Cabot Center · at Northeastern
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NE | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects PRIN 75–72 · win probability PRIN 58%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: PRIN has more of the edges
PRIN 5, NE 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: PRIN 34.6, NE 29.4. Allowed: PRIN 34.0, NE 41.9
Three-pointers
PRIN hits 33.9% and allows 31.1%; NE hits 33.7% and allows 35.8%. Threes are 44.5% and 37.8% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: PRIN plays 65.0 a game (344th fastest), NE 69.9 (120th). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: PRIN 17.1%, NE 16.3%. Forced: PRIN 14.2%, NE 16.8%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: PRIN 100%, NE 43%. Transfers in: PRIN 0, NE 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
PRIN offense vs NE defense
Offense 177th of 366 against a defense 263rd, on the model’s ratings
NE offense vs PRIN defense
Offense 194th of 366 against a defense 115th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
NE at home. This season: NE 0-0 at home, PRIN 0-0 away
Context
Schedule so far
PRIN has played the 137th-hardest schedule, NE the 185th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: PRIN 27.2%, NE 27.3%. Defensive: PRIN 71.5%, NE 69.8%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: PRIN 49.6 and allows 52.0; NE 52.4 and allows 56.4
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | PRIN -2.2 | — |
| Total | — | 147.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | PRIN 74.7 · NE 72.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | PRIN -1.5 | — |
| 1H total | 68.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | PRIN 35.1 · NE 33.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 1-9 10% | 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
PRIN 4–0 NEPRIN leads · 4 games since 2021-22 · PRIN has won the last 4 meetings · PRIN 2-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2025-26 | NE 57 @ PRIN 70 | PRIN -2.5 | PRIN W |
| Nov 10, 2024-25 | PRIN 79 @ NE 76 | NE +7.5 | NE W |
| Nov 25, 2023-24 | NE 66 @ PRIN 80 | PRIN -12.5 | PRIN W |
| Nov 26, 2022-23 | NE 54 vs PRIN 56 | PRIN -8.5 | NE W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Princeton
28 games played
Straight up
8-20
29% wins
Against the spread
16-12
57% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-15
46% overs · avg −2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 69-104 | +13.5 | L −21.5 | 156.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 73-63 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 57-76 | +22.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 69-89 | +2.5 | L −17.5 | 154.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 70-57 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 64-88 | +9.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 75-79 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 74-79 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 58-60 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 58-63 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 68-73 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 136.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 56-59 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 115 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 61-65 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 75-69 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 78-76 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 76-60 | +7.5 | W +23.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 80-87 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 69-71 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 63-53 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 64-87 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 80-68 | +5.5 | W +17.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 60-61 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 65-89 | +3.5 | L −20.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 65-75 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 137.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 71-80 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 56-58 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 130.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 82-61 | -1.5 | W +19.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 53-78 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
