Kohl Center · at Wisconsin
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | WIS | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WIS 91–65 · win probability WIS 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: WIS has more of the edges
NE 0, WIS 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
WIS offense vs NE defense
Offense 44th of 366 against a defense 263rd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
NE has played the 185th-hardest schedule, WIS the 24th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: NE 29.4, WIS 31.5. Allowed: NE 41.9, WIS 29.9
NE offense vs WIS defense
Offense 194th of 366 against a defense 40th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
NE hits 33.7% and allows 35.8%; WIS hits 36.2% and allows 33.5%. Threes are 37.8% and 52.1% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: NE 52.4 and allows 56.4; WIS 54.5 and allows 51.4
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NE 27.3%, WIS 29.1%. Defensive: NE 69.8%, WIS 71.8%
Home court
WIS at home. This season: WIS 0-0 at home, NE 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NE 43%, WIS 54%. Transfers in: NE 3, WIS 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NE 16.3%, WIS 12.8%. Forced: NE 16.8%, WIS 14.3%
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: NE plays 69.9 a game (120th fastest), WIS 70.0 (119th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WIS -25.4 | — |
| Total | — | 156.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | NE 65.4 · WIS 90.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WIS -15.0 | — |
| 1H total | 73.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | NE 29 · WIS 44 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Northeastern
31 games played
Straight up
7-24
23% wins
Against the spread
11-20
35% covers · avg −2.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-11
65% overs · avg +7.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 75-76 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 68-65 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 77-60 | +5.5 | W +22.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 74-85 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 134.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 57-70 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 93-86 | +7.5 | W +14.5 | 147.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 73-86 | +17.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 59-76 | -8.5 | L −25.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 73-56 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 83-91 | +14.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 77-85 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 91-103 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 85-74 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 82-97 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 154.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 78-87 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 78-87 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 85-78 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 68-81 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 80-95 | -3.5 | L −18.5 | 148.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 78-83 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 84-89 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 161.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 63-80 | +8.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 55-69 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 67-94 | +5.5 | L −21.5 | 167.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 61-70 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 143.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 68-82 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 77-84 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 65-76 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 83-89 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 88-72 | -2.5 | W +13.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 77-84 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | O 161 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BU
L 75-76
−3.5
7
@
COLG
W 68-65
+8.5
11
@
HARV
W 77-60
+22.5
15
vs
UVM
L 74-85
−12.5
20
@
PRIN
L 57-70
−10.5
22
vs
DUQ
W 93-86
+14.5
28
@
WAKE
L 73-86
+4.5
3
@
HC
L 59-76
−25.5
7
vs
CCSU
W 73-56
+15.5
20
@
SYR
L 83-91
+6.5
22
@
URI
L 77-85
+2.5
29
@
ELON
L 91-103
−7.5
31
@
NCAT
W 85-74
+7.5
3
@
CAM
L 82-97
−11.5
8
vs
UNCW
L 78-87
−4.5
10
vs
TOW
L 78-87
−6.5
15
vs
ELON
