Xfinity Mobile Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | WIS | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-1 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-1 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 1-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WIS 77–77 · win probability WIS 52%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 153.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: VILL has more of the edges
VILL 1, WIS 0 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: VILL 15.0%, WIS 12.8%. Forced: VILL 18.6%, WIS 14.3%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: VILL plays 67.3 a game (270th fastest), WIS 70.0 (119th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: VILL 33%, WIS 54%. Transfers in: VILL 6, WIS 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: VILL 32.2%, WIS 29.1%. Defensive: VILL 68.2%, WIS 71.8%
Even
WIS offense vs VILL defense
Offense 44th of 366 against a defense 30th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: VILL 53.8 and allows 51.4; WIS 54.5 and allows 51.4
Even
Three-pointers
VILL hits 35.7% and allows 33.4%; WIS hits 36.2% and allows 33.5%. Threes are 45.7% and 52.1% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
VILL has played the 35th-hardest schedule, WIS the 24th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: VILL 30.9, WIS 31.5. Allowed: VILL 30.0, WIS 29.9
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
VILL offense vs WIS defense
Offense 39th of 366 against a defense 40th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WIS -0.5 | — |
| Total | — | 153.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | VILL 76.6 · WIS 77.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WIS -0.2 | — |
| 1H total | 71.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | VILL 35.9 · WIS 36 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
VILL 1–0 WISVILL leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · VILL 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2025-26 | WIS 66 vs VILL 76 | VILL +3.5 | VILL W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Villanova
33 games played
Straight up
24-9
73% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-13
61% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Against the spread
19-1458%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 66-71 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 94-74 | -17.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 94-60 | -19.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 87-77 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 70-55 | -12.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 89-75 | -22.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 74-56 | -14.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 90-63 | -18.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 61-89 | +17.5 | L −10.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 79-61 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 76-66 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 23 | @ | W 64-56 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 71-66 | -12.5 | L −7.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 85-67 | +2.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 72-76 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 76-73 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 88-82 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 79-86 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 66-51 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 67-75 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 87-73 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 72-60 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 134.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 80-73 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 77-74 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 80-69 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 92-89 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 63-73 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 82-73 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 57-89 | +7.5 | L −24.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 76-57 | -1.5 | W +17.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 91-78 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 64-78 | -7.5 | L −21.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 76-86 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BYU
L 66-71
+4.5
8
vs
QUC
W 94-74
+2.5
11
vs
SHU
W 94-60
+14.5
15
vs
DUQ
W 87-77
−0.5
19
@
LAS
W 70-55
+2.5
25
vs
