Bramlage Coliseum · at Kansas St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | KSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects KSU 85–72 · win probability KSU 87%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 157.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: KSU has more of the edges
CSUN 2, KSU 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
KSU offense vs CSUN defense
Offense 74th of 366 against a defense 271st, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CSUN 31.9%, KSU 29.2%. Defensive: CSUN 73.4%, KSU 66.0%
Context
Schedule so far
CSUN has played the 219th-hardest schedule, KSU the 43rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
CSUN hits 32.4% and allows 34.4%; KSU hits 36.4% and allows 33.7%. Threes are 33.6% and 40.9% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: CSUN 34.2, KSU 26.9. Allowed: CSUN 34.3, KSU 35.2
Home court
KSU at home. This season: KSU 0-0 at home, CSUN 0-0 away
Even
CSUN offense vs KSU defense
Offense 140th of 366 against a defense 97th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: CSUN 51.3 and allows 51.6; KSU 53.3 and allows 52.5
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CSUN 17.5%, KSU 17.4%. Forced: CSUN 16.5%, KSU 17.1%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CSUN 18%, KSU 7%. Transfers in: CSUN 7, KSU 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 75 possessions: CSUN plays 75.6 a game (2nd fastest), KSU 73.8 (11th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | KSU -13.1 | — |
| Total | — | 157.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | CSUN 72.3 · KSU 85.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | KSU -7.6 | — |
| 1H total | 73.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | CSUN 33 · KSU 40.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
CSU Northridge
32 games played
Straight up
18-14
56% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-13
59% overs · avg +2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 57-86 | +9.5 | L −19.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 9 | @ | W 93-85 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 68-90 | +4.5 | L −17.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 94-85 | +4.5 | W +13.5 | 157.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 64-78 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 50-82 | +1.5 | L −30.5 | 148.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 87-66 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 71-85 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 89-87 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 88-66 | +1.5 | W +23.5 | 144.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 100-88 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 164.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 27 | @ | L 80-88 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 160.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 80-89 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 74-65 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 95-90 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 175.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 79-86 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 173.5 | U 165 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 84-79 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 80-87 | -7.5 | L −14.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 68-89 | +10.5 | L −10.5 | 158.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 94-78 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 81-64 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 160.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 97-96 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 177.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 88-74 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 160.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 84-60 | +2.5 | W +26.5 | 162.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 85-83 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 78-76 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 67-68 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 84-95 | -4.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 86-84 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 77-90 | -5.5 | L −18.5 | 170.5 | U 167 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 80-70 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 78-93 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
UNI
L 57-86
−19.5
9
@
UND
W 93-85
+1.5
11
@
NDSU
L 68-90
−17.5
16
vs
TROY
W 94-85
+13.5
26
vs
IDHO
L 64-78
−12.5
28
vs
IDST
L 50-82
−30.5