W 85-78
+10.5
19
@
MONM
L 68-81
−9.5
22
vs
STBK
L 80-95
−18.5
24
@
DREX
L 78-83
−0.5
31
vs
COFC
L 84-89
−1.5
5
@
HOF
L 63-80
−8.5
7
@
STBK
L 55-69
−10.5
12
vs
W&M
L 67-94
−21.5
19
vs
DREX
L 61-70
−10.5
21
vs
HOF
L 68-82
−7.5
26
@
W&M
L 77-84
+4.5
28
@
HAMP
L 65-76
−7.5
3
vs
MONM
L 83-89
−2.5
6
vs
NCAT
W 88-72
+13.5
7
vs
DREX
L 77-84
−2.5
covered 11didn’t cover 20avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BU
L 75-76
+8.5
7
@
COLG
W 68-65
−14.5
11
@
HARV
W 77-60
−7.5
15
vs
UVM
L 74-85
+24.5
20
@
PRIN
L 57-70
−18.5
22
vs
DUQ
W 93-86
+31.5
28
@
WAKE
L 73-86
+4.5
3
@
HC
L 59-76
−10.5
7
vs
CCSU
W 73-56
−9.5
20
@
SYR
L 83-91
+33.5
22
@
URI
L 77-85
+17.5
29
@
ELON
L 91-103
+40.5
31
@
NCAT
W 85-74
+7.5
3
@
CAM
L 82-97
+24.5
8
vs
UNCW
L 78-87
+22.5
10
vs
TOW
L 78-87
+21.5
15
vs
ELON
W 85-78
+5.5
19
@
MONM
L 68-81
+5.5
22
vs
STBK
L 80-95
+26.5
24
@
DREX
L 78-83
+21.5
31
vs
COFC
L 84-89
+11.5
5
@
HOF
L 63-80
−10.5
7
@
STBK
L 55-69
−29.5
12
vs
W&M
L 67-94
−6.5
19
vs
DREX
L 61-70
−12.5
21
vs
HOF
L 68-82
+5.5
26
@
W&M
L 77-84
−3.5
28
@
HAMP
L 65-76
−4.5
3
vs
MONM
L 83-89
+23.5
6
vs
NCAT
W 88-72
+8.5
7
vs
DREX
L 77-84
+22.5
over 20under 11avg +7.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Wisconsin
35 games played
Straight up
24-11
69% wins
Against the spread
21-14
60% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-13
63% overs · avg +3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 96-64 | -20.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 97-72 | -28.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 86-55 | -26.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 94-69 | -25.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 70-98 | +4.5 | L −23.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 104-83 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 166.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 63-74 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 157.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 85-73 | -10.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 96-76 | -11.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 60-90 | +1.5 | L −28.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 66-76 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 88-61 | -26.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 80-60 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 157.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 73-89 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 80-72 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 91-88 | +19.5 | W +22.5 | 169.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 78-75 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 96-87 | -15.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 98-71 | -5.5 | W +21.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 25 | vs | L 71-73 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 158.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 67-63 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 92-82 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 77-78 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 92-90 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 92-71 | +1.5 | W +22.5 | 149.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 69-86 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 84-71 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 71-85 | -5.5 | L −19.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 90-73 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 78-45 | -14.5 | W +18.5 | 153.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 97-93 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | O 190 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 85-82 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 91-88 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 158.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 65-68 | +12.5 | W +9.5 | 161.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 82-83 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CAM
W 96-64
+11.5
7
vs
NIU
W 97-72
−3.5
11
vs
BALL
W 86-55
+4.5
17
vs
SIUE
W 94-69
−0.5
21
@
BYU
L 70-98
−23.5
27
vs
PROV
W 104-83
+14.5
28
vs
TCU
L 63-74
−16.5
3
vs
NU
W 85-73
+1.5
6
vs
MARQ
W 96-76
+8.5
10
@
NEB
L 60-90
−28.5
19
vs
VILL
L 66-76
−13.5
22
vs
CMU
W 88-61
+0.5
30
vs
MILW
W 80-60
+0.5
3
vs
PUR
L 73-89
−10.5
6
vs
UCLA
W 80-72
+4.5
10
@
MICH
W 91-88
+22.5
13
@
MINN
W 78-75
+1.5
17
vs
RUTG
W 96-87
−6.5
22
@
PSU
W 98-71
+21.5
25
vs
USC
L 71-73
−9.5
28
vs
MINN
W 67-63
−5.5
31
vs
OSU
W 92-82
+5.5
7
@
IU
L 77-78
+2.5
10
@
ILL