ODU
W 89-75
−8.5
1
vs
TEM
W 74-56
+3.5
6
vs
PENN
W 90-63
+8.5
9
@
MICH
L 61-89
−10.5
13
vs
PITT
W 79-61
+7.5
19
vs
WIS
W 76-66
+13.5
23
@
HALL
W 64-56
+9.5
31
vs
DEP
W 71-66
−7.5
3
@
BTLR
W 85-67
+20.5
7
vs
CREI
L 72-76
−8.5
10
@
MARQ
W 76-73
−0.5
13
@
PROV
W 88-82
+3.5
17
vs
SJU
L 79-86
−4.5
21
vs
GTWN
W 66-51
+6.5
24
@
CONN
L 67-75
+3.5
30
vs
PROV
W 87-73
+5.5
4
vs
HALL
W 72-60
+6.5
7
@
GTWN
W 80-73
+4.5
10
vs
MARQ
W 77-74
−6.5
14
@
CREI
W 80-69
+9.5
17
@
XAV
W 92-89
−1.5
21
vs
CONN
L 63-73
−6.5
25
vs
BTLR
W 82-73
−1.5
28
@
SJU
L 57-89
−24.5
4
@
DEP
W 76-57
+17.5
7
vs
XAV
W 91-78
+1.5
12
vs
GTWN
L 64-78
−21.5
20
vs
USU
L 76-86
−8.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BYU
L 66-71
−16.5
8
vs
QUC
W 94-74
+17.5
11
vs
SHU
W 94-60
−6.5
15
vs
DUQ
W 87-77
+12.5
19
@
LAS
W 70-55
−19.5
25
vs
ODU
W 89-75
+16.5
1
vs
TEM
W 74-56
−16.5
6
vs
PENN
W 90-63
+2.5
9
@
MICH
L 61-89
−6.5
13
vs
PITT
W 79-61
+1.5
19
vs
WIS
W 76-66
−10.5
23
@
HALL
W 64-56
−15.5
31
vs
DEP
W 71-66
−2.5
3
@
BTLR
W 85-67
+2.5
7
vs
CREI
L 72-76
+5.5
10
@
MARQ
W 76-73
+2.5
13
@
PROV
W 88-82
+13.5
17
vs
SJU
L 79-86
+17.5
21
vs
GTWN
W 66-51
−25.5
24
@
CONN
L 67-75
+4.5
30
vs
PROV
W 87-73
+2.5
4
vs
HALL
W 72-60
−2.5
7
@
GTWN
W 80-73
+12.5
10
vs
MARQ
W 77-74
+6.5
14
@
CREI
W 80-69
+3.5
17
@
XAV
W 92-89
+28.5
21
vs
CONN
L 63-73
−5.5
25
vs
BTLR
W 82-73
+7.5
28
@
SJU
L 57-89
−1.5
4
@
DEP
W 76-57
−2.5
7
vs
XAV
W 91-78
+15.5
12
vs
GTWN
L 64-78
+1.5
20
vs
USU
L 76-86
+15.5
over 20under 13avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Wisconsin
35 games played
Straight up
24-11
69% wins
Against the spread
21-14
60% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-13
63% overs · avg +3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 96-64 | -20.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 97-72 | -28.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 86-55 | -26.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 94-69 | -25.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 70-98 | +4.5 | L −23.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 104-83 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 166.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 63-74 | -5.5 | L −16.5 | 157.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 85-73 | -10.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 96-76 | -11.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 60-90 | +1.5 | L −28.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 66-76 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 88-61 | -26.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 80-60 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 157.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 73-89 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 80-72 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 91-88 | +19.5 | W +22.5 | 169.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 78-75 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 96-87 | -15.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 98-71 | -5.5 | W +21.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 25 | vs | L 71-73 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 158.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 67-63 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 92-82 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 77-78 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 92-90 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 92-71 | +1.5 | W +22.5 | 149.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 69-86 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 84-71 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 71-85 | -5.5 | L −19.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 90-73 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 78-45 | -14.5 | W +18.5 | 153.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 97-93 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | O 190 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 85-82 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 91-88 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 158.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 65-68 | +12.5 | W +9.5 | 161.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 82-83 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CAM
W 96-64
+11.5
7
vs
NIU
W 97-72
−3.5
11
vs
BALL
W 86-55
+4.5
17
vs
SIUE
W 94-69
−0.5
21
@
BYU
L 70-98
−23.5
27
vs
PROV
W 104-83
+14.5
28
vs
TCU
L 63-74
−16.5
3
vs
NU
W 85-73
+1.5
6
vs
MARQ
W 96-76
+8.5
10
@
NEB
L 60-90
−28.5
19
vs
VILL
L 66-76
−13.5
22
vs
CMU
W 88-61
+0.5
30
vs
MILW
W 80-60
+0.5
3