AKR
L 69-104
−21.5
11
vs
BUCK
W 73-63
+5.5
15
@
KU
L 57-76
+3.5
18
@
IONA
L 69-89
−17.5
20
vs
NE
W 70-57
+10.5
24
vs
BRAD
L 64-88
−14.5
25
vs
TEM
L 75-79
+4.5
26
vs
UVM
L 74-79
+0.5
30
vs
JOES
L 58-60
+3.5
3
@
MONM
L 58-63
+0.5
6
@
LUC
L 68-73
+1.5
10
vs
MRMK
L 56-59
−5.5
22
@
TEM
L 61-65
+4.5
30
vs
UVM
W 75-69
+9.5
5
vs
PENN
W 78-76
−1.5
10
vs
YALE
W 76-60
+23.5
17
@
HARV
L 80-87
−2.5
19
@
DART
L 69-71
−3.5
24
vs
BRWN
W 63-53
+5.5
30
@
COR
L 64-87
−15.5
31
@
COLU
W 80-68
+17.5
7
@
PENN
L 60-61
+2.5
13
vs
COR
L 65-89
−20.5
14
vs
COLU
L 65-75
−8.5
20
@
BRWN
L 71-80
−6.5
27
vs
HARV
L 56-58
+1.5
28
vs
DART
W 82-61
+19.5
7
@
YALE
L 53-78
−10.5
covered 16didn’t cover 12avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
AKR
L 69-104
+16.5
11
vs
BUCK
W 73-63
−10.5
15
@
KU
L 57-76
−11.5
18
@
IONA
L 69-89
+3.5
20
vs
NE
W 70-57
−18.5
24
vs
BRAD
L 64-88
+10.5
25
vs
TEM
L 75-79
+8.5
26
vs
UVM
L 74-79
+12.5
30
vs
JOES
L 58-60
−28.5
3
@
MONM
L 58-63
−18.5
6
@
LUC
L 68-73
+4.5
10
vs
MRMK
L 56-59
−19.5
22
@
TEM
L 61-65
−13.5
30
vs
UVM
W 75-69
+7.5
5
vs
PENN
W 78-76
+8.5
10
vs
YALE
W 76-60
−6.5
17
@
HARV
L 80-87
+33.5
19
@
DART
L 69-71
−7.5
24
vs
BRWN
W 63-53
−18.5
30
@
COR
L 64-87
−7.5
31
@
COLU
W 80-68
+8.5
7
@
PENN
L 60-61
−23.5
13
vs
COR
L 65-89
−1.5
14
vs
COLU
L 65-75
+2.5
20
@
BRWN
L 71-80
+21.5
27
vs
HARV
L 56-58
−16.5
28
vs
DART
W 82-61
+0.5
7
@
YALE
L 53-78
−6.5
over 13under 15avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Northeastern
31 games played
Straight up
7-24
23% wins
Against the spread
11-20
35% covers · avg −2.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-11
65% overs · avg +7.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 75-76 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 68-65 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 77-60 | +5.5 | W +22.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 74-85 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 134.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 57-70 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 93-86 | +7.5 | W +14.5 | 147.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 73-86 | +17.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 59-76 | -8.5 | L −25.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 73-56 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 83-91 | +14.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 77-85 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 91-103 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 85-74 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 82-97 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 154.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 78-87 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 78-87 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 85-78 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 68-81 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 80-95 | -3.5 | L −18.5 | 148.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 78-83 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 84-89 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 161.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 63-80 | +8.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 55-69 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 67-94 | +5.5 | L −21.5 | 167.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 61-70 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 143.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 68-82 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 77-84 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 65-76 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 83-89 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 88-72 | -2.5 | W +13.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 77-84 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | O 161 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BU
L 75-76
−3.5
7
@
COLG
W 68-65
+8.5
11
@
HARV
W 77-60
+22.5
15
vs
UVM
L 74-85
−12.5
20
@
PRIN
L 57-70
−10.5
22
vs
DUQ
W 93-86
+14.5
28
@
WAKE
L 73-86
+4.5
3
@
HC
L 59-76
−25.5
7
vs
CCSU
W 73-56
+15.5
20
@
SYR
L 83-91
+6.5
22
@
URI
L 77-85
+2.5
29
@
ELON
L 91-103
−7.5
31
@
NCAT
W 85-74
+7.5
3
@
CAM
L 82-97
−11.5
8
vs
UNCW
L 78-87
−4.5
10
vs
TOW
L 78-87
−6.5
15
vs
ELON
W 85-78
+10.5
19
@
MONM
L 68-81
−9.5
22
vs
STBK
L 80-95
−18.5
24
@
DREX
L 78-83
−0.5
31
vs
COFC
L 84-89
−1.5