W 92-90
+11.5
13
vs
MSU
W 92-71
+22.5
17
@
OSU
L 69-86
−15.5
22
vs
IOWA
W 84-71
+10.5
25
@
ORE
L 71-85
−19.5
28
@
WASH
W 90-73
+15.5
4
vs
MD
W 78-45
+18.5
7
@
PUR
W 97-93
+13.5
12
vs
WASH
W 85-82
−3.5
13
vs
ILL
W 91-88
+11.5
14
vs
MICH
L 65-68
+9.5
19
vs
HPU
L 82-83
−11.5
covered 21didn’t cover 14avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CAM
W 96-64
+8.5
7
vs
NIU
W 97-72
+11.5
11
vs
BALL
W 86-55
−15.5
17
vs
SIUE
W 94-69
+16.5
21
@
BYU
L 70-98
+2.5
27
vs
PROV
W 104-83
+20.5
28
vs
TCU
L 63-74
−20.5
3
vs
NU
W 85-73
+2.5
6
vs
MARQ
W 96-76
+11.5
10
@
NEB
L 60-90
−8.5
19
vs
VILL
L 66-76
−10.5
22
vs
CMU
W 88-61
−3.5
30
vs
MILW
W 80-60
−17.5
3
vs
PUR
L 73-89
+8.5
6
vs
UCLA
W 80-72
−0.5
10
@
MICH
W 91-88
+9.5
13
@
MINN
W 78-75
+6.5
17
vs
RUTG
W 96-87
+33.5
22
@
PSU
W 98-71
+11.5
25
vs
USC
L 71-73
−14.5
28
vs
MINN
W 67-63
−16.5
31
vs
OSU
W 92-82
+18.5
7
@
IU
L 77-78
−2.5
10
@
ILL
W 92-90
+28.5
13
vs
MSU
W 92-71
+13.5
17
@
OSU
L 69-86
−2.5
22
vs
IOWA
W 84-71
+7.5
25
@
ORE
L 71-85
+3.5
28
@
WASH
W 90-73
+9.5
4
vs
MD
W 78-45
−30.5
7
@
PUR
W 97-93
+35.5
12
vs
WASH
W 85-82
+9.5
13
vs
ILL
W 91-88
+20.5
14
vs
MICH
L 65-68
−28.5
19
vs
HPU
L 82-83
+3.5
over 22under 13avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Wisconsin has the better starters
Position by position: Northeastern 0, Wisconsin 3, even 2
NortheasternBetterWisconsin
G M. Loughnane10.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 45
→WISSmall
G E. Elmer TR12.8 pts · 6.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 68
G R. King TR5.8 pts · 2.1 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 46
→WISSmall
G T. Autry TR10.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 61
G M. Newton5.4 pts · 2 reb · 0.9 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G B. Carrington8.3 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 90
G R. Williams7.4 pts · 1.1 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 89
=Even
F N. Winter13.1 pts · 8.5 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 96
C P. Pinter3.3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 5
→WISBig
F A. Rapp9.7 pts · 4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 83
NortheasternBetterWisconsin
NE offense194th of 366 · -6.0
→WISBig
WIS defense40th of 366 · +2.9
NE defense263rd of 366 · -6.8
→WISBig
WIS offense44th of 366 · +4.5
Backcourt-0.9 · 4 players
→WISSmall
Backcourt+2.0 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.0 · 1 player
→WISBig
Frontcourt+6.7 · 2 players
Bench-1.8 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-2.6 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestNE betterWIS betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Loughnane31 minR. King19 min · TRM. Newton17 minR. Williams15 minL. Bond14 min · TRD. GrosberNew
Forwards
B. Young5 min · TRJ. IcitovicNewD. JungNewS. BaptisteNew
Centers
P. Pinter14 minL. Koelsch9 min
Guards
E. Elmer31 min · TRT. Autry29 min · TRB. Carrington18 minJ. Janicki17 minH. Jones7 minZ. Kinziger6 min
Forwards
N. Winter31 minA. Rapp23 minV. Onuetu18 min · TRW. Garlock7 minI. RiddleNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.9 #168 | Points per game | 83.0 #28 |
| 1.07 #210 | Points per possession | 1.18 #27 |
| 69.9 #120 | Pace (possessions) | 70.0 #119 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.4 #130 | Effective FG% | 54.5 #52 |
| 33.7 #187 | 3-point % | 36.2 #50 |
| 37.8 #218 | 3-point attempt rate | 52.1 #6 |
| 29.4 #324 | Free throw rate | 31.5 #267 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.3 #159 | Turnover rate | 12.8 #4 |
| 27.3 #286 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.1 #232 |
| 15.3 #75 | Assists per game | 16.0 #48 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.9 #331 | Points allowed | 76.1 #221 |
| 1.16 #335 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #193 |
| 56.4 #351 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.4 #178 |
| 35.8 #297 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.5 #152 |
| 16.8 #163 | Turnovers forced | 14.3 #327 |
| 69.8 #169 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.8 #74 |
| 7.0 #131 | Steals per game | 5.6 #287 |
| 3.0 #229 | Blocks per game | 3.1 #198 |
Northeastern
7-24 in 2025-26 overall · 3-17 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Drexel77–84
- Wvs NC A&T88–72
- Lvs Monmouth83–89
- L@ Hampton65–76
- L@ William & Mary77–84
A week or more of rest.
Wisconsin
24-11 in 2025-26 overall · 16-7 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs High Point82–83
- Lvs Michigan65–68
- Wvs Illinois91–88
- Wvs Washington85–82
- W@ Purdue97–93
A week or more of rest.