vs
PUR
L 73-89
−10.5
6
vs
UCLA
W 80-72
+4.5
10
@
MICH
W 91-88
+22.5
13
@
MINN
W 78-75
+1.5
17
vs
RUTG
W 96-87
−6.5
22
@
PSU
W 98-71
+21.5
25
vs
USC
L 71-73
−9.5
28
vs
MINN
W 67-63
−5.5
31
vs
OSU
W 92-82
+5.5
7
@
IU
L 77-78
+2.5
10
@
ILL
W 92-90
+11.5
13
vs
MSU
W 92-71
+22.5
17
@
OSU
L 69-86
−15.5
22
vs
IOWA
W 84-71
+10.5
25
@
ORE
L 71-85
−19.5
28
@
WASH
W 90-73
+15.5
4
vs
MD
W 78-45
+18.5
7
@
PUR
W 97-93
+13.5
12
vs
WASH
W 85-82
−3.5
13
vs
ILL
W 91-88
+11.5
14
vs
MICH
L 65-68
+9.5
19
vs
HPU
L 82-83
−11.5
covered 21didn’t cover 14avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CAM
W 96-64
+8.5
7
vs
NIU
W 97-72
+11.5
11
vs
BALL
W 86-55
−15.5
17
vs
SIUE
W 94-69
+16.5
21
@
BYU
L 70-98
+2.5
27
vs
PROV
W 104-83
+20.5
28
vs
TCU
L 63-74
−20.5
3
vs
NU
W 85-73
+2.5
6
vs
MARQ
W 96-76
+11.5
10
@
NEB
L 60-90
−8.5
19
vs
VILL
L 66-76
−10.5
22
vs
CMU
W 88-61
−3.5
30
vs
MILW
W 80-60
−17.5
3
vs
PUR
L 73-89
+8.5
6
vs
UCLA
W 80-72
−0.5
10
@
MICH
W 91-88
+9.5
13
@
MINN
W 78-75
+6.5
17
vs
RUTG
W 96-87
+33.5
22
@
PSU
W 98-71
+11.5
25
vs
USC
L 71-73
−14.5
28
vs
MINN
W 67-63
−16.5
31
vs
OSU
W 92-82
+18.5
7
@
IU
L 77-78
−2.5
10
@
ILL
W 92-90
+28.5
13
vs
MSU
W 92-71
+13.5
17
@
OSU
L 69-86
−2.5
22
vs
IOWA
W 84-71
+7.5
25
@
ORE
L 71-85
+3.5
28
@
WASH
W 90-73
+9.5
4
vs
MD
W 78-45
−30.5
7
@
PUR
W 97-93
+35.5
12
vs
WASH
W 85-82
+9.5
13
vs
ILL
W 91-88
+20.5
14
vs
MICH
L 65-68
−28.5
19
vs
HPU
L 82-83
+3.5
over 22under 13avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Villanova 0, Wisconsin 0, even 5
VillanovaBetterWisconsin
G J. Fiegen TR11 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 82
=Even
G E. Elmer TR12.8 pts · 6.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 68
G D. Simmons TR16.3 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 63
=Even
G T. Autry TR10.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 61
G T. Perkins18 pts · 4 reb · 3 ast
Score 100
=Even
G B. Carrington8.3 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 90
F D. Royal TR5 pts · 8 reb · 0 ast
Score 100
=Even
F N. Winter13.1 pts · 8.5 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 96
F K. Evans TR13.3 pts · 7.4 reb · 2 ast
Score 95
=Even
F A. Rapp9.7 pts · 4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 83
VillanovaBetterWisconsin
VILL offense39th of 366 · +5.0
=Even
WIS defense40th of 366 · +2.9
VILL defense30th of 366 · +3.5
=Even
WIS offense44th of 366 · +4.5
Backcourt+7.2 · 3 players
←VILLBig
Backcourt+2.0 · 3 players
Frontcourt+6.1 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt+6.7 · 2 players
Bench+3.3 · 4 players
←VILLBig
Bench-2.6 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestVILL betterWIS betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Fiegen38 min · TRD. Simmons36 min · TRT. Perkins35 minE. Crawford26 min · TRW. Chiddick3 minB. MullerNew
Forwards
D. Royal32 min · TRK. Evans31 min · TRM. Hodge28 minA. Samb6 min · TR
Centers
N. OnyekwereNewL. SuigoNew
Guards
E. Elmer31 min · TRT. Autry29 min · TRB. Carrington18 minJ. Janicki17 minH. Jones7 minZ. Kinziger6 min
Forwards
N. Winter31 minA. Rapp23 minV. Onuetu18 min · TRW. Garlock7 minI. RiddleNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.1 #113 | Points per game | 83.0 #28 |
| 1.15 #64 | Points per possession | 1.18 #27 |
| 67.3 #270 | Pace (possessions) | 70.0 #119 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.8 #74 | Effective FG% | 54.5 #52 |
| 35.7 #77 | 3-point % | 36.2 #50 |
| 45.7 #52 | 3-point attempt rate | 52.1 #6 |
| 30.9 #284 | Free throw rate | 31.5 #267 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.0 #65 | Turnover rate | 12.8 #4 |
| 32.2 #118 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.1 #232 |
| 15.5 #66 | Assists per game | 16.0 #48 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.2 #82 | Points allowed | 76.1 #221 |
| 1.06 #105 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #193 |
| 51.4 #181 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.4 #178 |
| 33.4 #148 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.5 #152 |
| 18.6 #70 | Turnovers forced | 14.3 #327 |
| 68.2 #246 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.8 #74 |
| 7.4 #93 | Steals per game | 5.6 #287 |
| 2.1 #340 | Blocks per game | 3.1 #198 |
Villanova
24-9 in 2025-26 overall · 15-6 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Utah State76–86
- Lvs Georgetown64–78
- Wvs Xavier91–78
- W@ DePaul76–57
- L@ St John's57–89
A week or more of rest.
Wisconsin
24-11 in 2025-26 overall · 16-7 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs High Point82–83
- Lvs Michigan65–68
- Wvs Illinois91–88
- Wvs Washington85–82
- W@ Purdue97–93
A week or more of rest.