4
vs
CSUB
W 87-66
+15.5
6
@
UCI
L 71-85
−6.5
10
vs
FRES
W 89-87
−1.5
13
@
DEL
W 88-66
+23.5
22
vs
SAC
W 100-88
+3.5
27
@
STAN
L 80-88
+7.5
1
@
UCD
L 80-89
−5.5
3
vs
UCSB
W 74-65
+6.5
8
vs
CP
W 95-90
−1.5
10
@
CSUF
L 79-86
−5.5
15
@
UCSD
W 84-79
+12.5
17
vs
LBSU
L 80-87
−14.5
24
@
HAW
L 68-89
−10.5
29
vs
UCD
W 94-78
+12.5
31
vs
UCSD
W 81-64
+18.5
5
@
CP
W 97-96
−1.5
7
vs
UCR
W 88-74
+3.5
14
vs
HAW
W 84-60
+26.5
19
@
UCSB
W 85-83
+7.5
21
@
LBSU
W 78-76
−0.5
26
vs
UCI
L 67-68
−2.5
28
@
UCR
L 84-95
−15.5
5
@
CSUB
W 86-84
−6.5
7
vs
CSUF
L 77-90
−18.5
12
vs
UCSD
W 80-70
+11.5
13
vs
UCI
L 78-93
−11.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
UNI
L 57-86
−10.5
9
@
UND
W 93-85
+19.5
11
@
NDSU
L 68-90
+1.5
16
vs
TROY
W 94-85
+21.5
26
vs
IDHO
L 64-78
−17.5
28
vs
IDST
L 50-82
−16.5
4
vs
CSUB
W 87-66
−2.5
6
@
UCI
L 71-85
+3.5
10
vs
FRES
W 89-87
+14.5
13
@
DEL
W 88-66
+9.5
22
vs
SAC
W 100-88
+23.5
27
@
STAN
L 80-88
+7.5
1
@
UCD
L 80-89
+6.5
3
vs
UCSB
W 74-65
−17.5
8
vs
CP
W 95-90
+9.5
10
@
CSUF
L 79-86
−8.5
15
@
UCSD
W 84-79
+3.5
17
vs
LBSU
L 80-87
+8.5
24
@
HAW
L 68-89
−1.5
29
vs
UCD
W 94-78
+8.5
31
vs
UCSD
W 81-64
−15.5
5
@
CP
W 97-96
+15.5
7
vs
UCR
W 88-74
+1.5
14
vs
HAW
W 84-60
−18.5
19
@
UCSB
W 85-83
+11.5
21
@
LBSU
W 78-76
−3.5
26
vs
UCI
L 67-68
−18.5
28
@
UCR
L 84-95
+20.5
5
@
CSUB
W 86-84
+6.5
7
vs
CSUF
L 77-90
−3.5
12
vs
UCSD
W 80-70
−3.5
13
vs
UCI
L 78-93
+18.5
over 19under 13avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Kansas St
32 games played
Straight up
12-20
38% wins
Against the spread
12-20
38% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 93-64 | -18.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 98-71 | -28.5 | L −1.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 99-96 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 164.5 | O 195 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 84-83 | -12.5 | L −11.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 98-77 | +2.5 | W +23.5 | 164.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 85-86 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 168.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 69-86 | +10.5 | L −6.5 | 164.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 1 | vs | L 66-82 | -12.5 | L −28.5 | 159.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 67-78 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 108-49 | -38.5 | W +20.5 | 160.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 83-76 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 106-76 | -21.5 | W +8.5 | 176.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 94-85 | -32.5 | L −23.5 | 169.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 73-83 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 174.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 76-101 | +17.5 | L −7.5 | 171.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 84-87 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 169.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 73-82 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 170.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 83-84 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 175.5 | U 167 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 81-78 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 168.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 62-86 | +4.5 | L −19.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 54-59 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 61-95 | +12.5 | L −21.5 | 156.5 | U 156 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 82-84 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 62-91 | +2.5 | L −26.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 64-78 | +22.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 90-74 | +3.5 | W +19.5 | 159.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 72-100 | +12.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 70-79 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 163.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 68-77 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 65-63 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 85-104 | +17.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 189 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 91-105 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 168.5 | O 196 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
UNCG
W 93-64
+10.5
8
vs
BELL
W 98-71
−1.5
13
vs
CAL
W 99-96
−3.5
17
vs
TLSA
W 84-83
−11.5
20
vs
MSST
W 98-77
+23.5
21
vs
NEB
L 85-86
+0.5
25
@
IU
L 69-86
−6.5
1
vs
BGSU
L 66-82
−28.5
6
vs
HALL
L 67-78
−13.5
8
vs
MVSU
W 108-49
+20.5
13
@
CREI
W 83-76
+11.5
20
vs
SDAK
W 106-76
