Welsh-Ryan Arena · at Northwestern · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WIS 77–76 · win probability WIS 53%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: WIS has more of the edges
WIS 3, NU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WIS 29.1%, NU 28.1%. Defensive: WIS 71.8%, NU 65.3%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: WIS plays 70.0 a game (119th fastest), NU 65.5 (328th). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WIS 12.8%, NU 13.1%. Forced: WIS 14.3%, NU 17.5%
Three-pointers
WIS hits 36.2% and allows 33.5%; NU hits 33.0% and allows 33.4%. Threes are 52.1% and 34.0% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WIS 54%, NU 24%. Transfers in: WIS 3, NU 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
NU at home. This season: NU 0-0 at home, WIS 0-0 away
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: WIS 54.5 and allows 51.4; NU 51.7 and allows 51.0
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: WIS 31.5, NU 33.9. Allowed: WIS 29.9, NU 34.8
Even
NU offense vs WIS defense
Offense 67th of 366 against a defense 40th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
WIS has played the 24th-hardest schedule, NU the 36th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
WIS offense vs NU defense
Offense 44th of 366 against a defense 42nd, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WIS -0.8 | — |
| Total | — | 152.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | WIS 76.6 · NU 75.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WIS -0.6 | — |
| 1H total | 71.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | WIS 35.9 · NU 35.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | |
| 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 8 since 2021-22
WIS 6–2 NUWIS leads · 8 games since 2021-22 · WIS has won the last 5 meetings · WIS 5-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2025-26 | NU 73 @ WIS 85 | WIS -10.5 | WIS W |
| Mar 13, 2024-25 | NU 63 vs WIS 70 | WIS -8.5 | NU W |
| Feb 1, 2024-25 | WIS 75 @ NU 69 | NU +4.5 | WIS W |
| Mar 15, 2023-24 | WIS 70 vs NU 61 | NU +5.5 | WIS W |
| Jan 13, 2023-24 | NU 63 @ WIS 71 | WIS -7.5 | WIS W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Wisconsin
35 games played
Straight up
24-11
69% wins
Against the spread
21-14
60% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-13
63% overs · avg +3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 96-64 | -20.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 97-72 | -28.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 86-55 | -26.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 94-69 | -25.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 70-98 | +4.5 | L −23.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 104-83 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 166.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 63-74 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 157.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 85-73 | -10.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 96-76 | -11.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 60-90 | +1.5 | L −28.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 66-76 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 88-61 | -26.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 80-60 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 157.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 73-89 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 80-72 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 91-88 | +19.5 | W +22.5 | 169.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 78-75 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 96-87 | -15.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 98-71 | -5.5 | W +21.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 25 | vs | L 71-73 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 158.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 67-63 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 92-82 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 77-78 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 92-90 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 92-71 | +1.5 | W +22.5 | 149.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 69-86 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 84-71 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 71-85 | -5.5 | L −19.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 90-73 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 78-45 | -14.5 | W +18.5 | 153.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 97-93 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | O 190 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 85-82 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 91-88 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 158.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 65-68 | +12.5 | W +9.5 | 161.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 82-83 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CAM
