6.5
16
@
NU
L 70-86
+10.5
21
vs
MUR
L 79-85
+8.5
29
@
UNI
L 48-58
−25.5
1
@
SIU
L 70-75
−0.5
4
vs
UIC
W 66-59
−19.5
7
vs
ILST
W 77-71
+9.5
10
@
MUR
L 79-92
+18.5
13
@
BEL
L 74-78
+5.5
17
vs
UNI
W 54-44
−32.5
21
vs
SIU
W 69-63
−10.5
28
vs
BEL
L 77-78
+9.5
31
@
INST
W 76-72
+2.5
3
@
BRAD
L 65-72
−7.5
6
vs
EVAN
W 70-63
−3.5
9
@
DRKE
W 81-76
+12.5
12
@
ILST
L 64-86
+11.5
15
vs
INST
W 76-75
+5.5
18
vs
BRAD
W 79-72
+8.5
21
@
UIC
W 71-67
−0.5
25
vs
DRKE
W 74-71
−1.5
28
@
EVAN
L 79-80
+21.5
5
vs
INST
W 63-62
−15.5
6
vs
BRAD
L 84-90
+34.5
over 17under 15avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Troy 1, Valparaiso 1, even 3
TroyBetterValparaiso
G R. Davis TR9.9 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 14
→VALBig
G R. Chaney10.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 62
G D. Oday TR18.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 95
←TROYBig
G B. Alocen TR6.4 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 34
G J. Hutchinson TR12.1 pts · 3.4 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 76
=Even
G J. McNair7.9 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 65
F C. Diggs TR10.3 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 59
=Even
F J. Pettigrew12.6 pts · 6.9 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 70
F K. Kiel3.6 pts · 3.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 23
=Even
F C. Hopoi3.5 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 23
TroyBetterValparaiso
TROY offense143rd of 366 · -4.3
=Even
VAL defense170th of 366 · -3.9
TROY defense162nd of 366 · -3.6
=Even
VAL offense199th of 366 · -6.1
Backcourt+1.4 · 3 players
←TROYSmall
Backcourt-1.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.0 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.1 · 2 players
Bench-2.0 · 4 players
→VALSmall
Bench-0.5 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestTROY betterVAL betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Davis31 min · TRD. Oday30 min · TRJ. Hutchinson29 min · TRH. Awata2 minJ. KontuniemiNewR. ValakouNew
Forwards
C. Diggs23 min · TRK. Kiel16 minM. Ikegwuruka13 min · TRS. Walters9 min · TRE. Griffin5 min
Centers
A. PachecoNew
Guards
R. Chaney29 minB. Alocen22 min · TRJ. McNair18 minS. Servilus10 minN. Lombardi1 minC. Webster1 min
Forwards
J. Pettigrew28 minC. Hopoi15 minK. WalkerNewG. RichardsonNewH. ScrogginsNew
Centers
K. Yu8 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.3 #110 | Points per game | 71.2 #263 |
| 1.11 #113 | Points per possession | 1.06 #233 |
| 69.6 #141 | Pace (possessions) | 67.4 #258 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.5 #171 | Effective FG% | 47.6 #322 |
| 33.0 #229 | 3-point % | 33.9 #180 |
| 45.9 #47 | 3-point attempt rate | 36.8 #234 |
| 36.2 #147 | Free throw rate | 39.1 #79 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.3 #226 | Turnover rate | 15.7 #116 |
| 34.5 #59 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.5 #110 |
| 15.0 #86 | Assists per game | 11.7 #307 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.5 #178 | Points allowed | 71.9 #103 |
| 1.07 #128 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #116 |
| 50.2 #111 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.5 #130 |
| 31.6 #47 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.1 #70 |
| 16.7 #173 | Turnovers forced | 16.9 #161 |
| 68.3 #243 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.9 #167 |
| 7.2 #107 | Steals per game | 5.9 #245 |
| 3.3 #169 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #124 |
Troy
20-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-6 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Nebraska47–76
- Wvs GA Southern77–61
- Wvs Southern Miss78–70
- Wvs UL Monroe80–65
- Wvs Louisiana78–59
A week or more of rest.
Valparaiso
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 12-10 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Bradley84–90
- Wvs Indiana St63–62
- L@ Evansville79–80
- Wvs Drake74–71
- W@ UIC71–67
A week or more of rest.