+8.5
28
vs
ULM
W 94-85
−23.5
3
vs
BYU
L 73-83
−2.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 76-101
−7.5
10
@
ASU
L 84-87
−1.5
14
vs
UCF
L 73-82
−11.5
17
@
OKST
L 83-84
+1.5
20
vs
UTAH
W 81-78
−7.5
24
vs
KU
L 62-86
−19.5
27
@
WVU
L 54-59
+2.5
1
vs
ISU
L 61-95
−21.5
7
@
TCU
L 82-84
+7.5
11
vs
CIN
L 62-91
−26.5
14
@
HOU
L 64-78
+8.5
17
vs
BAY
W 90-74
+19.5
21
@
TTU
L 72-100
−15.5
25
@
COLO
L 70-79
−3.5
28
vs
TCU
L 68-77
−5.5
3
vs
WVU
W 65-63
+5.5
7
@
KU
L 85-104
−1.5
10
vs
BYU
L 91-105
−2.5
covered 12didn’t cover 20avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
UNCG
W 93-64
+8.5
8
vs
BELL
W 98-71
+0.5
13
vs
CAL
W 99-96
+30.5
17
vs
TLSA
W 84-83
+6.5
20
vs
MSST
W 98-77
+10.5
21
vs
NEB
L 85-86
+2.5
25
@
IU
L 69-86
−9.5
1
vs
BGSU
L 66-82
−11.5
6
vs
HALL
L 67-78
−3.5
8
vs
MVSU
W 108-49
−3.5
13
@
CREI
W 83-76
−0.5
20
vs
SDAK
W 106-76
+5.5
28
vs
ULM
W 94-85
+9.5
3
vs
BYU
L 73-83
−18.5
7
@
ARIZ
L 76-101
+5.5
10
@
ASU
L 84-87
+1.5
14
vs
UCF
L 73-82
−15.5
17
@
OKST
L 83-84
−8.5
20
vs
UTAH
W 81-78
−9.5
24
vs
KU
L 62-86
−10.5
27
@
WVU
L 54-59
−33.5
1
vs
ISU
L 61-95
−0.5
7
@
TCU
L 82-84
+10.5
11
vs
CIN
L 62-91
+5.5
14
@
HOU
L 64-78
−2.5
17
vs
BAY
W 90-74
+4.5
21
@
TTU
L 72-100
+13.5
25
@
COLO
L 70-79
−14.5
28
vs
TCU
L 68-77
−14.5
3
vs
WVU
W 65-63
−15.5
7
@
KU
L 85-104
+31.5
10
vs
BYU
L 91-105
+27.5
over 16under 16avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Kansas St has the better starters
Position by position: CSU Northridge 0, Kansas St 1, even 4
CSU NorthridgeBetterKansas St
G J. Davis16.2 pts · 4.7 reb · 7.5 ast
Score 71
=Even
G B. Rechsteiner TR12 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 71
G C. Smith TR7.1 pts · 7.1 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 36
=Even
G J. Schutt TR7.7 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 39
G M. Ballew TR8.3 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 19
→KSUSmall
G M. Wheeler TR8.4 pts · 1.2 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 50
G B. Hicks TR8.6 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 49
=Even
F D. Lindsay TR5.3 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 51
G K. Ekissi TR4.7 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 29
=Even
F I. Abraham TR4.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 31
CSU NorthridgeBetterKansas St
CSUN offense140th of 366 · -4.2
=Even
KSU defense97th of 366 · -0.7
CSUN defense271st of 366 · -6.8
→KSUBig
KSU offense74th of 366 · +1.4
Backcourt-4.7 · 5 players
→KSUBig
Backcourt-1.1 · 3 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt-1.2 · 2 players
Bench-2.4 · 4 players
→KSUSmall
Bench-0.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCSUN betterKSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Davis34 minC. Smith30 min · TRM. Ballew23 min · TRB. Hicks22 min · TRK. Ekissi17 min · TRG. Gazarian2 min
Forwards
J. Martin7 min · TRB. OmotNew
Centers
E. Stephen15 min · TRL. Niang8 min · TR
Guards
B. Rechsteiner28 min · TRJ. Schutt25 min · TRM. Wheeler22 min · TRA. Kostic14 minJ. AlexanderNew
Forwards
D. Lindsay21 min · TRI. Abraham20 min · TRT. Malovec15 min · TRP. N'Diaye9 min · TRB. Vice6 min · TRM. GilhoolNew
Centers
J. Rock13 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.6 #54 | Points per game | 79.6 #74 |
| 1.06 #219 | Points per possession | 1.08 #191 |
| 75.6 #2 | Pace (possessions) | 73.8 #11 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.3 #183 | Effective FG% | 53.3 #88 |
| 32.4 #260 | 3-point % | 36.4 #43 |
| 33.6 #308 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.9 #148 |
| 34.2 #200 | Free throw rate | 26.9 #351 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.5 #237 | Turnover rate | 17.4 #233 |
| 31.9 #130 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.2 #229 |
| 16.7 #31 | Assists per game | 16.8 #29 |
| Defense | ||
| 81.3 #336 | Points allowed | 81.8 #339 |
| 1.08 #153 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #244 |
| 51.6 #191 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.5 #239 |
| 34.4 #210 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.7 #166 |
| 16.5 #187 | Turnovers forced | 17.1 #145 |
| 73.4 #26 | Defensive rebound rate | 66.0 #317 |
| 6.6 #166 | Steals per game | 7.0 #121 |
| 2.8 #259 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #137 |
CSU Northridge
18-14 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UC Irvine78–93
- Wvs UC San Diego80–70
- Lvs Fullerton77–90
- W@ Bakersfield86–84
- L@ UC Riverside84–95
A week or more of rest.
Kansas St
12-20 in 2025-26 overall · 3-16 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs BYU91–105
- L@ Kansas85–104
- Wvs West Virginia65–63
- Lvs TCU68–77
- L@ Colorado70–79
A week or more of rest.