W 96-64
+11.5
7
vs
NIU
W 97-72
−3.5
11
vs
BALL
W 86-55
+4.5
17
vs
SIUE
W 94-69
−0.5
21
@
BYU
L 70-98
−23.5
27
vs
PROV
W 104-83
+14.5
28
vs
TCU
L 63-74
−16.5
3
vs
NU
W 85-73
+1.5
6
vs
MARQ
W 96-76
+8.5
10
@
NEB
L 60-90
−28.5
19
vs
VILL
L 66-76
−13.5
22
vs
CMU
W 88-61
+0.5
30
vs
MILW
W 80-60
+0.5
3
vs
PUR
L 73-89
−10.5
6
vs
UCLA
W 80-72
+4.5
10
@
MICH
W 91-88
+22.5
13
@
MINN
W 78-75
+1.5
17
vs
RUTG
W 96-87
−6.5
22
@
PSU
W 98-71
+21.5
25
vs
USC
L 71-73
−9.5
28
vs
MINN
W 67-63
−5.5
31
vs
OSU
W 92-82
+5.5
7
@
IU
L 77-78
+2.5
10
@
ILL
W 92-90
+11.5
13
vs
MSU
W 92-71
+22.5
17
@
OSU
L 69-86
−15.5
22
vs
IOWA
W 84-71
+10.5
25
@
ORE
L 71-85
−19.5
28
@
WASH
W 90-73
+15.5
4
vs
MD
W 78-45
+18.5
7
@
PUR
W 97-93
+13.5
12
vs
WASH
W 85-82
−3.5
13
vs
ILL
W 91-88
+11.5
14
vs
MICH
L 65-68
+9.5
19
vs
HPU
L 82-83
−11.5
covered 21didn’t cover 14avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CAM
W 96-64
+8.5
7
vs
NIU
W 97-72
+11.5
11
vs
BALL
W 86-55
−15.5
17
vs
SIUE
W 94-69
+16.5
21
@
BYU
L 70-98
+2.5
27
vs
PROV
W 104-83
+20.5
28
vs
TCU
L 63-74
−20.5
3
vs
NU
W 85-73
+2.5
6
vs
MARQ
W 96-76
+11.5
10
@
NEB
L 60-90
−8.5
19
vs
VILL
L 66-76
−10.5
22
vs
CMU
W 88-61
−3.5
30
vs
MILW
W 80-60
−17.5
3
vs
PUR
L 73-89
+8.5
6
vs
UCLA
W 80-72
−0.5
10
@
MICH
W 91-88
+9.5
13
@
MINN
W 78-75
+6.5
17
vs
RUTG
W 96-87
+33.5
22
@
PSU
W 98-71
+11.5
25
vs
USC
L 71-73
−14.5
28
vs
MINN
W 67-63
−16.5
31
vs
OSU
W 92-82
+18.5
7
@
IU
L 77-78
−2.5
10
@
ILL
W 92-90
+28.5
13
vs
MSU
W 92-71
+13.5
17
@
OSU
L 69-86
−2.5
22
vs
IOWA
W 84-71
+7.5
25
@
ORE
L 71-85
+3.5
28
@
WASH
W 90-73
+9.5
4
vs
MD
W 78-45
−30.5
7
@
PUR
W 97-93
+35.5
12
vs
WASH
W 85-82
+9.5
13
vs
ILL
W 91-88
+20.5
14
vs
MICH
L 65-68
−28.5
19
vs
HPU
L 82-83
+3.5
over 22under 13avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Northwestern
34 games played
Straight up
15-19
44% wins
Against the spread
18-16
53% covers · avg +0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-19
44% overs · avg −1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 70-47 | -26.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 76-52 | -17.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 110-63 | -23.5 | W +23.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 81-79 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 78-83 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 79-77 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 81-86 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 73-85 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 82-86 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 93-53 | -30.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 86-70 | -14.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 58-61 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 80-60 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 78-84 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 66-76 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 75-77 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 68-79 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 58-77 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 74-68 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 64-71 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 94-73 | -7.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 62-76 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 44-84 | +16.5 | L −23.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 70-76 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 75-87 | +15.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 49-68 | +13.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 78-74 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 72-68 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 63-62 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 66-70 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 66-67 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 76-66 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 74-61 | +6.5 | W +19.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 68-81 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 149 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MERC
W 70-47
−3.5
7
vs
BU
W 76-52
+6.5
10
vs
CLE
W 110-63
+23.5
14
@
DEP
W 81-79
−3.5
21
vs
UVA
L 78-83
−0.5
23
vs
SC
W 79-77
−2.5
27
vs
OKST
L 81-86
−7.5
3
@
WIS
L 73-85
−1.5
6
vs
OSU
L 82-86
−2.5
13
vs
JKST
W 93-53
+9.5
16
vs
VAL
W 86-70
+1.5
20
vs
BTLR
L 58-61
+0.5
30
vs
HOW
W 80-60
+0.5
3
vs
MINN
L 78-84
−10.5
8
@