5
@
HOF
L 63-80
−8.5
7
@
STBK
L 55-69
−10.5
12
vs
W&M
L 67-94
−21.5
19
vs
DREX
L 61-70
−10.5
21
vs
HOF
L 68-82
−7.5
26
@
W&M
L 77-84
+4.5
28
@
HAMP
L 65-76
−7.5
3
vs
MONM
L 83-89
−2.5
6
vs
NCAT
W 88-72
+13.5
7
vs
DREX
L 77-84
−2.5
covered 11didn’t cover 20avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BU
L 75-76
+8.5
7
@
COLG
W 68-65
−14.5
11
@
HARV
W 77-60
−7.5
15
vs
UVM
L 74-85
+24.5
20
@
PRIN
L 57-70
−18.5
22
vs
DUQ
W 93-86
+31.5
28
@
WAKE
L 73-86
+4.5
3
@
HC
L 59-76
−10.5
7
vs
CCSU
W 73-56
−9.5
20
@
SYR
L 83-91
+33.5
22
@
URI
L 77-85
+17.5
29
@
ELON
L 91-103
+40.5
31
@
NCAT
W 85-74
+7.5
3
@
CAM
L 82-97
+24.5
8
vs
UNCW
L 78-87
+22.5
10
vs
TOW
L 78-87
+21.5
15
vs
ELON
W 85-78
+5.5
19
@
MONM
L 68-81
+5.5
22
vs
STBK
L 80-95
+26.5
24
@
DREX
L 78-83
+21.5
31
vs
COFC
L 84-89
+11.5
5
@
HOF
L 63-80
−10.5
7
@
STBK
L 55-69
−29.5
12
vs
W&M
L 67-94
−6.5
19
vs
DREX
L 61-70
−12.5
21
vs
HOF
L 68-82
+5.5
26
@
W&M
L 77-84
−3.5
28
@
HAMP
L 65-76
−4.5
3
vs
MONM
L 83-89
+23.5
6
vs
NCAT
W 88-72
+8.5
7
vs
DREX
L 77-84
+22.5
over 20under 11avg +7.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Princeton has the better starters
Position by position: Princeton 3, Northeastern 1, even 1
PrincetonBetterNortheastern
G J. Hicke15.8 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 85
←PRINBig
G M. Loughnane10.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 45
G J. Stanton11.1 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 64
←PRINSmall
G R. King TR5.8 pts · 2.1 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 46
G L. Clark6.2 pts · 4 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 29
=No call
G M. Newton5.4 pts · 2 reb · 0.9 ast
Not ranked
G D. Davis14.8 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 69
→NESmall
G R. Williams7.4 pts · 1.1 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 89
F M. Abdullahi9.5 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 54
←PRINBig
C P. Pinter3.3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 5
PrincetonBetterNortheastern
PRIN offense177th of 366 · -5.5
←PRINSmall
NE defense263rd of 366 · -6.8
PRIN defense115th of 366 · -1.5
←PRINSmall
NE offense194th of 366 · -6.0
Backcourt+0.9 · 4 players
←PRINSmall
Backcourt-0.9 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.1 · 1 player
←PRINSmall
Frontcourt-2.0 · 1 player
Bench-4.6 · 5 players
→NESmall
Bench-1.8 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestPRIN betterNE betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Hicke35 minJ. Stanton32 minL. Clark29 minD. Davis28 minS. Whitfield12 minP. Seals8 min
Forwards
M. Abdullahi29 minJ. Huggins22 minC. Happy19 minJ. Hammond7 minC. McSweeney5 minW. Kutzler1 min
Centers
W. HiggsNew
Guards
M. Loughnane31 minR. King19 min · TRM. Newton17 minR. Williams15 minL. Bond14 min · TRD. GrosberNew
Forwards
B. Young5 min · TRJ. IcitovicNewD. JungNewS. BaptisteNew
Centers
P. Pinter14 minL. Koelsch9 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.5 #324 | Points per game | 74.9 #168 |
| 1.04 #268 | Points per possession | 1.07 #210 |
| 65.0 #344 | Pace (possessions) | 69.9 #120 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.6 #260 | Effective FG% | 52.4 #130 |
| 33.9 #177 | 3-point % | 33.7 #187 |
| 44.5 #78 | 3-point attempt rate | 37.8 #218 |
| 34.6 #192 | Free throw rate | 29.4 #324 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.1 #216 | Turnover rate | 16.3 #159 |
| 27.2 #287 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.3 #286 |
| 12.5 #254 | Assists per game | 15.3 #75 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.4 #114 | Points allowed | 80.9 #331 |
| 1.11 #242 | Points allowed per possession | 1.16 #335 |
| 52.0 #209 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.4 #351 |
| 31.1 #36 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.8 #297 |
| 14.2 #328 | Turnovers forced | 16.8 #163 |
| 71.5 #82 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.8 #169 |
| 4.6 #349 | Steals per game | 7.0 #131 |
| 2.1 #341 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #229 |
Princeton
8-20 in 2025-26 overall · 5-9 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Yale53–78
- Wvs Dartmouth82–61
- Lvs Harvard56–58
- L@ Brown71–80
- Lvs Columbia65–75
A week or more of rest.
Northeastern
7-24 in 2025-26 overall · 3-17 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Drexel77–84
- Wvs NC A&T88–72
- Lvs Monmouth83–89
- L@ Hampton65–76
- L@ William & Mary77–84
A week or more of rest.