MSU
L 66-76
+3.5
11
@
RUTG
L 75-77
−6.5
14
vs
ILL
L 68-79
−1.5
17
vs
NEB
L 58-77
−14.5
21
@
USC
W 74-68
+12.5
24
@
UCLA
L 64-71
+0.5
29
vs
PSU
W 94-73
+13.5
31
vs
WASH
L 62-76
−15.5
4
@
ILL
L 44-84
−23.5
8
@
IOWA
L 70-76
+4.5
11
vs
MICH
L 75-87
+3.5
14
@
NEB
L 49-68
−5.5
18
vs
MD
W 78-74
−3.5
24
@
IU
W 72-68
+13.5
28
vs
ORE
W 63-62
−2.5
4
vs
PUR
L 66-70
+8.5
7
@
MINN
L 66-67
+3.5
10
vs
PSU
W 76-66
+5.5
11
vs
IU
W 74-61
+19.5
12
vs
PUR
L 68-81
+0.5
covered 18didn’t cover 16avg +0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MERC
W 70-47
−23.5
7
vs
BU
W 76-52
−8.5
10
vs
CLE
W 110-63
+21.5
14
@
DEP
W 81-79
+14.5
21
vs
UVA
L 78-83
+11.5
23
vs
SC
W 79-77
+9.5
27
vs
OKST
L 81-86
+7.5
3
@
WIS
L 73-85
+2.5
6
vs
OSU
L 82-86
+12.5
13
vs
JKST
W 93-53
−0.5
16
vs
VAL
W 86-70
+10.5
20
vs
BTLR
L 58-61
−35.5
30
vs
HOW
W 80-60
−8.5
3
vs
MINN
L 78-84
+23.5
8
@
MSU
L 66-76
−1.5
11
@
RUTG
L 75-77
+7.5
14
vs
ILL
L 68-79
−4.5
17
vs
NEB
L 58-77
−14.5
21
@
USC
W 74-68
−7.5
24
@
UCLA
L 64-71
−8.5
29
vs
PSU
W 94-73
+18.5
31
vs
WASH
L 62-76
−8.5
4
@
ILL
L 44-84
−21.5
8
@
IOWA
L 70-76
+6.5
11
vs
MICH
L 75-87
+8.5
14
@
NEB
L 49-68
−29.5
18
vs
MD
W 78-74
+9.5
24
@
IU
W 72-68
−5.5
28
vs
ORE
W 63-62
−16.5
4
vs
PUR
L 66-70
−9.5
7
@
MINN
L 66-67
−0.5
10
vs
PSU
W 76-66
−1.5
11
vs
IU
W 74-61
−7.5
12
vs
PUR
L 68-81
+9.5
over 15under 19avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Wisconsin has the better starters
Position by position: Wisconsin 2, Northwestern 1, even 2
WisconsinBetterNorthwestern
G E. Elmer TR12.8 pts · 6.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 68
=No call
G L. Pratt TR17 pts · 1.7 reb · 3.3 ast
Not ranked
G T. Autry TR10.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 61
→NUBig
F J. Karasinski TR21.7 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 97
G B. Carrington8.3 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 90
←WISBig
F C. Smith TR11.9 pts · 4.2 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 48
F N. Winter13.1 pts · 8.5 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 96
=Even
F L. McEldon TR11.7 pts · 6.2 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 82
F A. Rapp9.7 pts · 4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 83
←WISSmall
F O. Federiko TR8.3 pts · 4.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 61
WisconsinBetterNorthwestern
WIS offense44th of 366 · +4.5
=Even
NU defense42nd of 366 · +2.7
WIS defense40th of 366 · +2.9
=Even
NU offense67th of 366 · +1.8
Backcourt+2.0 · 3 players
←WISSmall
Backcourt+0.9 · 1 player
Frontcourt+6.7 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt+7.1 · 4 players
Bench-2.6 · 5 players
=Even
Bench-2.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestWIS betterNU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
E. Elmer31 min · TRT. Autry29 min · TRB. Carrington18 minJ. Janicki17 minH. Jones7 minZ. Kinziger6 min
Forwards
N. Winter31 minA. Rapp23 minV. Onuetu18 min · TRW. Garlock7 minI. RiddleNew
Guards
L. Pratt33 min · TRA. Ciaravino22 minJ. West22 minA. Kostic12 min · TRD. Williams9 min · TRP. Gill4 min
Forwards
J. Karasinski30 min · TRC. Smith30 min · TRL. McEldon26 min · TRO. Federiko23 min · TRR. Soulis20 min · TRE. EschmeyerNew
Centers
S. GhaiNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 83.0 #28 | Points per game | 73.2 #220 |
| 1.18 #27 | Points per possession | 1.12 #100 |
| 70.0 #119 | Pace (possessions) | 65.5 #328 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.5 #52 | Effective FG% | 51.7 #159 |
| 36.2 #50 | 3-point % | 33.0 #232 |
| 52.1 #6 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.0 #296 |
| 31.5 #267 | Free throw rate | 33.9 #213 |
| Possessions | ||
| 12.8 #4 | Turnover rate | 13.1 #6 |
| 29.1 #232 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.1 #260 |
| 16.0 #48 | Assists per game | 17.2 #18 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.1 #221 | Points allowed | 72.0 #106 |
| 1.09 #193 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #210 |
| 51.4 #178 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.0 #157 |
| 33.5 #152 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.4 #145 |
| 14.3 #327 | Turnovers forced | 17.5 #120 |
| 71.8 #74 | Defensive rebound rate | 65.3 #332 |
| 5.6 #287 | Steals per game | 5.8 #256 |
| 3.1 #198 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #131 |
Wisconsin
24-11 in 2025-26 overall · 16-7 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs High Point82–83
- Lvs Michigan65–68
- Wvs Illinois91–88
- Wvs Washington85–82
- W@ Purdue97–93
A week or more of rest.
Northwestern
15-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-16 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Purdue68–81
- Wvs Indiana74–61
- Wvs Penn State76–66
- L@ Minnesota66–67
- Lvs Purdue66–70
A week or more of rest.